Case 3:14-cv-02235-DMS-BLM Document 449 Filed 07/22/18 PageID.21998 Page 1 of 5
`
`
`
`Allison H. Goddard (211098)
` ali@pattersonlawgroup.com
`PATTERSON LAW GROUP
`402 West Broadway, 29th Floor
`San Diego, CA 92101
`(619) 398-4760
`(619) 756-6991 (facsimile)
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff,
`Wi-LAN Inc.
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN DIEGO
`
`
`
`
` )))))))))))))
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`WI-LAN INC.,
`
`vs.
`APPLE INC.,
`
`
`No. 3:14-cv-1507-DMS-BLM; (Lead Case
`No. 3:14-cv-2235-DMS-BLM)
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`STIPULATION REGARDING PRIOR
`LITIGATION, WILLFULNESS, AND
`INDUCED INFRINGEMENT
`
`Department: 13A
`Judge: Hon. Dana M. Sabraw
`Magistrate: Hon. Barbara L. Major
`
`
`Case No. 3:14-cv-01507-DMS-BLM
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATION REGARDING PRIOR LITIGATION,
`WILLFULNESS, AND INDUCED INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:14-cv-02235-DMS-BLM Document 449 Filed 07/22/18 PageID.21999 Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
`Apple Inc. (“Apple”) and Wi-LAN, Inc. (“Wi-LAN”) (collectively the “Parties”),
`by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
`WHEREAS, on July 20, 2018, the Court issued its Order ruling on the Parties’
`Motions in Limine;
`WHEREAS, on July 21, 2018, Wi-LAN submitted a letter requesting
`reconsideration of the Court’s ruling on Wi-LAN’s Motion in Limine No. 3;
`WHEREAS, upon further consideration, the Parties agree to certain stipulations
`to remove this issue from the Court’s docket;
`NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED:
`1. Wi-LAN will dismiss its willful and induced infringement claims with
`prejudice.
`2. The Parties will not argue or offer evidence regarding the prior litigation
`history between Apple and Wi-LAN, except as set forth below in paragraph 5.
`3. Wi-LAN will not state or argue that Apple is the only or the rare mobile device
`manufacturer/company which has not entered into a license agreement with Wi-LAN.
`However, this agreement does not prevent Wi-LAN from offering its licenses with
`handset manufacturers into evidence, and does not prevent Wi-LAN from referencing
`that evidence in opening and closing.
`4. Wi-LAN will not argue that litigation with Wi-LAN justifies an upward
`adjustment of any license or that litigation between the Parties justifies an upward
`adjustment. However, this agreement does not prevent Wi-LAN from offering
`testimony that the hypothetical negotiation requires an assumption that U.S. Patents
`8,457,145 and 8,537,757 are valid and infringed. This agreement also does not prevent
`Wi-LAN from offering testimony and evidence that in many cases Wi-LAN’s licensees
`were free to challenge validity and infringement, and that the rates and/or payments of
`those licenses should be adjusted upward to reflect this difference.
`5. The Parties agree that they can cross-examine experts with their or other
`experts’ prior statements or expert opinions from other cases so long as the cross
`STIPULATION REGARDING PRIOR LITIGATION,
`-2-
`Case No. 3:14-cv-01507-DMS-BLM
`WILLFULNESS, AND INDUCED INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:14-cv-02235-DMS-BLM Document 449 Filed 07/22/18 PageID.22000 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`examination is done in a way not to disclose any prior litigations between Apple and
`Wi-LAN. The Parties also agree that they can cross-examine experts about the number
`of times they have testified adverse to one of the Parties in prior cases.
`
`SO STIPULATED by the Parties through their undersigned counsel:
`
`Dated: July 22, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Mike McKool
` Allison H. Goddard (211098)
` PATTERSON LAW GROUP
` 402 West Broadway, 29th Floor
` San Diego, CA 92101
` (619) 398-4760
` (619) 756-6991 (facsimile)
`
` Mike McKool
` Ashley Moore
` Warren Lipschitz
` MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
` 300 Crescent Court
` Dallas, TX 75201
` (214) 978-4000
` (214) 978-4044 (facsimile)
`
` Robert Cote
` Brett Cooper
` Jonathan Yim
` Kevin Schubert
` Christopher McNett (298893)
` MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
` One Bryant Park, 47th Floor
` New York, NY 10036
` (212) 402-9400
` (212) 402-9444 (facsimile)
`
` Steve Pollinger
` Seth Hasenour
` MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
` 300 W. 6th Street, Suite 1700
` Austin, TX 78701
` (512) 692-8700
` (512) 692-8744 (facsimile)
`
` Attorneys for Wi-LAN Inc.
`
`
`STIPULATION REGARDING PRIOR LITIGATION,
`WILLFULNESS, AND INDUCED INFRINGEMENT
`
`-3-
`
`Case No. 3:14-cv-01507-DMS-BLM
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:14-cv-02235-DMS-BLM Document 449 Filed 07/22/18 PageID.22001 Page 4 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ John Allcock
`
` John Allcock
` Sean C. Cunningham
` Erin Gibson
` Robert Buergi
` Robert Williams
` Tiffany Miller
` Jacob Anderson
` Amy Walters
`
` DLA Piper LLP
` 401 B Street, Suite 1700
` San Diego, California 92101-4297
` (619) 699-2828
` (619) 764-6628
`
`
` Attorneys for Apple Inc.
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: _____________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_________________________________
`HON. DANA M. SABRAW
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`STIPULATION REGARDING PRIOR LITIGATION,
`WILLFULNESS, AND INDUCED INFRINGEMENT
`
`-4-
`
`Case No. 3:14-cv-01507-DMS-BLM
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:14-cv-02235-DMS-BLM Document 449 Filed 07/22/18 PageID.22002 Page 5 of 5
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on July 22, 2018, I caused a copy of this pleading to be
`
`delivered via CM/ECF on the counsel of record.
`
`
`Dated: July 22, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Mike McKool
` Mike McKool
` mmckool@mckoolsmith.com
`
` MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
` 300 Crescent Court
` Dallas, TX 75201
` (214) 978-4000
` (214) 978-4044 (facsimile)
`
` Attorneys for Wi-LAN Inc.
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`STIPULATION REGARDING PRIOR LITIGATION,
`WILLFULNESS, AND INDUCED INFRINGEMENT
`
`-5-
`
`Case No. 3:14-cv-01507-DMS-BLM
`
`
`
`