throbber
Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 342-12 Filed 10/29/21 PageID.31461 Page 1 of
`10
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 11
`TO TRENT TANNER DECLARATION ISO
`NUVASIVE’S COMBINED MOTIONS IN LIMINE
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 342-12 Filed 10/29/21 PageID.31462 Page 2 of
`10
`
` HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY
`
`Page 1
`
` UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
` SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
` SAN DIEGO DIVISION
`
` NUVASIVE, INC., a Delaware )
`
` corporation, )
`
` )
`
` Plaintiff, )
`
` )
`
` vs. ) Case No. 3:18-CV-00347
`
` ) CAB-MDD
`
` ALPHATEC HOLDINGS, INC., a )
`
` Delaware corporation and )
`
` ALPHATEC SPINE, INC., a )
`
` California corporation, )
`
` Defendants. )
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`EXHIBIT 11, Page 151 of 159
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 342-12 Filed 10/29/21 PageID.31463 Page 3 of
`10
`Page 2
`1 The Zoom video deposition of RYAN DONAHOE,
`
`Page 4
`
`1 I N D E X
`2 Page
`3 Exam by Nimalka Wickramasekera 7
`4 Exam by Paul Tripodi 334
`
` E X H I B I T S
` Page
`
`5 6
`
`7
`
`Exhibit No. 1 - 9
`8 Defendants' Second Notice of Deposition to
`NuVasive, Inc., Pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6)
`
`9
`
`Exhibit No. 2 - 9
`10 Defendants' Notice of Taking Remote Virtual
`Deposition of Ryan Donahoe
`
`11
`
`Exhibit No. 3 - 26
`12 United States Patent '334 B2
`13 Exhibit No. 4 - 26
`United States Patent '156 B2
`
`14
`
`Exhibit No. 5 - 142
`15 April 26, 2003 letter from NuVasive to the FDA
`16 Exhibit No. 6 - 156
`Appendix IV, Predicate Device Information
`
`17
`
`Exhibit No. 7 - 166
`18 Section I, Premarket Submission Cover Sheet
`19 Exhibit No. 8 - 168
`510(k) Premarket Notification
`
`20
`
`Exhibit No. 9 - 187
`21 Interoffice Memo, November 10, 2003
`22 Exhibit No. 10 - 191
`"Take Your Pick" Radiolucent, Configurable
`23 Fusion Confirmation
`24 Exhibit No. 11 - Vertebral Spacer - PR 192
`
` taken before Richard Derrick Ehrlich, Registered
`
` Merit Reporter, Certified Realtime Reporter, taken
`
`2 3 4 5
`
`6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13 pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
`14
`15
`16
`17 commencing at 9:00 a.m., on the 6th day of November,
`18
`19
`20
`21 .
`22
`23
`24
`
`Page 3
`
`Page 5
`
`1 A P P E A R A N C E S
`2 On behalf of the Plaintiff:
`3 Paul D. Tripodi
` WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI P.C.
`4 633 West Fifth Street
` Suite 1550
`5 Los Angeles, CA 90071
` 323.210.2900
`6 ptripodi@wsgr.com
`7 Mike Doyle
` In-house counsel for NuVasive, Inc.
`8 7475 Lusk Boulevard
` San Diego, CA 92121
`
`9
`
`10
`
`On behalf of the Defendants:
`
` Nimalka Wickramasekera
`11 WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
` 333 South Grand Avenue
`12 Suite 3800
` Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543
`13 213.615.1700
` nwickramasekera@winston.com
`
`14
`
` Craig Hunsaker
`15 In-house counsel for Alphatec Spine, Inc.
