throbber
Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 195-1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 1 of 9
`
`RYAN R. SMITH (SBN 229323)
`rsmith@wsgr.com
`CHRISTOPHER D. MAYS (SBN 266510)
`cmays@wsgr.com
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH &
`ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`650 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
`Telephone: (650) 493-9300
`Facsimile: (650) 493-6811
`
`EDWARD G. POPLAWSKI (SBN 113590)
`epoplawski@wsgr.com
`OLIVIA M. KIM (SBN 228382)
`okim@wsgr.com
`TALIN GORDNIA (SBN 274213)
`tgordnia@wsgr.com
`STEPHANIE C. CHENG (SBN 319856)
`stephanie.cheng@wsgr.com
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH &
`ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1550
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Telephone: (323) 210-2901
`Facsimile: (866) 974-7329
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`QUALYS INC.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`
`CASE NO.: 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`QUALYS’S RESPONSIVE SEPARATE
`STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED
`MATERIAL FACTS
`
`)))))))))))
`
`FINJAN LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`QUALYS INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`-1-
`
`QUALYS’S RESPONSIVE SEPARATE STATEMENT OF
`UNDISPUTED FACTS
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 195-1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 2 of 9
`
`Issue 1
`(Qualys
`cannot
`establish
`DSAVT is
`admissible
`as prior
`art)
`
`Issue 1
`
`Pursuant to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers’ Standing Order in Civil Case Rule 9(c),
`Qualys Inc. (“Qualys”) hereby submits the following Responsive Separate Statement:
`Issue No.
`Finjan’s Undisputed Material
`Opposing Party’s Response and
`Facts and Supporting Evidence
`Supporting Evidence
`Fact 1. Qualys offered no evidence
`Disputed.
`Hall-Ellis
`personally
`from
`anyone with
`personal
`reviewed a physical copy of DSAVT in
`knowledge that DSAVT is authentic
`her analysis for the Juniper matter. That
`or was publicly accessible before
`physical copy of DSAVT is materially
`November 6, 1997.
`identical
`to
`the DSAVT reference
`produced in this matter. Hall-Ellis's
`Exh. 1 (Hall-Ellis Dep. Tr.) at
`review of the scanned copy of DSAVT’s
`40:11-18, and 41:12-22, 44:21-45,
`printed copyright date also constitutes
`50:5-9, 51:15-19
`personal knowledge. Hall-Ellis also has
`personal knowledge of the publication
`dates from her review of the MARC
`record she personally retrieved.
`Hall-Ellis Decl. at ¶¶ 6-18.
`Mays Decl. at ¶ 2.
`Ex. 34 (Hall-Ellis Expert Report) at ¶
`56-61.
`Disputed. Dr. Hall-Ellis’s opinion
`regarding the public accessibility of
`DSAVT was based on a library catalog
`record for a different “manifestation” of
`the same book, which she explains
`means a different printing of the same
`book, not a different book.
`Hall-Ellis Decl. at ¶¶ 6-18.
`Ex. 34 (Hall-Ellis Expert Report) at ¶¶
`56-61.
`Ex. 38 (Hall-Ellis Dep. Tr.) at 43:20-
`44:20; 46:15-47:12; 48:16-50:4; 51:15-
`22.
`D.I. 192-4 at 27 (Hall-Ellis Expert
`Report, Attachment 2a, MARC record
`for DSAVT).
`D.I. 192-3 at QUALYS00002805-807,
`QUALYS00003045 (DSAVT).
`Disputed.
`Hall-Ellis
`personally
`reviewed a physical copy of DSAVT in
`her analysis for the Juniper matter,
`which was provided to her by Juniper’s
`counsel. In this case, Qualys obtained
`the digital copy of DSAVT at issue in
`this motion from Juniper’s counsel. The
`physical copy of DSAVT is materially
`identical
`to
`the DSAVT reference
`produced
`in
`this matter, which
`is
`different printing of
`the DSAVT
`reference described
`in
`the MARC
`record.
`QUALYS’S RESPONSIVE SEPARATE STATEMENT OF
`UNDISPUTED FACTS
`
`Fact 2. Dr. Hall-Ellis’ opinion
`regarding the public accessibility of
`DSAVT was based on a library
`catalog
`record
`for a different
`reference.
`Exh. 1 (Hall-Ellis Dep. Tr.) at 36:3-
`16, 40:11-18, 43:13-15, 41:21-22,
`44:21-45, 47:13-48:5, 48:9-51:19
`Exh. 3 (Hall-Ellis Ex. Rep.) at ¶¶ 59-
`60 and Attachment 2a [MARC
`Record for a different Reference]
`Exh. 2
`(QUALYS00002807/DSAVT
`Reference Relied on by Qualys) at
`2807
`
`Issue 1
`
`Fact 3. Dr. Hall-Ellis’ had not seen
`or inspected the contents of the
`DSAVT reference that corresponds
`to the library catalog she relies on to
`support her opinion regarding the
`DSAVT.
`Exh. 1 (Hall-Ellis Dep. Tr.) at
`40:20-41:7, 50:5-9
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`-2-
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 195-1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 3 of 9
`
`Hall-Ellis Decl. at ¶¶ 6-18.
`Mays Decl. at ¶ 2.
`Ex. 34 (Hall-Ellis Expert Report) at ¶
`56-61.
`Ex. 38 (Hall-Ellis Dep. Tr.) at 43:20-
`44:20; 46:15-47:12; 48:16-50:4; 51:15-
`22.
`D.I. 192-4 at 27. (Hall-Ellis Expert
`Report, Attachment 2a, MARC record
`for DSAVT).
`D.I. 192-3 at QUALYS00002805-807,
`QUALYS00003045 (DSAVT).
`Disputed.
`Hall-Ellis
`personally
`retrieved Mounji from CiteSeerx and
`reviewed
`its contents, which she
`concluded was complete and unaltered.
`Hall-Ellis also personally reviewed the
`publication date listed on the face of
`Mounji and the date listed in CiteSeerx
`to conclude that Mounji was publicly
`available before November 6, 1997.
`Hall-Ellis Decl. at ¶¶ 19, 24.
`Ex. 34 (Hall-Ellis Expert Report) at ¶¶
`102-106.
`Ex. 38 (Hall-Ellis Dep. Tr.) at 54:25-
`57:1; 58:24-59:7.
`Undisputed.
`
`Undisputed.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Issue 2
`(Qualys
`cannot
`establish
`Mounji is
`admissible
`as prior
`art)
`
`Fact 4. Qualys offered no evidence
`from
`anyone with
`personal
`knowledge that Mounji is authentic
`or was publicly accessible before
`November 6, 1997.
`Exh. 1 (Hall-Ellis Dep. Tr.) at 24:5-
`13, 55:8-18, 56:4-57:1, 57:10-12,
`60:16-24, 61:1-18, 72:14-23
`
`Issue 2
`
`Issue 2
`
`Fact 5. Qualys offered no evidence
`that
`the Mounji reference was
`publicly accessible on the CiteSeerX
`website before November 6, 1997.
`Exh. 3 (Hall-Ellis Exp. Rep.) at ¶¶
`104-05
`Exh. 1 (Hall-Ellis Dep. Tr.) at 75:1-
`15
`(Hall-Ellis Dep. Ex.
`Exh. 5
`8/CiteSeer Wikipedia page)
`
`Fact 6. Qualys offered no evidence
`that
`the Mounji reference was
`publicly
`accessible
`on
`the
`ResearchGate website
`before
`November 6, 1997.
`Exh. 3 (Hall-Ellis Exp. Rep.) at ¶¶
`104-05
`Exh. 1 (Hall-Ellis Dep. Tr.) at
`76:16-18
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`-3-
`
`QUALYS’S RESPONSIVE SEPARATE STATEMENT OF
`UNDISPUTED FACTS
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 195-1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 4 of 9
`
`personally
`Hall-Ellis
`Disputed.
`retrieved Thompson from Semantic
`Scholar. Hall-Ellis also personally
`reviewed
`the
`landing
`page
`of
`ResearchGate for Thomson to conclude
`that Thomson was publicly available
`before November 6, 1997.
`Hall-Ellis Decl. at ¶¶ 19, 23.
`Ex. 34 (Hall-Ellis Expert Report) at ¶¶
`115-119.
`Ex. 38 (Hall-Ellis Dep. Tr.) at 63:18-
`20; 64:16-65:19; 73:4-9.
`Undisputed.
`
`Exh. 6 (Hall-Ellis Dep. Ex. 9/
`ResearchGate Informational Page)
`
`Issue 3
`(Qualys
`cannot
`establish
`Thomson
`is
`admissible
`as prior
`art)
`
`Fact 7. Qualys offered no evidence
`from
`anyone with
`personal
`knowledge
`that Thomson
`is
`authentic or was publicly accessible
`before November 6, 1997.
`Exh. 1 (Hall-Ellis Dep. Tr.) at 24:5-
`13, 63:24-25, 64:25-65:12, 65:20-
`23, 67:6-9, 73:10-19
`
`Fact 8. Qualys offered no evidence
`that the Thomson reference was
`publicly
`accessible
`on
`the
`ResearchGate website
`before
`November 6, 1997.
