`
`Subject:
`
`Sent:
`
`Sent As:
`
`Attachments:
`
`Apple Inc. (trademarkdocket@apple.com)
`
`U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88559819 - NEWS+ - N/A
`
`September 09, 2019 03:20:35 PM
`
`ecom117@uspto.gov
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
`
`Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
`
`U.S. Application Serial
`No. 88559819
`
`
`
`Mark: NEWS+
`
`Correspondence Address:
`THOMAS R. LA PERLE
`
`APPLE INC.
`
`ONE APPLE PARK WAY
`
`MS: 169-3IPL
`
`CUPERTINO, CA 95014
`
`Applicant: Apple Inc.
`
`
`
`Reference/Docket No. N/A
`
`
`
`Correspondence Email
`
`Address:
`
`trademarkdocket@apple.com
`
`NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
`
`The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be
`abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the
`
`end of this Office action.
`
`Issue date: September 09, 2019
`
`
`
`The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to
`the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
`
`SEARCH OF OFFICE’S DATABASE OF MARKS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that
`would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
`
`IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS AND/OR SERVICES
`
`Some of the wording in the identification of goods/services is indefinite and must be clarified. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01.
`Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate:
`
`035: Retail store services in the field of books, magazines, periodicals, newsletters, journals and other publications on a wide range of
`topics of general interest, provided via the Internet and other computer, electronic and communications networks; subscription services,
`namely, providing subscriptions to text, data, image, audio, video, and multimedia content, provided via the Internet and other electronic
`and communications networks; providing subscription services of downloadable pre-recorded text, data, image, audio, video, and
`multimedia content for a fee or pre-paid subscription, via the Internet and other electronic and communications networks.
`
`Applicant’s goods and/or services may be clarified or limited, but may not be expanded beyond those originally itemized in the application or
`as acceptably narrowed. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §§1402.06, 1904.02(c)(iv). Applicant may clarify or limit the identification by inserting
`qualifying language or deleting items to result in a more specific identification; however, applicant may not substitute different goods and/or
`services or add goods and/or services not found or encompassed by those in the original application or as acceptably narrowed. See TMEP
`§1402.06(a)-(b). The scope of the goods and/or services sets the outer limit for any changes to the identification and is generally determined by
`the ordinary meaning of the wording in the identification. TMEP §§1402.06(b), 1402.07(a)-(b). Any acceptable changes to the goods and/or
`services will further limit scope, and once goods and/or services are deleted, they are not permitted to be reinserted. TMEP §1402.07(e).
`Additionally, for applications filed under Trademark Act Section 66(a), the scope of the identification for purposes of permissible
`amendments is limited by the international class assigned by the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization
`(International Bureau); and the classification of goods and/or services may not be changed from that assigned by the International Bureau. 37
`C.F.R. §2.85(d); TMEP §§1401.03(d), 1904.02(b). Further, in a multiple-class Section 66(a) application, classes may not be added or goods
`and/or services transferred from one existing class to another. 37 C.F.R. §2.85(d); TMEP §1401.03(d).
`
`For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S.
`Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
`
`Intent to Perfect 44(d) BASIS
`
`The application specifies both an intent to use basis under Trademark Act Section 1(b) and a claim of priority under Section 44(d) based on a
`foreign application. See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(b), 1126(d); 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(2), (a)(4). However, no copy of a foreign registration has been
`provided even though the application indicates applicant’s intent to rely on Section 44(e) as an additional basis for registration. See 15 U.S.C.
`§1126(e).
`
`An application with a Section 44(e) basis must include a true copy, photocopy, certification, or certified copy of a foreign registration from an
`applicant’s country of origin. 15 U.S.C. §1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(ii); TMEP §§1004, 1004.01, 1016. In addition, an applicant’s country
`of origin must be a party to a convention or treaty relating to trademarks to which the United States is also a party, or must extend reciprocal
`registration rights to nationals of the United States by law. 15 U.S.C. §1126(b); TMEP §§1002.01, 1004.
`
`Therefore, applicant must provide a copy of the foreign registration from applicant’s country of origin when it becomes available. TMEP
`§1003.04(a). A copy of a foreign registration must consist of a document issued to an applicant by, or certified by, the intellectual property office
`in applicant’s country of origin. TMEP §1004.01. If applicant’s country of origin does not issue registrations or Madrid Protocol certificates of
`extension of protection, applicant may submit a copy of the Madrid Protocol international registration that shows that protection of the
`international registration has been extended to applicant’s country of origin. TMEP §1016. In addition, applicant must also provide an English
`translation if the foreign registration is not written in English. 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(ii); TMEP §1004.01(a)-(b). The translation should be
`signed by the translator. TMEP §1004.01(b).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`If the foreign registration has not yet issued, or applicant requires additional time to procure a copy of the foreign registration (and English
`translation, as appropriate), applicant should so inform the trademark examining attorney and request that the U.S. application be suspended until
`a copy of the foreign registration is available. TMEP §§716.02(b), 1003.04(b).
`
`If applicant cannot satisfy the requirements of a Section 44(e) basis, applicant may request that the mark be approved for publication based solely
`on the Section 1(b) basis. See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(b), 1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §2.35(b)(1); TMEP §§806.02(f), 806.04(b), 1003.04(b). Although the
`mark may be approved for publication on the Section 1(b) basis, it will not register until an acceptable allegation of use has been filed. See 15
`U.S.C. §1051(c)-(d); 37 C.F.R. §§2.76, 2.88; TMEP §1103. Please note that, if the U.S. application satisfied the requirements of Section 44(d) as
`of the U.S. application filing date, applicant may retain the priority filing date under Section 44(d) without perfecting the Section 44(e) basis,
`
`provided there is a continuing valid basis for registration. See 37 C.F.R. §2.35(b)(3)-(4); TMEP §§806.02(f), 806.04(b).
`
`Alternatively, applicant has the option to amend the application to rely solely on the Section 44(e) basis and request deletion of the Section 1(b)
`basis. See 37 C.F.R. §2.35(b)(1); TMEP §806.04. The foreign registration alone may serve as the basis for obtaining a U.S. registration. See 37
`C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3); TMEP §806.01(d).
`
`TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL
`REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online
`using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office
`actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3)
`agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b);
`TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125
`per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS
`Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring
`
`this additional fee.
`How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action
`
`/Hsu, Fong/
`
`Trademark Examining Attorney
`
`Law Office 117
`
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`
`Office: (571) 272-2001
`
`Fax: (571) 272-2002
`
`RESPONSE GUIDANCE
`Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon. A response or notice of appeal must be received by
`the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period. TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen
`
`circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.
`
`Responses signed by an unauthorized party are not accepted and can cause the application to abandon. If applicant does not have an
`attorney, the response must be signed by the individual applicant, all joint applicants, or someone with legal authority to bind a juristic
`applicant. If applicant has an attorney, the response must be signed by the attorney.
`
`If needed, find contact information for the supervisor of the office or unit listed in the signature block.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`To:
`
`Subject:
`
`Sent:
`
`Sent As:
`
`Attachments:
`
`Apple Inc. (trademarkdocket@apple.com)
`
`U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88559819 - NEWS+ - N/A
`
`September 09, 2019 03:20:37 PM
`
`ecom117@uspto.gov
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
`
`USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE
`
`Office Action (Official Letter) has issued
`on September 09, 2019 for
`U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88559819
`
`Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney. As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an
`official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned. Please follow the steps below.
`
`(1) Read the official letter.
`
`(2) Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below.
`
`/Hsu, Fong/
`
`Trademark Examining Attorney
`
`Law Office 117
`
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`
`Office: (571) 272-2001
`
`Fax: (571) 272-2002
`
`Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or
`whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).
`
`(3) Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from September 09, 2019, using the Trademark Electronic
`Application System (TEAS). The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response
`period. See the Office action for more information about how to respond.
`
`GENERAL GUIDANCE
`· Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical
`deadlines.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`· Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.
`
`· Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application. Private companies not associated with the USPTO use
`public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.
`All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”
`
`
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site