throbber
Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 57-15 Filed 02/26/18 Page 1 of 3 Page ID
` #:1358
`
`Exhibit N
`
`

`

`Case 6:15-cv-00692-JRG Document 61 Filed 04/05/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1320Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 57-15 Filed 02/26/18 Page 2 of 3 Page ID
`
` #:1359
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`DSS Technology Management, Inc.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Qualcomm Incorporated,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Civil Action 6:15-cv-692
`(LEAD CASE)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`DSS Technology Management, Inc.,
`
`Civil Action 6:15-cv-690
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`v.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al,
`
`Defendants.
`
`DSS Technology Management, Inc.,
`
`Civil Action 6:15-cv-691
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`v.
`
`SK hynix Inc. et al,
`
`Defendants.
`
`ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO STAY
`PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEW
`
`Before the Court is the Unopposed Motion of Defendants Qualcomm Incorporated
`
`(“Qualcomm”); Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung
`
`Semiconductor, Inc., and Samsung Austin Semiconductor LLC (collectively, “Samsung”); and
`
`SK hynix Inc., SK hynix America Inc., SK hynix memory solutions Inc., and Hynix
`
`Exhibit N, Page 358
`
`

`

`Case 6:15-cv-00692-JRG Document 61 Filed 04/05/16 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1321Case 8:17-cv-00981-JVS-JCG Document 57-15 Filed 02/26/18 Page 3 of 3 Page ID
`
` #:1360
`
`Semiconductor Manufacturing America Inc. (collectively, “Hynix”) (collectively, “Defendants”)
`
`to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review. (Dkt. No. 59.)
`
`After consideration of same, the Court finds that said motion should be GRANTED.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Civil Action Nos. 6:15-cv-690, 5:15-cv-691, and 6:15-
`
`cv-692 are hereby STAYED pending final written decisions from the Patent Trial and Appeal
`
`Board on Intel Corporation’s IPR petitions, namely, IPR2016-00287, IPR2016-00288,
`
`IPR2016-00289, and IPR2016-00290.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within fourteen days of the latest final written decision
`
`on the Intel IPR petitions, the parties shall file a joint status report in Civil Action Nos. 6:15-cv-
`
`690, 6:15-cv-691, and 6:15-cv-692. The joint status report shall address the status of the Intel
`
`IPR petitions, the status of the claims of the ’552 and ’924 patents, and whether the stay should
`
`be continued in light of the Intel IPR petitions and the final written decisions thereon, the
`
`Samsung IPR petition and/or the Hynix IPR petition.
`
`Also before the Court is the Parties' Joint Motion for Amending the Second Amended
`
`Docket Control Order (Dkt. No. 58.) Having reviewed the Motion, the Court finds that the Motion
`
`should be and is hereby DENIED AS MOOT in view of the stay of this case, as granted above.
`
`2
`
`Exhibit N, Page 359
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket