Case 1:12-cv-00398-GMS Document 42 Filed 09/26/13 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1380
`Case 1:12—cv—OO398—GMS Document 42 Filed 09/26/13 Page 1 of 4 Page|D #: 1380
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`HUMANEYES TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
`
`Plaintifif
`
`V.
`
`C.A. No. 12-398-GMS
`
`SONY CORPORATION, SONY
`CORPORATION OF AMERICA, SONY
`ELECTRONICS INC., SONY MOBILE
`COMMUNICATIONS AB, AND SONY
`MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF DEVELOPMENTS IN INTER PARTES PROCEEDINGS
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`John Flock
`
`Walter Hanley
`Michelle Carniaux
`Sheila Mortazavi
`Iuliana Tanase
`KENYON & KENYON LLP
`
`One Broadway
`New York, New York 100044050
`(212) 425-7200
`
`Chad M. Shandler (#3796)
`Travis S. Hunter (#5350)
`RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A.
`One Rodney Square
`920 N. King Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 651-7700
`Shand1er@rlf.corn
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Sony Corporation,
`Sony Corporation ofAmerica, Sony Electronics
`Inc., Sony Mobile Communications AB, Sony
`Mobile Communications (USA) Inc.
`
`

`
`Case 1:12-cv-00398-GMS Document 42 Filed 09/26/13 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 1381
`Case 1:12—cv—OO398—GMS Document 42 Filed 09/26/13 Page 2 of 4 Page|D #: 1381
`
`Pursuant to D. Del. L.R. 7.1 .2(b) and in reference to Defendants Sony Corporation, Sony
`
`Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Sony Mobile Communications AB, and Sony
`
`Mobile Communications (USA) lnc.’s (“Sony”) Motion to Stay Litigation Pending the Outcome
`
`of Inter Partes Review of the Patents—In—Suit (D.I. 29), Sony respectfully brings to the Court’s
`
`attention the attached decisions instituting inter partes review of all of claims that plaintiff
`
`HumanEyes Technologies Ltd. (“HurnanEyes”) has asserted against Sony to date. A copy of the
`
`decisions instituting inter partes review are attached as Exhibits A-D.
`
`Prior to filing its motion to stay (D.I. 29), Sony petitioned for inter parres review of the
`
`claims of the patents-in-suit, U.S. Patent No. 6,665,003 (the “003 patent”) and U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,477,284 (the ‘"284 patent”), that HumanEyes had asserted in its ITC Complaint against Sony.
`
`On September 23, 2013, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) issued decisions
`
`instituting inter partes review of all of the petitioned claims of each of the patent—in-suits. See
`
`Exhibits A, B.
`
`After HumanEyes identified new claims (that had not been asserted in the ITC
`
`Investigation) in its Opposition to Sony’s Motion to Stay (D.I. 34 at 13-14), Sony petitioned for
`
`inter partes review of these newly identified claims. On September 24, 2013, the PTAB issued
`
`decisions instituting inter partes review of all of these newly identified claims. See Exhibits C,
`
`D.
`
`On September 23, 2013, the PTAB also set identical schedules for the proceedings
`
`instituted in accordance with the decisions issued on that date (see Exhibits E and F attached
`
`hereto), with oral argument set for June 18, 2014. On September 24, 2013, the PTAB granted
`
`Sony’s motions to join the inter partes reviews of the newly identified ciaims with the inter
`
`partes reviews of the claims in the initial petitions (see Exhibits G and H attached hereto).
`
`

`
`Case 1:12-cv-00398-GMS Document 42 Filed 09/26/13 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 1382
`Case 1:12—cv—OO398—GMS Document 42 Filed 09/26/13 Page 3 of 4 Page|D #: 1382
`
`Therefore, the inter paries reviews of all claims asserted to date will proceed on the same
`
`schedule.
`
`
`@443
`
`Chad M. Shandler ( 796)
`Travis S. Hunter (#5350)
`RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A.
`One Rodney Square
`920 N. King Street
`Wilmington , DE 19801
`(302) 651-7700
`Shandler@rif.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Sony
`Corporation, Sony Corporation ofAmerica,
`Sony Electronics Inc, Sony Mobile
`Communications AB, Sony Mobile
`Communications (USA) Inc.
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`John Flock
`Walter Hanley
`Michelle Carniaux
`Sheila Mortazavi
`Iuliana Tanase
`KENYON & KENYON LLP
`
`One Broadway
`New York, New York 10004-1050
`(212) 425-7200
`
`Dated: September 26, 2013
`
`

`
`Case 1:12-cv-00398-GMS Document 42 Filed 09/26/13 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 1383
`Case 1:12—cv—OO398—GMS Document 42 Filed 09/26/13 Page 4 of 4 Page|D #: 1383
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on September 26, 2013, I caused to be filed the foregoing document
`
`with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF, which will send notification of such filing to counsel of
`
`record, and served true and correct copies of the foregoing on the following counsel as indicated:
`
`BY ELECTRONIC MAIL
`
`Steven J. Balick
`
`Andrew Colin Mayo
`Tiffany Geyer Lydon
`Ashby & Geddes
`500 Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor
`P.O. Box 1150
`
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`sba1icl<@ashby—geddes.com
`amayo@ashby—geddes.corn
`tlydon@ashby-geddes.c0m
`
`Matthew D. Powers
`
`Steven S. Cherensky
`Paul T. Ehrlich
`
`Stefani C. Smith
`
`Robert L. Gerrity
`TENSEGRITY LAW GROUP LLP
`
`555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 360
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`matthew.powers@tensegritylawgroup.com
`steven.cherensky@tensegritylawgroup.com
`paul.ehrlich@tensegrity1awgroup.corn
`stefani.smith@tensegritylawgroup.corn
`robert.gerrity@tensegritylawgroup.coIn
`
`/s/ Travis 8. Hunter
`
`Travis S. Hunter (#5350)
`hunter@rlf.c0rn
`
`RLF1 8082884v.l