`
`Subject:
`
`Sent:
`
`Sent As:
`
`Attachments:
`
`McCarthy, Nathan (mswyers@thetrademarkcompany.com)
`
`U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 86491495 - TAMALPAIS SURF CLUB THE TIME TUNNEL -
`N/A
`
`11/28/2015 11:25:49 AM
`
`ECOM117@USPTO.GOV
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
`OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
`
`U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 86491495
`
`
`
`MARK: TAMALPAIS SURF CLUB THE TIME
`TUNNEL
`
`CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:
`
` MATTHEW H SWYERS
`
` The Trademark Company
` 344 Maple Ave W # 151
` Vienna, VA 22180-5612
`
`
`
`APPLICANT: McCarthy, Nathan
`
`
`
`*86491495*
`
`CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS
`LETTER:
`http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp
`
`VIEW YOUR APPLICATION FILE
`
`CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET
`
`
`
` N/A
`
`NO:
`CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS:
`
` mswyers@thetrademarkcompany.com
`
`STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER
`TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S
`COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.
`
`OFFICE ACTION
`
`ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 11/28/2015
`
`THIS IS A FINAL ACTION.
`
`On May 27, 2015, action on this application was suspended pending the disposition of U.S. Application Serial No. 86458133. The referenced
`pending application has abandoned and is no longer a potential bar to the registration of applicant’s mark.
`
`Applicant filed a request to change the owner name on January 2, 2015. This request was denied, and applicant was required to clarify whether
`the proper party filed the original application. Applicant did not address this issue in its May 20, 2015, response. As such, the requirement that
`applicant clarify whether the proper party filed the original application is now made FINAL for the reasons set forth below. See 37 C.F.R.
`§§2.63(b), 2.71(d).
`
`REQUEST TO CHANGE OWNER NAME DENIED – NO ASSIGNMENT FILED
`
`Applicant has requested that the owner name be amended; however, applicant has not provided a reason for this request, or provided or recorded
`ownership transfer documentation. The name of one of the original applicants is Nathan McCarthy DBA Proof Lab, a California partnership;
`applicant seeks to amend this to Proof Lab, a California corporation (with deletion of the other partner, William Hutchinson). The request to
`change the owner name raises a question regarding whether the proper party filed the original application. Indeed, if the name change is allowed
`as applicant has requested, then the partnership with William Hutchinson ceases to exist, and any subsequent arrangement constitutes a new
`entity. See TMEP §803.03(b).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Therefore, applicant must clarify whether the proper party filed the original application. In addition, the request to amend the owner name is
`denied until clear chain of title to the new party has been established.
`
`An application is void if it was filed in the name of a party who did not own, or was not entitled to use, the applied-for mark on the application
`filing date. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(d); Huang v. Tzu Wei Chen Food Co., 849 F.2d 1458, 1459-60, 7 USPQ2d 1335, 1335-36 (Fed. Cir. 1988); TMEP
`§§803.06, 1201.02(b); see 15 U.S.C. §1051(a)(1). A void application cannot be cured by amendment or assignment. TMEP §§803.06,
`1201.02(b); see 37 C.F.R. §2.71(d). In these cases, the true owner must file a new application. TMEP §803.06.
`
`If the application was filed by the owner and the original applicant has since changed its name or transferred ownership of the mark to another
`entity, the new owner must file documentation to establish its ownership of the application as follows:
`
`(1) The new owner must (a) record an assignment, name change, or other documentation affecting title with the USPTO’s Assignment
`Recordation Branch showing a clear chain of title to the mark in the new owner; and (b) promptly notify the trademark examining
`attorney that the documentation has been recorded.
`
`(2) The new owner must file either (a) a written statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20,
`explaining in detail the chain of title to the new owner; or (b) documentation showing transfer of title to the new owner. However, the
`registration will not issue in the name of the new owner without recording chain of title documentation with the USPTO and notifying the
`trademark examining attorney, as specified in (1) above.
`
`TMEP §502.01; see 15 U.S.C. §1060; 37 C.F.R. §§2.193(e)(1), 3.73(b)(1); TMEP §502.02(a).
`
`Assignments and other documents affecting title may be filed electronically at http://etas.uspto.gov/. There is a fee for recording ownership
`changes. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(b)(6), 3.41(a); TMEP §503.03(d). Recording an assignment or other ownership transfer document does not constitute
`
`a response to an Office action. TMEP §503.01(d).
`
`If the party applying to register the mark is in fact the owner of the mark, but there is a typographical error or other minor mistake in the manner
`the owner name is set forth in the application, the mistake may be corrected by amendment. U.S. Pioneer Elecs. Corp. v. Evans Mktg., Inc., 183
`USPQ 613, 614 (Comm’r Pats. 1974); TMEP §1201.02(c) (providing examples of correctable and non-correctable errors).
`
`This requirement is now made FINAL.
`
`RESPONSE OPTIONS
`
`Applicant must respond within six months of the date of issuance of this final Office action or the application will be abandoned. 15 U.S.C.
`§1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a). Applicant may respond by providing one or both of the following:
`
`(1)
`
`(2)
`
`A response that fully satisfies all outstanding requirements and/or resolves all outstanding refusals.
`
`An appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, with the appeal fee of $100 per class.
`
`37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(1)-(2); TMEP §714.04; see 37 C.F.R. §2.6(a)(18); TBMP ch. 1200.
`
`In certain rare circumstances, an applicant may respond by filing a petition to the Director pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(2) to review
`procedural issues. TMEP §714.04; see 37 C.F.R. §2.146(b); TBMP §1201.05; TMEP §1704 (explaining petitionable matters). The petition fee
`is $100. 37 C.F.R. §2.6(a)(15).
`
`/Andrew Leaser/
`Trademark Examining Attorney
`Law Office 117
`(571) 272-1911
`andrew.leaser@uspto.gov
`
`TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond
`to this Office action by e-mail. Instead, go to http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp to file a formal response. Please wait
`48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system
`
`updates of the application. For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.
`For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney. All informal communications relevant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to this application will be placed in the official application record.
`
`TEAS PLUS APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING
`SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus application
`form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §819.02(b) for a complete list of
`these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail
`throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §2.22(b); TMEP §819. TEAS Plus applicants who do not meet these requirements
`must submit an additional processing fee of $50 per international class of goods. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c); TMEP §819.04. However, in
`certain situations, TEAS Plus applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone without
`
`incurring this additional fee.
`WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE: It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an
`applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants). If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the
`
`response.
`PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official
`notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at
`http://tsdr.uspto.gov/. Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen. If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the
`Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199. For more information on checking
`status, see http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/process/status/.
`
`TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS: Use the TEAS form at http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`To:
`
`Subject:
`
`Sent:
`
`Sent As:
`
`Attachments:
`
`McCarthy, Nathan (mswyers@thetrademarkcompany.com)
`
`U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 86491495 - TAMALPAIS SURF CLUB THE TIME TUNNEL -
`N/A
`
`11/28/2015 11:25:50 AM
`
`ECOM117@USPTO.GOV
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
`
`IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING YOUR
`U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION
`
`USPTO OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) HAS ISSUED
`ON 11/28/2015 FOR U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 86491495
`
`Please follow the instructions below:
`
`(1) TO READ THE LETTER: Click on this link or go to http://tsdr.uspto.gov, enter the U.S. application serial number, and click on
`“Documents.”
`
`The Office action may not be immediately viewable, to allow for necessary system updates of the application, but will be available within 24
`hours of this e-mail notification.
`
`(2) TIMELY RESPONSE IS REQUIRED: Please carefully review the Office action to determine (1) how to respond, and (2) the applicable
`response time period. Your response deadline will be calculated from 11/28/2015 (or sooner if specified in the Office action). For information
`regarding response time periods, see http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/process/status/responsetime.jsp.
`
`Do NOT hit “Reply” to this e-mail notification, or otherwise e-mail your response because the USPTO does NOT accept e-mails as
`responses to Office actions.
`Instead, the USPTO recommends that you respond online using the Trademark Electronic Application System
`(TEAS) response form located at http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.
`
`(3) QUESTIONS: For questions about the contents of the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney. For
`technical assistance in accessing or viewing the Office action in the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system, please e-mail
`TSDR@uspto.gov.
`
`WARNING
`
`Failure to file the required response by the applicable response deadline will result in the ABANDONMENT of your application. For
`more information regarding abandonment, see http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/basics/abandon.jsp.
`
`PRIVATE COMPANY SOLICITATIONS REGARDING YOUR APPLICATION: Private companies not associated with the USPTO are
`using information provided in trademark applications to mail or e-mail trademark-related solicitations. These companies often use names that
`closely resemble the USPTO and their solicitations may look like an official government document. Many solicitations require that you pay
`
`“fees.”
`
`Please carefully review all correspondence you receive regarding this application to make sure that you are responding to an official document
`from the USPTO rather than a private company solicitation. All official USPTO correspondence will be mailed only from the “United States
`Patent and Trademark Office” in Alexandria, VA; or sent by e-mail from the domain “@uspto.gov.” For more information on how to handle
`private company solicitations, see http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/solicitation_warnings.jsp.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site