` 5818 El Camino Real
`16 Carlsbad, CA 92008
` 760.494.6801
`17 jhamilton@atecspine.com
`18
`
`Videographer:
`19 Jonathan Popham
`20 Concierge:
`Bill Craddock
`
`21
`22
`23
`24
`
`1 E X H I B I T S (Continued)
`2 Exhibit No. 12 - 214
`Section VI, Rationale for Substantial
`3 Equivalence
`4 Exhibit No. 13 - 231
`CoRoent Radiolucent Systems, Design Rationale
`
`5
`
`Exhibit No. 14 - 242
`6 CoRoent XL & XLR
`7 Exhibit No. 15 - 254
`CoRoent Small Implants
`
`8
`
`Exhibit No. 16 - 254
`9 PEEK Cement Restrictors
`10 Exhibit No. 17 - 260
`Email from Matt Copp
`
`11
`
`Exhibit No. 18 - 260
`12 "Quality You Can See"
`13 Exhibit No. 19 - 260
`"Quality You Can See"
`
`14
`
`Exhibit No. 20 - 283
`15 Spreadsheet
`16 Exhibit No. 21 - 297
`List of notes and sketches
`
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`2 (Pages 2 - 5)
`
`888-391-3376
`
`EXHIBIT 11, Page 152 of 159
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 342-12 Filed 10/29/21 PageID.31464 Page 4 of
`10
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY
`
`Page 6
`1 VIDEOGRAPHER: Good morning. We are going
`2 on the record at 11:05 a.m. Central time on
`3 November 6th, 2020.
`4 Please note that the microphones are
`5 sensitive and may pick up whispering, private
`6 conversations, and cellular interference. Audio
`7 and video recording will continue until all
`8 parties agree to go off the record.
`9 This is Media No. 1 of the video deposition
`10 of Ryan Donahoe taken by counsel for the
`11 defendant in the matter of NuVasive,
`12 Incorporated., vs. Alphatec Holdings,
`13 Incorporated., and Alphatec Spine,
`14 Incorporated., filed in the United States
`15 District Court for the Southern District of
`16 California, San Diego Division, Case Number
`17 3:18-CV-00347-CAB-MDD.
`18 This deposition is being held at multiple
`19 locations via videoconference.
`20 My name is Jonathan Popham from Veritext,
`21 and I'm the videographer. The court reporter is
`22 Richard Ehrlich, also from Veritext. And also
`23 joining us today is Bill Craddock as our virtual
`24 concierge technician.
`
`Page 8
`
`1 MR. TRIPODI: Okay.
`2 VIDEOGRAPHER: Okay. If that's everyone,
`3 will the court reporter please swear in the
`4 witness?
`5 RYAN DONAHOE, DEPONENT, SWORN
`6 MS. WICKRAMASEKERA: May I proceed?
`7 VIDEOGRAPHER: Yes, please.
`8 EXAMINATION
`9 BY MS. WICKRAMASEKERA:
`10 Q Good morning, Mr. Donahoe. Could you please
`11 state and spell your name for the record?
`12 A Ryan Donahoe, R-Y-A-N, D-O-N-A-H-O-E.
`13 Q And who are you employed by?
`14 A NuVasive.
`15 Q And what's your address?
`16 A The work address or home address?
`17 Q Home address.
`18 A Home address, 2815 Santa Fe Vista Court,
`19 Encinitas, California 92024.
`20 Q And what's your current title at NuVasive?
`21 A Vice president of research and development for
`22 the spine business unit.
`23 Q Okay. I'm going to mark two exhibits off the
`24 bat.
`
`Page 7
`
`Page 9
`
`1 I'm not authorized to administer an oath.
`2 I'm not related to any party in this action, nor
`3 am I financially interested in the outcome.
`4 Counsel will now, please, state their
`5 appearances and affiliations for the record.
`6 MR. TRIPODI: I'm Paul Tripodi of Wilson
`7 Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati on behalf of NuVasive,
`8 Inc., and NuVasive's 30(b)(6) designee, Ryan
`9 Donahoe.
`10 With me today here in the conference room
`11 is Mike Doyle, in-house counsel at NuVasive.
`12 MS. WICKRAMASEKERA: Good morning. This is
`13 Nimalka Wickramasekera from Winston & Strawn on
`14 behalf of the Alphatec defendants, and with me
`15 is my colleague Billy Wardlaw.
`16 VIDEOGRAPHER: Is there anyone else joining
`17 us?
`18 MS. WICKRAMASEKERA: Yes. Craig Hunsaker
`19 from Alphatec is our corporate representative.
`20 MR. TRIPODI: Pardon my -- pardon me,
`21 Nimalka. I'm not sure that I recognize the name
`22 "Billy Wardlaw." Is that someone on your
`23 Winston team?
`24 MS. WICKRAMASEKERA: Yes.
`
`1 Let me know once you see Exhibit 1, which
`2 is the Alphatec 30(b)(6) notice to NuVasive, and
`3 Exhibit 2, which is your deposition notice.
`4 Can you introduce Exhibit OA and OD,
`5 please?
`6 CONCIERGE: That's for me, right, Nimalka?
`7 MS. WICKRAMASEKERA: Yes.
`8 CONCIERGE: And is it OA1 and OB2 or ...
`9 MS. WICKRAMASEKERA: OA is going to be
`10 Exhibit 1, and OD -- I'm sorry. I said "OC,"
`11 but it was OD should be Exhibit 2.
`12 CONCIERGE: Okay. One moment. Stand by.
`13 MR. TRIPODI: Are these in the witness's
`14 collection of documents that were -- that were
`15 delivered to us?
`16 MS. WICKRAMASEKERA: OA should be -- yes.
`17 They should both be in the -- in the exhibit
`18 box.
`19 MR. TRIPODI: So, Mr. Donahoe, if you would
`20 go ahead and retrieve those from the collection
`21 that you have. They should be -- A and B should
`22 be -- they should be the first two in the box, I
`23 believe.
`24 THE DEPONENT: All right. I have A and B.
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`3 (Pages 6 - 9)
`
`888-391-3376
`
`EXHIBIT 11, Page 153 of 159
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 342-12 Filed 10/29/21 PageID.31465 Page 5 of
`10
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY
`
`Page 322
`
`Page 324
`
`1 outside of the inserter are trials. The trials
`2 are specific to the shape of CoRoent. And so
`3 what I was saying is unless Alphatec copied the
`4 shape of CoRoent, then their implants could be
`5 used with our trials. However, it would be far
`6 less safe and effective because the trial
`7 wouldn't match the shape and size of the
`8 implant.
`9 BY MS. WICKRAMASEKERA:
`10 Q Okay. So setting aside the trials and the
`11 implant inserter, what are the other instruments
`12 that are designed for use with the CoRoent?
`13 A There's an implant removal instrument that's
`14 specifically designed for use with CoRoent.
`15 There are discectomy instruments that are
`16 specifically designed for the use with CoRoent.
`17 Here's the MaXcess retractor that's specifically
`18 designed for use with CoRoent. Those are kind
`19 of the main categories of instruments.
`20 Q Okay. Can the MaXcess retractors, the implant
`21 removal instrument -- I missed what the third
`22 instrument you said was. I can see in the
`23 transcript -- can you just --
`24 A They're disc removal instruments.
`
`Page 323
`1 Q Okay. So can the implants, the disc removal
`2 instruments, and the MaXcess retractors be used
`3 with competitor implants?
`4 A In theory, they could be used, but as I
`5 mentioned, would likely generate a less safe and
`6 effective result.
`7 Q And is the same true with respect to Alphatec's
`8 implants? Can the MaXcess retractors and the
`9 disc removal instruments be used with the
`10 Alphatec implants?
`11 MR. TRIPODI: Objection. Form.
`12 Foundation. Speculation.
`13 THE DEPONENT: I'd have to look
`14 specifically. When I mentioned other
`15 manufacturers' implants could be used -- you
`16 know, again, as I mentioned, if they copied the
`17 shapes and size of our implants, then they could
`18 be used but generate a less safe and effective
`19 result.
`20 So the same applies to Alphatec. If they
`21 had copied the shapes and the features and the
`22 insertion receptacles of our CoRoent implants,
`23 then yes, they can use the -- those implants
`24 with the NuVasive system.
`
`1 BY MS. WICKRAMASEKERA:
`2 Q What are you referring to as the insertion
`3 receptacle of the implant?
`4 A So the insertion receptacle is a threaded hole
`5 with what we call a racetrack feature inside the
`6 lateral aspect of the implant. It's how you
`7 connect the implant to the inserter.
`8 Q Okay. So is the MaXcess retractor designed
`9 specifically for use with the CoRoent implant?
`10 MR. TRIPODI: Objection. Form.
`11 THE DEPONENT: Yes.
`12 BY MS. WICKRAMASEKERA:
`13 Q Okay. Can you use a MaXcess retractor to insert
`14 other implants, other competitor implants?
`15 MR. TRIPODI: Objection. Form.
`16 THE DEPONENT: Again, if those implants
`17 have copied the shape and size of CoRoent, then
`18 yes, you can use them with the MaXcess
`19 retractor.
`20 BY MS. WICKRAMASEKERA:
`21 Q Do you recall, Mr. Donahoe, that you were
`22 previously deposed in a lawsuit between NuVasive
`23 and Medtronic?
`24 A Yes.
`
`Page 325
`
`1 Q Do you recall that that lawsuit involved
`2 infringement of the Medtronic patents related to
`3 a retractor?
`4 A It's quite some time ago. I do recall that it
`5 was related to retractors and -- or retractors
`6 and implants, yes.
`7 Q And do you recall that your testimony was played
`8 before a jury in the trial between Medtronic and
`9 NuVasive?
`10 A I don't recall. I wasn't in the trial room to
`11 know what they played or didn't play.
`12 Q Do you recall that NuVasive was found to
`13 infringe a Medtronic patent regarding the design
`14 of the MaXcess retractor?
`15 MR. TRIPODI: Objection. Form. Outside
`16 the notice.
`17 THE DEPONENT: I don't recall the exact
`18 conclusion of the trial.
`19 BY MS. WICKRAMASEKERA:
`20 Q Okay. You don't know what the design of the
`21 MaXcess retractor was based on, do you?
`22 MR. TRIPODI: Objection. Form. Outside
`23 the notice.
`24 THE DEPONENT: So as I mentioned, the
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`82 (Pages 322 - 325)
`
`888-391-3376
`
`EXHIBIT 11, Page 154 of 159
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 342-12 Filed 10/29/21 PageID.31466 Page 6 of
`10
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY
`
`Page 326
`1 design of the MaXcess retractor predated my
`2 start at NuVasive. So I wasn't part of the
`3 origination and conception of the MaXcess
`4 retractor. It all happened many years before I
`5 started. So I don't know exactly what it was
`6 based on now.
`7 BY MS. WICKRAMASEKERA:
`8 Q Got it. So when you say that the MaXcess
`9 retractor was designed for the CoRoent implant,
`10 you don't, in fact, know that to be true because
`11 you don't have any personal knowledge of that,
`12 correct?
`13 MR. TRIPODI: Objection. Form.
`14 Foundation. Outside the notice.
`15 THE DEPONENT: No, that's not correct. As
`16 I described, similar to the XLIF -- or sorry --
`17 the CoRoent XL implants, there's been
`18 generational changes over time. And so as I've
`19 been at NuVasive, we've released multiple
`20 generations of MaXcess.
`21 So when I refer to it as being designed for
`22 use with CoRoent implants, that's direct
`23 knowledge when I was with the company of what it
`24 was designed for and what it was intended to be
`
`Page 328
`
`1 BY MS. WICKRAMASEKERA:
`2 Q Okay. Can you -- and I believe earlier in your
`3 testimony you described how precise you are as
`4 an engineer. And so in relation to questions
`5 that I had posed to you regarding different
`6 CoRoent implants, you wanted to emphasize that
`7 you have to be very precise about the features
`8 because they're not all necessarily the same.
`9 Do you recall that testimony?
`10 MR. TRIPODI: Objection. Form.
`11 THE DEPONENT: I recall asking for
`12 precision in the questions because some of the
`13 terms used in some of the questions are very
`14 broad. So I wanted to be able to provide a good
`15 answer and an accurate answer, and so I needed
`16 better specificity in the questions and the
`17 terms being --
`18 BY MS. WICKRAMASEKERA:
`19 Q Okay. So using your very precise terminology,
`20 can you tell me the differences that you're
`21 aware of between the Alphatec Battalion implant
`22 and the NuVasive CoRoent implant?
`23 MR. TRIPODI: Objection. Form. Outside
`24 the notice. Calls for speculation.
`
`Page 327
`
`Page 329
`
`1 used with.
`2 BY MS. WICKRAMASEKERA:
`3 Q Do you recall in that prior trial regarding
`4 Medtronic and NuVasive that NuVasive's
`5 CoRoent XL implant was also found to infringe a
`6 Medtronic implant patent?
`7 MR. TRIPODI: Objection. Form.
`8 Foundation. Outside the notice.
`9 THE DEPONENT: I can't recall exactly what
`10 the conclusions were from that trial. It was a
`11 while ago.
`12 BY MS. WICKRAMASEKERA:
`13 Q So you don't, in fact, know whether the design
`14 of the MaXcess and the CoRoent were copied from
`15 the Medtronic patent, correct?
`16 MR. TRIPODI: Objection. Form.
`17 Foundation. Outside the notice.
`18 THE DEPONENT: No.
`19 BY MS. WICKRAMASEKERA:
`20 Q Okay. Are you familiar with Alphatec's
`21 implants?
`22 MR. TRIPODI: Objection. Form.
`23 THE DEPONENT: I have a limited working
`24 knowledge of Alphatec's implants.
`
`1 THE DEPONENT: Yeah. I would be
`2 speculating. I haven't looked at any of the
`3 Battalion spacers in specific detail. You know,
`4 similar to other competitors, I don't spend my
`5 time looking specifically at their designs. I
`6 don't have access to their drawings, their CAD
`7 models.
`8 BY MS. WICKRAMASEKERA:
`9 Q What other --
`10 A So I'd be --
`11 Q Oh, sorry. Go ahead.
`12 A So I would be speculating on specific
`13 differences between the two.
`14 Q Okay. What other competitor implants are you
`15 aware of for use in lateral surgery?
`16 MR. TRIPODI: Objection. Form.
`17 THE DEPONENT: So, generally speaking, I'm
`18 aware of Medtronic, K2M, Stryker, Globus
`19 Medical, and DePuy Synthes. There's probably,
`20 last I heard, somewhere around 150 companies
`21 that have some form of a lateral implant.
`22 BY MS. WICKRAMASEKERA:
`23 Q Okay. Do you think, based on what you know of
`24 the Battalion Lateral implant, that it is the
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`83 (Pages 326 - 329)
`
`888-391-3376
`
`EXHIBIT 11, Page 155 of 159
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 342-12 Filed 10/29/21 PageID.31467 Page 7 of
`10
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY
`
`Page 344
`
`1 But thank you. Thank you for your
`2 understanding here at the end.
`3 MS. WICKRAMASEKERA: Okay. I agree. It
`4 would not have made a difference because it's
`5 irrelevant.
`6 And with that, we're done.
`7 MR. TRIPODI: Okay. Mr. Donahoe, thank you
`8 very much for your time and attention.
`9 We can go off the record.
`10 MS. WICKRAMASEKERA: Thank you.
`11 VIDEOGRAPHER: This concludes today's --
`12 MR. TRIPODI: Before we go off the record,
`13 I would like to reserve the witness's right to
`14 read and sign.
`15 MS. WICKRAMASEKERA: Okay. Thank you.
`16 VIDEOGRAPHER: Okay. This concludes the
`17 testimony of Ryan Donahoe.
`18 We're going off the record at 7:56 p.m.
`19 Central time. This also concludes Media 6.
`20 (Signature reserved.)
`21 (Zoom video concluded at 7:56 p.m.)
`22
`23
`24
`
`Page 345
`
`1 CERTIFICATE
`
`2 3
`
` I, Richard D. Ehrlich, a Certified Shorthand
`4 Reporter of the State of Illinois, CSR License No.
`5 084-2019, do hereby certify that I stenographically
`6 reported the proceedings had at the Zoom video
`7 deposition, as aforesaid, and that the foregoing
`8 transcript is a true and accurate record of the
`9 proceedings had therein.
`10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I do set my hand at
`11 Chicago, Illinois, this 12th day of November, 2020.
`12
`
` <%2171,Signature%>
`13 Richard D. Ehrlich
` Certified Shorthand Reporter
`14 License No. 084.2019
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`
`Page 342
`1 Q And the people who are identified in many of the
`2 documents that you reviewed -- Mr. Curran,
`3 Dr. Pimenta, Mr. Miles, Dr. Peterson -- are they
`4 associated or affiliated with NuVasive in any
`5 way?
`6 A None. Not anymore.
`7 MR. TRIPODI: So, once again, as I -- for
`8 counsel and for the record -- as I tried to
`9 explain earlier today, there's no one left at
`10 NuVasive who could answer questions that you
`11 posed.
`12 As I understand one of your statements
`13 earlier today, Counsel, you indicated that you
`14 have already obtained detailed information from
`15 Mr. Miles; and, in fact, I think much of your
`16 examination today was not intended to procure
`17 information but, instead, to exact statements
`18 from the witness that he couldn't possibly
`19 answer because there's no one left at NuVasive
`20 to respond to those kinds of questions.
`21 So with that, my examination is concluded.
`22 MS. WICKRAMASEKERA: So in response to your
`23 accusation just now, that's 100 percent false.
`24 There was no information that was obtained from
`
`Page 343
`1 other witnesses. The questions were all based
`2 off the documents that were produced by NuVasive
`3 in this case.
`4 And the witness was not able to testify
`5 regarding the design and development, first sale
`6 or first use of the cement restrictor or the
`7 original CoRoent XL implant, which are all
`8 factual questions. And I did appreciate the
`9 witness's difficulty with certain legal
`10 language, so I rephrased them to only ask the
`11 factual questions, and the witness was still
`12 unable to provide that testimony.
`13 Other than that, I disagree with your
`14 characterization of things, and we will move
`15 forward, and we'll move to preclude any
`16 testimony at trial, as appropriate, based on
`17 today's deposition.
`18 MR. TRIPODI: And I'm sure you'll do
`19 whatever you want to do.
`20 I wanted to -- I obviously wanted to make
`21 you aware of all this earlier in the day, and
`22 it's unfortunate that I was unable to. It does
`23 not sound like it would've made any difference,
`24 though.
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`87 (Pages 342 - 345)
`
`888-391-3376
`
`EXHIBIT 11, Page 156 of 159
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 342-12 Filed 10/29/21 PageID.31468 Page 8 of
`10
`Page 346
`
`Page 348
`
`1 Veritext Legal Solutions
` 1100 Superior Ave
`2 Suite 1820
` Cleveland, Ohio 44114
`3 Phone: 216-523-1313
`4
`
`November 12, 2020
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`To: Paul D. Tripodi, Esq.
`
`Case Name: Nuvasive, Inc v. Alphatec Holdings, Inc.
`
`Veritext Reference Number: 4324177
`
`Witness: Ryan Donahoe Deposition Date: 11/6/2020
`
`9
`10 Dear Sir/Madam:
`11
`
`Enclosed please find a deposition transcript. Please have the witness
`
`review the transcript and note any changes or corrections on the
`
`included errata sheet, indicating the page, line number, change, and
`
`the reason for the change. Have the witness’ signature notarized and
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`forward the completed page(s) back to us at the Production address
`16 shown
`17 above, or email to production-midwest@veritext.com.
`18
`
`If the errata is not returned within thirty days of your receipt of
`
`19
`
`this letter, the reading and signing will be deemed waived.
`
`20
`21 Sincerely,
`22 Production Department
`23
`24 NO NOTARY REQUIRED IN CA
`
`1 DEPOSITION REVIEW
` CERTIFICATION OF WITNESS
`
`2
`
` ASSIGNMENT REFERENCE NO: 4324177
`3 CASE NAME: Nuvasive, Inc v. Alphatec Holdings, Inc.
` DATE OF DEPOSITION: 11/6/2020
`4 WITNESS' NAME: Ryan Donahoe
`5 In accordance with the Rules of Civil
` Procedure, I have read the entire transcript of
`6 my testimony or it has been read to me.
`7 I have listed my changes on the attached
` Errata Sheet, listing page and line numbers as
`8 well as the reason(s) for the change(s).
`9 I request that these changes be entered
` as part of the record of my testimony.
`
`10
`
` I have executed the Errata Sheet, as well
`11 as this Certificate, and request and authorize
` that both be appended to the transcript of my
`12 testimony and be incorporated therein.
`13 _______________ ________________________
` Date Ryan Donahoe
`
`14
`
` Sworn to and subscribed before me, a
`15 Notary Public in and for the State and County,
` the referenced witness did personally appear
`16 and acknowledge that:
`17 They have read the transcript;
` They have listed all of their corrections
`18 in the appended Errata Sheet;
` They signed the foregoing Sworn
`19 Statement; and
` Their execution of this Statement is of
`20 their free act and deed.
`21 I have affixed my name and official seal
`22 this ______ day of_____________________, 20____.
`23 ___________________________________
` Notary Public
`
`24
`
` ___________________________________
`25 Commission Expiration Date
`
`1 DEPOSITION REVIEW
` CERTIFICATION OF WITNESS
`
`2
`
` ASSIGNMENT REFERENCE NO: 4324177
`3 CASE NAME: Nuvasive, Inc v. Alphatec Holdings, Inc.
` DATE OF DEPOSITION: 11/6/2020
`4 WITNESS' NAME: Ryan Donahoe
`5 In accordance with the Rules of Civil
` Procedure, I have read the entire transcript of
`6 my testimony or it has been read to me.
`7 I have made no changes to the testimony
` as transcribed by the court reporter.
`
`8
`
` _______________ ________________________
`9 Date Ryan Donahoe
`10 Sworn to and subscribed before me, a
` Notary Public in and for the State and County,
`11 the referenced witness did personally appear
` and acknowledge that:
`
`12
`
` They have read the transcript;
`13 They signed the foregoing Sworn
` Statement; and
`14 Their execution of this Statement is of
` their free act and deed.
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
` I have affixed my name and official seal
`
` this ______ day of_____________________, 20____.
`
` ___________________________________
`18 Notary Public
`19 ___________________________________
` Commission Expiration Date
`
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 347
`
`Page 349
`
`1 ERRATA SHEET
` VERITEXT LEGAL SOLUTIONS MIDWEST
`2 ASSIGNMENT NO: 4324177
`3 PAGE/LINE(S) / CHANGE /REASON
`4 ___________________________________________________
`5 ___________________________________________________
`6 ___________________________________________________
`7 ___________________________________________________
`8 ___________________________________________________
`9 ___________________________________________________
`10 ___________________________________________________
`11 ___________________________________________________
`12 ___________________________________________________
`13 ___________________________________________________
`14 ___________________________________________________
`15 ___________________________________________________
`16 ___________________________________________________
`17 ___________________________________________________
`18 ___________________________________________________
`19
`
` _______________ ________________________
`20 Date Ryan Donahoe
`21 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS ________
`22 DAY OF ________________________, 20______ .
`23 ___________________________________
` Notary Public
`
`24
`
` ___________________________________
`25 Commission Expiration Date
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`88 (Pages 346 - 349)
`
`888-391-3376
`
`EXHIBIT 11, Page 157 of 159
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 342-12 Filed 10/29/21 PageID.31469 Page 9 of
`10
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ERRATA SHEET FOR THE TRANSCRIPT OF:
`
`Case Name: NuVasive, Inc. v. Alphatec Holdings, Inc., et al.
`
`Deponent:
`
`Ryan Donahoe
`
`Dep. Date: November 6, 2020
`
`I wish to make the following changes for the following reasons:
`
`Pg. Ln. Now Reads
`
`Should Read
`
`253 15
`
`“There are more bolded versions of
`the CoRoent XL implants.”
`
`“There are more versions of the CoRoent XL
`implants.”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_____________________________________________
`Ryan Donahoe
`
`
`This ________ day of ________, 2020
`
`10th
`
`December
`
`EXHIBIT 11, Page 158 of 159
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 342-12 Filed 10/29/21 PageID.31470 Page 10 of
`10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF DEPONENT
`
`I, Ryan Donahoe, declare under penalty of perjury that I have read and examined the foregoing
`
`transcript of my deposition taken on November 6, 2020, and that the same is a true, correct and
`
`complete transcription of the testimony given by me and any corrections appears on the
`
`attached Errata Sheet signed by me.
`
`DATED: ______ day of _________, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`________________________________________
`Ryan Donahoe
`
`10th
`
`December
`
`EXHIBIT 11, Page 159 of 159
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket