To:
`
`Subject:
`
`Sent:
`
`Sent As:
`
`Attachments:
`
`Staten, Jason (privacy@trademarkengine.com)
`
`U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 88015458 - DEEP SPACE RADIO - N/A
`
`10/17/2018 7:39:30 AM
`
`ECOM122@USPTO.GOV
`
`Attachment - 1
`Attachment - 2
`Attachment - 3
`Attachment - 4
`Attachment - 5
`Attachment - 6
`Attachment - 7
`Attachment - 8
`Attachment - 9
`Attachment - 10
`Attachment - 11
`Attachment - 12
`Attachment - 13
`Attachment - 14
`Attachment - 15
`Attachment - 16
`Attachment - 17
`Attachment - 18
`Attachment - 19
`Attachment - 20
`Attachment - 21
`Attachment - 22
`Attachment - 23
`Attachment - 24
`Attachment - 25
`Attachment - 26
`Attachment - 27
`Attachment - 28
`Attachment - 29
`Attachment - 30
`Attachment - 31
`Attachment - 32
`Attachment - 33
`Attachment - 34
`Attachment - 35
`Attachment - 36
`Attachment - 37
`Attachment - 38
`Attachment - 39
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
`
`OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
`
` 
` 
`

`

`U.S. APPLICATION
`SERIAL NO.   88015458
`
`           
`
`MARK: DEEP SPACE
`RADIO
`
`*88015458*
`
`CORRESPONDENT
`ADDRESS:
`  
`       STATEN, JASON
`
`CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS
`LETTER:
`
`           541 10TH STREET #206
`
`http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp
`
`         ATLANTA, GA 30318
`
`VIEW YOUR APPLICATION FILE
`
`   
`
`              
`    
`
`APPLICANT: Staten, Jason
`
`CORRESPONDENT’S
`REFERENCE/DOCKET
`
`NO:       
`
`  N/A
`
`   
`
`CORRESPONDENT E-
`
`MAIL ADDRESS:       
`
`privacy@trademarkengine.com
`
`OFFICE ACTION
`
`STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER
`TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S
`COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.   A RESPONSE
`TRANSMITTED THROUGH THE TRADEMARK ELECTRONIC APPLICATION SYSTEM (TEAS) MUST BE RECEIVED BEFORE
`MIDNIGHT EASTERN TIME OF THE LAST DAY OF THE RESPONSE PERIOD.
`
`ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 10/17/2018
`
`The referenced application from Jason Staten (“Applicant”) has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.   Applicant must
`respond timely and completely to the issues below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
`
`SUMMARY OF ISSUES
`
`Section 2(d) Refusal – Likelihood of Confusion
`Disclaimer of “RADIO” Required
`Prior-Filed Application Advisory
`
`SECTION 2(d) REFUSAL – LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION
`
`Registration of the applied-for mark, DEEP SPACE RADIO (“The Applied for Mark”) is refused because of a likelihood of confusion with the
`mark in U.S. Registration Nos. 5442491 (“Registration 1”) and 5442492 (“Registration 2”) (jointly, “The Registered Marks”).
`  Trademark Act
`Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); see TMEP §§1207.01 et seq.  See the attached registrations owned by Registrant.
`
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
`  
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
`

`

`Marks are compared in their entireties for similarities in appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression.  Stone Lion Capital
`Partners, LP v. Lion Capital LLP, 746 F.3d 1317, 1321, 110 USPQ2d 1157, 1160 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (quoting Palm Bay Imps., Inc. v. Veuve
`Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee En 1772, 396 F.3d 1369, 1371, 73 USPQ2d 1689, 1691 (Fed. Cir. 2005)); TMEP §1207.01(b)-(b)(v). 
`“Similarity in any one of these elements may be sufficient to find the marks confusingly similar.”   In re Davia, 110 USPQ2d 1810, 1812 (TTAB
`2014) (citing In re 1st USA Realty Prof’ls, Inc. , 84 USPQ2d 1581, 1586 (TTAB 2007)); In re White Swan Ltd., 8 USPQ2d 1534, 1535 (TTAB
`1988)); TMEP §1207.01(b).
`
`Trademark Act Section 2(d) bars registration of an applied-for mark that so resembles a registered mark that it is likely a potential consumer
`would be confused, mistaken, or deceived as to the source of the goods and/or services of the applicant and registrant.  See 15 U.S.C. §1052(d). 
`A determination of likelihood of confusion under Section 2(d) is made on a case-by case basis and the factors set forth in In re E. I. du Pont de
`Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 1361, 177 USPQ 563, 567 (C.C.P.A. 1973) aid in this determination.  Citigroup Inc. v. Capital City Bank Grp.,
`Inc., 637 F.3d 1344, 1349, 98 USPQ2d 1253, 1256 (Fed. Cir. 2011) (citing On-Line Careline, Inc. v. Am. Online, Inc., 229 F.3d 1080, 1085, 56
`USPQ2d 1471, 1474 (Fed. Cir. 2000)).  Not all the du Pont factors, however, are necessarily relevant or of equal weight, and any one of the
`factors may control in a given case, depending upon the evidence of record.  Citigroup Inc. v. Capital City Bank Grp., Inc., 637 F.3d at 1355, 98
`USPQ2d at 1260; In re Majestic Distilling Co., 315 F.3d 1311, 1315, 65 USPQ2d 1201, 1204 (Fed. Cir. 2003); see In re E. I. du Pont de
`Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d at 1361-62, 177 USPQ at 567.
`
`In this case, the following factors are the most relevant:  similarity of the marks, similarity and nature of the services, and similarity of the trade
`channels of the services.  See In re Viterra Inc., 671 F.3d 1358, 1361-62, 101 USPQ2d 1905, 1908 (Fed. Cir. 2012); In re Dakin’s Miniatures
`Inc., 59 USPQ2d 1593, 1595-96 (TTAB 1999); TMEP §§1207.01 et seq.
`
`Similarity of the Marks
`
`The Applied for Mark is DEEP SPACE RADIO and The Registered Marks are SPACE RADIO. The marks are similar in connotation and
`
`commercial impression.  
`
`When comparing marks, “[t]he proper test is not a side-by-side comparison of the marks, but instead ‘whether the marks are sufficiently similar
`in terms of their commercial impression’ such that [consumers] who encounter the marks would be likely to assume a connection between the
`parties.”   In re U.S. Warriors Ice Hockey Program, Inc., 122 USPQ2d 1790, 1795 (TTAB 2017) (citing Coach Servs., Inc. v. Triumph Learning
`LLC, 668 F.3d 1356, 1368, 101 USPQ2d 1713, 1721 (Fed. Cir. 2012)); TMEP §1207.01(b).  The proper focus is on the recollection of the
`average purchaser, who retains a general rather than specific impression of trademarks.  In re Bay State Brewing Co., 117 USPQ2d 1958, 1960
`(TTAB 2016) (citing Spoons Rests. Inc. v. Morrison Inc., 23 USPQ2d 1735, 1741 (TTAB 1991), aff’d per curiam , 972 F.2d 1353 (Fed. Cir.
`1992)); TMEP §1207.01(b).
`
`When evaluating a composite mark containing both words and designs, the word portion is more likely to indicate the origin of the goods and/or
`services because it is that portion of the mark that consumers use when referring to or requesting the goods and/or services.  Bond v. Taylor, 119
`USPQ2d 1049, 1055 (TTAB 2016) (citing In re Viterra Inc., 671 F.3d 1358, 1362, 101 USPQ2d 1905, 1908, 1911 (Fed. Cir. 2012)); TMEP
`§1207.01(c)(ii).  Thus, although marks must be compared in their entireties, the word portion is often considered the dominant feature and is
`accorded greater weight in determining whether marks are confusingly similar, even where the word portion has been disclaimed.  In re Viterra
`Inc., 671 F.3d at 1366-67, 101 USPQ2d at 1911 (citing Giant Food, Inc. v. Nation’s Foodservice, Inc. , 710 F.2d 1565, 1570-71, 218 USPQ2d
`
`390, 395 (Fed. Cir. 1983)).  
`
`The word portion of The Applied for Mark merely adds the term “DEEP” to Registration 1 and to the word portion of Registration 2. Adding a
`term to a registered mark generally does not obviate the similarity between the compared marks, as in the present case, nor does it overcome a
`likelihood of confusion under Section 2(d).  See Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Jos. E. Seagram & Sons, Inc., 526 F.2d 556, 557, 188 USPQ 105, 106
`(C.C.P.A. 1975) (finding BENGAL and BENGAL LANCER and design confusingly similar); In re Toshiba Med. Sys. Corp., 91 USPQ2d 1266,
`1269 (TTAB 2009) (finding TITAN and VANTAGE TITAN confusingly similar); In re El Torito Rests., Inc., 9 USPQ2d 2002, 2004 (TTAB
`1988) (finding MACHO and MACHO COMBOS confusingly similar); TMEP §1207.01(b)(iii).  In the present case, the marks are identical in
`part. This weighs heavily in favor of finding The Applied for Mark confusingly similar to The Registered Marks.
`
`The Applied for Mark includes the phrase “SPACE RADIO” and The Registered Marks are “SPACE RADIO”. Marks may be confusingly
`similar in appearance where similar terms or phrases or similar parts of terms or phrases appear in the compared marks and create a similar
`overall commercial impression.  See Crocker Nat’l Bank v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce , 228 USPQ 689, 690-91 (TTAB 1986), aff’d
`sub nom. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v. Wells Fargo Bank, Nat’l Ass’n , 811 F.2d 1490, 1495, 1 USPQ2d 1813, 1817 (Fed. Cir.
`1987) (finding COMMCASH and COMMUNICASH confusingly similar); In re Corning Glass Works, 229 USPQ 65, 66 (TTAB 1985) (finding
`CONFIRM and CONFIRMCELLS confusingly similar); In re Pellerin Milnor Corp., 221 USPQ 558, 560 (TTAB 1983) (finding MILTRON and
`MILLTRONICS confusingly similar); TMEP §1207.01(b)(ii)-(iii). This also weighs in favor of finding The Applied for Mark confusingly
`
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
`

`

`similar to The Registered Marks.
`
`For the foregoing reasons, The Applied for Mark is confusingly similar to The Registered Mark.
`
`Similarity and Nature of the Services and of the Trade Channels
`
`Applicant’s services are “Entertainment services, namely, providing radio programs in the field of music and musical-based entertainment via a
`global computer network; Entertainment services, namely, providing an ongoing radio program in the field of music and musical-based
`entertainment; Entertainment services, namely, the provision of continuing radio and online radio programs and shows featuring music and
`musical-based entertainment delivered by radio, satellite, the internet, webcasts, and audio and video media; Entertainment in the nature of live
`radio personality performances; Entertainment, namely, a continuing online radio program and radio broadcast show broadcast over the internet
`
`and global computer network; Production of radio programs; Radio entertainment production” in Class 41.   
`
`Registrant’s services associated with Registration 1 are “Music composition for others; Music composition services; Music production services;
`Music selection services for use in television, film, radio and video games; Production of music” in Class 41.
`
`Registrant’s services associated with Registration 2 are “Music composition for others; Music composition services; Music production services;
`Music selection services for use in television, film, radio and video games; Production of music” in Class 41.
`
`The goods and/or services of the parties need not be identical or even competitive to find a likelihood of confusion.  See On-line Careline Inc. v.
`Am. Online Inc., 229 F.3d 1080, 1086, 56 USPQ2d 1471, 1475 (Fed. Cir. 2000); Recot, Inc. v. Becton, 214 F.3d 1322, 1329, 54 USPQ2d 1894,
`1898 (Fed. Cir. 2000) (“[E]ven if the goods in question are different from, and thus not related to, one another in kind, the same goods can be
`
`related in the mind of the consuming public as to the origin of the goods.”); TMEP §1207.01(a)(i).   
`
`The respective goods and/or services need only be “related in some manner and/or if the circumstances surrounding their marketing [be] such
`that they could give rise to the mistaken belief that [the goods] emanate from the same source.”   Coach Servs., Inc. v. Triumph Learning LLC,
`668 F.3d 1356, 1369, 101 USPQ2d 1713, 1722 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (quoting 7-Eleven Inc. v. Wechsler, 83 USPQ2d 1715, 1724 (TTAB 2007));
`TMEP §1207.01(a)(i).
`
`The attached Internet evidence establishes that the same entity provides the relevant services and markets the services under the same mark.  This
`weighs in favor of finding Applicant’s services related to Registrant’s services for likelihood of confusion purposes.
`  See, e.g., In re Davey
`Prods. Pty Ltd., 92 USPQ2d 1198, 1202-04 (TTAB 2009); In re Toshiba Med. Sys. Corp., 91 USPQ2d 1266, 1268-69, 1271-72 (TTAB 2009).
`
`In addition, the trademark examining attorney has attached evidence from the USPTO’s X-Search database consisting of a number of third-party
`marks registered for use in connection with the same or similar services as those of both Applicant and Registrant.  This evidence shows that the
`services listed therein, namely, Applicant’s radio entertainment production, radio personality performances, ongoing radio program, radio
`programs in the field of music, and Registrant’s music production, production of music, music composition, music selection services, are of a
`kind that may emanate from a single source under a single mark.  See In re Aquamar, Inc., 115 USPQ2d 1122, 1126 n.5 (TTAB 2015) (citing In
`re Mucky Duck Mustard Co., 6 USPQ2d 1467, 1470 n.6 (TTAB 1988)); In re Albert Trostel & Sons Co., 29 USPQ2d 1783, 1785-86 (TTAB
`1993); TMEP §1207.01(d)(iii). This also weighs in favor of finding Applicant’s services and Registrant’s services related for likelihood of
`confusion purposes.
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Applicant’s services and Registrant’s services are related for likelihood of confusion purposes.
`
`With respect to trade channels, absent restrictions in an application and/or registration, the identified goods and/or services are “presumed to
`travel in the same channels of trade to the same class of purchasers.”   In re Viterra Inc., 671 F.3d 1358, 1362, 101 USPQ2d 1905, 1908 (Fed.
`
`Cir. 2012) (quoting Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Packard Press, Inc., 281 F.3d 1261, 1268, 62 USPQ2d 1001, 1005 (Fed. Cir. 2002)).  
`
`The identifications set forth in the application and registrations have no restrictions as to nature, type, channels of trade, or classes of purchasers. 
`Therefore, for purpose of a likelihood of confusion analysis, it is presumed that Applicant’s services and Registrant’s services travel in all
`normal channels of trade, and are available to the same class of purchasers.
`
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
`

`

`Section 2(d) Analysis Conclusion
`
`In total, The Applied for Mark, DEEP SPACE RADIO, is confusingly similar to The Registered Marks, SPACE RADIO; Applicant’s services
`are related to Registrant’s services; and Applicant’s services travel in the same trade channels as Registrant’s services. Consequently,
`consumers are likely to be confused by the marks and mistakenly believe that the services that these marks identify originate from a common
`source. Therefore, registration of The Applied for Mark must be refused under Trademark Act Section 2(d) because of a likelihood of confusion
`with The Registered Marks.
`
`Although Applicant’s mark has been refused registration, Applicant may respond to the refusal by submitting evidence and arguments in support
`of registration.  However, if Applicant responds to the refusal set forth above, Applicant must also respond to the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s)
`set forth below.
`
`DISCLAIMER OF “RADIO” REQUIRED
`
`Applicant must disclaim “RADIO” because it merely describes an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose, or use of
`applicant’s goods and/or services, and thus is an unregistrable component of the mark.   See 15 U.S.C. §§1052(e)(1), 1056(a); DuoProSS
`Meditech Corp. v. Inviro Med. Devices, Ltd., 695 F.3d 1247, 1251, 103 USPQ2d 1753, 1755 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (quoting In re Oppedahl & Larson
`
`LLP, 373 F.3d 1171, 1173, 71 USPQ2d 1370, 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2004)); TMEP §§1213, 1213.03(a).  
`
`Applicant’s services include “providing radio programs”, “providing an ongoing radio program”, “provision of continuing radio and online
`radio programs…delivered by radio”, “live radio personality performances”, “continuing online radio program and radio broadcast show”,
`“Production of radio programs”, and “Radio entertainment productions.   Therefore, the wording merely describes Applicant’s radio services.
`
`An applicant may not claim exclusive rights to terms that others may need to use to describe their goods and/or services in the marketplace.  See
`Dena Corp. v. Belvedere Int’l, Inc. , 950 F.2d 1555, 1560, 21 USPQ2d 1047, 1051 (Fed. Cir. 1991); In re Aug. Storck KG, 218 USPQ 823, 825
`(TTAB 1983).  A disclaimer of unregistrable matter does not affect the appearance of the mark; that is, a disclaimer does not physically remove
`the disclaimed matter from the mark.  See Schwarzkopf v. John H. Breck, Inc., 340 F.2d 978, 978, 144 USPQ 433, 433 (C.C.P.A. 1965); TMEP
`
`§1213.  
`
`If Applicant does not provide the required disclaimer, the USPTO may refuse to register the entire mark.  See In re Stereotaxis Inc., 429 F.3d
`1039, 1040-41, 77 USPQ2d 1087, 1088-89 (Fed. Cir. 2005); TMEP §1213.01(b).
`
`Applicant should submit a disclaimer in the following standardized format:
`
`No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “RADIO” apart from the mark as shown.
`
`For an overview of disclaimers and instructions on how to satisfy this disclaimer requirement online using the Trademark Electronic Application
`System (TEAS) form, please go to http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/law/disclaimer.jsp.
`
`PRIOR-FILED APPLICATION ADVISORY
`
`The filing date of pending U.S. Application Serial No. 87873287 precedes Applicant’s filing date.  See attached referenced application.  If the
`mark in the referenced application registers, Applicant’s mark may be refused registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d) because of a
`likelihood of confusion between the two marks.  See 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); 37 C.F.R. §2.83; TMEP §§1208 et seq.  Therefore, upon receipt of
`Applicant’s response to this Office action, action on this application may be suspended pending final disposition of the earlier-filed referenced
`application.
`
`In response to this Office action, Applicant may present arguments in support of registration by addressing the issue of the potential conflict
`between Applicant’s mark and the mark in the referenced application.  Applicant’s election not to submit arguments at this time in no way
`limits Applicant’s right to address this issue later if a refusal under Section 2(d) issues.
`
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
`

`

`RESPONSE GUIDELINES
`
`For this application to proceed further, Applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement raised in this Office action.  If the
`action includes a refusal, Applicant may provide arguments and/or evidence as to why the refusal should be withdrawn and the mark should
`register.  Applicant may also have other options for responding to a refusal and should consider such options carefully.  To respond to
`requirements and certain refusal response options, Applicant should set forth in writing the required changes or statements.  For more information
`and general tips on responding to USPTO Office actions, response options, and how to file a response online, see “Responding to Office
`Actions” on the USPTO’s website.
`
`If Applicant does not respond to this Office action within six months of the issue/mailing date, or responds by expressly abandoning the
`application, the application process will end and the trademark will fail to register.  See 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.65(a), 2.68(a); TMEP
`§§718.01, 718.02.  Additionally, the USPTO will not refund the application filing fee, which is a required processing fee.  See 37 C.F.R.
`§§2.6(a)(1)(i)-(iv), 2.209(a); TMEP §405.04.
`
`Where the application has been abandoned for failure to respond to an Office action, Applicant’s only option would be to file a timely petition to
`revive the application, which, if granted, would allow the application to return to active status.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.66; TMEP §1714.  There is a
`$100 fee for such petitions.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.6, 2.66(b)(1).
`
`Because of the legal technicalities and strict deadlines involved in the USPTO application process, Applicant may wish to hire a private attorney
`specializing in trademark matters to represent Applicant in this process and provide legal advice.  Although the undersigned trademark examining
`attorney is permitted to help an applicant understand the contents of an Office action as well as the application process in general, no USPTO
`
`attorney or staff is permitted to give an applicant legal advice or statements about an applicant’s legal rights.   TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.  
`
`For attorney referral information, Applicant may consult the American Bar Association’s Consumers’ Guide to Legal Help, an attorney referral
`service of a state or local bar association, or a local telephone directory.  The USPTO may not assist an applicant in the selection of a private
`attorney.  37 C.F.R. §2.11.
`
`TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL
`REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE:  Applicants who filed their application online
`using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office
`actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3)
`agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b);
`TMEP §§819, 820.  TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125
`per class of goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04.  However, in certain situations, TEAS
`Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring
`
`this additional fee.   
`
`If Applicant has questions regarding this Office action, please telephone or e-mail the assigned trademark examining attorney.  All relevant e-
`mail communications will be placed in the official application record; however, an e-mail communication will not be accepted as a response to
`this Office action and will not extend the deadline for filing a proper response.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. 
`Further, although the trademark examining attorney may provide additional explanation pertaining to the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this
`Office action, the trademark examining attorney may not provide legal advice or statements about Applicant’s rights.   See TMEP §§705.02,
`709.06.
`
`/Louis Kolodner/
`
`Examining Attorney
`
`Law Office 122
`
`(571)272-7562
`
`Louis.Kolodner@uspto.gov
`
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
`   
` 
`

`

`TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:   Go to http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.   Please wait 48-72 hours from the
`issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application. 
`For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.  For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned
`trademark examining attorney.  E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to
`this Office action by e-mail.
`
`All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.
`
`WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE:  It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an
`applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants).  If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the
`
`response.  
`
`PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION:   To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official
`notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at
`http://tsdr.uspto.gov/.   Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen.   If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the
`Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199.   For more information on checking
`status, see http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/process/status/.
`
`TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS:  Use the TEAS form at http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.
`
` 
` 
` 
`  
`

`

`Pfint:0mfl16,2fl1fl
`
`37530981
`
`DESIGN MARK
`
`serial Number
`8T530981
`
`Status
`REGISTERED
`
`Word Mark
`SPACE RADIC
`
`Standard Character Mark
`Yes
`
`Registration Number
`5442491
`
`Date Registered
`2018x04x10
`
`Type of Mark
`SERVICE MARK
`
`Register
`PRINCIPAL
`
`Mark Drawing Code
`[4]
`STANDARD CHARACTER MARK
`
`Owner
`Beard, Lexie INDIVIDUAL UNITED STATES 130 Cedar Elm Ln. Georgetown
`TEXAS T5206
`
`GoodsfServioes
`Class Status -- ACTIVE.
`
`composition for others; Music composition services: Music production
`services; Music selection services for use in television,
`filmIr radio
`and video games; Production of music. First Use: ZOOBHOIIOI. First
`Use In Commerce: ZOOBKOIFOI.
`
`G d S: Music
`
`IC 041.
`
`US
`
`100 101 10?.
`
`Disclaimer Statement
`No CLAIM Is MADE To THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT To USE "RADIO" APART FROM THE
`MARK AS SHCInm.
`
`Filing Date
`2011;01/11
`
`Examining Attorney
`CALLCWAY, CHRISTINA
`
`Attorneyr of Record
`
`

`

`Print: Dd 16, 2013
`
`37530981
`
`Adam R Villanueva
`
`

`

`SPACE RADIO
`
`

`

`Pfint:0mfl16,2fl1fl
`
`37530990
`
`DESIGN MARK
`
`serial Number
`BTSBOBSO
`
`Status
`REGISTERED
`
`Word Mark
`SPACE RADIC
`
`Standard Character Mark
`No
`
`Registration Number
`5442492
`
`Date Registered
`ZOIBXOAXIO
`
`Type of Mark
`SERVICE MARK
`
`Register
`PRINCIPAL
`
`Mark Drawing Code
`[3] DESIGN PLUS WCRDS, LETTERS ANDXOR NUMBERS
`
`Owner
`Beard, Lexie INDIVIDUAL UNITED STATES 130 Cedar Elm Ln. Georgetown
`TEXAS T5206
`
`GoodsfServiees
`Class Status -- ACTIVE.
`
`composition for others; Music composition services: Music production
`services; Music selection services for use in television,
`filmIr radio
`and video games; Production of music. First Use: ZOOBHOIIOI. First
`Use In Commerce: ZOOBKOIFOI.
`
`G d S: Music
`
`IC 041.
`
`US
`
`100 101 10?.
`
`Disclaimer Statement
`No CLAIM Is MADE TO THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT To USE "RADIO" APART FROM THE
`MARK AS SHCInm.
`
`Description of Mark
`The mark consists of the stylized text "SPACE RADIO"Ir and the term
`"SPACE" is directly above the term "RADIO". The stylized term "RADIO"
`contains a lower case letter "i", which is dotted with a star, and the
`letter "O" is a stylized version of a planet with rings. The shaded
`rectangle represents background and is not a feature of the mark.
`
`.1.
`
`

`

`Print: Out 16, 2013
`
`37530990
`
`Colors Claimed
`Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark.
`
`Filing Date
`201WUW17‘
`
`Examining Attorney
`CALLOWAY , CHRI ST INA
`
`Attorney of Record
`Adam R Villanueva
`
`

`

`
`
`

`

`Pfint:0mfl10,2010
`
`07000710
`
`DESIGN MARK
`
`Serial Number
`8T060T10
`
`Status
`REGISTERED
`
`Word Mark
`SHE so HARD
`
`Standard Character Mark
`Yes
`
`Registration Number
`5219246
`
`Date Registered
`chTxDchs
`
`Type of Mark
`SERvICE MARK
`
`Register
`PRINCIPAL
`
`Mark Drawing Code
`[4]
`STANDARD CHARACTER MARK
`
`Owner
`INDIVIDUAL UNITED
`lyguianta thomas DEA she go hard entertainment
`STATES 3811 dreyfus st 3811 drevfus st houstcn TEXAS 11021
`
`GoodsfServiees
`Class Status -- ACTIVE.
`
`IC 041.
`
`US
`
`100 101 10?.
`
`G d S:
`
`Entertainment event booking agencies; Entertainment services in the
`nature of arranging social entertainment events; Entertainment
`services in the nature of hosting social entertainment events;
`Entertainment services in the nature of organizing social
`entertainment events; Entertainment services, namely, cabarets;
`Entertainment services, namely, conducting parties; Entertainment
`services, namely,
`live, televised and movie appearances by a
`professional entertainer; Entertainment, namely,
`live performances by
`rock groups; Music production services; Radio entertainment
`production; Television show production; Entertainment services in the
`nature of hosting social entertainment events; Entertainment services,
`namely,
`live,
`televised and movie appearances by a professional
`entertainer; Fashion modeling for entertainment purposes; Motion
`picture song production; Production of music; Production of radio
`programs; Providing a website featuring information in the field of
`music and entertainment: Providing on-line non-downloadable general
`
`
`
`.1.
`
`

`

`Pfint:0mfl16,2010
`
`07000710
`
`feature magazines; Publication of magazines; Publication of electronic
`magazines; Publishing of books, magazines; Publishing of web
`magazines; Radio entertainment production. First Use: ZOlflKOBKlO.
`First Use In Commerce: ZOlOEOEXlO.
`
`Filing Date
`ZOlEHOEHOE
`
`Examining Attorney
`RoSENTHAL, AARON E
`
`

`

`She Go Hard
`
`

`

`Pfin1:0mfl16,201fl
`
`37145191
`
`DESIGN MARK
`
`serial Number
`8T145I9I
`
`Sfiuus
`REGISTERED
`
`Registration Number
`5429199
`
`Date Registered
`ZOlBHOBHZU
`
`Type of Mark
`SERVICE MARK
`
`Register
`PRINCIPAL
`
`Mark Drawing Code
`[2] DESIGN oNLY
`
`Chuner
`Holi Concept GmbH LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY FED REP GERMANY Boxhagener
`StraBe TlA_Berlin FED REP GERMANY 10245
`
`GoodSIServices
`Class Status -- ACTIVE.
`
`IC 041.
`
`US
`
`100 101 10?.
`
`G & S:
`
`Entertainment services, namely, conducting, organizing, producing, and
`presenting live musical performances and musical festivals;
`Entertainment services, namely, hosting music festivals; Entertainment
`services, namely, conducting, organizing, producing, and presenting a
`cultural festival; Entertainment services, namely, arranging for
`ticket reservations for live musical performances, musical festivals,
`and cultural festivals; Entertainment services, namely, radio
`entertainment production; Production and distribution of radio
`programs; Music production services; Music publishing services; Video
`production services: Entertainment services, namely, visual recording
`of music entertainment; Organization of exhibitions for cultural and
`education purposes; Educational services, namely, conducting,
`exhibiting, and presenting conferences, workshops, classes, and
`seminars related to culture, music, and entertainment; Providing an
`entertainment website featuring non—downloadable entertainment and
`multi-media materials in the nature of articles, blogs,
`interviews,
`journal entries, social media feeds, and videos featuring news and
`information related to music, musical artists, music based
`links to
`entertainment, performances by musicians and entertainers,
`music websites, and music performance ticket information; Providing an
`educational website featuring non—downloadable educational and
`
`
`multi-media materials in the nature of articles and videos featuring
`
`.1.
`
`

`

`Print: Oct 16, 2013
`
`3714-5191
`
`links to cultural
`news and information related to cultural eventsIr
`websites, and cultural event ticket information; Electronic publishing
`
`services, namely, providing digital publication of literary works
`related to music and musical festivals. First Use: ZOlBXUlXOl. First
`Use In Commerce: ZOlBKOlFUl.
`
`Description of Mark
`The mark consists of several curved and swirling bands.
`
`Colors Claimed
`Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark.
`
`Filing Date
`ZOZLEHOBHZO
`
`Examining Attorney
`ADEMI , XHENETA
`
`Attorney of Record
`Gandhar Savur
`
`

`

`
`
`

`

`Pfint:0mfl16,2fl1fl
`
`37181669
`
`DESIGN MARK
`
`Serial Number
`STlSlEES
`
`Status
`REGISTERED
`
`Word Mark
`DJ PNUT
`
`Standard Character Mark
`Yes
`
`Registration Number
`5203162
`
`Date Registered
`zoiixosxis
`
`Type of Mark
`SERvICE MARK
`
`Register
`PRINCIPAL
`
`Mark Drawing Code
`[4]
`STANDARD CHARACTER MARK
`
`Owner
`Charles A Wilson III ARA DJ PNut
`
`INDIVIDUAL UNITED STATES 2518
`
`Huntingdon Chase Sandy Springs GEORGIA 30350
`
`GoodsfServiees
`Class Status -- ACTIVE.
`
`IC 041.
`
`US
`
`100 101 10?.
`
`G & S:
`
`Entertainment services by a musical artist and producer, namely,
`musical composition for others and production of musical sound
`recordings; Entertainment services in the nature of development,
`creation, production and post-production services of multimedia
`entertainment content; Entertainment services in the nature of
`development, creation, production, distribution, and post—production
`of music and lifestyle content; Entertainment services in the nature
`of live visual and audio performances, namely, musical, variety, news
`and comedy shows; Entertainment services in the nature of presenting
`live musical performances; Entertainment services in the nature of
`
`recording, production and post—production services in the field of
`music; Hosting social entertainment events, namely, night club
`
`
`parties, day time parties or concerts, for others; Masuer o: ceremony
`services for parties and special events; Night Club services;
`Arranging, organizing, conducting, and hosting social entertainment
`events: Audio mastering: Entertainment services by a musical artist
`
`
`
`.1.
`
`

`

`Pfint:0mfl16,2fl1fl
`
`37181669
`
`and producer, namely, musical composition for others and production of
`musical sound recordings: Entertainment services in the nature of
`
`development, creation, production, distribution, and post-production
`
`of music; Entertainment services in the nature of hosting social
`
`entertainment events: Enoeroainment services in “he naoure of live
`
`
`
`
`
`
`musical performances; Enueruainment services in “he nauure of live
`visual and audio performances by disc jockey or artist; Entertainment
`services in the nature of live visual and audio performances, namely,
`musical, variety, news and comedy shows; Entertainment services in the
`nature of li