throbber
Case 3:18-cv-02245-JD Document 274 Filed 05/01/23 Page 1 of 6
`
`
`
`Edward R. Nelson III (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`Texas Bar No. 00797142
`Christopher G. Granaghan (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`Texas Bar No. 24078585
`ed@nelbum.com
`chris@nelbum.com
`NELSON BUMGARDNER CONROY P.C.
`3131 West Seventh Street, Suite 300
`Fort Worth, Texas 76107
`Telephone: (817) 377-9111
`Facsimile: (817) 377-3485
`
`Timothy E. Grochocinski (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`Illinois Bar No. 6295055
`Charles Austin Ginnings (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`New York Bar No. 4986691
`tim@nelbum.com
`austin@nelbum.com
`NELSON BUMGARDNER CONROY P.C.
`15020 S. Ravinia Avenue, Suite 29
`Orland Park, Illinois 60462
`Telephone: (708) 675-1974
`
`Ryan E. Hatch
`California Bar No. 235577
`ryan@hatchlaw.com
`HATCH LAW PC
`13323 Washington Blvd., Suite 302
`Los Angeles, CA 90066
`Telephone: (310) 279-5076
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FIRSTFACE CO., LTD.

`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
` NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`
`CASE NO. 3:18-cv-02245-JD
`
`JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING
`ADMISSIBILITY OF
`INTERROGATORY RESPONSES
`
`Judge: Hon. James Donato
`
`
`FIRSTFACE CO., LTD.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING
`ADMISSIBILITY OF INTERROGATORY RESPONSES
`

`
`CASE NO: 3:18-CV-02245-JD
`


`
`

`

`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-02245-JD Document 274 Filed 05/01/23 Page 2 of 6
`


`
`Plaintiff Firstface Co., Ltd. (“Firstface”) and Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”), by and through
`their counsel of record, jointly submit this stipulation regarding the admissibility of interrogatory
`responses.
`WHEREAS, Firstface has served the following interrogatory responses (“Firstface’s Interrogatory
`Responses”):
`
`Date Served
`August 25, 2022
`
`Interrogatory Responses
`Plaintiff’s Third Amended and
`Supplemental Objections and Responses to
`Defendant Apple Inc.’s Second Set of
`Interrogatories to Plaintiff Firstface Co., Ltd.
`(Nos. 9-14)
`Plaintiff’s Second Amended and
`Supplemental Objections and Responses to
`Defendant Apple Inc.’s Second Set of
`Interrogatories to Plaintiff Firstface Co., Ltd.
`(Nos. 9-14)
`Plaintiff’s Third Amended and
`Supplemental Objections and Responses to
`Apple Inc.’s First Set of Interrogatories to
`Plaintiff Firstface Co., Ltd. (Nos. 1-8)
`Plaintiff’s Objections and Responses to
`Defendant Apple Inc.’s Third Set of
`Interrogatories to Plaintiff Firstface Co., Ltd.
`(No. 15)
`Plaintiff’s Amended and Supplemental
`Objections and Responses to Defendant
`Apple Inc.’s Second Set of Interrogatories to
`Plaintiff Firstface Co., Ltd. (Nos. 9-14)
`WHEREAS, Apple has served the following interrogatory responses (“Apple’s Interrogatory
`Responses”):
`
`August 15, 2022
`
`August 12, 2022
`
`August 1, 2022
`
`July 26, 2022
`
`Interrogatory Responses
`Defendant Apple Inc.’s Amended Responses to
`Firstface Co., Ltd.’s Questions Regarding
`Usage Metrics
`Apple Inc.’s Second Supplemental Objections and
`Responses to Plaintiff Firstface Co., Ltd.’s Third
`Set of Interrogatories (No. 12)
`Defendant Apple Inc.’s Second Supplemental
`Objections and Responses to Plaintiff Firstface
`Co., Ltd.’s First Set of Interrogatories (No. 4)
`
`Date Served
`March 28, 2023
`
`September 6, 2022
`
`August 31, 2022
`
`
`

`
`JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING
`ADMISSIBILITY OF INTERROGATORY RESPONSES
`
`2
`
`CASE NO: 3:18-CV-02245-JD
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-02245-JD Document 274 Filed 05/01/23 Page 3 of 6
`


`
`August 31, 2022
`
`July 26, 2022
`
`July 26, 2022
`
`February 11, 2022
`
`July 1, 2019
`
`November 12, 2018
`
`Apple Inc.’s Supplemental Objections and
`Responses to Plaintiff Firstface Co., Ltd.’s Fourth
`Set of Interrogatories (No. 14)
`Defendant Apple Inc.’s Supplemental Objections
`and Responses to Plaintiff Firstface Co., Ltd.’s
`First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 4, 7, 8, and 9)
`Defendant Apple Inc.’s Supplemental Objections
`and Responses to Plaintiff Firstface Co., Ltd.’s
`Second Set of Interrogatories (No. 10)
`Apple Inc.’s Objections and Responses to Plaintiff
`Firstface Co., Ltd.’s Third Set of Interrogatories
`(Nos. 12-13)
`Defendant Apple Inc.’s Objections and Responses
`to Plaintiff Firstface Co., Ltd.’s Second Set of
`Interrogatories
`Defendant Apple Inc.’s Objections and Responses
`to Plaintiff Firstface Co., Ltd.’s First Set of
`Interrogatories
`WHEREAS, while Firstface’s and Apple’s Interrogatory Responses were signed by each party’s
`respective counsel, neither party has verified their respective interrogatory responses “under oath” as set
`out by Rule 33(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;
`WHEREAS, the parties desire to avoid disputes about the admissibility of the substantive portions
`of Firstface’s and Apple’s Interrogatory Responses on the basis that such responses were not made under
`oath;
`NOW THEREFORE, Firstface and Apple stipulate that:
`The substantive portions of Firstface’s and Apple’s Interrogatory Responses shall be admissible at
`trial or any hearing in this case to the same extent as if they had been made “under oath” in compliance
`with Rule 33(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the avoidance of doubt, the parties are
`not waiving any other objections they may have to the Interrogatory Responses.
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED.
`
`
`

`
`JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING
`ADMISSIBILITY OF INTERROGATORY RESPONSES
`
`3
`
`CASE NO: 3:18-CV-02245-JD
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-02245-JD Document 274 Filed 05/01/23 Page 4 of 6
`
`
`Dated: May 1, 2023
`
`
`
`NELSON BUMGARDNER CONROY P.C.
`
`By: /s/ Christopher G. Granaghan
`Edward R. Nelson III
`Texas Bar No. 00797142
`Christopher G. Granaghan
`Texas Bar No. 24078585
`ed@nelbum.com
`chris@nelbum.com
`NELSON BUMGARDNER
`CONROY P.C.
`3131 West Seventh Street, Suite 300
`Fort Worth, Texas 76107
`Telephone: (817) 377-9111
`Facsimile: (817) 377-3485
`
`Timothy E. Grochocinski
`Illinois Bar No. 6295055
`Charles Austin Ginnings
`New York Bar No. 4986691
`tim@nelbum.com
`austin@nelbum.com
`NELSON BUMGARDNER
`CONROY P.C.
`15020 S. Ravinia Avenue, Suite 29
`Orland Park, Illinois 60462
`Telephone: (708) 675-1974
`
`Ryan E. Hatch
`California Bar No. 235577
`ryan@hatchlaw.com
`HATCH LAW PC
`13323 Washington Blvd., Suite 302
`Los Angeles, CA 90066
`Telephone: (310) 279-5076
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FIRSTFACE CO., LTD.
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: May 1, 2023
`
`
`MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
`
`By: /s/ Shaelyn K. Dawson
`Bita Rahebi
`Alex Yap
`Nicholas Fung
`
`JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING
`ADMISSIBILITY OF INTERROGATORY RESPONSES
`
`4
`
`CASE NO: 3:18-CV-02245-JD
`


`

`

`
`
`

`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-02245-JD Document 274 Filed 05/01/23 Page 5 of 6
`
`brahebi@mofo.com
`ayap@mofo.com
`nfung@mofo.com
`MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
`707 Wilshire Boulevard
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`
`Richard S.J. Hung
`rhung@mofo.com
`Shaelyn Dawson
`shaelyndawson@mofo.com
`MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
`425 Market Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`APPLE INC.
`
`

`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING
`ADMISSIBILITY OF INTERROGATORY RESPONSES
`
`5
`
`CASE NO: 3:18-CV-02245-JD
`


`
`
`
`
`

`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-02245-JD Document 274 Filed 05/01/23 Page 6 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Honorable James Donato
`United States District Judge
`
`
`


`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`Dated:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING
`Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has
`been obtained from each of the signatories listed above.
`
`
` /s/ Shaelyn K. Dawson
`
`
`

`
`JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING
`ADMISSIBILITY OF INTERROGATORY RESPONSES
`
`6
`
`CASE NO: 3:18-CV-02245-JD
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket