Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 250-2 Filed 11/26/18 Page 1 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 250-2 Filed 11/26/18 Page 2 of 6
`
`
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`Jonathan S. Kagan (SBN 166039)
`jkagan@irell.com
`Joshua Glucoft (SBN 301249)
`jglucoft@irell.com
`Casey Curran (SBN 305210)
`ccurran@irell.com
`1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
`Los Angeles, California 90067-4276
`Telephone: (310) 277-1010
`Facsimile: (310) 203-7199
`
`Rebecca Carson (SBN 254105)
`rcarson@irell.com
`Kevin Wang (SBN 318024)
`kwang@irell.com
`840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400
`Newport Beach, California 92660-6324
`Telephone: (949) 760-0991
`Facsimile: (949) 760-5200
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`DEFENDANT JUNIPER NETWORKS,
`INC.’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF FINJAN,
`INC.’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
`
`FINJAN, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`
`
`
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., a Delaware
`Corporation,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`A Registered Limited Liability
`Law Partnership Including
`Professional Corporations
`
`10473025
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`JUNIPER’S RESPONSE TO
`FINJAN’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
`(Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA)
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 250-2 Filed 11/26/18 Page 3 of 6
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`SRX1500
`
`SRX3400
`
`SRX3600
`
`SRX4100
`
`SRX4200
`
`SRX5400
`
`SRX5600
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`SRX5800
`
`vSRX
`
`cSRX
`
`
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`At least the following versions of Space Security Director have been released in the U.S.
`
`since 2012: 17.2; 17.1; 16.2; 16.1; and 15.2.
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 3:
`
`For the source code that You produced or made available for inspection or will produce
`
`and make available for inspection, identify the products that correspond to the source code
`
`including the name and version number of each product, the directories and subdirectories of the
`
`source code corresponding to the active source code incorporated into each of the products, the
`
`last date the source code was modified for each of the products, and which portion, if any, of the
`
`code You contend is prior art to the Asserted Patents.
`
`RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 3:
`
`Juniper incorporates herein by reference all General Objections set forth above.
`
`Juniper also specifically objects to this Interrogatory because Finjan’s Interrogatories were
`
`improperly served as set forth in the General Objections above. Juniper provides this specific
`
`objection and response in an abundance of caution and in order to facilitate discovery, although
`
`this Interrogatory is moot and no response is required.
`
`Juniper also specifically objects to this Interrogatory to the extent that it seeks information
`
`or documents that are subject to the attorney-client privilege, that evidence or constitute attorney
`
`work product, or that otherwise are not discoverable or are the subject of any other applicable
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`A Registered Limited Liability
`Law Partnership Including
`Professional Corporations
`
`10473025
`
`
`- 13 -
`
`
`JUNIPER’S RESPONSE TO
`FINJAN’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
`(Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA)
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 250-2 Filed 11/26/18 Page 4 of 6
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`privilege or immunity, whether based upon statute or recognized at common law, specifically
`
`including documents protected by the common interest privilege and/or joint defense agreements.
`
`Juniper further specifically objects to the definition of “You” as overbroad, unduly
`
`burdensome, oppressive, indefinite, vague and ambiguous. Juniper also objects to this definition
`
`to the extent that it purports to impose discovery obligations on persons or entities other than the
`
`parties to this action. Juniper will construe the term “You” to mean “Juniper Networks, Inc.”
`
`Juniper also specifically objects to the definition of “Accused Instrumentalities” as
`
`including Advanced Threat Protection Appliance and Contrail. Advanced Threat Protection
`
`Appliance was not identified in Finjan’s Complaint by name or technology and is therefore not
`
`10
`
`part of this case. See Richtek Tech. Corp. v. uPi Semiconductor Corp., 2016 WL 1718135, at *2
`
`11
`
`(N.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2016) (Alsup, J.). Contrail is not alleged to infringe any Asserted Patent.
`
`12
`
`Juniper interprets this Interrogatory as excluding Advanced Threat Protection Appliance and
`
`13
`
`Contrail. Juniper also specifically objects to the definition of “Accused Instrumentalities” as
`
`14
`
`including “all previous or currently contemplated versions, revision, releases, or continuations of
`
`15
`
`said Juniper products and services, and all additional products accused of infringement by Finjan
`
`16
`
`in this action in infringement contentions or similar pleadings.” This definition is objectionable at
`
`17
`
`least because it is overbroad and unduly burdensome and may include instrumentalities released
`
`18
`
`outside of the statutory damages period. Juniper will interpret this Interrogatory as limited to only
`
`19
`
`those instrumentalities properly identified in both the operative complaint and Finjan’s
`
`20
`
`infringement contentions and also made, used, sold, offered for sale, or imported into the U.S.
`
`21
`
`within the statutory damages period.
`
`22
`
`Juniper also specifically objects to this Interrogatory as seeking discovery that is not
`
`23
`
`proportional to the needs of the case, considering the importance of the issues at stake in the
`
`24
`
`action, the amount in controversy, the parties’ relative access to relevant information, the parties’
`
`25
`
`resources, the importance of the discovery in resolving the issues, and whether the burden or
`
`26
`
`expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit.
`
`27
`
`28
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`A Registered Limited Liability
`Law Partnership Including
`Professional Corporations
`
`10473025
`
`
`- 14 -
`
`
`JUNIPER’S RESPONSE TO
`FINJAN’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
`(Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA)
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 250-2 Filed 11/26/18 Page 5 of 6
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`Juniper also objects to this Interrogatory on the grounds that it is overbroad, unduly
`
`burdensome, oppressive, vague and ambiguous, not proportional to the needs of the case, and
`
`3
`
`seeks irrelevant information.
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`Juniper also specifically objects to this Interrogatory as premature. Juniper will produce
`
`information, including invalidity contentions, in accordance with the timeline set forth in the
`
`Patent Local Rules and the Court’s Scheduling Order in this matter. This Response is provided
`
`without prejudice to Juniper’s ability to identify or produce additional information or documents
`
`in response to this Interrogatory.
`
`Subject to these specific objections and the general objections incorporated herein, Juniper
`
`10
`
`responds as follows:
`
`11
`
`Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(d), Juniper directs Finjan to the directory structure provided
`
`12
`
`on the secured review computer to identify the products corresponding to the source code by
`
`13
`
`product name and release and the directories and subdirectories of the source code corresponding
`
`14
`
`to the active source code incorporated into each of the products. The table below shows the
`
`15
`
`versions of Junos corresponding to specific SRX Gateways. Sky ATP is regularly updated;
`
`16
`
`pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(d), Juniper directs Finjan to the Git log produced on the secured
`
`17
`
`review computer showing the complete revision commit history of Sky ATP. At least the
`
`18
`
`following versions of Space Security Director have been released in the U.S. since 2012: 17.2;
`
`19
`
`17.1; 16.2; 16.1; and 15.2.
`
`20
`
`Juniper does not presently intend to rely on any of the source code that it has produced as
`
`21
`
`prior art to the Asserted Patents; Juniper’s invalidity contentions will be timely provided in
`
`22
`
`accordance with the Patent Local Rules.
`
`23
`
`
`
`24
`
`Junos
`12.1
`
`Junos
`12.1X44
`
`Junos
`12.1X45
`
`Junos
`12.1X46
`
`Junos
`12.1X47
`
`Junos
`12.3X48
`
`Junos
`15.1X49
`
`Junos
`17.3
`
`Junos
`17.4
`
`3/28/12
`
`1/18/13
`
`7/17/13
`
`12/30/13
`
`8/18/14
`
`3/6/15
`
`6/30/15
`
`8/25/17 12/21/17
`
`
`Release
`Date
`
`SRX110
`
`SRX220
`
`SRX3XX
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`SRX550
`
`N/A
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`A Registered Limited Liability
`Law Partnership Including
`Professional Corporations
`
`10473025
`
`
`- 15 -
`
`
`JUNIPER’S RESPONSE TO
`FINJAN’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
`(Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA)
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 250-2 Filed 11/26/18 Page 6 of 6
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`SRX1400
`
`SRX1500
`
`SRX3400
`
`SRX3600
`
`SRX4100
`
`SRX4200
`
`SRX5400
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`SRX5600
`
`SRX5800
`
`vSRX
`
`cSRX
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✕
`
`
`
`DATED: March 26, 2018
`
`
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✓
`
`✕
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`
`By: /s/ Joshua Glucoft
`Joshua Glucoft
`Attorneys for Defendant
`Juniper Networks, Inc.
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`A Registered Limited Liability
`Law Partnership Including
`Professional Corporations
`
`10473025
`
`
`- 16 -
`
`
`JUNIPER’S RESPONSE TO
`FINJAN’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
`(Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA)
`
`
`
`