`Case 5:l5—cv—O2008—EJD Document 87-2 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 16
`
`EXHIBIT 16
`
`
`
`Case 5:15-cv-02008-EJD Document 87-2 Filed 04/19/16 Page 2 of 2
`
`~~,-- --
`I
`
`f\
`
`.,1
`
`J
`
`Interview Summary
`
`,,--
`All participants (applicant, applicant's representative, PTO personnel):
`
`I Applid~nt(s)
`
`Application No.
`091054,740
`Examiner
`
`John w. Miller
`
`Wolzlen
`I Group Art Unit
`2611
`
`I
`
`(1) John W Miller
`
`(2) Scott Dovie
`
`Date of Interview
`
`Oct 27 2000
`
`(3) Thomas Wolzien
`
`(4)
`
`Type·
`
`[]relephonic
`
`~ersonal (copy is given to @Ii cant
`
`ai:!Q]icant's representative).
`
`Exhibit shown or demonstration conducted:
`
`~s !®. If yes, brief description
`
`Agreement L]Nas reached.
`
`!)@as not reached.
`
`Claim(s) discussed: all
`
`Identification of prior art discussed:
`_Throckmorton et al (441)
`
`Description of the general nature of what was agreed to if an agreement was reached, or any other comments:
`AgpJicant 12ro12osed adding lanquaqe to the claims to indicate the 'automatic' electronic extraction of address data and the
`establishment of a 'direct link', initiated b'f.. the user, to an online information source These features if added to the claims
`would likel'f.. render them allowable over Throckmorton et al alone. That is the 12rior art discloses the selection of a source of
`information from a menu of sources each associated with 12ointers to the sources rather than a user-initiated automatic and
`direct link to the sources.
`
`1.
`
`--·
`
`(A fuller description, if necessary, and a copy of the amendments, if available, which the examiner agreed would render
`the claims allowable must be attached. Also, where no copy of the amendents which would render the claims allowable
`is available, a summary thereof must be attached )
`1 ~ It is not necessary for applicant to provide a separate record of the substance of the interview.
`Unless the paragraph above has been checked to indicate to the contrary, f.1 FORMAL WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE LAST
`OFFICE ACTION IS NOT WAIVED AND MUST INCLUDE THE SUBSTANCE OF THE INTERVIEW (See MPEP Section
`713 04). If a response to the last Office action has already been filed, APPLICANT IS GIVEN ONE MONTH FROM THIS
`INTERVIEW DATE TO FILE A STATEMENT OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE INTCRVIEW
`2 .--1 Since the Examiner's interview summary above (including any attachments) reflects a complete response to
`'-
`each of the objections, rejections and requirements that may be present in the last Office action, and since the
`claims are now allowable, this completed form is considered to fulfill the response requirements of the last
`Office action. Applicant is not relieved from providing a separate record of the interview unless box 1 above
`1s also checked.
`
`!'"""" '°" '°" m"" "'" '"" e<omp '""Wm""''°'' io'" •U.ohm'"' '" • "'""' °'"" """"
`
`I=! lent and Trademark Office
`413 (Rev. 10-95)
`
`~<27,__z£ >--
`
`/ / JOHN W. MILLER
`PRIMARY EXAMINER
`ART UNIT 2611
`
`Interview Summary
`
`Paper No.
`
`13
`
`OPENTV2008-00001620