throbber
Case 3:16-cv-06001-WHO Document 26 Filed 10/24/16 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`THOMAS H. ZELLERBACH (SBN 154557)
`tzellerbach@orrick.com
`DIANA M. RUTOWSKI (SBN 233878)
`drutowski@orrick.com
`CATHY C. SHYONG (SBN 288537)
`cshyong@orrick.com
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`1000 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, California 94025
`Telephone:
`+1-650-614-7400
`Facsimile:
`+1-650-614-7401
`
`NATHAN SHAFFER (SBN 282015)
`nshaffer@orrick.com
`405 Howard St.
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`Telephone: +1-415-773-5700
`Facsimile: +1-415-773-5759
`
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Apple Inc.
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Case No. 3:16-cv-06001-WHO
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
`SUTCLIFFE LLP
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`SILICON VALLEY
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`STIPULATION TO SHORTEN TIME
`ON APPLE’S MOTION FOR
`EXPEDITED DISCOVERY
`
`MOBILE STAR LLC, a New York Limited
`Liability Company, and Does 1-50
`
`Dept: Courtroom 2, 17th Floor
`Judge: Hon. William H. Orrick
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STIP.TO SHORTEN TIME ON EXPED.
`DISCOV. MOT.
`CASE NO. 3:16-cv-06001-WHO
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:16-cv-06001-WHO Document 26 Filed 10/24/16 Page 2 of 4
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2(a), Plaintiff Apple Inc. and Defendant Mobile Star LLC, by
`
`and through counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
`
`1.
`
`Apple has filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction calendared in accordance with
`
`the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the applicable Local Rules for hearing on December 7,
`
`2016.
`
`2.
`
`Apple has filed a Motion for Expedited Discovery calendared in accordance with
`
`the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the applicable Local Rules on November 30, 2016.
`
`3.
`
`Apple’s Motion for Expedited Discovery seeks an order from the Court granting
`
`limited discovery on an expedited basis in advance of the December 7, 2016 Preliminary
`
`10
`
`Injunction.
`
`11
`
`4.
`
`Due to the pending Motion for Preliminary Injunction, the parties agree that the
`
`12
`
`Motion for Expedited Discovery should be heard on shortened time so that discovery, if ordered
`
`13
`
`by the Court, can be completed in advance of the Preliminary Injunction hearing.
`
`14
`
`5.
`
`The parties have stipulated to the following briefing schedule for Apple’s Motion
`
`15
`
`for Expedited Discovery:
`
`October 28, 2016
`
`Mobile Star’s Opposition Brief Due
`
`November 2, 2016
`
`November 9, 2016
`
`Apple’s Reply Brief Due
`Hearing on Apple’s Expedited Discovery Motion
`
`The Court has not made any previous changes to the schedule in this case.
`
`If this stipulation is approved, it will not have an effect on the schedule of this
`
`- 2 -
`
`STIP. TO SHORTEN TIME ON EXPED.
`DISCOV. MOT.
`CASE NO. 3:16-cv-06001-WHO
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`case.
`
`///
`
`///
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
`SUTCLIFFE LLP
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`SILICON VALLEY
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-06001-WHO Document 26 Filed 10/24/16 Page 3 of 4
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: October 20, 2016
`
`
`Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
`
`By: /s/ Thomas H. Zellerbach
`THOMAS H. ZELLERBACH
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Apple Inc.
`
`
`
`Dated: October 20, 2016
`
`
`Tucker Ellis LLP
`
`By: /s/ Brian K Brookey
`Brian K. Brookey
`Attorneys for Defendant Mobile Star LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE
`
`
`I, Thomas H. Zellerbach, as the ECF user and filer of this document, attest that
`
`concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories.
`
`
`
`Dated: October 20, 2016
`
`
`By: /s/ Thomas H. Zellerbach
`
`Thomas H. Zellerbach
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`STIP. TO SHORTEN TIME ON EXPED.
`DISCOV. MOT.
`CASE NO. 3:16-cv-06001-WHO
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 1
`
`
`
`2 2
`
`
`
`3 3
`
`
`
`4 4
`
`
`
`5 5
`
`
`
`6 6
`
`
`
`7 7
`
`
`
`8 8
`
`
`
`9 9
`
`
`
`10 10
`
`
`
`11 11
`
`
`
`12 12
`
`
`
`13 13
`
`
`
`14 14
`
`
`
`15 15
`
`
`
`16 16
`
`
`
`17 17
`
`
`
`18 18
`
`
`
`19 19
`
`
`
`20 20
`
`
`
`21 21
`
`
`
`22 22
`
`
`
`23 23
`
`
`
`24 24
`
`
`
`25 25
`
`
`
`26 26
`
`
`
`27 27
`
`
`
`28 28
`
`
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
`
`SUTCLIFFE LLP SUTCLIFFE LLP
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`SILICON VALLEY
`SILICON VALLEY
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Case 3:16-cv-06001-WHO Document 26 Filed 10/24/16 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`ORDER
`
`Pursuant to stipulation and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
`
`that Plaintiff Apple Inc.’s Motion for Expedited Discovery shall be briefed and heard pursuant to
`
`the following schedule:
`
`October 28, 2016
`
`Mobile Star’s Opposition Brief Due
`
`November 2, 2016
`
`November 9, 2016
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`
`Apple’s Reply Brief Due
`Hearing on Apple’s Expedited Discovery Motion
`
`Dated: October 24, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Hon. William H. Orrick
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`1 1
`
`
`
`2 2
`
`
`
`3 3
`
`
`
`4 4
`
`
`
`5 5
`
`
`
`6 6
`
`
`
`7 7
`
`
`
`8 8
`
`
`
`9 9
`
`
`
`10 10
`
`
`
`11 11
`
`
`
`12 12
`
`
`
`13 13
`
`
`
`14 14
`
`
`
`15 15
`
`
`
`16 16
`
`
`
`17 17
`
`
`
`18 18
`
`
`
`19 19
`
`
`
`20 20
`
`
`
`21 21
`
`
`
`22 22
`
`
`
`23 23
`
`
`
`24 24
`
`
`
`25 25
`
`
`
`26 26
`
`
`
`27 27
`
`
`
`28 28
`
`
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
`
`SUTCLIFFE LLP SUTCLIFFE LLP
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`
`
`SILICON VALLEY
`SILICON VALLEY
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`STIP. TO SHORTEN TIME ON EXPED.
`DISCOV. MOT.
`CASE NO. 3:16-cv-06001-WHO
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket