To:
`
`Subject:
`
`Sent:
`
`Sent As:
`
`Attachments:
`
`RAIN INTERNATIONAL LLC (docket@mabr.com)
`
`U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 86039531 - RAIN - R1835.80922U
`
`11/22/2013 11:30:54 AM
`
`ECOM106@USPTO.GOV
`
`Attachment - 1
`Attachment - 2
`Attachment - 3
`Attachment - 4
`Attachment - 5
`Attachment - 6
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
`OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160) (cid:160)(cid:160) TRACEY HARRACH
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160) (cid:160)(cid:160) MASCHOFF BRENNAN LAYCOCK GILMORE ISRAELS
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`1389 CENTER DR STE 300
`(cid:160)(cid:160) (cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160) (cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) PARK CITY, UT 84098-7660
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`*86039531*
`
`CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:
`http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp
`
`(cid:160) (cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 86039531
`(cid:160) (cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) MARK: RAIN
`(cid:160)(cid:160) (cid:160)(cid:160) (cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) APPLICANT: RAIN INTERNATIONAL LLC
`(cid:160) (cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO :(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`(cid:160) (cid:160) R1835.80922U
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS:(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`(cid:160) (cid:160) docket@mabr.com
`
`OFFICE ACTION
`
`STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER
`TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S
`COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.
`
`(cid:160)I
`
`SSUE/MAILING DATE: 11/22/2013
`
`The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.(cid:160) Applicant must respond timely and completely to
`the issue(s) below.(cid:160) 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
`
`SECTION 2(d) REFUSAL – LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION
`
`The following refusal is limited to Class 3.
`
`(cid:160)R
`
`egistration of the applied-for mark is refused because of a likelihood of confusion with the mark in U.S. Registration No. 3683697.(cid:160) Trademark
`Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); see TMEP §§1207.01 et seq.(cid:160) See the enclosed registration.
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`rademark Act Section 2(d) bars registration of an applied-for mark that so resembles a registered mark that it is likely a potential consumer
`would be confused, mistaken, or deceived as to the source of the goods and/or services of the applicant and registrant.(cid:160) See 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).(cid:160)
`A determination of likelihood of confusion under Section 2(d) is made on a case-by case basis and the factors set forth in In re E. I. du Pont de
`Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (C.C.P.A. 1973) aid in this determination.(cid:160) Citigroup Inc. v. Capital City Bank Grp., Inc., 637
`F.3d 1344, 1349, 98 USPQ2d 1253, 1256 (Fed. Cir. 2011) (citing On-Line Careline, Inc. v. Am. Online, Inc., 229 F.3d 1080, 1085, 56 USPQ2d
`1471, 1474 (Fed. Cir. 2000)).(cid:160) Not all the du Pont factors, however, are necessarily relevant or of equal weight, and any one of the factors may
`
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`

`

`control in a given case, depending upon the evidence of record.(cid:160) Citigroup Inc. v. Capital City Bank Grp., Inc., 637 F.3d at 1355, 98 USPQ2d at
`1260; In re Majestic Distilling Co., 315 F.3d 1311, 1315, 65 USPQ2d 1201, 1204 (Fed. Cir. 2003); see In re E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476
`F.2d at 1361-62, 177 USPQ at 567.
`
`(cid:160)I
`
`n this case, the following factors are the most relevant:(cid:160) similarity of the marks, similarity and nature of the goods and/or services, and similarity
`of the trade channels of the goods and/or services.(cid:160) See In re Viterra Inc., 671 F.3d 1358, 1361-62, 101 USPQ2d 1905, 1908 (Fed. Cir. 2012); In
`re Dakin’s Miniatures Inc. , 59 USPQ2d 1593, 1595-96 (TTAB 1999); TMEP §§1207.01 et seq.
`
`(cid:160)I
`
`n a likelihood of confusion determination, the marks in their entireties are compared for similarities in appearance, sound, connotation, and
`commercial impression.(cid:160) In re E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 1361, 177 USPQ 563, 567 (C.C.P.A. 1973); TMEP §1207.01(b)-
`
`(b)(v).(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`In the present case, applicant’s mark is RAIN and registrant’s mark is RAIN.(cid:160) Thus, the marks are identical in terms of appearance and sound.(cid:160)
`In addition, the connotation and commercial impression of the marks do not differ when considered in connection with applicant’s and
`registrant’s respective goods and/or services.
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`herefore, the marks are confusingly similar.(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`The goods and/or services of the parties need not be identical or even competitive to find a likelihood of confusion.(cid:160) See On-line Careline Inc. v.
`Am. Online Inc., 229 F.3d 1080, 1086, 56 USPQ2d 1471, 1475 (Fed. Cir. 2000); Recot, Inc. v. Becton, 214 F.3d 1322, 1329, 54 USPQ2d 1894,
`1898 (Fed. Cir. 2000) (“[E]ven if the goods in question are different from, and thus not related to, one another in kind, the same goods can be
`
`related in the mind of the consuming public as to the origin of the goods.”); TMEP §1207.01(a)(i). (cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`The respective goods and/or services need only be “related in some manner and/or if the circumstances surrounding their marketing [be] such
`that they could give rise to the mistaken belief that [the goods and/or services] emanate from the same source.” (cid:160) Coach Servs., Inc. v. Triumph
`Learning LLC, 668 F.3d 1356, 1369, 101 USPQ2d 1713, 1722 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (quoting 7-Eleven Inc. v. Wechsler, 83 USPQ2d 1715, 1724
`(TTAB 2007)); Gen. Mills Inc. v. Fage Dairy Processing Indus. SA, 100 USPQ2d 1584, 1597 (TTAB 2011); TMEP §1207.01(a)(i).
`
`(cid:160)A
`
`pplicant’s goods are “Body and beauty care cosmetics; Cosmetics and cosmetic preparations; Cosmetic preparations for bath and shower;
`Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, creams, lotions, balms, oils, serums, gels, exfoliants, toners, cleaners, peels, and polishes;
`Cosmetics and cosmetic preparations containing plant and seed extracts and/or the cold-pressed extracts of botanical seeds; Cosmetic
`preparations for the hair; Hair care preparations containing plant and seed extracts and/or the cold-pressed extracts of botanical seeds;
`Sunscreens; Sunblocks; Skin care preparations with SPF.” (cid:160) The registrant’s goods are “Bar soap; Bath soaps in liquid, solid or gel form; Hand
`soaps.”
`
`(cid:160)W
`
`ith respect to applicant’s and registrant’s goods and/or services, the question of likelihood of confusion is determined based on the
`description of the goods and/or services stated in the application and registration at issue, not on extrinsic evidence of actual use.(cid:160) See, e.g.,
`Coach Servs., Inc. v. Triumph Learning LLC, 668 F.3d 1356, 1369-70, 101 USPQ2d 1713, 1722 (Fed. Cir. 2012); Octocom Sys. Inc. v. Hous.
`
`Computers Servs. Inc., 918 F.2d 937, 942, 16 USPQ2d 1783, 1787 (Fed. Cir. 1990).(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`Absent restrictions in an application and/or registration, the identified goods and/or services are “presumed to travel in the same channels of
`trade to the same class of purchasers.” (cid:160) In re Viterra Inc., 671 F.3d 1358, 1362, 101 USPQ2d 1905, 1908 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (quoting Hewlett-
`Packard Co. v. Packard Press, Inc., 281 F.3d 1261, 1268, 62 USPQ2d 1001, 1005 (Fed. Cir. 2002)).(cid:160) Additionally, unrestricted and broad
`identifications are presumed to encompass all goods and/or services of the type described.(cid:160) See In re Jump Designs, LLC, 80 USPQ2d 1370, 1374
`
`(TTAB 2006) (citing In re Elbaum, 211 USPQ 639, 640 (TTAB 1981)); In re Linkvest S.A., 24 USPQ2d 1716, 1716 (TTAB 1992).(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`In this case, the identification set forth in the application and registration(s) has no restrictions as to nature, type, channels of trade, or classes of
`purchasers.(cid:160) Therefore, it is presumed that these goods and/or services travel in all normal channels of trade, and are available to the same class
`of purchasers.(cid:160) Further, the application use(s) broad wording to describe the goods and/or services and this wording is presumed to encompass
`all goods and/or services of the type described, including those in registrant(s)’s more narrow identification. (cid:160) Specifically, applicant’s cosmetic
`preparations for bath and shower, and skin care preparations such as cleaners could include registrants’ soaps. (cid:160) The attached web page evidence
`from Miracle Soap, Cosmetic Garden, and Neutrogena demonstrates that cosmetic preparations often include soaps, and that soaps are a type of
`cleaner.(cid:160) Thus, the goods are related, if not identical.
`
`(cid:160)W
`
`here the goods and/or services of an applicant and registrant are “similar in kind and/or closely related,” the degree of similarity between the
`marks required to support a finding of likelihood of confusion is not as great as in the case of diverse goods and/or services.(cid:160) In re J.M. Originals
`Inc., 6 USPQ2d 1393, 1394 (TTAB 1987); see Shen Mfg. Co. v. Ritz Hotel Ltd., 393 F.3d 1238, 1242, 73 USPQ2d 1350, 1354 (Fed. Cir. 2004);
`TMEP §1207.01(b).
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he overriding concern is not only to prevent buyer confusion as to the source of the goods and/or services, but to protect the registrant from
`adverse commercial impact due to use of a similar mark by a newcomer.(cid:160) See In re Shell Oil Co., 992 F.2d 1204, 1208, 26 USPQ2d 1687, 1690
`
`

`

`(Fed. Cir. 1993).(cid:160) Therefore, any doubt regarding a likelihood of confusion determination is resolved in favor of the registrant.(cid:160) TMEP
`§1207.01(d)(i); see Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Packard Press, Inc., 281 F.3d 1261, 1265, 62 USPQ2d 1001, 1003 (Fed. Cir. 2002); In re Hyper
`Shoppes (Ohio), Inc., 837 F.2d 463, 464-65, 6 USPQ2d 1025, 1026 (Fed. Cir. 1988).
`
`(cid:160)F
`
`or the reasons set forth above, registration is refused based on the Trademark Act Section 2(d).
`
`(cid:160)I
`
`dentification
`
`The wording “Skin care preparations with SPF;” and “Non-alcoholic beverages containing plant and seed extracts, cold-pressed extracts of
`botanical seeds, and/or D-ribose; Concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of beverages containing plant and seed extracts, cold-
`pressed extracts of botanical seeds, and/or D-ribose; Preparations for making beverages, namely, sports drinks and energy drinks” in the
`identification of goods is indefinite and must be clarified because it is unclear.(cid:160) See TMEP §1402.01.(cid:160) Applicant must more clearly indicate the
`type of skin care preparation for classification purposes.(cid:160) The specific type of non-alcoholic beverage must be specified.(cid:160) The beverages
`containing plant and seed extracts, cold-pressed extracts of botanical seeds, and/or D-ribose is unclear.(cid:160) The specific type of preparation must be
`clarified.(cid:160) Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate:
`
`(cid:160)C
`
`lass 3 –
`Body and beauty care cosmetics; Cosmetics and cosmetic preparations; Cosmetic preparations for bath and shower; Non-medicated skin care
`preparations, namely, creams, lotions, balms, oils, serums, gels, exfoliants, toners, cleaners, peels, and polishes; Cosmetics and cosmetic
`preparations containing plant and seed extracts and/or the cold-pressed extracts of botanical seeds; Cosmetic preparations for the hair; Hair care
`preparations containing plant and seed extracts and/or the cold-pressed extracts of botanical seeds; Sunscreens; Sunblocks; Non-medicated skin
`care preparations with SPF
`
`(cid:160)C
`
`lass 5 –
`Medicated skin care preparations with SPF
`
`(cid:160)C
`
`lass 32 –
`Beauty beverages, namely, fruit juices and energy drinks containing nutritional supplements; Fruit-flavored beverages; Isotonic beverages; Non-
`alcoholic, non-carbonated soft drinks; Sports drinks; Energy drinks; Concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of sports drinks,
`energy drinks and fruit-flavored drinks
`
`(cid:160)I
`
`dentifications of goods can be amended only to clarify or limit the goods; adding to or broadening the scope of the goods is not permitted.(cid:160) 37
`C.F.R. §2.71(a); see TMEP §§1402.06 et seq., 1402.07.(cid:160) Therefore, applicant may not amend the identification to include goods that are not
`within the scope of the goods set forth in the present identification.
`
`(cid:160)F
`
`or assistance with identifying and classifying goods and/or services in trademark applications, please see the online searchable Manual of
`Acceptable Identifications of Goods and Services at http://tess2.uspto.gov/netahtml/tidm.html.(cid:160) See TMEP §1402.04.
`
`(cid:160)M
`
`ULTIPLE-CLASS APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he application identifies goods and/or services that are classified in at least 3 classes; however, applicant submitted a fee(s) sufficient for only 2
`class(es).(cid:160) In a multiple-class application, a fee for each class is required.(cid:160) 37 C.F.R. §2.86(a)(2); TMEP §§810.01, 1403.01.
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`herefore, applicant must either (1) restrict the application to the number of classes covered by the fees already paid, or (2) submit the fees for
`each additional class.
`
`The filing fees for adding classes to an application are as follows:
`
`(1)(cid:160) A $325 fee per class, when the fees are submitted with an electronic response filed online at
`http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp, via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).
`
`(2)(cid:160) A $375 fee per class, when the fees are submitted with a paper response.
`
`(cid:160)3
`
`7 C.F.R. §2.6(a)(1)(i)-(ii); TMEP §§810, 1403.02(c).
`
`/Tejbir Singh/
`Trademark Attorney
`Law Office 106
`571-272-5878
`
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`

`

`571-273-9106 (fax)
`Tejbir.Singh@uspto.gov (informal inquiries only)
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`O RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: (cid:160) Go to http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp. (cid:160) Please wait 48-72 hours from the
`issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application.(cid:160)
`For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.(cid:160) For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned
`trademark examining attorney.(cid:160) E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to
`this Office action by e-mail.
`
`(cid:160)A
`
`ll informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.
`
`(cid:160)W
`
`HO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE:(cid:160) It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an
`applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants).(cid:160) If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the
`
`response.(cid:160)(cid:160)
`PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: (cid:160) To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official
`notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at
`http://tsdr.uspto.gov/. (cid:160) Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen. (cid:160) If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the
`Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199. (cid:160) For more information on checking
`status, see http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/process/status/.
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`O UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS:(cid:160) Use the TEAS form at http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)
`

`

`
`
`
`“mum Encu ennui Lme_yu£t.“I
`fL5£'_£4-'_ig9u,
`
`‘full-E “ESE-
`
`
`
`Miracie II Soap
`The snap that started it all
`and deodorizer... all in
`ifs a soap
`cleaner
`degreaser
`one! Miracle ll Soap cleanses your skin, your hair, and your
`home —inclIiding1he laundry, One nflhe rnosl amazingproducls
`lhal has ever been nresenled Io mankind! Mosl oflhis spiritual
`product IS from Ihe dusl ollhe earth. wrlhmil Ihe drawbacks and
`harsh ingredients ofordinary soaps and delergenls,
`Naturally concenlraled and deconlamiilaling Di|Li1e II In create
`sululionsfor lighl, mediun, or heavy cleaning,, Revealed in
`Claylon Tedelon more Ihan 20 years ago, new uses are
`discovered all lire lime! Iilnre lnformalinn.
`
`0 Account Lngin
`F-£9"! ‘PE _
`l
`izasmunii:
`
`J
`
`Our Ploducls
`Valu—PaI:|(
`PTPH EEEIIHHI OE
`Mirade II Soap
`Mnlstung Soap
`lleutraizer Liquid
`lleutraizer Gui
`Skin nimistunizer
`Therapeutic Bal
`
`CPDTV BIIIS
`M
`It
`Case Unils
`Organic (‘arrier oils
`llewsetter
`
`llatural Deodorant
`
`Miracle ll Snag - 2 oz.
`Price $14.95 MSRP: 5-19:99
`Quanlrlv in Basket none
`
`Quanlily: 1
`
`Your Basket
`Yam hasket is empty,
`
`HEALTHY
`.
` coNNEcnoi~is"
`Miracle 11 Newsletter
`Publshed nnce per
`h
`'
`I
`:l‘l3OSITtLJS;v;fi;Jt;:B:ttl:il';'\tS
`and unqUE,ntE,wEw5_
`loin Healthy uannectluns
`enter your email address
`
`2x Stiengfll Soag
`Price $26.95 MSRP: $3599
`Qiianlrlv in Basket none
`E Quanlily: 1
`am r.:.E:a;iei
`
`
`e|':9~Mi.mde" Sol ' 1 '1'
`
`
`
`Price $59.95 MSRP:$W-99
`Gummy In Basket "we
`Quanlily: 1
`am r.:.Ea;iei
`
`
`Quanlily: 1
`
`Gallon Snag — Low Foam
`Price $59.95 MSRP: $3-99
`Qiianlily in Basket none
`
`Quanlily: 1
`
`am r.:.E:a;iei
`
`
`202 Eadie Pumg
`Price 5295 MSRP: 53:95
`Qiianlily in Basket none
`
`
`
`
`
` Same Dag Shiggngl
`Plucc your Ill
`3 in man by
`
`
`um csr [Mu
`um: yam
`
`_ order will -nip an in
`ma uayi
`
`
` Excluding Fuduul Hnlldlyl,
`
`
`
` ; Jill! I I I n
` nIiac|esoap.com : ililngllliradgoapnom : 1—:mH:9ssonp(7r-27)
`ele| | |CL|m:l| |A|fi|ia1ePv mule
`
`lIln:l'Mviiw niradfioanmrrilsoap Ilnl
`111521AM11i22i‘2D13
`
`

`

` V
`
`Testimonia 5
`
`ALL NATURAL Lotion Bar
`This '5 beauiiflfly crafted btinn bar - al nalurai - great for far your skh.
`detaiis
`Qty:£ TntaI:$7
`Add In Cart
`
`
`
`Lavender Hand and Body Lotion
`8 oz of Lavender Luxury (avaiabie abo n 40: bottles). This great Eohnn
`has real Lavender essental oi mixed a1 it. Goes welwnh Lavender snap.
`detalis
`Qty:1 Tm3I:$1D
`Add to Carl
`
`Vitamin Grapefruit Body Lotion
`Rejuvenamg nun sticky fonnuia baded wth Vtarnn E as we! as 100
`“In pure Fhk grapeflui: essential oi Boz. bottie
`detaiis
`Qty: 1 1'ulaI:$1lJ
`Add to can
`
`
`
`Lotion Sale on Ebay
`Our ebav stole Eu‘. great saies for iotion
`details
`Qty:1 Tm3I:$5a|e
`
`
`
`(Q LUIJ. All FIQTIE TESETVECI. L.0SlT|€1JC VJETCIEH.
`
`‘p Site develnped by: Techparade Designs
`
`http.ffwww.co5meIicgarden.comfprodudidetal|5.php?id:Ei0dy
`11:16 47AM 1iI2212[)i3
`
`

`

`
`
`Q1y:1 'lotal:$sale
`
`_
`Goat MI|kSoap
`All natural. Great for sensitive skin.
`detais
`Qly:1 ToIaI:$6
`
`m
`
`est mon
`
`Lavender Soap
`Relaxing power of Lavender combined with other natural
`healing ingrediens. If you need to relax, you need to
`use Eh": soap.
`detais
`Qly:1 rotaI:5,4.5o
`
`i V
`
`itamin Grapefruit Soap
`Rejuvenating fonnula contains a huge portion of Vitamin
`E as well as 100 % pure Pink grapefruit &ential oil.
`deals
`Qly:1 ToIaI:$6
`
`i P
`
`eppennint Lavender Soap
`ALLM.auxa—s.mea..dboiss'u.»,gorge«.s.
`detais
`Qly:1 rmaI:5,5.5o
`
`E o
`
`ur store on ebay
`mmemebay—anun,onsaie
`decals
`
`1 Honey Almond Soap
`l
`This '5 a fantaslic combination of almond oil and
`honey.
`detais
`Qly:1 Tola|:$4.5
`‘ E
`
`Honey Goat Milk Soap
`Combination of clear yellowish honey with all natural,
`hypo allergenic goat milk.
`
`Surprise Soap - Combination of Glycerin
`and Castile Soap
`nssacmmamu.of¢,cana..dcasmsoap—s.pa.a:e,.u.
`ammurnmm.
`detais
`Qlv:1 TuIaI:$6
`i
`
`
`
`Honey Soap
`Use me power of Honey and feel the difference.
`detais
`Qly:1 TotaI:$4.$0
`
`i
`
`imp Ilwwwcosrrlellcgamen C0mIp(oduCl_delaIls plp'!ld=Soap
`H 17 12AM 11I22f2013
`
`

`

`1‘,~m»mm,.mn,,.s25~ -sum “Mann.
`C\mlLuvA.uun
`‘
`L,
`5;/qua
`Lxwn Cm ~r
`
`
`
`W.‘
`
`Hsmn
`
`Aw
`,-..»mm.w¢ E1!
`S:=nrnr.;54n.‘5?1sH'.
`>n> Mvwwwu 1.-,».w«
`uIPRur1m
`
`
`owm
`
`;
`
`.V_,_,‘ n .
`
`7 n
`
`‘ 1‘.1 1.; nrnenfl
`tttt “Mt
`$7 49
`BMW
`
`rmmm.‘ Fir
`tttti um:
`$2 43
`33!
`
`mo»-
`
`Him a=mxPmm 4 mm 'z=r
`tit!‘ “/<5
`$8 99
`|'""W ‘
`
`
`
`r\,u1:A1cu-mlhnuuh vmv-my ».....a
`rum mm M! L
`"um
`«mu :...
`ttttfi-em:
`s7 49
`as 99
`3% %
`
`
`
`
`name: ummum 5 »-
`>,mh
`g-*1‘-1 .,:y;
`
`,.w W
`
`$7 49
`
`non W. mg u...w
`«nun um:
`se 49
`Eflfl
`
`
`M M. 1:3mmm WC! wmrauxvw
`Mdruv-(mm.-u
`pg-*1, mm:
`37 49
`
`\§
`Lg
`wm.mW mam
`‘Jr-W101
`«w
`it!’
`$8 49
`
`.r_
`
`_
`Nsulma=u®Nmuvz 5 rm. . Dodv u..
`atwaamv
`$3 99
`
`[:22 Gem my cm.’
`tttt 2x
`~
`$5 89
`
`mm
`
`
`MU: men \cuYs
`amM, 1 Nnks
`Mies rm Ahruelenex
`",lannsw1Fpvr»g
`mrucwwis
`‘(Hus Lssenlw w
`R515:mmmo
`N|4n—1A:M mm
`Ema-sun mm;
`mm am
`, {:7 Hum! ;
`“u ymy
`mu-‘mm. mm
`
` ‘bulrmsn-an wfl
`Fm:/vfl Pmmmm.
`me an swam
`u m.A..L-
`.4JwPmL=uvUmv|
`
`3‘m....»-/...‘M.q.
`‘
` mm am~
`mm tun!)
`
`_"
`
`‘Q
`
`I
`
`n.¢mmm—.. ’Ze11vI
`tiff! "M5
`$5 59
`
`np;.m.—n rwnm=<—mh
`tit? '? W
`55 99
`
`has). ‘:1 WWW :r:mmj =~m»
`ittii 4075
`$6 99
`
`
`
`,:vy1.msr Huiuuhu
`Dmwik
`uxwsmx.
`ttit
`
`57 49
`
`
`
`mum UI\yrL~/;lS)mcC:u1.:\
`‘kitt
`wl:/5
`$7 49
`
`Jam-,nunm;
`tfifii
`
`$5 49
`
`
`
`mm“Ame mu m, Scrub
`tam»:-
`
`5529
`Eflfil
`
`0\\—F'eeAA:n: mm Cream Guraer
`an-ta-1 ms
`5599
`mm:
`
`
`ax
`m Fm-Iwv W; M mm. W
`Fame Gkmscr
`i‘h t 1
`
`
`$7 49
`
`
`
`c 1 We:Am:'.'.'mramc m.
`ta-1--Aunms
`ssas
`ENE!
`‘
`
`
`
`.. /..‘.v.v.r..«n.w.. “':~‘nm
`/7
`n Hlkama
`k t *Vt
`‘ V M’
`$7 49
`
`
`
`Hum.
`MVnmvwrmlrwenarxnv1vLHfBwVV'ch4r§e~sI<fiW|rhar§e«s:10mn_snlr:4?W|e&mu_nmixmHuo&wn_arIml9n»CLmm\m*r-llmvamea-—-Mahew‘Rnvuwevhxmnjemy
`.....»-mu.-awm...ua..... ...u..H:»,.....m.mu<.uu»aww.« rlllx urfl‘J4II1.os:¢/mu
`u IkMV3IlM11'£AZUI5
`
`

`

`Print: NOV 22, 2013
`
`773004-24-
`
`DESIGN MARK
`
`Serial Number
`11300424
`
`Status
`REGISTERED
`
`Word Mark
`RAIN
`
`Standard Character Mark
`Yes
`
`Registration Number
`368369?
`
`Date Registered
`2DDSxDSx15
`
`Type ef Marl:
`TRADEMARK
`
`Register
`PRINCIPAL
`
`Mark Drawing Code
`[4]
`STANDARD CHARACTER MARK
`
`Dwner
`Vendome Beauty Group, LLC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY CHIC PO Box 515
`Washington Depot CONNECTICUT UETB4
`
`Goodsfserviees
`Class Status -- ACTIVE.
`
`IC 003.
`
`US
`
`U01 U04 U06 U50 U51 052.
`
`G & S:
`
`Bar soap; Bath soaps in liquid, solid or gel form: Hand soaps. First
`Use: 2003/CE/CC. First Use In Commerce: 2CO3flOf2T.
`
`Filing Date
`2CD?/ID/ID
`
`Examining Attorney
`LEE, YAT SYE
`
`

`

`RAIN
`
`

`

`To:
`
`Subject:
`
`Sent:
`
`Sent As:
`
`Attachments:
`
`RAIN INTERNATIONAL LLC (docket@mabr.com)
`
`U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 86039531 - RAIN - R1835.80922U
`
`11/22/2013 11:30:55 AM
`
`ECOM106@USPTO.GOV
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
`
`IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING YOUR
`U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION
`
`USPTO OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) HAS ISSUED
`ON 11/22/2013 FOR U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 86039531
`
`Please follow the instructions below:
`
`(cid:160)(
`
`1)(cid:160) TO READ THE LETTER:(cid:160) Click on this link or go to http://tsdr.uspto.gov, enter the U.S. application serial number, and click on
`“Documents.”
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he Office action may not be immediately viewable, to allow for necessary system updates of the application, but will be available within 24
`hours of this e-mail notification.
`
`(cid:160)(
`
`2)(cid:160) TIMELY RESPONSE IS REQUIRED:(cid:160) Please carefully review the Office action to determine (1) how to respond, and (2) the applicable
`response time period.(cid:160) Your response deadline will be calculated from 11/22/2013 (or sooner if specified in the Office action).(cid:160) For information
`regarding response time periods, see http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/process/status/responsetime.jsp.
`
`(cid:160)D
`
`o NOT hit “Reply” to this e-mail notification, or otherwise e-mail your response because the USPTO does NOT accept e-mails as
`responses to Office actions.(cid:160)
`Instead, the USPTO recommends that you respond online using the Trademark Electronic Application System
`(TEAS) response form located at http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.
`
`(cid:160)(
`
`3)(cid:160) QUESTIONS:(cid:160) For questions about the contents of the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.(cid:160) For
`technical assistance in accessing or viewing the Office action in the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system, please e-mail
`TSDR@uspto.gov.
`
`WARNING
`
`(cid:160)F
`
`ailure to file the required response by the applicable response deadline will result in the ABANDONMENT of your application.(cid:160) For
`more information regarding abandonment, see http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/basics/abandon.jsp.
`
`PRIVATE COMPANY SOLICITATIONS REGARDING YOUR APPLICATION:(cid:160) Private companies not associated with the USPTO are
`using information provided in trademark applications to mail or e-mail trademark-related solicitations.(cid:160) These companies often use names that
`closely resemble the USPTO and their solicitations may look like an official government document.(cid:160) Many solicitations require that you pay
`
`“fees.” (cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`Please carefully review all correspondence you receive regarding this application to make sure that you are responding to an official document
`from the USPTO rather than a private company solicitation.(cid:160) All official USPTO correspondence will be mailed only from the “United States
`Patent and Trademark Office” in Alexandria, VA; or sent by e-mail from the domain “@uspto.gov.” (cid:160) For more information on how to handle
`private company solicitations, see http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/solicitation_warnings.jsp.
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160)
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

PTO Denying Access

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket