`
`Subject:
`
`Sent:
`
`Sent As:
`
`Attachments:
`
`Larry Melton (kevin.oliveira@ofplaw.com)
`
`U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88414165 - BIKING BRUHZ - 88842.0002
`
`July 26, 2019 12:02:23 PM
`
`ecom104@uspto.gov
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
`Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
`
`U.S. Application Serial
`No. 88414165
`
`Mark: BIKING BRUHZ
`
`Correspondence
`Address:
`Kevin Oliveira
`Odin, Feldman &
`Pittleman PC
`1775 Wiehle Avenue,
`Suite 400
`Reston VA 20190-5159
`
`
`
`
`
`Applicant: Larry Melton
`
`
`
`Reference/Docket No.
`88842.0002
`
`Correspondence Email
`
`Address:
`
`kevin.oliveira@ofplaw.com
`
`FINAL OFFICE ACTION
`
`The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be
`abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) and/or Electronic System for Trademark Trials and Appeals
`
`(ESTTA). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form and/or to ESTTA for an appeal appears at the end of this Office action.
`
`Issue date: July 26, 2019
`
`This Office acknowledges receipt of applicant’s communication dated July 24, 2019, in which applicant amended the identification of goods,
`disclaim the word “BIKING”, and submitted a specimen.
`
`The following requirements have been satisfied:
`
`Identification of Goods Requirement
`Disclaimer Requirement
`
`The examining attorney maintains and now makes FINAL the following refusal:
`
`Specimen Refusal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SPECIMEN REFUSAL
`
`Registration is refused because the specimen in International Class 25 appears to be mere advertising material and thus the specimen fails to
`show the applied-for mark in use in commerce. Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a);
`TMEP §§904, 904.07(a). Specifically, applicant submitted a webpage that displayed the mark and the goods but that does not provide a means of
`ordering the goods.
`
`Advertising materials are generally not acceptable as specimens to show use in commerce for goods. See In re Kohr Bros., 121 USPQ2d 1793,
`1794 (TTAB 2017) (quoting In re Quantum Foods, Inc., 94 USPQ2d 1375, 1379 (TTAB 2010)); TMEP §904.04(b), (c). Advertising materials
`may consist of the following: online advertising banners appearing on search engine result pages and in social media; advertising circulars and
`
`brochures; price lists; listings in trade directories; and business cards. See TMEP §904.04(b).
`
`An application based on Trademark Act Section 1(a) must include a specimen showing the applied-for mark in use in commerce for each
`international class of goods identified in the application or amendment to allege use. 15 U.S.C. §1051(a)(1); 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a);
`
`TMEP §§904, 904.07(a).
`
`Examples of specimens for goods include tags, labels, instruction manuals, containers, photographs that show the mark on the actual goods or
`packaging, and displays associated with the actual goods at their point of sale. See TMEP §§904.03 et seq. Webpages may also be specimens
`for goods when they include a picture or textual description of the goods associated with the mark and the means to order the goods.
`
`TMEP §904.03(i).
`
`Applicant may respond to this refusal by satisfying one of the following for each applicable international class:
`
`(1)
`
`Submit a different specimen (a verified “substitute” specimen ) that (a) was in actual use in commerce at least as early as the filing
`date of the application or prior to the filing of an amendment to allege use and (b) shows the mark in actual use in commerce for
`the goods identified in the application or amendment to allege use. A “verified substitute specimen” is a specimen that is
`accompanied by the following statement made in a signed affidavit or supported by a declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: “The
`substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce at least as early as the filing
`date of the application or prior to the filing of the amendment to allege use.” The substitute specimen cannot be accepted without
`this statement.
`
`(2)
`
`Amend the filing basis to intent to use under Section 1(b), for which no specimen is required. This option will later necessitate
`additional fee(s) and filing requirements such as providing a specimen.
`
`For an overview of both response options referenced above and instructions on how to satisfy either option online using the Trademark Electronic
`
`Application System (TEAS) form, please go to the Specimen webpage.
`
`RESPONSE GUIDANCE
`
`Applicant must respond within six months of the date of issuance of this final Office action or the application will be abandoned. 15 U.S.C.
`§1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a). Applicant may respond by providing one or both of the following:
`
`(1)
`
`(2)
`
`a response filed using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) that fully satisfies all outstanding requirements
`and/or resolves all outstanding refusals; and/or
`
`an appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board filed using the Electronic System for Trademark Trials and Appeals (ESTTA)
`with the required filing fee of $200 per class.
`
`37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(1)-(2); TMEP §714.04; see 37 C.F.R. §2.6(a)(18); TBMP ch. 1200.
`
`In certain rare circumstances, an applicant may respond by filing a petition to the Director pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(2) to review procedural
`issues. TMEP §714.04; see 37 C.F.R. §2.146(b); TBMP §1201.05; TMEP §1704 (explaining petitionable matters). There is a fee required for
`filing a petition. 37 C.F.R. §2.6(a)(15).
`
`TEAS PLUS OR REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
`MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee
`TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP
`§§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive
`correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820.
`TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF
`applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional
`
`fee.
`
`How to respond. Click to file a response to this final Office action and/or appeal it to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB).
`
`/Donald Johnson/
`Examining Attorney
`Law Office 104
`571-272-7831
`don.johnson@uspto.gov
`
`RESPONSE GUIDANCE
`Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon. A response or notice of appeal must be received by
`the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period. TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen
`
`circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.
`
`Responses signed by an unauthorized party are not accepted and can cause the application to abandon. If applicant does not have an
`attorney, the response must be signed by the individual applicant, all joint applicants, or someone with legal authority to bind a juristic
`applicant. If applicant has an attorney, the response must be signed by the attorney.
`
`If needed, find contact information for the supervisor of the office or unit listed in the signature block.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`To:
`
`Subject:
`
`Sent:
`
`Sent As:
`
`Attachments:
`
`Larry Melton (kevin.oliveira@ofplaw.com)
`
`U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88414165 - BIKING BRUHZ - 88842.0002
`
`July 26, 2019 12:02:24 PM
`
`ecom104@uspto.gov
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
`
`USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE
`
`Office Action (Official Letter) has issued
`on July 26, 2019 for
`U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88414165
`
`Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney. As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an
`official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned. Please follow the steps below.
`
`(1) Read the official letter.
`
`(2) Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below.
`
`Johnson, Don
`/Donald Johnson/
`Examining Attorney
`Law Office 104
`571-272-7831
`don.johnson@uspto.gov
`
`Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or
`whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).
`
`(3) Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from July 26, 2019, using the Trademark Electronic Application
`System (TEAS). The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period. See the
`Office action for more information about how to respond.
`
`GENERAL GUIDANCE
`· Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical
`deadlines.
`
`· Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.
`
`· Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application. Private companies not associated with the USPTO use
`public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.
`All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site