`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 10-258 (SLR)(MPT)
`
`))))))))
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`MOBILEMEDIA IDEAS LLC,
`
`MOBILEMEDIA IDEAS LLC’S PROPOSED VERDICT SHEET
`
`November 28, 2012
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:10-cv-00258-SLR-MPT Document 487 Filed 11/28/12 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 9353
`
`
`We, the jury, unanimously find as follows:
`
`I.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,070,068 (the “’068 Patent”)
`
`Direct Infringement
`
`Has MobileMedia proven, by a preponderance of the evidence, that each
`and every limitation of either Claim 23 or Claim 24 of the ’068 Patent is
`found in the accused Apple iPhones (hereinafter, “Apple’s iPhones”)?
`
`Checking “yes” below indicates a finding for MobileMedia.
`Checking “no” below indicates a finding for Apple.
`
`Claim 23
`Claim 24
`
`
`
`
`
`No
`No
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Yes
`Yes
`
`
`
`
`Indirect Infringement – Inducing Infringement
`
`Has MobileMedia proven, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Apple
`induced infringement of either Claim 23 or Claim 24 of the ’068 Patent?
`
`Checking “yes” below indicates a finding for MobileMedia.
`Checking “no” below indicates a finding for Apple.
`
`Claim 23
`Claim 24
`
`No
`No
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Yes
`Yes
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Invalidity
`
`Has Apple proven, by clear and convincing evidence, that each and every
`limitation of the following claims of the ’068 Patent was found in a single
`prior art reference prior to March 19, 1996, and thus, the claim was
`anticipated?
`
`A.
`
`1.
`
`
`B.
`
`2.
`
`
`
`C.
`
`3.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Checking “yes” below indicates a finding for Apple.
`Checking “no” below indicates a finding for MobileMedia.
`
`Claim 23
`Claim 24
`
`No
`No
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Yes
`Yes
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`If your answer is “yes” for Claim 23, identify the prior art reference(s):
`
`__________________________________________________________
`
`If your answer is “yes” for Claim 24, identify the prior art reference(s):
`
`__________________________________________________________
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 1:10-cv-00258-SLR-MPT Document 487 Filed 11/28/12 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 9354
`
`
`Has Apple proven, by clear and convincing evidence, that the following
`claims of the ’068 Patent would have been obvious to a person of ordinary
`skill in the art as of March 19, 1996, and thus, the claim is invalid as
`obvious?
`
`Checking “yes” below indicates a finding for Apple.
`Checking “no” below indicates a finding for MobileMedia.
`
`Claim 23
`Claim 24
`
`No
`No
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Yes
`Yes
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`If your answer is “yes” for Claim 23, identify the combination of prior art
`references:
`
`__________________________________________________________
`
`If your answer is “yes” for Claim 24, identify the combination of prior art
`references:
`
`__________________________________________________________
`
`
`4.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,253,075 (the “’075 Patent”)
`
`Direct Infringement
`
`Has MobileMedia proven, by a preponderance of the evidence, that each
`and every limitation of either Claim 5, Claim 6 or Claim 10 of the ’075
`Patent is found in Apple’s iPhones?
`
`Checking “yes” below indicates a finding for MobileMedia.
`Checking “no” below indicates a finding for Apple.
`
`Claim 5
`Claim 6
`Claim 10
`
`
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`No
`No
`No
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Indirect Infringement – Inducing Infringement
`
`Has MobileMedia proven, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Apple
`induced infringement of either Claim 5 or Claim 6 of the ’075 Patent?
`
`Checking “yes” below indicates a finding for MobileMedia.
`Checking “no” below indicates a finding for Apple.
`
`Claim 5
`Claim 6
`
`No
`No
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Yes
`Yes
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`A.
`
`5.
`
`
`B.
`
`6.
`
`
`
`
`
`II.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:10-cv-00258-SLR-MPT Document 487 Filed 11/28/12 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 9355
`
`
`Invalidity
`
`Has Apple proven, by clear and convincing evidence, that the following
`claims of the ’075 Patent would have been obvious to a person of ordinary
`skill in the art as of May 19, 1998, and thus, the claim is invalid as obvious?
`
`Checking “yes” below indicates a finding for Apple.
`Checking “no” below indicates a finding for MobileMedia.
`
`Claim 5
`Claim 6
`Claim 10
`
`No
`No
`No
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`If your answer is “yes” for Claim 5, identify the combination of prior art
`references:
`
`__________________________________________________________
`
`If your answer is “yes” for Claim 6, identify the combination of prior art
`references:
`
`__________________________________________________________
`
`If your answer is “yes” for Claim 10, identify the combination of prior art
`references:
`
`__________________________________________________________
`
`
`
`C.
`
`7.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8.
`
`Has Apple proven, by clear and convincing evidence, that the following
`claims of the ’075 Patent are invalid for failing to satisfy the written
`description requirement?
`
`Checking “yes” below indicates a finding for Apple.
`Checking “no” below indicates a finding for MobileMedia.
`
`Claim 5
`Claim 6
`Claim 10
`
`No
`No
`No
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:10-cv-00258-SLR-MPT Document 487 Filed 11/28/12 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 9356
`
`
`9.
`
`Has Apple proven, by clear and convincing evidence, that the following
`claims of the ’075 Patent are invalid for failing to satisfy the enablement
`requirement?
`
`Checking “yes” below indicates a finding for Apple.
`Checking “no” below indicates a finding for MobileMedia.
`
`Claim 5
`Claim 6
`Claim 10
`
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`No
`No
`No
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,427,078 (the “’078 Patent”)
`
`A.
`
`Direct Infringement
`
`10. Has MobileMedia proven, by a preponderance of the evidence, that each
`and every limitation of Claim 73 of the ’078 Patent is found in Apple’s
`iPhones?
`
`Checking “yes” below indicates a finding for MobileMedia.
`Checking “no” below indicates a finding for Apple.
`
`Yes
`
`No
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`B.
`
`Invalidity
`
`11. Has Apple proven, by clear and convincing evidence, that each and every
`limitation of Claim 73 of the ’078 Patent was found in a single prior art
`reference prior to May 19, 1994, and thus, the claim was anticipated?
`
`Checking “yes” below indicates a finding for Apple.
`Checking “no” below indicates a finding for MobileMedia.
`
`Yes
`
`
`
`
`
`No
`
`
`
`
`
`If your answer is “yes” for Claim 73, identify the prior art reference(s):
`
`__________________________________________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`III.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:10-cv-00258-SLR-MPT Document 487 Filed 11/28/12 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 9357
`
`
`12. Has Apple proven, by clear and convincing evidence, that Claim 73 of
`the ’078 Patent would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in
`the art as of May 19, 1994, and thus, the claim is invalid as obvious?
`
`Checking “yes” below indicates a finding for Apple.
`Checking “no” below indicates a finding for MobileMedia.
`
`Yes
`
`
`
`
`
`No
`
`
`
`
`
`If your answer is “yes” for Claim 73, identify the combination of prior art
`references:
`
`__________________________________________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:10-cv-00258-SLR-MPT Document 487 Filed 11/28/12 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 9358
`
`
`You have now reached the end of the verdict form. Each juror should sign the
`
`verdict form to reflect that a unanimous verdict has been reached.
`
`Date: ____________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`____________________________________
`Jury Foreperson
`
`____________________________________
`Jury Member
`
`____________________________________
`Jury Member
`
`____________________________________
`Jury Member
`
`____________________________________
`Jury Member
`
`____________________________________
`Jury Member
`
`____________________________________
`Jury Member
`
`____________________________________
`Jury Member
`
`____________________________________
`Jury Member
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6