throbber
Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 63 Filed 04/15/19 Page 1 of 6
`
`
`
`Sarah G. Hartman (Cal. Bar No. 281751)
`shartman@brownrudnick.com
`Alfred R. Fabricant (pro hac vice)
`afabricant@brownrudnick.com
`Peter Lambrianakos (pro hac vice)
`plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III (pro hac vice)
`vrubino@brownrudnick.com
`Brown Rudnick LLP
`7 Times Square
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone:
`(212) 209-4800
`Facsimile:
`(212) 209-4801
`
`Arjun Sivakumar (Cal. Bar No. 297787)
`asivakumar@brownrudnick.com
`Brown Rudnick LLP
`2211 Michelson Drive, Seventh Floor
`Irvine, California 92612
`Telephone: (949) 752-7100
`Facsimile: (949) 252-1514
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`
`
` Case No. 18-cv-06185-HSG
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
`ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER
`(DKT. 25)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ZTE (USA) INC.,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC, et
`al.
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER,
`CASE NO. 18-cv-06185-HSG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 63 Filed 04/15/19 Page 2 of 6
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b), Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, and the
`
`
`
`
`
`Court’s Scheduling Order (Dkt. 25), Defendant AGIS Software Development LLC (“AGIS
`
`Software”) and Plaintiff ZTE (USA) Inc. (“ZTE”) (collectively, “the Parties”), hereby stipulate and
`
`agree as follows:
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, on October 9, 2018, ZTE filed its initial Complaint seeking a judicial
`
`declaration of non-infringement, invalidity, and/or unenforceability as to the patents-in-suit against
`
`AGIS Software, AGIS Holdings, Inc. (“AGIS Holdings”), and Advanced Ground Information
`
`Systems, Inc. (“AGIS, Inc.”) (Dkt. 1);
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, on December 31, 2018, ZTE filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”)
`
`removing AGIS Holdings and AGIS, Inc. as named defendants, but continuing to assert claims
`
`against AGIS Software (Dkt. 18);
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, on January 17, 2019, the Court signed and entered the Scheduling Order (Dkt.
`
`25), which set the following dates:
`Event
`Amendment of Complaint
`Defendant’s Disclosure of Asserted Claims
`and Infringement Contentions
`Defendant’s Production
`Deadline for the Parties to Submit a Proposed
`Protective Order
`Deadlines for the Parties to Submit a Proposed
`ESI Order
`Deadlines for the Parties to Submit a Proposed
`Discovery Order
`Plaintiff’s Invalidity Contentions
`Plaintiff’s Production
`Exchange Proposed Claim Terms
`Exchange Preliminary Claim Constructions
`and Extrinsic Evidence
`Damages Contentions
`Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing
`Statement
`Exchange Expert Declarations in Support of
`Claim Construction, if Any
`Responsive Damages Contentions
`Complete Claim Construction Discovery
`
`Date
`March 15, 2019
`April 15, 2019
`
`April 15, 2019
`April 22, 2019
`
`April 22, 2019
`
`April 22, 2019
`
`April 29, 2019
`April 29, 2019
`May 13, 2019
`June 3, 2019
`
`June 10, 2019
`June 12, 2019
`
`June 12, 2019
`
`July 8, 2019
`July 15, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER,
`CASE NO. 18-cv-06185-HSG
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 63 Filed 04/15/19 Page 3 of 6
`
`July 30, 2019
`Submit Opening Claim Construction Brief
`August 13, 2019
`Submit Responsive Claim Construction Brief
`August 20, 2019
`Submit Reply Claim Construction Brief
`September 11, 2019; 1:00 p.m.
`Claim Construction Hearing
`WHEREAS, after the Court entered the Scheduling Order, on February 5, 2019, ZTE filed a
`
`
`
`
`
`Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), removing ZTE’s claims of invalidity of the patents-in-suit;
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, on February 19, 2019, AGIS Software filed a Motion to Dismiss the SAC
`
`(“MTD”), with a hearing scheduled for May 9, 2019 (Dkt. 41);
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, on March 15, 2019, AGIS Software filed a Motion for Sanctions against ZTE,
`
`with a hearing scheduled for June 6, 2019 (Dkt. 48);
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, on April 4, 2019, in order to allow sufficient time for the Parties to complete
`
`mediation, the Court granted the Parties’ request to extend the ADR deadline from April 17, 2019 to
`
`June 21, 2019 (Dkt. 56);
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, on April 9, 2019, in accordance with the Court’s April 2, 2019 Order, ZTE
`
`resubmitted its opposition brief to the MTD (Dkt. 59);
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, also on April 9, 2019, the Parties confirmed with JAMS that they will engage
`
`in mediation on June 4, 2019 with Hon. James Ware (Ret.) as Mediator;
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, AGIS Software’s reply brief in response to ZTE’s resubmitted opposition to
`
`the MTD is due to be filed on April 16, 2019;
`
`
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, considering the status of the case, the pendency of the motions (including a
`
`dispositive motion) and the upcoming mediation, the Parties have agreed that good cause exists for a
`
`3 week extension of all upcoming deadlines set forth in the Scheduling Order, as such extension will
`
`permit more efficient case management, serve the interests in judicial economy, and ensure the most
`
`efficient use of the Court’s and the Parties’ resources;
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, the Parties have not previously requested an extension of these deadlines, and
`
`the Parties do not believe the requested 3-week extension of the currently-scheduled deadlines will
`
`have a material impact on the schedule for the case;
`/ / /
`/ / /
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER,
`CASE NO. 18-cv-06185-HSG
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 63 Filed 04/15/19 Page 4 of 6
`
`IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff and Defendant,
`
`through their respective undersigned counsel, that the upcoming deadlines set forth in the Scheduling
`
`Order (Dkt. 25) be continued by 3 weeks, as follows:
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Event
`Defendant’s Disclosure of
`Asserted Claims and
`Infringement Contentions
`Defendant’s Production
`Deadline for the Parties to
`Submit a Proposed Protective
`Order
`Deadlines for the Parties to
`Submit a Proposed ESI Order
`Deadlines for the Parties to
`Submit a Proposed Discovery
`Order
`Plaintiff’s Invalidity Contentions
`Plaintiff’s Production
`Exchange Proposed Claim Terms
`Exchange Preliminary Claim
`Constructions and Extrinsic
`Evidence
`Damages Contentions
`Joint Claim Construction and
`Prehearing Statement
`Exchange Expert Declarations in
`Support of Claim Construction,
`if Any
`Responsive Damages
`Contentions
`Complete Claim Construction
`Discovery
`Submit Opening Claim
`Construction Brief
`Submit Responsive Claim
`Construction Brief
`Submit Reply Claim
`Construction Brief
`Claim Construction Hearing
`
`Previous Dates
`April 15, 2019
`
`Amended Dates
`May 6, 2019
`
`April 15, 2019
`April 22, 2019
`
`April 22, 2019
`
`April 22, 2019
`
`April 29, 2019
`April 29, 2019
`May 13, 2019
`June 3, 2019
`
`June 10, 2019
`June 12, 2019
`
`June 12, 2019
`
`July 8, 2019
`
`July 15, 2019
`
`July 30, 2019
`
`May 6, 2019
`May 13, 2019
`
`May 13, 2019
`
`May 13, 2019
`
`May 20, 2019
`May 20, 2019
`June 3, 2019
`June 24, 2019
`
`July 1, 2019
`July 3, 2019
`
`July 3, 2019
`
`July 29, 2019
`
`August 5, 2019
`
`August 20, 2019
`
`August 13, 2019
`
`September 3, 2019
`
`August 20, 2019
`
`September 10, 2019
`
`September 11, 2019; 1:00
`p.m.
`IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
`
`October 2, 2019; 1:00 p.m.
`
`
`4
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER,
`CASE NO. 18-cv-06185-HSG
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 63 Filed 04/15/19 Page 5 of 6
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: April 12, 2019
`
`Dated: April 12, 2019
`
`
`/ / /
`/ / /
`/ / /
`/ / /
`/ / /
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:/s/Alfred R. Fabricant
`Alfred R. Fabricant
`NY Bar No. 2219392
`Email: afabricant@brownrudnick.com
`Peter Lambrianakos
`NY Bar No. 2894392
`Email: plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III
`NY Bar No. 4557435
`Email: vrubino@brownrudnick.com
`Sarah G. Hartman
`CA Bar No. 281751
`Email: shartman@brownrudnick.com
`BROWN RUDNICK LLP
`7 Times Square
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone: 212-209-4800
`Facsimile: 212-209-4801
`
`Arjun Sivakumar
`CA Bar No. 297787
`BROWN RUDNICK LLP
`2211 Michelson Drive, Seventh Floor
`Irvine, CA 92612
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`AGIS Software Development LLC
`
`
`
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`
`
`By:/s/Lionel M. Lavenue
`Lionel M. Lavenue
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`ZTE (USA) Inc.
`
`
`
`
`5
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER,
`CASE NO. 18-cv-06185-HSG
`
`

`

`Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 63 Filed 04/15/19 Page 6 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTESTATION
`
`Counsel for Defendant hereby attests by her signature below that concurrence in the filing of
`
`this document was obtained from counsel for Plaintiff.
`
`
`
`
`
`BROWN RUDNICK, LLP
`
`
`
`Dated: April 12, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:/s/Sarah G. Hartman
`Sarah G. Hartman
`Attorneys for Defendant
`AGIS Software Development LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED,
`
`
`
`
`DATED: ______________________
`
`
`
`________________________________
`The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.
`U.S. District Court Judge
`Northern District of California
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER,
`CASE NO. 18-cv-06185-HSG
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`4/15/2019
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket