`Case 1:12—cv—OO398—GMS Document 31 Filed 04/19/13 Page 1 of 4 Page|D #: 401
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`HUMANEYES TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
`
`Plaintifif
`
`V.
`
`CA. No. l2—398—GMS
`
`SONY CORPORATION, SONY
`CORPORATION OF Al\/IERICA, SONY
`ELECTRONICS INC., SONY MOBILE
`COMMUNICATIONS AB, AND SONY
`MOBILE CONE»/IUNICATIONS (USA) INC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`DECLARATION OF IULIANA TANASE IN SUPPORT OF
`DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY LITIGATION PENDING THE
`OUTCOME OF INTER PARTES REVIEW OF THE PATENTS—IN-SUIT
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`John Flock
`Walter I-Ianley
`Michelle Camiaux
`Sheila Mortazavi
`Iuliana Tanase
`KENYON & KENYON LLP
`One Broadway
`New York, New York 10004~l 050
`(212) 425-7200
`'
`
`Chad M. Shandler (#3 796)
`Elizabeth R. He (#5345)
`RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A.
`One Rodney Square
`920 N. King Street
`Wilmington , DE 19801
`(302) 651-7700
`Shand1er@rI£com
`He@r1f. com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Sony Corporation,
`Sony Corporation ofAmerica, Sony Electronics
`Inc., Sony Mobile Communications AB, Sony
`Mobile Communications (USA) Inc.
`
`
`
`Case 1:12-cv-00398-GMS Document 31 Filed 04/19/13 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 402
`Case 1:12—cv—OO398—GMS Document 31 Filed 04/19/13 Page 2 of 4 Page|D #: 402
`
`I, Iuliana Tanase, am an attorney at law admitted to practice in the States of New York
`
`and New Jersey, and an Associate at Kenyon 8: Kenyon LLP, counsel for Defendants Sony
`
`Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Sony Mobile
`
`Communications AB and Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. I was admitted pro hac vice
`
`in this case on January 16, 2013. I make this certification in support of Defendants’ Motion to
`
`Stay Litigation Pending the Outcome of Inter Partes Review of the Patents-in-Suit.
`
`1.
`
`Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of Complainant I-IumanEyes
`
`Technologies, Ltd.’s Memorandum In Support of Motion for Termination filed in ITC
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA~842 on September 21, 2012.
`
`2.
`
`Attached as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of defendant Sony Corporation’s
`
`Petition for Inter Parres Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,665,003 dated March 29, 2013.
`
`3.
`
`Attached as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of defendant Sony Corporatiorfs
`
`Petition for Inter Pa;-"res Review of US. Patent No. 7,477,284 dated March 29, 2013.
`
`4.
`
`Attached as Exhibit D are true and correct copies ofthe Notice of Filing Date
`
`Accorded for Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,665,003 and Notice of Filing
`
`Date Accorded for Petition for Inter Parres Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,477,284, both dated
`
`April 3, 2013.
`
`5.
`
`Attached as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of I~IurnanEyes Technologies,
`
`Ltd.’s Verified Complaint of HurnanEyes Technologies, Ltd. Under Section 337 of the Tariff Act
`
`of 1930, as Amended.
`
`6.
`
`Attached as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of the Order tiled in Capriola
`
`Corp. v. LaRoSe Indus, Case No. 8:12—cv—2346-T-23TBM, Dkt. No. 49 (MD. Fla. Mar. 11,
`
`2013).
`
`
`
`Case 1:12-cv-00398-GMS Document 31 Filed 04/19/13 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 403
`Case 1:12—cv—OO398—GMS Document 31 Filed 04/19/13 Page 3 of 4 Page|D #: 403
`
`7.
`
`Attached as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of Volume 77, No. 157 of the
`
`Federal Register, dated August 14, 2012 and titled “Changes to Implement Inter Parres Review
`
`Proceedings, Post—G1'ant Review Proceedings, and Transitional Program for Covered Business
`
`Method Patents.”
`
`8.
`
`Attached as Exhibit H is a true and correct copy of the United States Patent and
`
`Trademark Ofiice Inter Panes Reexamination Filing Data dated June 30, 2012.
`
`9.
`
`Attached as Exhibit I is a true and correct copy, to the best of my knowledge,
`
`information and belief, of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and
`
`Appeal Board’s (“PTAB”) decisions regarding instituting petitions for inter partes review from
`
`September 16, 2012 to April 18, 2013. This list was compiled by Sony’s counsel from the PTAB
`
`patent review processing system publicly accessible at https://ptabt:rials.usp“oto. gov.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct, and that this
`
`declaration was executed on this 19th day of April, 2013 in New York City, New York.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:12-cv-00398-GMS Document 31 Filed 04/19/13 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 404
`Case 1:12—cv—OO398—GMS Document 31 Filed 04/19/13 Page 4 of 4 Page|D #: 404
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on April 19, 2013, I caused to be filed the foregoing document with
`
`the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF, which will send notification of Such filing to counsel of
`
`record, and served true and correct copies of the foregoing on the following counsel as indicated:
`
`BY ELECTRONIC MAIL
`
`Steven J. Balick
`
`Andrew Colin Mayo
`Tiffany Geyer Lydon
`Ashby & Geddes
`500 Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor
`P.O. Box 1150
`
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`sbalick@ashby-geddescom
`arnayo@ashby-ged.des.co1n
`tlydon@ashby-geddes.corn
`
`Matthew D. Powers
`
`Steven S. Cherensky
`Paul T. Ehrlich
`
`Stefani C. Smith
`
`Robert L. Gerrity
`TENSEGRITY LAW GROUP LLP
`
`555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 360
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`matthew.powers@tensegritylawgroup.com
`steven.cherensky@ter1segritylawgroupcom
`paul.ehrlich@tensegritylawgroupcom
`stefani.smith@tensegritylawgroup.com
`robert.gerrity@tensegritylawgroup.co1n
`
`/s/ Elizabeth R. He
`
`Elizabeth R. He (#5345)
`he@rlf.co1n
`
`RLF1 8509595v.l