`Exh. 3 (Hall-Ellis Exp. Rep.) at ¶¶
`116-17
`Exh. 1 (Hall-Ellis Dep. Tr.) at
`76:16-18
`Exh. 6 (Hall-Ellis Dep. Ex. 9/
`(ResearchGate Informational Page)
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Issue 3
`
`Issue 3
`
`Issue 1
`
`Undisputed.
`
`Fact 9. Qualys offered no evidence
`that the Thomson reference was
`publicly accessible on the Semantic
`Scholar website before November 6,
`1997.
`Exh. 3 (Hall-Ellis Exp. Rep.) at ¶¶
`23, 116-17
`Exh. 1 (Hall-Ellis Dep. Tr.) at 27:1-
`6, 77:25-78:2
`OPPOSING PARTY’S ADDITIONAL MATERIAL FACTS
`Additional Fact 1. Hall-Ellis has opined
`that the produced DSAVT reference is
`not in a condition that creates suspicion
`about its authenticity as it is unaltered
`and complete.
`Hall-Ellis Decl. at ¶ 12.
`Ex. 34 (Hall-Ellis Expert Report) at ¶
`56.
`Ex. 39 (DSAVT).
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`-4-
`
`QUALYS’S RESPONSIVE SEPARATE STATEMENT OF
`UNDISPUTED FACTS
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 195-1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 5 of 9
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Issue 2.
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`-5-
`
`Additional Fact 2. The copyright page
`of
`the DSAVT
`reference
`lists a
`copyright date of 1995 and an “edition
`date” of November 1995.
`Hall-Ellis Decl. at ¶ 12.
`Ex. 34 (Hall-Ellis Expert Report) at ¶
`56.
`D.I. 192-3 at QUALYS00002807.
`Additional Fact 3. The DSAVT MARC
`record bears the same title as the
`DSAVT reference.
`Hall-Ellis Decl.at ¶¶ 11-18.
`Ex. 34 (Hall-Ellis Expert Report) at ¶¶
`56, 59.
`D.I. 192-3 at QUALYS00002805.
`D.I. 192-4 at 27.
`Additional Fact 4. The DSAVT MARC
`record bears the same publisher (and
`publisher’s address) as listed in the
`DSAVT reference.
`Hall-Ellis Decl.at ¶¶ 11-18.
`Ex. 34 (Hall-Ellis Expert Report) at ¶
`56.
`D.I. 192-3 at QUALYS00002806,
`QUALYS00003045.
`D.I. 192-4 at 27.
`Additional Fact 5. The DSAVT MARC
`record bears the same copyright date
`and “edition date” as the DSAVT
`reference.
`Hall-Ellis Decl.at ¶¶ 11-18.
`Ex. 34 (Hall-Ellis Expert Report) at ¶
`56.
`D.I. 192-3 at QUALYS00002807.
`D.I. 192-4 at 27.
`Additional Fact 6. Stubblebine
`independently opined that DSAVT was
`publicly available before November 6,
`1997 based on of his review of two
`webpages.
`Stubblebine Decl. at ¶ 4.
`Ex. 36 (Stubblebine Depo Trans.) at
`23:15-24:7.
`Ex. 5 (Google books webpage).
`Ex. 28 (WinWorld webpage).
`Additional Fact 7. Hall-Ellis opined that
`the Mounji reference
`is not
`in a
`condition that creates suspicion about its
`authenticity as it is unaltered and
`complete.
`QUALYS’S RESPONSIVE SEPARATE STATEMENT OF
`UNDISPUTED FACTS
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 195-1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 6 of 9
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Issue 3.
`
`Hall-Ellis Decl. at ¶ 19.
`Ex. 34 (Hall-Ellis Expert Report) at ¶¶
`102-103, 106.
`Ex. 38 (Hall-Ellis Dep. Tr.) at 54:1-4.
`D.I. 192-5.
`Additional Fact 8. Hall-Ellis retrieved
`Mounji from CiteSeerx.
`Hall-Ellis Decl. at ¶ 19.
`Ex. 34 (Hall-Ellis Expert Report) at ¶¶
`102-103.
`Additional Fact 9. The Mounji reference
`bears a date of May 27, 1994.
`Hall-Ellis Decl. at ¶ 24.
`Ex. 34 (Hall-Ellis Expert Report) at ¶
`104.
`D.I. 192-5.
`Additional Fact 10. CiteSeerx indicated
`a 1994 date for Mounji.
`Hall-Ellis Decl. at ¶ 24.
`Ex. 34 (Hall-Ellis Expert Report) at ¶
`104.
`Additional Fact 11. Dr. Hall-Ellis
`opined
`that Mounji was publicly
`available before November 6, 1997
`based on her review of the Mounji
`reference itself and CiteSeerx.
`Hall-Ellis Decl. at ¶ 24.
`Ex. 34 (Hall-Ellis Expert Report) at ¶¶
`102-104.
`Ex. 38 (Hall-Ellis Dep. Tr.) at 54:25-
`57:1.
`Additional Fact 12. The Thomson
`reference is not in a condition that
`creates suspicion about its authenticity
`as it is unaltered and complete.
`Hall-Ellis Decl. at ¶ 19.
`Ex. 34 (Hall-Ellis Expert Report) at ¶¶
`115-116, 119.
`Ex. 38 (Hall-Ellis Dep. Tr.) at 63:8-11.
`D.I. 192-8.
`Additional Fact 13. Hall-Ellis retrieved
`Thomson from Semantic Scholar.
`Hall-Ellis Decl. at ¶ 19.
`Ex. 34 (Hall-Ellis Expert Report) at ¶¶
`115-116.
`Ex. 38 (Hall-Ellis Dep. Tr.) at 63:18-
`20.
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`-6-
`
`QUALYS’S RESPONSIVE SEPARATE STATEMENT OF
`UNDISPUTED FACTS
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 195-1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 7 of 9
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`-7-
`
`Additional Fact 14. The ResearchGate
`opening page for Thomson has a date
`of May 1997.
`Hall-Ellis Decl. at ¶ 23.
`Ex. 34 (Hall-Ellis Expert Report) at ¶
`117.
`Ex. 38 (Hall-Ellis Dep. Tr.) at 64:16-
`65:19.
`Additional Fact 15. Dr. Hall-Ellis
`opined that Thomson was publicly
`available before November 6, 1997
`based on her review of the Thomson
`reference and ResearchGate.
`Hall-Ellis Decl. at ¶ 23.
`Ex. 34 (Hall-Ellis Expert Report) at ¶¶
`115-119.
`Ex. 38 (Hall-Ellis Dep. Tr.) at 63:18-
`65:19; 73:4-9.
`Additional Fact 16. The Thomson
`reference is authored by Judi R.
`Thomson and bears a title of “Proxy
`Servers and Databases for Managing
`Web-based Information.”
`Ex. 34 (Hall-Ellis Expert Report) at ¶
`115.
`D.I. 192-8.
`Additional Fact 17. The Internet
`Archive screengrab of the University of
`Saskatchewan’s “1997 Graduate
`Student Symposium” webpage lists a
`paper entitled “Proxy Servers and
`Databases for Managing Web-based
`Information” by author Judi R.
`Thomson.
`Stubblebine Decl. at ¶ 5.
`Ex. 35 (Stubblebine Depo Ex. 31).
`Ex. 36 (Stubblebine Depo Trans.) at
`232:6-233:3.
`Additional Fact 18. The Internet
`Archive screengrab of the University of
`Saskatchewan’s “1997 Graduate
`Student Symposium” webpage states
`“This page last modified Wednesday
`August 27, 1997.”
`Stubblebine Decl. at ¶ 5.
`Ex. 35 (Stubblebine Depo Ex. 31).
`Ex. 36 (Stubblebine Depo Trans.) at
`233:8-234:7.
`Additional Fact 19. Dr. Stubblebine
`independently opines that Thomson was
`QUALYS’S RESPONSIVE SEPARATE STATEMENT OF
`UNDISPUTED FACTS
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 195-1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 8 of 9
`
`publicly available before November 6,
`1997 based on his review of an Internet
`Archive screengrab of the University of
`Saskatchewan’s
`“1997
`Graduate
`Student Symposium” webpage
`that
`published Judi R. Thomson’s “Proxy
`Servers and Databases for Managing
`Web-based Information.”
`Stubblebine Decl. at ¶¶ 5-6.
`Ex. 35 (Stubblebine Depo Ex. 31).
`Ex. 36 (Stubblebine Depo Trans.) at
`228:3-237:14.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`-8-
`
`QUALYS’S RESPONSIVE SEPARATE STATEMENT OF
`UNDISPUTED FACTS
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-07229-YGR Document 195-1 Filed 05/10/21 Page 9 of 9
`
`ATTESTATION
`I attest that the evidence cited herein fairly and accurately supports the facts as asserted.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`
`Dated: May 10, 2021
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Edward G. Poplawski
`EDWARD G. POPLAWSKI
`
`Counsel for
`QUALYS INC.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
`
`-9-
`
`QUALYS’S RESPONSIVE SEPARATE STATEMENT OF
`UNDISPUTED FACTS
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket