throbber
Case 1:14-cv-01432-LPS Document 259 Filed 04/13/20 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 16521
`
`THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`ELM 3DS INNOVATIONS, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`ELM 3DS INNOVATIONS, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., et al.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`ELM 3DS INNOVATIONS, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`
`C.A. No. 14-1430-LPS-CJB
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 14-1431-LPS-CJB
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 14-1432-LPS-CJB
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SK HYNIX INC., et al.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`At Wilmington this 13th day of April, 2020:
`
`
`
`For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion issued this date,
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01432-LPS Document 259 Filed 04/13/20 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 16522
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following claim terms of U.S. Patent Nos.
`
`7,193,239; 7,474,004; 7,504,732; 8,035,233; 8,410,617; 8,629,542; 8,653,672; 8,791,581;
`
`8,796,862; 8,841,778; 8,907,499; 8,928,119; and 8,933,570 are construed as follows:
`
`Term 1
`“substantially flexible substrate”
`“substantially flexible . . . substrate”
`“substrate is substantially flexible”
`“substrate substantially flexible”
`“substrate . . . is . . . substantially flexible”
`“substantially flexible . . . semiconductor layer”
`[’239 patent claims 1, 13]
`[’617 patent claims 36, 51]
`[’542 patent claims 1, 40, 44]
`[’672 patent claims 17, 84, 129, 143]
`[’581 patent claims 36, 54, 78, 116, 136]
`[’862 patent claims 30, 34, 36, 135-37, 147]
`[’778 patent claims 2, 8, 31, 44, 52, 53]
`[’499 patent claims 1, 24, 53, 83, 132]
`[’119 patent claims 1, 7, 17]
`[’570 patent claims 58, 67]
`
`Term 2
`“dice is substantially flexible”
`“die is substantially flexible”
`[’239 patent claims 60, 70]
`
`
`
`
`
`Court’s Construction
`Not indefinite. “A semiconductor
`substrate/semiconductor layer that is
`thinned to 50 µm or less and
`subsequently polished or smoothed such
`that it is largely able to bend without
`breaking”
`
`Court’s Construction
`“A dice/die that is thinned to 50 µm or
`less and subsequently polished or
`smoothed such that it is largely able to
`bend without breaking”
`
`Term 3
`“substantially flexible integrated circuit[s]”
`“substantially flexible integrated circuit layer[s]”
`“integrated circuits is substantially flexible”
`“integrated circuit . . . is . . . substantially flexible”
`“substantially flexible circuit layer[s]”
`“substantially flexible stacked integrated circuit
`structure”
`“substantially flexible circuit”
`“substantially flexible . . . structure”
`[’004 patent claims 1, 22, 23]
`[’732 patent claims 1, 13, 14]
`[’542 patent claims 1, 40]
`
`Court’s Construction
`Not indefinite. “An integrated
`circuit/integrated circuit layer/circuit
`layer/circuit structure/circuit/structure
`that is largely able to bend without
`breaking and contains a substantially
`flexible semiconductor substrate, that is
`thinned to 50 µm or less and
`subsequently polished or smoothed such
`that it is largely able to bend without
`breaking, and a sufficiently low tensile
`stress dielectric material.”
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01432-LPS Document 259 Filed 04/13/20 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 16523
`
`Court’s Construction
`Indefiniteness unable to be resolved at
`this stage of the case
`
`[’862 patent claims 30, 135, 147]
`[’778 patent claims 8, 44, 46]
`[’499 patent claims 1, 12, 13, 24, 36-38, 49, 53,
`83, 86, 87, 132]
`[’119 patent claims 1, 33]
`[’570 patent claim 58]
`
`
`Term 4
`“have stress of about 5×108 dynes/cm2 or less”
`“have a stress of about 5×108 dynes cm2 or less”
`“having a stress of 5x108 dynes/cm2 or less”
`“a stress of about 5×108 dynes/cm2 or less”
`“having a stress of 5×108 dynes/cm2 tensile or
`less”
`“[have] a stress of about 5×108 dynes/cm2 tensile
`or less”
`“having[/has] a stress of less than 5×108
`dynes/cm2 tensile”
`“with a tensile stress of less than 5×108
`dynes/cm2”
`“with a stress of less than 5×108 dynes/cm2
`tensile”
`“has[/having] a tensile stress of less than 5×108
`dynes/cm2”
`[’239 patent claims 11, 12, 19, 20, 62, 63, 72, 73]
`[’004 claim 20]
`[’542 patent claims 2, 41]
`[’732 patent claim 10]
`[’617 patent claim 36]
`[’672 patent claims 17, 22, 84, 129, 131, 145, 152]
`[’581 patent claims 12, 36, 54, 78, 116, 136]
`[’862 patent claims 135, 137, 138, 147]
`[’778 patent claims 1, 2, 8, 14]
`[’499 patent claims 1, 12, 13, 24, 53, 83, 86, 87,
`132]
`[’119 patent claims 7, 18]
`[’570 patent claims 60, 67]
`
`
`
` Term 5
`“low stress dielectric”
`“low stress dielectric layer”
`“low stress . . . dielectric material”
`“low-stress . . . dielectric material”
`
`Court’s Construction
`Indefiniteness unable to be resolved at
`this stage of the case
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01432-LPS Document 259 Filed 04/13/20 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 16524
`
`“low-stress . . . dielectric layer”
`“low stress . . . dielectric layer”
`[’239 patent, claims 10, 18, 61, 71]
`[’004 patent, claims 1, 21, 22, 23]
`[’732 patent, claims 1, 13, 14]
`[’672 patent, claim 95]
`[’862 patent, claims 30, 34]
`
`Term 6
`“vertically interconnected circuit block stacks”
`[’581, claims 1, 5, 113, 133]
`
`“vertically interconnected circuit blocks”
`[’499 patent claim 49]
`
`Court’s Construction
`“Vertically electrically connected circuit
`block stacks” and “vertically electrically
`connected circuit blocks”
`
`
`Court’s Construction
`“vertical electrical connections”
`
`Court’s Construction
`“vertical electrical connections”
`
`Term 7
`“a plurality of vertical interconnect segments
`interconnecting the first and second integrated
