`Case 1:13-cv-00919—LPS Document 243-1 Filed 12/28/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 8543
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 243-1 Filed 12/28/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 8544
`
`·1· · · · ·HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL.· ATTORNEY EYES ONLY
`
`Page 1
`
`·2· ·DISCLAIMER:
`
`·3· · · · · · · · · This is a draft transcript.· It is scan
`
`·4· ·edited only and may contain some proofreading errors.
`
`·5· ·This is not a legal document and may contain
`
`·6· ·copyrighted, privileged or confidential information.
`
`·7· · · · · · · · · This file should not be disclosed, this
`
`·8· ·realtime draft transcript in any form (written or
`
`·9· ·electronic).· This is an unofficial transcript which
`
`10· ·should NOT be relied upon for purposes of verbatim
`
`11· ·citation.
`
`12· · · · · · · · · This is NOT a certified transcript, and
`
`13· ·as such, it may contain computer generated
`
`14· ·mistranslations of stenotype code or electronic
`
`15· ·transmission errors, resulting in inaccurate or
`
`16· ·nonsensical word combinations, or untranslated
`
`17· ·stenotype symbols which cannot be deciphered by
`
`18· ·non-stenotypists.
`
`19· · · · · · · · · Corrections will be made in the
`
`20· ·preparation of the certified transcript, resulting in
`
`21· ·differences in content, page and line numbers,
`
`22· ·punctuation, and formatting.· This realtime unedited
`
`23· ·transcript contains no appearance page, certificate
`
`24· ·page, index, or certification.
`
`25· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ****
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 243-1 Filed 12/28/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 8545
`
`·1· · · · ·HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL.· ATTORNEY EYES ONLY
`
`Page 274
`
`·2· · · · Q.· · Okay cup cent I you understand Dr. Snelled
`
`·3· ·areply report reflect, his opinions, just like his
`
`·4· ·first infringement report reflect his opinions, and
`
`·5· ·you believe that your report fully responds to his
`
`·6· ·opinions in?
`
`·7· · · · · · · · · MR. LAURENZI:· Objection, form.
`
`·8· · · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Fully respond, I don't
`
`·9· ·knoll how to answer that question.· Other than to
`
`10· ·say -- um -- ^ it's my understanding that my purpose
`
`11· ·in this litigation, my role in the litigation is she
`
`12· ·spond to the allegations presented if the first
`
`13· ·Smedley report, and appendix.· I have done so.· My
`
`14· ·expert report contains my opinion, and the appendices
`
`15· ·of course there to, and it's also my understanding
`
`16· ·it's improper for Dr. Smedley to intrins disnew
`
`17· ·opinions in miss second report.· I am not seeing
`
`18· ·anything right now that I am not understanding
`
`19· ·anything concrete right now that would cause me to go
`
`20· ·off and supplement something new, but it's very
`
`21· ·plausible that something in the future can cause that
`
`22· ·to happen.
`
`23· · · · Q.· · Do you have in mind specific sections of
`
`24· ·Dr. Smedley's reply report that you believe are new as
`
`25· ·you use that term in your last response?
`
`