throbber
Case 1:17-cv-00868-VAC-SRF Document 9-2 Filed 08/04/17 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 166
`Case 1:17-cv—00868—VAC-SRF Document 9-2 Filed 08/04/17 Page 1 of 3 PagelD #: 166
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT B
`EXHIBIT B
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00868-VAC-SRF Document 9-2 Filed 08/04/17 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 167
`
`Ashraf, Amina
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Justin A. Nelson <jnelson@SusmanGodfrey.com>
`Monday, July 10, 2017 5:25 PM
`Ashraf, Amina; mlowrie@foley.com; Modi, Naveen
`bfarnan@farnanlaw.com; mfarnan@farnanlaw.com; Bill Carmody; Tamar Lusztig;
`mambros@foley.com
`RE: Univ. of Mass. Med. School and Carmel Labs., LLC v. L’Oréal S.A. and L’Oréal USA,
`Inc.
`
`Dear Naveen:
`
`Thank you for your letter of July 7, 2017. It is an inauspicious way to start a dialogue with
`opposing counsel by insinuating a Rule 11 violation. Rest assured, our firms have conducted a
`good faith investigation that more than satisfies Rule 11. Our experience is that further letter-
`writing campaigns on this point make little sense. We strongly disagree that we have somehow
`failed to adequately plead infringement. If, however, you believe in good faith that we have not
`adequately pleaded something, then make your motion. We look forward to interacting with
`you in a cooperative and friendly manner.
`
`On a separate note, can you please let us know whether you will accept service on behalf of
`L’Oreal S.A.? Should you accept, we will of course be amenable to a reasonable extension for
`you to file your responsive pleading on behalf of both defendants. I have included only you and
`Amina Ashraf on this email but please let us know whether we should include others from your
`firm or prior settlement counsel.
`
`Regards,
`
`Justin
`
`
`From: Ashraf, Amina [mailto:aminaashraf@paulhastings.com]
`Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 2:25 PM
`To: mlowrie@foley.com
`Cc: bfarnan@farnanlaw.com; mfarnan@farnanlaw.com; Bill Carmody; Tamar Lusztig; Justin A. Nelson;
`mambros@foley.com
`Subject: Univ. of Mass. Med. School and Carmel Labs., LLC v. L’Oréal S.A. and L’Oréal USA, Inc.

`Counsel,  

`Please see the attached.  

`Regards,  
`Amina Ashraf  
`
`____________________________________________________________________________ 
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00868-VAC-SRF Document 9-2 Filed 08/04/17 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 168
`
`Amina Ashraf | Client Service Specialist
`Paul Hastings LLP | 875 15th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20005 | Direct:
`+1.202.551.1230 | Main: +1.202.551.1700 | Fax: +1.202.551.0130 |
`AminaAshraf@PaulHastings.com | www.paulhastings.com  
`

`

`  


`
`******************************************************************************************
`This message is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you received
`this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachments.
`
`For additional information, please visit our website at
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket