throbber
Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 340 Filed 01/13/21 Page 1 of 4
`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 340 Filed 01/13/21 Page 1 of 4
`
`EXHIBIT 25
`
`EXHIBIT 25
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 340 Filed 01/13/21 Page 2 of 4
`
` PAGES 1 - 70
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`BEFORE THE HONORABLE VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI
`FINJAN, INC., A DELAWARE )
`CORPORATION, )
` )
` PLAINTIFF, )
` )
` VS. ) CASE NO. 17-CV-4467 BLF
` )
`SONICWALL, INC., A DELAWARE )
`CORPORATION, )
` ) SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA
` DEFENDANT. ) TUESDAY
` ) OCTOBER 29, 2019
`___________________________________)
`
`
`TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS OF THE OFFICIAL ELECTRONIC SOUND
`RECORDING 10:33 A.M. - 12:00 NOON
`
`APPEARANCES:
` FOR PLAINTIFF KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`990 MARSH ROAD
`MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA 94025
` BY: JAMES R. HANNAH, ESQUIRE
` AAKASH JARIWALA, ESQUIRE
`
` FOR DEFENDANT
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`1075 PEACHTREE STREET NE, SUITE 200
`ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30309
` BY: ROBIN L. MCGRATH, ESQUIRE
`
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`30 SOUTH 17TH STREET
`PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19103
` BY: JARRAD M. GUNTHER, ESQUIRE
`
`
`
`
`TRANSCRIBED BY: JOAN MARIE COLUMBINI, CSR #5435, RPR
` RETIRED OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER, USDC
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 340 Filed 01/13/21 Page 3 of 4
`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 340 Filed 01/13/21 Page 3 of 4
`
` 22
`
`22
`
`MR. GUNTHER: YES.
`
`THE COURT:
`
`OKAY.
`
`ALL RIGHT.
`
`THANK YOU FOR THAT.
`
`LET ME TURN TO THE PLAINTIFFS AND GET THEIR VIEWS ON
`
`THAT ISSUE.
`
`SO WILL IT BE MR. HANNAH?
`
`MR. HANNAH: YES, YOUR HONOR.
`
`MAY IT PLEASE THE
`
`COURT, THANK YOU.
`
`THE COURT:
`
`SO LET ME -- I WOULD LIKE TO GET YOUR
`
`RESPONSE TO THE POINTS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE, BUT I WANT TO START
`
`WITH THE BASIC QUESTION OF THE INFRINGEMENT THEORY.
`
`IS THERE AN INFRINGEMENT THEORY THAT FINIGAN HAS THAT
`
`THE GATEWAY PRODUCT AND THE ESA PRODUCT INFRINGE WITHOUT
`
`CONNECTING TO ANY SANDBOX IN THE CLOUD?
`
`MR. HANNAH:
`
`SO IF I CA
`
`-- IF I CAN BACK UP -- BACK
`
`UP A LITTLE BIT?
`
`MR. GUNTHER: YES.
`THE COURT: OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU FOR THAT.
`LET ME TURN TO THE PLAINTIFFS AND GET THEIR VIEWS ON
`THAT ISSUE. SO WILL IT BE MR. HANNAH?
`MR. HANNAH: YES, YOUR HONOR. MAY IT PLEASE THE
`COURT, THANK YOU.
`THE COURT: SO LET ME -- I WOULD LIKE TO GET YOUR
`RESPONSE TO THE POINTS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE, BUT I WANT TO START
`WITH THE BASIC QUESTION OF THE INFRINGEMENT THEORY.
`IS THERE AN INFRINGEMENT THEORY THAT FINIGAN HAS THAT
`THE GATEWAY PRODUCT AND THE ESA PRODUCT INFRINGE WITHOUT
`CONNECTING TO ANY SANDBOX IN THE CLOUD?
`MR. HANNAH: SO IF I CAN -- IF I CAN BACK UP -- BACK
`UP A LITTLE BIT?
`THE WAY THAT THESE PRODUCTS WORK AND WHAT WE'VE
`THE WAY THAT THESE PRODUCTS WORK AND WHAT WE'VE
`ACCUSED IS WE'VE ACCUSED THE GATEWAY BY ITSELF AS IT'S SOLD,
`ACCUSED IS WE'VE ACCUSED THE GATEWAY BY ITSELF AS IT'S SOLD,
`AND THEN THE ESA BY ITSELF AS IT'S SOLD, AND THEN CAPTURE ATP.
`AND THEN THE ESA BY ITSELF AS IT'S SOLD, AND THEN CAPTURE ATP.
`IT'S A SEPARATE PRODUCT. SEPARATE, IT'S SOLD SEPARATELY.
`IT'S A SEPARATE PRODUCT. SEPARATE, IT'S SOLD SEPARATELY.
`THE GATEWAY BY ITSELF INCLUDES CLOUD AV AND GRID.
`THAT COMES WITH THE GATEWAY PRODUCT. I DISAGREE WHOLEHEARTEDLY
`WITH WHAT COUNSEL JUST SAID THAT WOULD THE GATEWAY PRODUCT WORK
`WITHOUT CLOUD AV AND GRID, ABSOLUTELY NOT.
`(SIMULTANEOUS COLLOQUY.)
`THE COURT: JUST A MINUTE. JUST SO I UNDERSTAND THE
`TERMINOLOGY, CLOUD AV AND GRID ARE NOT SAME THING AS CLOUD AV
`
`TERMINOLOGY, CLOUD AV AND GRID ARE NOT SAME THING AS CLOUD AV
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`THE GATEWAY BY ITSELF INCLUDES CLOUD AV AND GRID.
`
`THAT COMES WITH THE GATEWAY PRODUCT.
`
`I DISAGREE WHOLEHEARTEDLY
`
`WITH WHAT COUNSEL JUST SAID THAT WOULD THE GATEWAY PRODUCT WORK
`
`WITHOUT CLOUD AV AND GRID, ABSOLUTELY NOT.
`
`(SIMULTANEOUS COLLOQUY.)
`
`THE COURT:
`
`JUST A MINUTE.
`
`JUST SO I UNDERSTAND THE
`
`JOAN MARIE COLUMBINI, CSR, RPR
`JOAN.MARIE COLUMBINI, CSR, RPR
`RETIRED OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER, USDC
`RETIRED OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER, USDC
`510-367-3043
`510-367-3043
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 340 Filed 01/13/21 Page 4 of 4
`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 340 Filed 01/13/21 Page 4 of 4
`
` 28
`
`28
`
`MR. HANNAH:
`
`RIGHT.
`
`SO THAT'S THE CAPTURE -- I'M
`
`SORRY.
`
`SO ON THE BOX IS THE CLOUD -- THAT CLOUD AV AND THE
`
`THREAT GRID INFORMATION, GOING FROM GRID TO THE CLOUD -- TO
`
`THAT COMPONENT.
`
`THE COURT:
`
`SO YOU'RE ACCUSING EVERYTHING EXCEPT THIS
`
`INTERACTION WITH THE SONICWALL CAPTURE CLOUD SERVICE WHEN YOU
`
`SAY "GATEWAY ONLY"?
`
`MR. HANNAH:
`
`GATEWAY OR ESA, CORRECT, BECAUSE THAT'S
`
`THE FUNCTIONALITY YOU GET WHEN YOU BUY THE PRODUCT.
`
`MR. HANNAH: RIGHT. SO THAT'S THE CAPTURE -- I'M
`SORRY. SO ON THE BOX IS THE CLOUD -- THAT CLOUD AV AND THE
`THREAT GRID INFORMATION, GOING FROM GRID TO THE CLOUD -- TO
`THAT COMPONENT.
`THIS BACK AND FORTH WHERE IT SAYS THE FILE VERDICT,
`THIS BACK AND FORTH WHERE IT SAYS THE FILE VERDICT,
`THAT IS WHEN YOU'RE ACTUALLY SENDING A FILE UP TO THE CLOUD,
`THAT IS WHEN YOU'RE ACTUALLY SENDING A FILE UP TO THE CLOUD,
`AND THEN IT, IN TURN, WILL SEND INFORMATION BACK BASED ON
`AND THEN IT, IN TURN, WILL SEND INFORMATION BACK BASED ON
`WHATEVER SANDBOXING THAT YOU DO THROUGH CAPTURE ATP.
`WHATEVER SANDBOXING THAT YOU DO THROUGH CAPTURE ATP.
`THAT IS A SEPARATE PRODUCT. THAT'S A SEPARATE
`THAT IS A SEPARATE PRODUCT. THAT'S A SEPARATE
`SERVICE THAT YOU PAY FOR. THAT'S AN INTERACTION WHERE YOU'RE
`SERVICE THAT YOU PAY FOR. THAT'S AN INTERACTION WHERE YOU'RE
`CONNECTING TO THE CLOUD IN ORDER TO SEND INFORMATION UP AND GET
`CONNECTING TO THE CLOUD IN ORDER TO SEND INFORMATION UP AND GET
`INFORMATION BACK. YOU'RE NOT -- WHEN YOU BUY THE GATEWAY, FROM
`INFORMATION BACK. YOU'RE NOT -- WHEN YOU BUY THE GATEWAY, FROM
`WHAT I UNDERSTAND BASED ON THE INFORMATION WE HAVE SO FAR, YOU
`WHAT I UNDERSTAND BASED ON THE INFORMATION WE HAVE SO FAR, YOU
`DON'T GET THAT FUNCTIONALITY. YOU HAVE TO PAY FOR THAT
`DON'T GET THAT FUNCTIONALITY. YOU HAVE TO PAY FOR THAT
`FUNCTIONALITY WITH CAPTURE ATP.
`FUNCTIONALITY WITH CAPTURE ATP.
`THE COURT: SO YOU'RE ACCUSING EVERYTHING EXCEPT THIS
`INTERACTION WITH THE SONICWALL CAPTURE CLOUD SERVICE WHEN YOU
`SAY "GATEWAY ONLY"?
`MR. HANNAH: GATEWAY OR ESA, CORRECT, BECAUSE THAT'S
`THE FUNCTIONALITY YOU GET WHEN YOU BUY THE PRODUCT.
`THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. SO NEXT QUESTION IS --
`MR. HANNAH: YES.
`THE COURT: IF THAT'S THE CASE, WHY DIDN'T YOU ACCUSE
`IT IN THE FIRST PLACE?
`MR. HANNAH: I BELIEVE WE DID. THAT'S THROUGHOUT OUR
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`THAT'S THROUGHOUT OUR
`
`THE COURT:
`
`ALL RIGHT.
`
`SO NEXT QUESTION IS --
`
`MR. HANNAH: YES.
`
`THE COURT:
`
`IF THAT'S THE CASE, WHY DIDN'T YOU ACCUSE
`
`IT IN THE FIRST PLACE?
`
`MR. HANNAH:
`
`I BELIEVE WE DID.
`
`JOAN MARIE COLUMBINI, CSR, RPR
`JOAN.MARIE COLUMBINI, CSR, RPR
`RETIRED OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER, USDC
`RETIRED OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER, USDC
`510-367-3043
`510-367-3043
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket