` #:1358
`
`Exhibit N
`
`
`
`Case 6:15-cv-00692-JRG Document 61 Filed 04/05/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1320Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 57-15 Filed 02/26/18 Page 2 of 3 Page ID
`
` #:1359
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`DSS Technology Management, Inc.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Qualcomm Incorporated,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Civil Action 6:15-cv-692
`(LEAD CASE)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`DSS Technology Management, Inc.,
`
`Civil Action 6:15-cv-690
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`v.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al,
`
`Defendants.
`
`DSS Technology Management, Inc.,
`
`Civil Action 6:15-cv-691
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`v.
`
`SK hynix Inc. et al,
`
`Defendants.
`
`ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO STAY
`PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEW
`
`Before the Court is the Unopposed Motion of Defendants Qualcomm Incorporated
`
`(“Qualcomm”); Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung
`
`Semiconductor, Inc., and Samsung Austin Semiconductor LLC (collectively, “Samsung”); and
`
`SK hynix Inc., SK hynix America Inc., SK hynix memory solutions Inc., and Hynix
`
`Exhibit N, Page 358
`
`
`
`Case 6:15-cv-00692-JRG Document 61 Filed 04/05/16 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1321Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 57-15 Filed 02/26/18 Page 3 of 3 Page ID
`
` #:1360
`
`Semiconductor Manufacturing America Inc. (collectively, “Hynix”) (collectively, “Defendants”)
`
`to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review. (Dkt. No. 59.)
`
`After consideration of same, the Court finds that said motion should be GRANTED.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Civil Action Nos. 6:15-cv-690, 5:15-cv-691, and 6:15-
`
`cv-692 are hereby STAYED pending final written decisions from the Patent Trial and Appeal
`
`Board on Intel Corporation’s IPR petitions, namely, IPR2016-00287, IPR2016-00288,
`
`IPR2016-00289, and IPR2016-00290.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within fourteen days of the latest final written decision
`
`on the Intel IPR petitions, the parties shall file a joint status report in Civil Action Nos. 6:15-cv-
`
`690, 6:15-cv-691, and 6:15-cv-692. The joint status report shall address the status of the Intel
`
`IPR petitions, the status of the claims of the ’552 and ’924 patents, and whether the stay should
`
`be continued in light of the Intel IPR petitions and the final written decisions thereon, the
`
`Samsung IPR petition and/or the Hynix IPR petition.
`
`Also before the Court is the Parties' Joint Motion for Amending the Second Amended
`
`Docket Control Order (Dkt. No. 58.) Having reviewed the Motion, the Court finds that the Motion
`
`should be and is hereby DENIED AS MOOT in view of the stay of this case, as granted above.
`
`2
`
`Exhibit N, Page 359
`
`