`circuit layers, wherein each vertical interconnect
`segment forms an interconnection only between a
`pair of adjacent integrated circuits”
`[’570 patent claim 58]
`
`Term 8
`“Said plurality of first interconnection and said
`plurality of second interconnections are
`substantially aligned with each other, and said
`plurality of first interconnections and said plurality
`of second interconnections are electrically coupled
`together to form a plurality of vertical
`interconnections, including redundant vertical
`interconnections”
`[’004 patent claim 1]
`
`Term 9
`“At least one interconnection between two of the
`plurality of substrates”
`[’672 patent claim 84]
`
`Court’s Construction
`“at least one electrical connection
`between two of the plurality of
`substrates”
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01432-LPS Document 259 Filed 04/13/20 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 16525
`
`Claim Term 10
`“a bonding layer bonding together the adjacent
`substrates, the bonding layer being formed by
`bonding first and second substantially planar
`surfaces having a bond-forming material
`throughout a majority of the surface area thereof ”
`[’239 patent claim 1]
`
`
`
`“a bonding layer bonding together the adjacent
`dice, the bonding layer bonding first and second
`substantially planar adjacent surfaces of the
`adjacent dice, with at least one or more portions of
`the bonding layer being located other than at the
`edges of the adjacent dice”
`[’239 patent claim 60]
`
`
`Claim Term 11
`“Wherein the semiconductor die is attached to the
`first surface of the substrate by one or more bonds
`including one bond located other than at the edges
`of the semiconductor die”
`[’239 patent claim 70]
`
`
`
`
`Claim Term 12
`“A first integrated circuit having circuitry formed
`on a front surface thereof, the front surface or a
`back surface being bonded to the circuit
`substrate.”
`[’542 patent claim 1]
`
`
`Court’s Construction
`“a bonding layer physically joining
`together the adjacent substrates, the
`bonding layer being formed by
`physically joining first and second
`substantially planar surfaces having a
`bond forming material throughout a
`majority of the surface area thereof”
`
`“a bonding layer physically joining
`together the adjacent dice, the bonding
`layer physically joining first and second
`substantially planar adjacent surfaces of
`the adjacent dice, with at least one or
`more portions of the bonding layer being
`located other than at the edges of the
`adjacent dice”
`
`Court’s Construction
`“wherein the semiconductor die is
`attached to the first surface of the
`substrate by one or more physical
`connections, including one physical
`connection located other than at the
`edges of the semiconductor die”
`
`
`Court’s Construction
`“the front surface or a back surface being
`physically joined to the circuit substrate”
`
`Claim Term 13
`“the first and second substrates are bonded
`together in fixed relationship to one another at
`least predominantly with metal, or at least
`predominantly with silicon-based dielectric
`material and metal”
`
`Court’s Construction
`“physically joined in a fixed relationship
`to one another at least mostly with metal,
`or at least mostly with silicon-based
`dielectric material and metal”
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01432-LPS Document 259 Filed 04/13/20 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 16526
`
`[’672 patent claim 17]
`
`“two of the plurality of substrates are bonded
`together in fixed relationship to one another at
`least predominantly with metal, or at least
`predominantly with silicon-based dielectric
`material and metal”
`[’672 patent claim 84]
`
`
`Claim Term 14
`“A second substrate bonded to the first surface of
`the first substrate to form conductive paths
`between the first substrate and the second
`substrate”
`[’239 patent claims 13, 46]
`
`“A semiconductor die having an integrated circuit
`formed thereon bonded to the first surface of the
`substrate with conductive paths between the
`substrate and the die”
`[’239 patent claim 70]
`
`
`
`
`“physically joined in fixed relationship to
`one another at least mostly with metal, or
`at least mostly with silicon-based
`dielectric material and metal”
`
`Court’s Construction
`“physically joined to the first surface of
`the first substrate to form electrically
`conductive paths between the first
`substrate and the second substrate”
`
`
`“physically joined to the first surface of
`the substrate with electrically conductive
`paths between the substrate and the die”
`
`
`Claim Term 15
`“Conductive paths between the interconnect
`contacts supported by the topside surface of the
`first substrate and the interconnect contacts
`supported by the second substrate”
`[’672 patent claim 17]
`
`“Conductive paths between the interconnect
`contacts supported by the first surface of the first
`substrate and of the interconnect contacts
`supported by the second substrate”
`[’672 patent claims 129, 143]
`
`Court’s Construction
`“electrically conductive paths between
`the interconnect contacts supported by
`the topside surface of the first substrate
`and the interconnect contacts supported
`by the second substrate”
`
`“electrically conductive paths between
`the interconnect contacts supported by
`the first surface of the first substrate and
`of the interconnect contacts supported by
`the second substrate”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Claim Term 16
`
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01432-LPS Document 259 Filed 04/13/20 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 16527
`
`“Thin”
`[’862 patent claims 30, 135, 147]
`[’499 patent claims 1, 12, 13, 24, 36, 37, 38, 49,
`53, 83, 86, 87, 132]
`[’570 patent claim 58]
`
`Not indefinite. No construction
`necessary.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`________________________________
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket