throbber
Case 1:16-cv-00830-RGA Document 27-1 Filed 07/10/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 2178
`Case 1:16-cv-00830-RGA Document 27-1 Filed 07/10/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 2178
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00830-RGA Document 27-1 Filed 07/10/17 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 2179
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`Yanney, Pierre R.
`Friday, July 07, 2017 11:00 AM
`'George Pazuniak'; bschladweiler@ramllp.com
`Daniel Murray (dmurray@oeblegal.com)
`RE: Case 1:16-cv-00830-RGA SIPCO, LLC et al v. Streetline, Inc. et al, DI 26.
`
`George, 

`Thank you for your response, but we cannot agree to such a limitation.  The most recent complaint is still deficient, and 
`defendants need the time to formulate an appropriate response. We will proceed and submit our request to Judge 
`Andrews. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. 

`Best regards, 

`Pierre 


`Pierre R. Yanney | Partner 
`Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP 
`180 Maiden Lane, New York, NY 10038 
`(tel) 212.806.5858 | (fax) 212.806.6006 
`pyanney@stroock.com | stroock.com 


`‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ 
`From: George Pazuniak [mailto:gp@del‐iplaw.com]  
`Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 10:50 AM 
`To: Yanney, Pierre R.; bschladweiler@ramllp.com 
`Cc: Daniel Murray (dmurray@oeblegal.com) 
`Subject: <EXTERNAL> RE: Case 1:16‐cv‐00830‐RGA SIPCO, LLC et al v. Streetline, Inc. et al, DI 26. 

`Plaintiffs will agree to extend the time for Defendants to answer the complaint.  But, we do not see any justification to 
`extend the time for any other response, particularly given the lengthy past history of the pleadings and the fact that, to 
`avoid further disputes, Plaintiffs had gone through the process of attaching claim charts to the complaint.   
`Given the history, why do you need more time? 

`George 

`‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ 
`From: Yanney, Pierre R. [mailto:pyanney@stroock.com]  
`Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 8:20 PM 
`To: George Pazuniak <gp@del‐iplaw.com>; bschladweiler@ramllp.com 
`Cc: Daniel Murray (dmurray@oeblegal.com) <dmurray@oeblegal.com> 
`Subject: RE: Case 1:16‐cv‐00830‐RGA SIPCO, LLC et al v. Streetline, Inc. et al, DI 26. 

`George, 

`As a compromise, would plaintiffs agree to a 28 day extension for defendants' response date?  Thanks. 
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00830-RGA Document 27-1 Filed 07/10/17 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 2180
`


`Pierre R. Yanney | Partner 
`Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP 
`180 Maiden Lane, New York, NY 10038 
`(tel) 212.806.5858 | (fax) 212.806.6006 
`pyanney@stroock.com | stroock.com 



`‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ 
`From: George Pazuniak [mailto:gp@del‐iplaw.com]  
`Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 4:36 PM 
`To: Yanney, Pierre R.; bschladweiler@ramllp.com 
`Cc: Daniel Murray (dmurray@oeblegal.com) 
`Subject: <EXTERNAL> RE: Case 1:16‐cv‐00830‐RGA SIPCO, LLC et al v. Streetline, Inc. et al, DI 26. 
`
` I
`
` am willing to agree to a 30‐day extension to answer the complaint, but not for any other response. 
`

`‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ 
`From: Yanney, Pierre R. [mailto:pyanney@stroock.com]  
`Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 4:15 PM 
`To: George Pazuniak <gp@del‐iplaw.com>; bschladweiler@ramllp.com 
`Cc: Daniel Murray (dmurray@oeblegal.com) <dmurray@oeblegal.com> 
`Subject: RE: Case 1:16‐cv‐00830‐RGA SIPCO, LLC et al v. Streetline, Inc. et al, DI 26. 

`George, 

`Will plaintiffs agree to a 35‐day extension on our response deadline, which is otherwise set for July 14? Please let me 
`know so we can submit the request to the Court. Thanks. 

`Pierre 


`Pierre R. Yanney | Partner 
`Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP 
`180 Maiden Lane, New York, NY 10038 
`(tel) 212.806.5858 | (fax) 212.806.6006 
`pyanney@stroock.com | stroock.com 


`‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ 
`From: George Pazuniak [mailto:gp@del‐iplaw.com]  
`Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 5:35 PM 
`To: Yanney, Pierre R.; bschladweiler@ramllp.com 
`Cc: Daniel Murray (dmurray@oeblegal.com) 
`Subject: <EXTERNAL> RE: Case 1:16‐cv‐00830‐RGA SIPCO, LLC et al v. Streetline, Inc. et al, DI 26. 

`Pierre, Ben, 

`Attached please find the confidential exhibits attached to the Second Amended Complaint, and filed as DI 26. 

`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00830-RGA Document 27-1 Filed 07/10/17 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 2181
`
`Although Exhibits are marked Confidential under LR 26.2, you are authorized to disclose the exhibits to extent necessary 
`to your clients so long as they are not further disseminated. 

`George 
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket