`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`CASE No C
`
`ADR CERTIFICATION BY
`PARTIES AND COUNSEL
`
`
`Plaintiff(s)
`
`Defendant(s)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8(b) and ADR L.R. 3-5 (b), each of the undersigned certifies that he or
`she has:
`
`
`1) Read the handbook entitled “Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedures Handbook”
`(available at cand.uscourts.gov/adr).
`2) Discussed with each other the available dispute resolution options provided by the Court
`and private entities; and
`3) Considered whether this case might benefit from any of the available dispute resolution
`options.
`
`Date:
`
`Date:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Party
`
`Attorney
`
`Counsel further certifies that he or she has discussed the selection of an ADR process with
`counsel for the other parties to the case. Based on that discussion, the parties:
` intend to stipulate to an ADR process
` prefer to discuss ADR selection with the Assigned Judge at the case management
`conference
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date:
`
`
`
`Attorney
`
`Important! E-file this form in ECF using event name: “ADR Certification (ADR LR 3-5 b) of Discussion of ADR
`Options.”
`
`Form ADR-Cert rev. 1-15-2019
`
`Twitter, Inc.
`
`VoIP-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`3:21-cv-9773-JD
`
`3/1/2022
`
`/s/Emil Malak
`
`3/1/2022
`
`/s/Lewis E. Hudnell, III
`
`n
`
`3/1/2022
`
`/s/Lewis E. Hudnell, III
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 29 Filed 03/01/22 Page 2 of 2
`
`ATTESTATION
`Under Civ. L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been
`obtained from the signatory indicated by a ‘conformed’ signature (/s/) within this e-filed
`document.
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Lewis E. Hudnell, III
`Lewis E. Hudnell, III
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
