To:
`Subject:
`Sent:
`Sent As:
`
`Michael P. Eddy(meddy@patent.org)
`U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 97216809 - JAG - 4050-03
`August 02, 2022 10:52:20 PM EDT
`tmng.notices@uspto.gov
`
`Attachments
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
`Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
`
`
`
`U.S. Application Serial No.  97216809
`
`Mark:   JAG
`
`Correspondence Address:  
`MICHAEL P. EDDY
`LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL P. EDDY
`12526 HIGH BLUFF DRIVE, SUITE 300
`SAN DIEGO CA 92130 UNITED STATES
`
`Applicant:   Vip wears (pvt) Ltd
`
`Reference/Docket No.  4050-03
`
`Correspondence Email Address:   meddy@patent.org
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
`
`The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date
`below or the application will be abandoned.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application
`System (TEAS).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office 
`action.  
`
`Issue date:   August 02, 2022
`
`The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant
`must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a),
`2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
`
`SEARCH OF OFFICE RECORDS - NO CONFLICTING MARKS FOUND
`
`

`

`
`The trademark examining attorney has searched the USPTO database of registered and pending marks
`and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). 15
`U.S.C. §1052(d); TMEP §704.02.
`
`However, before the mark can be approved for publication (the next step in the registration process),
`the following requirement(s) must be satisfied:
`
`SUMMARY OF ISSUES:
`
`
`•
`
`IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS - INTERNATIONAL CLASS 25
`
`
`
`INDEFINITE/MISCLASSIFIED IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS - INTERNATIONAL CLASS
`25
`
`The identification of goods reads as follows:
`
`
`The wording “Clothing, namely, athletic sleeves” in the identification of goods is indefinite and must
`be clarified because it is indefinite as to the specific type of sleeves. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP
`§1402.01. Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate: “Padded elbow compression
`sleeves sold as an integral component of athletic clothing, namely, racing jackets.”
`
`Applicant has classified “Compression garments for athletic or other non-medical use, namely,
`ompression socks, stockings, leggings, jerseys, vests, and trousers” in International Class 25; however,
`the proper classification is International Class 10. Therefore, applicant may respond by (1) adding
`International Class 10 to the application and reclassifying these goods and/or services in the proper
`international class, (2) deleting “Compression garments for athletic or other non-medical use, namely,
`ompression socks, stockings, leggings, jerseys, vests, and trousers” from the application, or (3) deleting
`the remainder of the items in the identification and reclassifying the specified goods and/or services in
`the proper international class. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.86(a), 6.1; TMEP §§1403.02 et seq. If applicant adds
`one or more international classes to the application, applicant must comply with the multiple-class
`requirements specified in this Office action.
`
`The wording “Wrist bands” in the identification of goods is indefinite and must be clarified because it
`is indefinite as to the specific purpose of the wrist bands. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01.
`Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate: “Wrist bands in the nature of clothing .”
`
`
`
`Please be advised that an applicant may amend the identification to clarify or limit the goods and/or
`services, but not to broaden or expand the goods and/or services beyond those in the original
`application or as acceptably amended. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06. Generally, any deleted
`goods and/or services may not later be reinserted. See TMEP §1402.07(e). Additionally, for
`applications filed under Trademark Act Section 66(a), the scope of the identification for purposes of
`permissible amendments is limited by the international class assigned by the International Bureau of the
`World Intellectual Property Organization (International Bureau); and the classification of goods and/or
`services may not be changed from that assigned by the International Bureau. 37 C.F.R. §2.85(d); TMEP
`
`

`

`§§1401.03(d), 1904.02(b). Further, in a multiple-class Section 66(a) application, classes may not be
`added or goods and/or services transferred from one existing class to another. 37 C.F.R. §2.85(d);
`TMEP §1401.03(d).
`
`For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see
`the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See
`TMEP §1402.04.
`
`MULTIPLE CLASS APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
`
`The application identifies goods and/or services that are (or may be) classified in more than one
`international class; therefore, applicant must satisfy all the requirements below for each international
`class based on Trademark Act Section 1(b):
`
`
`(1)   List the goods and/or services by their international class number in consecutive
`numerical order, starting with the lowest numbered class.
`
`(2)   Submit a filing fee for each international class not covered by the fee(s) already paid
`(view the USPTO’s current fee schedule).  The application identifies goods and/or services that
`are (or may be) classified in at least 3 classes; however, applicant submitted a fee(s) sufficient for
`only 2 class(es).  Applicant must either submit the filing fees for the classes not covered by the
`submitted fees or restrict the application to the number of classes covered by the fees already
`paid.
`
`
`See 37 C.F.R. §2.86(a); TMEP §§1403.01, 1403.02(c).
`
`For an overview of the requirements for a Section 1(b) multiple-class application and how to satisfy the
`requirements online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, see the
`Multiple-class Application webpage.
`
`RESPONSE GUIDELINES
`
`Response guidelines. For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal
`and/or requirement in this Office action. For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and
`evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above. For a
`requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements. Please see “Responding to Office
`Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on
`responding.
`
`
`
`
`How to respond.   Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
`
`

`

`
`
`/Jennifer Button/
`Jennifer Button
`Trademark Examining Attorney
`Law Office 105
`(571) 272-8279
`jennifer.button@uspto.gov
`
`
`
`RESPONSE GUIDANCE
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  The
`response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the
`response period.  TEAS maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s
`ability to timely respond.
`
`Responses signed by an unauthorized party are not accepted and can cause the application to
`abandon.  If applicant does not have an attorney, the response must be signed by the individual
`applicant, all joint applicants, or someone with legal authority to bind a juristic applicant.  If
`applicant has an attorney, the response must be signed by the attorney.
`
`If needed, find contact information for the supervisor of the office or unit listed in the
`signature block.
`
`

`

`United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
`
`USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE
`
`Office Action (Official Letter) has issued
`on August 02, 2022 for
`U.S. Trademark Application Serial No.  97216809
`
`A USPTO examining attorney has reviewed your trademark application and issued an Office
`action.  You must respond to this Office action in order to avoid your application
`abandoning.  Follow the steps below.
`
`(1)   Read the Office action. This email is NOT the Office action.
`
`(2)  Respond to the Office action by the deadline using the Trademark Electronic Application
`System (TEAS). Your response must be received by the USPTO on or before 11:59 p.m.
`Eastern Time of the last day of the response period. Otherwise, your application will be
`abandoned. See the Office action itself regarding how to respond.
`
`(3)  Direct general questions about using USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the
`application process, the status of your application, and whether there are outstanding deadlines
`to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).
`
`After reading the Office action, address any question(s) regarding the specific content to the
`USPTO examining attorney identified in the Office action.
`
`GENERAL GUIDANCE
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status &
`Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.
`
`Update your correspondence email address to ensure you receive important USPTO
`notices about your application.
`
`Beware of trademark-related scams . Protect yourself from people and companies that
`may try to take financial advantage of you. Private companies may call you and pretend
`to be the USPTO or may send you communications that resemble official USPTO
`documents to trick you. We will never request your credit card number or social security
`number over the phone. And all official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed
`from the domain “@uspto.gov.” Verify the correspondence originated from us by using
`your Serial Number in our database, TSDR, to confirm that it appears under the
`“Documents” tab, or contact the Trademark Assistance Center. 
`
`

`

`•
`
`Hiring a U.S.-licensed attorney . If you do not have an attorney and are not required to
`have one under the trademark rules, we encourage you to hire a U.S.-licensed attorney
`specializing in trademark law to help guide you through the registration process. The
`USPTO examining attorney is not your attorney and cannot give you legal advice, but
`rather works for and represents the USPTO in trademark matters.
`

`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

Connectivity issues with tsdrapi.uspto.gov. Try again now (HTTP Error 429: ).

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket