To:
`
`Subject:
`
`Sent:
`
`Sent As:
`
`Attachments:
`
`Reboot Veterans (meinsiedel@bakerlaw.com)
`
`U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 88348173 - REBOOT VETERANS - 107412.98907
`
`5/31/2019 1:48:39 PM
`
`ECOM109@USPTO.GOV
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
`OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
`
`*88348173*
`
`CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS
`LETTER:
`http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp
`
`VIEW YOUR APPLICATION FILE
`
`U.S. APPLICATION
`SERIAL NO.   88348173
`
`           
`
`MARK: REBOOT
`VETERANS
`
`CORRESPONDENT
`ADDRESS:
`  
`       MARK S.
`EINSIEDEL
`  
`       BAKER &
`HOSTETLER LLP
`         200 CIVIC CENTER
`DRIVE
`           COLUMBUS, OH
`43215
`    
`   
`APPLICANT: Reboot
`Veterans
`
`    
`
`CORRESPONDENT’S
`REFERENCE/DOCKET
`
`   
`
`NO:       
`
`  107412.98907
`CORRESPONDENT E-
`
`MAIL ADDRESS:       
`
`meinsiedel@bakerlaw.com
`
`OFFICE ACTION
`
`STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER
`TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S
`COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.   A RESPONSE
`TRANSMITTED THROUGH THE TRADEMARK ELECTRONIC APPLICATION SYSTEM (TEAS) MUST BE RECEIVED BEFORE
`MIDNIGHT EASTERN TIME OF THE LAST DAY OF THE RESPONSE PERIOD.
`
`ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 5/31/2019
`
`The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to
`the issue(s) below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
`
`Search Results
`
`The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that
`would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d).  TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
`
`However, before the mark can be published for opposition, the applicant must address the following.
`












`

`

`Refusal under Sections 1 and 45 – Specimen Unacceptable
`
`Registration is refused because the applied-for mark, as used on the specimen of record, is used only as a trade name to identify applicant’s
`business; it does not function as a service mark to indicate the source of applicant’s services and to identify and distinguish them from others. 
`Trademark Act Sections 1, 2, 3, and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051-1053, 1127; see In re Walker Process Equip. Inc., 233 F.2d 329, 332, 110 USPQ 41,
`43-44 (C.C.P.A. 1956); TMEP §§904.07(b), 1301.02(a).  Although a designation may function as both a trade name and a service mark, the
`Trademark Act does not provide for registration of matter that functions solely as a trade name.  In re Univar Corp., 20 USPQ2d 1865, 1866-67
`(TTAB 1991); TMEP §1202.01.
`
`The determination as to whether a trade name also functions as a service mark is based on the manner in which the applied-for mark is used on
`the specimen or any other evidence of use, as well as the probable impact of such use on purchasers.  See In re Univar Corp., 20 USPQ2d at
`1867; In re The Signal Cos., 228 USPQ 956, 957 (TTAB 1986); TMEP §1202.01.  In this case, the specimen shows the applied-for mark used
`following the copyright symbol and no place else on the specimen.  As such it identifies the business claiming the copyright but not the source of
`the services described therein.
`
`A trademark or service mark is used to identify and distinguish an owner’s services from those of others and to indicate the source of the
`owner’s services.   A trade name, however, identifies and distinguishes an owner’s business or vocation.   15 U.S.C. §1127; TMEP §1202.01.
`
`Applicant may respond to this refusal by submitting a substitute specimen or amending applicant’s basis to intent to use under Section 1(b) for
`each applicable international class.
`
`Submitting a substitute specimen:  Applicant may submit a substitute specimen that shows the applied-for mark used in commerce as a service
`mark for the services in the application, and the following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20:  “
`The substitute specimen was in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application.”   37 C.F.R. §2.59(a); TMEP §904.05;
`see 37 C.F.R. §2.193(e)(1). 
`If submitting a substitute specimen requires an amendment to the dates of use, applicant must also verify the
`
`amended dates.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(c); TMEP §904.05.  
`
`Examples of specimens for services include advertising and marketing materials, brochures, photographs of business signage and billboards, and
`webpages that show the mark used in the actual sale, rendering, or advertising of the services.  See TMEP §1301.04(a), (h)(iv)(C).  Specimens
`comprising advertising and promotional materials must show a direct association between the mark and the services.  TMEP §1301.04(f)(ii).
`
`To submit a verified substitute specimen online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) response form, applicant should (1)
`answer “Yes” to form wizard question #2; and then, continuing on to the next portion of the form, do the following for each relevant class for
`which a substitute specimen is being submitted:  (2) under “Classification and Listing of Goods/Services/Collective Membership Organization,”
`select the following statement, “Check here to modify the current classification number; listing of goods/services; dates of use; and/or filing
`basis; or to submit a substitute specimen or foreign registration certificate.  If not checked, the changes will be ignored.”; (3) under “Specimen
`File,” attach a specimen (attachment may not exceed 5 megabytes); (4) describe what the specimen consists of; and (5) select the following
`statement: “The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce at least as early as the filing
`date of the application” [for an application based on Section 1(a), Use in Commerce] OR “The substitute (or new, or originally
`submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce prior either to the filing of the Amendment to Allege Use or expiration of
`the filing deadline for filing a Statement of Use” [for an application based on Section 1(b) Intent-to-Use]. Note:  When submitting a
`verified substitute specimen, the TEAS online response form requires two signatures:  one in the “Declaration Signature” section and one in the
`
`“Response Signature” section.   
`
`Amending to Section 1(b):  If applicant cannot provide an acceptable substitute specimen, applicant may amend the application basis to intent to
`use under Section 1(b), for which no specimen is required, and the refusal will be withdrawn.  See TMEP §806.03(c).  However, if applicant
`amends the basis to Section 1(b), registration will not be granted until applicant later amends the application back to use in commerce by filing an
`acceptable allegation of use with a proper specimen.  See 15 U.S.C. §1051(c), (d); 37 C.F.R. §§2.76, 2.88; TMEP §1103.  If the same specimen is
`submitted with an allegation of use, the same refusal will likely issue.
`
`To amend to Section 1(b), applicant must submit the following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: 
`“ Applicant has a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce and had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce as of the
`
`application filing date.”   37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(2); TMEP §806.01(b); see 15 U.S.C. §1051(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.35(b)(1), 2.193(e)(1).  
`
`To amend to Section 1(b) online using the TEAS response form, applicant should (1) answer “Yes” to form wizard question #2, and then, after
`proceeding to the next page in the form, do the following for each relevant class for which the basis is being amended:  (2) under “Classification
`and Listing of Goods/Services/Collective Membership Organization,” select the following statement: “Check here to modify the current
`classification number; listing of goods/services; dates of use; and/or filing basis; or to submit a substitute specimen or foreign registration
`certificate.  If not checked, the changes will be ignored.”; (3) under “Filing Basis Section 1(a),” uncheck the box for “Filing Basis Section
`








`

`

`1(a)”and delete the information appearing in the Date of First Use of Mark Anywhere and Date of First Use of Mark in Commerce textboxes;
`and (4) check the box for “Filing Basis Section 1(b).”   Note:  When amending to Section 1(b), the TEAS online response form requires two
`signatures:  one in the “Declaration Signature” section and one in the “Response Signature” section.
`
`Recitation of Services in International Class 35
`
`The identification of services for International Class 35 must be clarified because it is too broad and could include services in other international
`classes.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03.  For example, this wording could encompass training services which are c
`
`classified in International Class 41.  
`
`The applicant may amend the recitation of services in International Class 35 as follows, if accurate:  Charitable services, namely, providing on-
`line employment information for veterans in the field of job resources and listings and listing for vocational training centers.
`
`Applicant may amend the identification to clarify or limit the services, but not to broaden or expand the services beyond those in the original
`application or as acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Generally, any deleted services may not later be reinserted.  See
`TMEP §1402.07(e).
`
`The application references services based on use in commerce in more than one international class; therefore, applicant must satisfy all the
`requirements below for each international class:
`
`(1)      
`
`(2)      
`
`(3)      
`
`(4)      
`
`List the goods and/or services by their international class number in consecutive numerical order, starting with the lowest
`numbered class (for example, International Class 3: perfume; International Class 18: cosmetic bags sold empty).
`
`Submit a filing fee for each international class not covered by the fee(s) already paid (view the USPTO’s current fee schedule).  
`Specifically, the application identifies services based on use in commerce that are classified in at least two classes; however, applicant
`submitted a fee sufficient for only one class.   Applicant must either (a) submit the filing fees for the classes not covered by the
`submitted fees or (b) restrict the application to the number of classes covered by the fees already paid.
`
`Submit verified dates of first use of the mark anywhere and in commerce for each international class.   See more information
`about verified dates of use.
`
`Submit a specimen for each international class.   The current specimen is not acceptable for any international class.   See more
`information about specimens.
`
`Examples of specimens for services include advertising and marketing materials, brochures, photographs of business signage and
`
`billboards, and website printouts that show the mark used in the actual sale, rendering, or advertising of the services.   
`
`(5)      
`
`Submit a verified statement that “ The specimen was in use in commerce on or in connection with the goods and/or services
`listed in the application at least as early as the filing date of the application.”   See more information about verification.
`
`See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(a), 1112; 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(6)-(7), 2.34(a)(1), 2.86(a); TMEP §§904, 1403.01, 1403.02(c).
`
`See an overview of the requirements for a Section 1(a) multiple-class application and how to satisfy the requirements online using the Trademark
`Electronic Application System (TEAS) form.
`
`For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S.
`Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual.  See TMEP §1402.04.
`
`Disclaimer
`
`Applicant must provide a disclaimer of the unregistrable part(s) of the applied-for mark even though the mark as a whole appears to be
`registrable.  See 15 U.S.C. §1056(a); TMEP §§1213, 1213.03(a).  A disclaimer of an unregistrable part of a mark will not affect the mark’s
`appearance.  See Schwarzkopf v. John H. Breck, Inc., 340 F.2d 978, 979-80, 144 USPQ 433, 433 (C.C.P.A. 1965).
`
`In this case, applicant must disclaim the wording “VETERANS” because it is not inherently distinctive.  These unregistrable term(s) at best are
`merely descriptive of an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose, or use of applicant’s goods and/or services.  See 15 U.S.C.
`§1052(e)(1); DuoProSS Meditech Corp. v. Inviro Med. Devices, Ltd., 695 F.3d 1247, 1251, 103 USPQ2d 1753, 1755 (Fed. Cir. 2012); TMEP
`
`§§1213, 1213.03(a).  
`









`            






`

`

`Specifically, based on the applicant’s own recitation of services, the applicant’s services are for VETERANS.
`
`Applicant may respond to this issue by submitting a disclaimer in the following format:  
`No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “VETERANS” apart from the mark as shown.   
`
`For an overview of disclaimers and instructions on how to satisfy this issue using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), see the
`
`Disclaimer webpage.  
`
`Reply Guidelines
`
`TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL
`REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE:  Applicants who filed their application online
`using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office
`actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3)
`agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b);
`TMEP §§819, 820.  TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125
`per class of goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04.  However, in certain situations, TEAS
`Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring
`
`this additional fee.   
`
`Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action.  Although the trademark examining
`attorney cannot provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights, the trademark examining attorney can provide applicant with
`additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action.  See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.  Although the USPTO does
`not accept emails as responses to Office actions, emails can be used for informal communications and will be included in the application record. 
`
`See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05.    
`
`/Julie Watson/
`Trademark Examining Attorney
`Law Office 109
`571-272-9236
`julie.watson@uspto.gov
`
`TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:   Go to http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.   Please wait 48-72 hours from the
`issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application. 
`For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.  For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned
`trademark examining attorney.  E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to
`this Office action by e-mail.
`
`All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.
`
`WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE:  It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an
`applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants).  If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the
`
`response.  
`
`PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION:   To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official
`notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at
`http://tsdr.uspto.gov/.   Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen.   If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the
`Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199.   For more information on checking
`status, see http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/process/status/.
`
`TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS:  Use the TEAS form at http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.
`






`  
`

`

`To:
`
`Subject:
`
`Sent:
`
`Sent As:
`
`Attachments:
`
`Reboot Veterans (meinsiedel@bakerlaw.com)
`
`U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 88348173 - REBOOT VETERANS - 107412.98907
`
`5/31/2019 1:48:41 PM
`
`ECOM109@USPTO.GOV
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
`
`IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING YOUR
`U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION
`
`USPTO OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) HAS ISSUED
`ON 5/31/2019 FOR U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 88348173
`
`Please follow the instructions below:
`
`(1)  TO READ THE LETTER:  Click on this link or go to http://tsdr.uspto.gov, enter the U.S. application serial number, and click on
`“Documents.”
`
`The Office action may not be immediately viewable, to allow for necessary system updates of the application, but will be available within 24
`hours of this e-mail notification.
`
`(2)  TIMELY RESPONSE IS REQUIRED:  Please carefully review the Office action to determine (1) how to respond, and (2) the applicable
`response time period.  Your response deadline will be calculated from 5/31/2019 (or sooner if specified in the Office action).  A response
`transmitted through the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) must be received before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the
`response period.   For information regarding response time periods, see http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/process/status/responsetime.jsp.
`
`Do NOT hit “Reply” to this e-mail notification, or otherwise e-mail your response because the USPTO does NOT accept e-mails as
`responses to Office actions. 
`Instead,
`the USPTO recommends that you respond online using the TEAS response form located at
`http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.
`
`(3)  QUESTIONS:  For questions about the contents of the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.  For
`technical assistance in accessing or viewing the Office action in the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system, please e-mail
`TSDR@uspto.gov.
`
`WARNING
`
`Failure to file the required response by the applicable response deadline will result in the ABANDONMENT of your application.  For
`more information regarding abandonment, see http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/basics/abandon.jsp.
`
`PRIVATE COMPANY SOLICITATIONS REGARDING YOUR APPLICATION:  Private companies not associated with the USPTO are
`using information provided in trademark applications to mail or e-mail trademark-related solicitations.  These companies often use names that
`closely resemble the USPTO and their solicitations may look like an official government document.  Many solicitations require that you pay
`
`“fees.”   
`
`Please carefully review all correspondence you receive regarding this application to make sure that you are responding to an official document
`from the USPTO rather than a private company solicitation.  All official USPTO correspondence will be mailed only from the “United States
`Patent and Trademark Office” in Alexandria, VA; or sent by e-mail from the domain “@uspto.gov.”   For more information on how to handle
`private company solicitations, see http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/solicitation_warnings.jsp.
`

`  










`  
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

Connectivity issues with tsdrapi.uspto.gov. Try again now (HTTP Error 429: ).

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket