`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-2769-LHK
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`DENYING SUA SPONTE JUDICIAL
`REFERRAL TO CONSIDER WHETHER
`CASES SHOULD BE RELATED
`(Civil L.R. 3-12 and 7-11)
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-9773-EJD
`
`
`
`
`
`TWITTER, INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`v.
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`TWITTER, INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`v.
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`
`This Court, having reviewed VoIP-Pal’s Opposition to the Sua Sponte Judicial Referral To
`Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related and Defendant’s Opposition, DENIES the referral.
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`Dated: ______________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_______________________________________
`Honorable Lucy H. Koh
`United States District Judge
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SUA SPONTE JUDICIAL REFERRAL TO CONSIDER
`WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED
`5:21-cv-2769-LHK; 5:21-cv-9773-EJD
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`