throbber
Case 1:12-cv-00398-GMS Document 31 Filed 04/19/13 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 401
`Case 1:12—cv—OO398—GMS Document 31 Filed 04/19/13 Page 1 of 4 Page|D #: 401
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`HUMANEYES TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
`
`Plaintifif
`
`V.
`
`CA. No. l2—398—GMS
`
`SONY CORPORATION, SONY
`CORPORATION OF Al\/IERICA, SONY
`ELECTRONICS INC., SONY MOBILE
`COMMUNICATIONS AB, AND SONY
`MOBILE CONE»/IUNICATIONS (USA) INC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`DECLARATION OF IULIANA TANASE IN SUPPORT OF
`DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY LITIGATION PENDING THE
`OUTCOME OF INTER PARTES REVIEW OF THE PATENTS—IN-SUIT
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`John Flock
`Walter I-Ianley
`Michelle Camiaux
`Sheila Mortazavi
`Iuliana Tanase
`KENYON & KENYON LLP
`One Broadway
`New York, New York 10004~l 050
`(212) 425-7200
`'
`
`Chad M. Shandler (#3 796)
`Elizabeth R. He (#5345)
`RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A.
`One Rodney Square
`920 N. King Street
`Wilmington , DE 19801
`(302) 651-7700
`Shand1er@rI£com
`He@r1f. com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Sony Corporation,
`Sony Corporation ofAmerica, Sony Electronics
`Inc., Sony Mobile Communications AB, Sony
`Mobile Communications (USA) Inc.
`
`

`
`Case 1:12-cv-00398-GMS Document 31 Filed 04/19/13 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 402
`Case 1:12—cv—OO398—GMS Document 31 Filed 04/19/13 Page 2 of 4 Page|D #: 402
`
`I, Iuliana Tanase, am an attorney at law admitted to practice in the States of New York
`
`and New Jersey, and an Associate at Kenyon 8: Kenyon LLP, counsel for Defendants Sony
`
`Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Sony Mobile
`
`Communications AB and Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. I was admitted pro hac vice
`
`in this case on January 16, 2013. I make this certification in support of Defendants’ Motion to
`
`Stay Litigation Pending the Outcome of Inter Partes Review of the Patents-in-Suit.
`
`1.
`
`Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of Complainant I-IumanEyes
`
`Technologies, Ltd.’s Memorandum In Support of Motion for Termination filed in ITC
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA~842 on September 21, 2012.
`
`2.
`
`Attached as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of defendant Sony Corporation’s
`
`Petition for Inter Parres Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,665,003 dated March 29, 2013.
`
`3.
`
`Attached as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of defendant Sony Corporatiorfs
`
`Petition for Inter Pa;-"res Review of US. Patent No. 7,477,284 dated March 29, 2013.
`
`4.
`
`Attached as Exhibit D are true and correct copies ofthe Notice of Filing Date
`
`Accorded for Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,665,003 and Notice of Filing
`
`Date Accorded for Petition for Inter Parres Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,477,284, both dated
`
`April 3, 2013.
`
`5.
`
`Attached as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of I~IurnanEyes Technologies,
`
`Ltd.’s Verified Complaint of HurnanEyes Technologies, Ltd. Under Section 337 of the Tariff Act
`
`of 1930, as Amended.
`
`6.
`
`Attached as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of the Order tiled in Capriola
`
`Corp. v. LaRoSe Indus, Case No. 8:12—cv—2346-T-23TBM, Dkt. No. 49 (MD. Fla. Mar. 11,
`
`2013).
`
`

`
`Case 1:12-cv-00398-GMS Document 31 Filed 04/19/13 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 403
`Case 1:12—cv—OO398—GMS Document 31 Filed 04/19/13 Page 3 of 4 Page|D #: 403
`
`7.
`
`Attached as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of Volume 77, No. 157 of the
`
`Federal Register, dated August 14, 2012 and titled “Changes to Implement Inter Parres Review
`
`Proceedings, Post—G1'ant Review Proceedings, and Transitional Program for Covered Business
`
`Method Patents.”
`
`8.
`
`Attached as Exhibit H is a true and correct copy of the United States Patent and
`
`Trademark Ofiice Inter Panes Reexamination Filing Data dated June 30, 2012.
`
`9.
`
`Attached as Exhibit I is a true and correct copy, to the best of my knowledge,
`
`information and belief, of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and
`
`Appeal Board’s (“PTAB”) decisions regarding instituting petitions for inter partes review from
`
`September 16, 2012 to April 18, 2013. This list was compiled by Sony’s counsel from the PTAB
`
`patent review processing system publicly accessible at https://ptabt:rials.usp“oto. gov.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct, and that this
`
`declaration was executed on this 19th day of April, 2013 in New York City, New York.
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 1:12-cv-00398-GMS Document 31 Filed 04/19/13 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 404
`Case 1:12—cv—OO398—GMS Document 31 Filed 04/19/13 Page 4 of 4 Page|D #: 404
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on April 19, 2013, I caused to be filed the foregoing document with
`
`the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF, which will send notification of Such filing to counsel of
`
`record, and served true and correct copies of the foregoing on the following counsel as indicated:
`
`BY ELECTRONIC MAIL
`
`Steven J. Balick
`
`Andrew Colin Mayo
`Tiffany Geyer Lydon
`Ashby & Geddes
`500 Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor
`P.O. Box 1150
`
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`sbalick@ashby-geddescom
`arnayo@ashby-ged.des.co1n
`tlydon@ashby-geddes.corn
`
`Matthew D. Powers
`
`Steven S. Cherensky
`Paul T. Ehrlich
`
`Stefani C. Smith
`
`Robert L. Gerrity
`TENSEGRITY LAW GROUP LLP
`
`555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 360
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`matthew.powers@tensegritylawgroup.com
`steven.cherensky@ter1segritylawgroupcom
`paul.ehrlich@tensegritylawgroupcom
`stefani.smith@tensegritylawgroup.com
`robert.gerrity@tensegritylawgroup.co1n
`
`/s/ Elizabeth R. He
`
`Elizabeth R. He (#5345)
`he@rlf.co1n
`
`RLF1 8509595v.l

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket