`
`Subject:
`
`Sent:
`
`Sent As:
`
`Attachments:
`
`The Smiley Company (SPRL) (sbaron@mandellmenkes.com)
`
`U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 79073546 - 9243
`
`10/21/2015 5:03:39 PM
`
`ECOM109@USPTO.GOV
`
`Attachment - 1
`Attachment - 2
`Attachment - 3
`Attachment - 4
`Attachment - 5
`Attachment - 6
`Attachment - 7
`Attachment - 8
`Attachment - 9
`Attachment - 10
`Attachment - 11
`Attachment - 12
`Attachment - 13
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
`OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
`
`U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. (cid:160) 79073546
`
`(cid:160) (cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`(cid:160)M
`
`ARK:
`
`CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:
`(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160) (cid:160) (cid:160) Steven L. Baron
`(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160) (cid:160) (cid:160) Mandell Menkes LLC
`(cid:160) (cid:160) (cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) Suite 3600
`(cid:160) (cid:160) (cid:160)(cid:160) (cid:160) (cid:160) One North Franklin St.
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160) (cid:160) Chicago IL 60606
`
`APPLICANT: The Smiley Company (SPRL)
`
`(cid:160) (cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET
`
`*79073546*
`
`(cid:160)C
`
`LICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS
`LETTER:
`http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp
`
`VIEW YOUR APPLICATION FILE
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`(cid:160) 9243
`
`NO:(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS:(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`sbaron@mandellmenkes.com
`
`OFFICE ACTION
`
`STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`O AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S
`COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.
`
`(cid:160)I
`
`SSUE/MAILING DATE: 10/21/2015
`
`INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION NO. 1015069
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS NOTIFICATION:(cid:160) TO AVOID PARTIAL ABANDONMENT OF THE REQUEST FOR
`EXTENSION OF PROTECTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE A COMPLETE RESPONSE
`
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`
`
`TO THIS PROVISIONAL PARTIAL REFUSAL NOTIFICATION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE “DATE ON WHICH THE
`NOTIFICATION WAS SENT TO WIPO (MAILING DATE)” LOCATED ON THE WIPO COVER LETTER ACCOMPANYING THIS
`NOTIFICATION.
`
`(cid:160)I
`
`n addition to the Mailing Date appearing on the WIPO cover letter, a holder (hereafter “applicant”) may confirm this Mailing Date using the
`USPTO’s Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.uspto.gov/.(cid:160) To do so, enter the U.S. application serial
`number for this application and then select “Documents.” (cid:160) The Mailing Date used to calculate the response deadline for this provisional partial
`refusal is the “Create/Mail Date” of the “IB-1rst Refusal Note.”
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`his is a PROVISIONAL PARTIAL REFUSAL of the request for extension of protection of the mark in the above-referenced U.S. application
`that applies to only the following class 025 in the application:(cid:160) (cid:160) See 15 U.S.C. §1141h(c).(cid:160) See below in this notification (hereafter “Office
`action”) for details regarding the provisional partial refusal.
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`A.(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`Refusal to Register: Likelihood of Confusion as to class 025 only
`
`(cid:160) R
`
`egistration of the applied-for mark is refused because of a likelihood of confusion with the mark in U.S. Registration Nos. 4727831, 4261640,
`4376671, 3842325, 3700179 and 3700178.(cid:160) Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); see TMEP §§1207.01 et seq.(cid:160) See the enclosed
`registrations.
`
`(cid:160)F
`
`or the reasons discussed below, the examining attorney concludes that confusion as to the source of goods and services is likely between the
`applicant's mark DESIGN OF A SMILEY FACE (cid:160) and the registrant's marks all DESIGNS OF A SMILEY FACE for the goods and/or
`services listed in the application.
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`rademark Act Section 2(d) bars registration of an applied-for mark that so resembles a registered mark that it is likely that a potential consumer
`would be confused or mistaken or deceived as to the source of the goods and/or services of the applicant and registrant.(cid:160) See 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).(cid:160)
`The court in In re E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (C.C.P.A. 1973) listed the principal factors to be considered
`when determining whether there is a likelihood of confusion under Section 2(d).(cid:160) See TMEP §1207.01.(cid:160) However, not all of the factors are
`necessarily relevant or of equal weight, and any one factor may be dominant in a given case, depending upon the evidence of record.(cid:160) In re
`Majestic Distilling Co., 315 F.3d 1311, 1315, 65 USPQ2d 1201, 1204 (Fed. Cir. 2003); see In re E. I. du Pont, 476 F.2d at 1361-62, 177 USPQ at
`567.
`
`(cid:160)I
`
`n this case, the following factors are the most relevant:(cid:160) similarity of the marks, similarity of the goods and/or services, and similarity of trade
`channels of the goods and/or services.(cid:160) See In re Opus One, Inc., 60 USPQ2d 1812 (TTAB 2001); In re Dakin’s Miniatures Inc. , 59 USPQ2d
`1593 (TTAB 1999); In re Azteca Rest. Enters., Inc., 50 USPQ2d 1209 (TTAB 1999); TMEP §§1207.01 et seq.In any likelihood of confusion
`determination, two key considerations are similarity of the marks and similarity or relatedness of the goods and/or services.(cid:160) Syndicat Des
`Proprietaires Viticulteurs De Chateauneuf-Du-Pape v. Pasquier DesVignes, 107 USPQ2d 1930, 1938 (TTAB 2013) (citing Federated Foods,
`Inc. v. Fort Howard Paper Co., 544 F.2d 1098, 1103, 192 USPQ 24, 29 (C.C.P.A. 1976)); In re Iolo Techs., LLC, 95 USPQ2d 1498, 1499
`(TTAB 2010); see TMEP §1207.01.(cid:160) That is, the marks are compared in their entireties for similarities in appearance, sound, connotation, and
`commercial impression.(cid:160) In re Viterra Inc., 671 F.3d 1358, 1362, 101 USPQ2d 1905, 1908 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (quoting In re E. I. du Pont de
`Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 1361, 177 USPQ 563, 567 (C.C.P.A. 1973)); TMEP §1207.01(b)-(b)(v).(cid:160) Additionally, the goods and/or
`services are compared to determine whether they are similar or commercially related or travel in the same trade channels.(cid:160) See Coach Servs., Inc.
`v. Triumph Learning LLC, 668 F.3d 1356, 1369-71, 101 USPQ2d 1713, 1722-23 (Fed. Cir. 2012); Herbko Int’l, Inc. v. Kappa Books, Inc. , 308
`F.3d 1156, 1165, 64 USPQ2d 1375, 1381 (Fed. Cir. 2002); TMEP §1207.01, (a)(vi).
`
`Similarity of the Marks
`
`Marks are compared in their entireties for similarities in appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression.(cid:160) Stone Lion Capital
`Partners, LP v. Lion Capital LLP, 746 F.3d 1317, 1321, 110 USPQ2d 1157, 1160 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (quoting Palm Bay Imps., Inc. v. Veuve
`Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee En 1772, 396 F. 3d 1369, 1371, 73 USPQ2d 1689, 1691 (Fed. Cir. 2005)); TMEP §1207.01(b)-(b)(v).(cid:160)
`“Similarity in any one of these elements may be sufficient to find the marks confusingly similar.” (cid:160) In re Davia, 110 USPQ2d 1810, 1812 (TTAB
`2014) (citing In re 1st USA Realty Prof’ls, Inc. , 84 USPQ2d 1581, 1586 (TTAB 2007)); In re White Swan Ltd., 8 USPQ2d 1534, 1535 (TTAB
`1988)); TMEP §1207.01(b).
`
`(cid:160)A
`
`lthough marks are compared in their entireties, one feature of a mark may be more significant or dominant in creating a commercial
`impression.(cid:160) See In re Viterra Inc., 671 F.3d 1358, 1362, 101 USPQ2d 1905, 1908 (Fed. Cir. 2012); In re Nat’l Data Corp. , 753 F.2d 1056,
`1058, 224 USPQ 749, 751 (Fed. Cir. 1985); TMEP §1207.01(b)(viii), (c)(ii).(cid:160) Greater weight is often given to this dominant feature when
`determining whether marks are confusingly similar.(cid:160) See In re Nat’l Data Corp. , 753 F.2d at 1058, 224 USPQ at 751.
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`
`(cid:160)I
`
`n the present case, the applicant’ s mark(s) the design of a smiley face and the registered mark(s) as a design of smiley faces are similar in
`appearance and sound and would create the same general overall commercial impression among potential consumers. The marks are all basically
`identical and there is no difference in commercial impression.
`
`(cid:160)I
`
`f the marks of the respective parties are identical or highly similar, the examining attorney must consider the commercial relationship between
`the goods or services of the respective parties carefully to determine whether there is a likelihood of confusion.(cid:160) In re Concordia International
`Forwarding Corp., 222 USPQ 355 (TTAB 1983).
`
`(cid:160)S
`
`imilarity of the Goods/Services
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he second part of the legal analysis involves comparing the goods to determine whether they are similar or related, and could cause a mistaken
`belief among potential purchasers that the goods come from a common source.
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he goods and/or services of the parties need not be identical or even competitive to find a likelihood of confusion.(cid:160) See On-line Careline Inc. v.
`Am. Online Inc., 229 F.3d 1080, 1086, 56 USPQ2d 1471, 1475 (Fed. Cir. 2000); Recot, Inc. v. Becton, 214 F.3d 1322, 1329, 54 USPQ2d 1894,
`1898 (Fed. Cir. 2000) (“[E]ven if the goods in question are different from, and thus not related to, one another in kind, the same goods can be
`
`related in the mind of the consuming public as to the origin of the goods.”); TMEP §1207.01(a)(i). (cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`The respective goods and/or services need only be “related in some manner and/or if the circumstances surrounding their marketing [be] such
`that they could give rise to the mistaken belief that [the goods and/or services] emanate from the same source.” (cid:160) Coach Servs., Inc. v. Triumph
`Learning LLC, 668 F.3d 1356, 1369, 101 USPQ2d 1713, 1722 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (quoting 7-Eleven Inc. v. Wechsler, 83 USPQ2d 1715, 1724
`(TTAB 2007)); TMEP §1207.01(a)(i).
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he fact that the goods of the parties differ is not controlling in determining likelihood of confusion.(cid:160) The issue is not likelihood of confusion
`between particular goods, but likelihood of confusion as to the source or sponsorship of those goods.(cid:160) In re Majestic Distilling Co., 315 F.3d
`1311, 1316, 65 USPQ2d 1201, 1205 (Fed. Cir. 2003); In re Shell Oil Co., 992 F.2d 1204, 1208, 26 USPQ2d 1687, 1689 (Fed. Cir. 1993); TMEP
`§1207.01.
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he applicant’s goods/services, namely “ Clothing, namely, shirts, t-shirts, pants, dresses, shorts, coats, jackets, jogging suits, bathing suits,
`bathing trunks; footwear used in connection with beach, ski or sports; slippers; socks; baby cloth bibs; clothing items made of leather or imitation
`leather, namely, belts; headgear, namely, hats, caps, berets; scarves; gloves as clothing; neckties; hosiery; underwear” are almost identical to
`registrant’s goods/services, namely:
`
`(cid:160)R
`
`egistration No. 4727831 class 025 as Coats; sweaters; pants; shirts; trousers; skirts; shorts; T-shirts; pyjamas; swimsuits; underwear; socks and
`stockings; scarves; neckties; gloves; footwear; hats; caps.
`
`(cid:160)R
`
`egistration No. 4261640, class 025 as Caps; footwear; hats; pants; shirts; shorts; skirts; T-shirts; underwear; visors
`
`(cid:160)R
`
`egistration No. 4376671 class 025 as Caps; Coats; Footwear; Gloves; Hats; Neckties; Pajamas; Pants; Scarves; Shirts; Shorts; Skirts; Socks and
`stockings; Sweaters; Swimsuits; T-shirts; Trousers; Underwear
`
`(cid:160)R
`
`egistration No. 3842325 class 025 as Caps; Coats; Footwear; Gloves; Hats; Neckties; Pajamas; Pants; Scarves; Shirts; Shorts; Skirts; Socks and
`stockings; Sweaters; Swimsuits; T-shirts; Trousers; Underwear
`
`(cid:160)R
`
`egistration No. 3700179 class 025 as Caps; Coats; Footwear; Gloves; Hats; Neckties; Pants; Pyjamas; Scarves; Shirts; Shorts; Skirts; Socks and
`stockings; Sweaters; Swimsuits; T-shirts; Trousers; Underwear
`
`(cid:160)R
`
`egistration No 3700178 class 025 as Caps; Coats; Footwear; Gloves; Hats; Neckties; Pants; Pyjamas; Scarves; Shirts; Shorts; Skirts; Socks and
`stockings; Sweaters; Swimsuits; T-shirts; Trousers; Underwear
`
`(cid:160)I
`
`t is therefore quite likely that both applicant’s and registrant’s goods/services will travel through the same channels of trade to the same classes
`of purchasers.
`
`When analyzing an applicant’s and registrant’s goods and/or services for similarity and relatedness, that determination is based on the
`description of the goods and/or services stated in the application and registration at issue, not on extrinsic evidence of actual use.(cid:160) See Octocom
`Sys. Inc. v. Hous. Computers Servs. Inc., 918 F.2d 937, 942, 16 USPQ2d 1783, 1787 (Fed. Cir. 1990); see also Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Packard
`
`Press Inc., 281 F.3d 1261, 1267, 62 USPQ2d 1001, 1004 (Fed. Cir. 2002).(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`Absent restrictions in an application and/or registration, the identified goods and/or services are presumed to travel in the same channels of trade
`to the same class of purchasers.(cid:160) Citigroup Inc. v. Capital City Bank Grp., Inc., 637 F.3d 1344, 1356, 98 USPQ2d 1253, 1261 (Fed. Cir. 2011);
`
`(cid:160)
`
`
`Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Packard Press Inc., 281 F.3d at 1268, 62 USPQ2d at 1005.(cid:160) Additionally, unrestricted and broad identifications are
`presumed to encompass all goods and/or services of the type described.(cid:160) See In re Jump Designs, 80 USPQ2d 1370, 1374 (TTAB 2006); In re
`
`Linkvest S.A., 24 USPQ2d 1716, 1716 (TTAB 1992).(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`In this case, the identifications set forth in the application and registration(s) are identical and have no restrictions as to nature, type, channels of
`trade, or classes of purchasers.(cid:160) Therefore, it is presumed that these goods and/or services travel in all normal channels of trade, and are available
`to the same class of purchasers.(cid:160) See Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc. v. Societe des Produits Nestle S.A., 685 F.3d 1046, 1053, 103 USPQ2d 1435,
`1440 (Fed. Cir. 2012).(cid:160) Accordingly, the goods and/or services of applicant and the registrant(s) are considered related for purposes of the
`likelihood of confusion analysis.
`
`(cid:160)N
`
`either the application nor the registration(s) contains any limitations regarding trade channels for the goods and therefore it is assumed that
`registrant’s and applicant’s goods are sold everywhere that is normal for such items, i.e., clothing and department stores.
`(cid:160) Thus, it can also be
`assumed that the same classes of purchasers shop for these items and that consumers are accustomed to seeing them sold under the same or
`similar marks.(cid:160) See Kangol Ltd. v. KangaROOS U.S.A., Inc., 974 F.2d 161, 23 USPQ2d 1945 (Fed. Cir. 1992); In re Smith & Mehaffey, 31
`USPQ2d 1531 (TTAB 1994); TMEP §1207.01(a)(iii).
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he marks are very similar.(cid:160) The goods/services are identical.(cid:160) The similarities among the marks and the goods/services are so great as to create a
`likelihood of confusion among consumers. The examining attorney must resolve any doubt regarding a likelihood of confusion in favor of the
`prior registrant.(cid:160) In re Hyper Shoppes (Ohio), Inc., 837 F.2d 463, 6 USPQ2d 1025 (Fed. Cir., 1988).(cid:160) TMEP §§1207.01(d)(i).
`
`(cid:160)A
`
`lthough applicant’s mark has been refused registration, applicant may respond to the refusal(s) by submitting evidence and arguments in
`support of registration.
`
`(cid:160)A
`
`pplicant must respond within six months of the date of issuance of this final Office action or the following class to which the refusal(s) and/or
`requirement(s) apply will be deleted from the application by Examiner’s Amendment: (cid:160)(cid:160) 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a); see 15 U.S.C. §1062(b).
`
`(cid:160)C
`
`lass 025
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he application will then proceed with the following classes 016 and 018.
`
`(cid:160)A
`
`pplicant may respond by providing one or both of the following:
`
`A response that fully satisfies all outstanding requirements and/or resolves all outstanding refusals.
`
`An appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, with the appeal fee of $100 per class
`
`(1)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`(cid:160)(
`
`2)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`(cid:160)3
`
`7 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(1)-(2); TMEP §714.04; see 37 C.F.R. §2.6(a)(18); TBMP ch. 1200.
`
`(cid:160)I
`
`n certain rare circumstances, an applicant may respond by filing a petition to the Director pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(2) to review
`procedural issues.(cid:160) TMEP §714.04; see 37 C.F.R. §2.146(b); TBMP §1201.05; TMEP §1704 (explaining petitionable matters).(cid:160) The petition fee
`is $100.(cid:160) 37 C.F.R. §2.6(a)(15).
`
`(cid:160)W
`
`HO IS PERMITTED TO RESPOND TO THIS PROVISIONAL PARTIAL REFUSAL:(cid:160) Any response to this provisional refusal must
`be personally signed by an individual applicant, all joint applicants, or someone with legal authority to bind a juristic applicant (e.g., a corporate
`officer or general partner).(cid:160) 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(b), 2.193(e)(2)(ii); TMEP §712.01.(cid:160) If applicant hires a qualified U.S. attorney to respond on his or
`her behalf, then the attorney must sign the response.(cid:160) 37 C.F.R. §§2.193(e)(2)(i), 11.18(a); TMEP §§611.03(b), 712.01.(cid:160) Qualified U.S. attorneys
`include those in good standing with a bar of the highest court of any U.S. state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and other federal
`territories and possessions of the United States.(cid:160) See 37 C.F.R. §§2.17(a), 2.62(b), 11.1, 11.14(a); TMEP §§602, 712.01.(cid:160) Additionally, for all
`responses, the proper signatory must personally sign the document or personally enter his or her electronic signature on the electronic filing.(cid:160) See
`37 C.F.R. §2.193(a); TMEP §§611.01(b), 611.02.(cid:160) The name of the signatory must also be printed or typed immediately below or adjacent to the
`signature, or identified elsewhere in the filing.(cid:160) 37 C.F.R. §2.193(d); TMEP §611.01(b).
`
`(cid:160)I
`
`n general, foreign attorneys are not permitted to represent applicants before the USPTO (e.g., file written communications, authorize an
`amendment to an application, or submit legal arguments in response to a requirement or refusal).(cid:160) See 37 C.F.R. §11.14(c), (e); TMEP §§602.03-
`
`.03(b), 608.01.(cid:160)(cid:160)
`DESIGNATION OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE:(cid:160) The USPTO encourages applicants who do not reside in the United States to
`designate a domestic representative upon whom any notice or process may be served.(cid:160) TMEP §610; see 15 U.S.C. §§1051(e), 1141h(d); 37
`
`C.F.R. §2.24(a)(1)-(2).(cid:160) Such designations may be filed online at http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`(cid:160)
`
`
`/William Rossman/
`EXAMINING ATTORNEY
`LAW OFFICE 109
`PHONE: 571-272-9029
`EMAIL: william.rossman@uspto.gov
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)
`TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: (cid:160) Go to http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp. (cid:160) Please wait 48-72 hours from the
`issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application.(cid:160)
`For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.(cid:160) For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned
`trademark examining attorney.(cid:160) E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to
`this Office action by e-mail.
`
`(cid:160)A
`
`ll informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.
`
`(cid:160)W
`
`HO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE:(cid:160) It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an
`applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants).(cid:160) If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the
`
`response.(cid:160)(cid:160)
`PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: (cid:160) To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official
`notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at
`http://tsdr.uspto.gov/. (cid:160) Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen. (cid:160) If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the
`Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199. (cid:160) For more information on checking
`status, see http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/process/status/.
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`O UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS:(cid:160) Use the TEAS form at http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`
`Print: Oct 19, 2015
`
`T734760!-
`
`DESIGN MARK
`
`Serial Number
`TT34TeD4
`
`Status
`REGISTERED
`
`Registration Number
`4127331
`
`Date Registered
`2015jO4j28
`
`Type of Merit
`TRADEMARK
`
`Register
`PRINCIPAL
`
`Mark Drawing Code
`[2] DESIGN oNLY
`
`Owner
`Harvey E-all Smile Limited LIMITED LIABILITY ooMPANY JAPAN
`#832Minamimeguroen Blg 4-6-16 Kamiosaki Shinagawa-ku JAPAN 141-U021
`
`Goodsiservices
`G & S: Coats;
`U22 039.
`US
`IC 025.
`Class Status -- ACTIVE.
`sweaters: pants; shirts: trousers: skirts; shorts: T—shirts: pyjamas:
`swimsuits; underwear; socks and stockings; scarves; neokties; gloves;
`footwear; hats; Caps. First Use: ZOOBKOZKZT. First Use In Commerce:
`2009fO2f27.
`
`Prior Registratiems)
`3242122
`
`Colors claimed
`Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark.
`
`Filing Date
`2001212209
`
`Examining Attorney
`oRNDoREE, LINDA
`
`
`
`
`
`Print: Oct 10, 2015
`
`77010000
`
`DESIGN MARK
`
`Serial Number
`11610600
`
`Status
`SECTION 8—ACCEPTED
`
`Registration Number
`3100110
`
`Date Registered
`2009110120
`
`Type ef Marl:
`TRADEMARK
`
`Register
`PRINCIPAL
`
`Mark Drawing Code
`[2] DESIGN ONLY
`
`Owner
`Harvey ea11 Smile Limited LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY JAPAN
`#832Minamimegur0en Bldg 4-6-16 Kamiosaki Shinagawa-ku JAPAN 141-0021
`
`Goodsiservices
`
`G & S: Caps; Coats:
`U22 039.
`US
`IC 025.
`Class Status -- ACTIVE.
`Footwear: Gloves; Hats: Neckties: Pants; Pyjamas: Scarves: Shirts:
`Shorts; Skirts; Socks and stockings; Sweaters; Swimsuits; T—shirts;
`Trousers; Underwear. First Use: ZOOBKOZKZT. First Use In Commerce:
`2009fO2f21.
`
`Prior Registratiems)
`3066112:3502405;3502982
`
`Colors claimed
`Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark.
`
`Filing Date
`2008H11H09
`
`Examining Attorney
`e00DMAN, WENDY
`
`
`
`
`
`Print: Oct 19, 2015
`
`77810632
`
`DESIGN MARK
`
`Serial Number
`TT610632
`
`Status
`SECTION 8-ACCEPTED
`
`Registration Number
`3100179
`
`Date Registered
`2009j10j2U
`
`Type ef Marl:
`TRADEMARK
`
`Register
`PRINCIPAL
`
`Mark Drawing Code
`[2] DESIGN ONLY
`
`Owner
`Harvey E-all Smile Limited LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY JAPAN
`#832Minamimegur0en Bldg 4-6-16 Kamiosaki Shinagawa-ku JAPAN 141-U021
`
`Goodsiservices
`
`G & S: Caps; Coats:
`U22 039.
`US
`IC 025.
`Class Status -- ACTIVE.
`Footwear: Gloves; Hats: Neckties: Pants; Pyjamas: Scarves: Shirts:
`Shorts; Skirts; Socks and stockings; Sweaters; Swimsuits; T-shirts;
`Trousers; Underwear. First Use: ZOOBKOZKZT. First Use In Commerce:
`2009fO2f27.
`
`Prior Registratiems)
`3066172:3502405;3502982
`
`Colors claimed
`Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark.
`
`Filing Date
`2008f11f1O
`
`Examining Attorney
`GDDDMAN, WENDY
`
`
`
`
`
`Pfint:Dmfl19,2fl15
`
`TTE2B1TB
`
`DESIGN MARK
`
`Serial Number
`TT628lT8
`
`Status
`REGISTERED
`
`Registration Number
`42G1G4O
`
`Date Registered
`2OI2x12x1e
`
`Type of Merit
`TRADEMARK
`
`Register
`PRINOIPAL
`
`Mark Drawing Code
`[2] DESIGN ONLY
`
`Chuner
`HARVEY EALL GMILE LIMITED LIMITED LIABILITY OOMPANY JAPAN
`
`#832MINAMIMEGUROEN BLDG 4-6-16 KRMIOSAKI
`I41-D021
`
`sHINAGAWA—KU TOKYO JAPAN
`
`Geedsisewices
`Class Status —— ACTIVE.
`
`IC 033.
`
`US
`
`O4? 049.
`
`G & S: Wines. First
`
`Use: 2009/O2/27. First Use In Commerce: 2009/O2/2?.
`
`Goodsiservices
`Class Status -- HCTIVE.
`
`IC 014.
`
`US
`
`O02 O27 O28 050.
`
`G & S: Alarm
`
`clocks; bracelets; bracelets Of precious metal; brooches;
`chronometers: clocks: cuff—1inks; earrings: figures of precious metal:
`figurines of precious metal;
`insignias of precious metal; key holders
`of precious metals; key rings of precious metal; necklaces; precious
`gemstones: tie clips: tie pins; watch bands: watches: wrist watches.
`First Use: ZUOQHOZ/27. First Use In Commerce: QOOQHOQHQT.
`
`Guudsiservices
`Class Status —— ACTIVE.
`
`Ic O20.
`
`Us
`
`O02 O13 O22 O25 O32 O50.
`
`G a G:
`
`Cushions; furniture, mirrors, picture frames; non—metal key rings;
`pillows. First Use: 2009fO2f2?. First Use In Commerce: 2009fO2f27.
`
`Goodsfservices
`Class Status -- ACTIVE.
`
`IC 021.
`
`US
`
`O02 O13 O23 O29 OED O33 O40 050.
`
`G & S: Bath sponges; combs; cups; drinking glasses; hair brushes; pet
`brushes; plates; serving platters. First Use: ZOOSHOZHZT. First Use
`In Commerce: 2009fO2f2?.
`
`.1.
`
`
`
`Pfint:Dmfl19,2fl15
`
`TTE2B1TB
`
`Goodsiservioes
`G & 8: Bath linen: bed
`O42 050.
`US
`IC 024.
`Class Status —— ACTIVE.
`linen; bed linen and table linen; canvas for tapestry or embroidery;
`cloth labels; curtain fabric; curtains made of textile fabrics;
`household linen: textile fabrics for lingerie; towels. First Use:
`ZOOSHOZHZT. First Use In Commerce: 2009fO2f2?.
`
`Goodsiservices
`footwear;
`G & S: Caps;
`O22 039.
`US
`IC 025.
`Class Status —— ACTIVE.
`hats; pants; shirts; shorts; skirts; T—shirts; underwear; visors.
`First Use: 2009fO2f27. First Use In Commerce: 2009fO2f27.
`
`Goodsffiewices
`Class Status —— ACTIVE.
`
`IC 028.
`
`US
`
`O22 O23 O38 050.
`
`G & 8: Action
`
`skill games; childrenis multiple activity toys; dolls; parlor games;
`play figures; play houses; stuffed toys. First Use: ZUUBKUZKZT.
`First Use In Commerce: 2009fO2f27.
`
`Goodsffiewices
`G & 5: Beverages made of
`046.
`US
`IC 030.
`Class Status -- ACTIVE.
`coffee; biscuits; bread; candy; caramels; chewing gum; chocolate;
`chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based;
`cones for ice cream: cookies; crackers: cream puffs; doughnuts: honey;
`ice candies;
`ice cream; pancakes; pasta; pies; sauces; seasonings;
`sherbet; sponge cakes; sugar; wafers. First Use: ZOOBHOZKET. First
`Use In Commerce: 2009KO2f2?.
`
`Prior Rogistration(s)
`3066172:3502405:3502982
`
`Description of Marl:
`The mark consists of a smiley face.
`
`Colors Claimed
`Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark.
`
`Filing Date
`2008H12H08
`
`Examining Attorney
`RHIM, ANDREW
`
`
`
`___________
`
`_______E%_______=__E_______
`
`_______
`
`
`
`Pfint:Dmfl19,2fl15
`
`77832762
`
`DESIGN MARK
`
`Serial Number
`TT632T62
`
`Status
`REGISTERED
`
`Registration Number
`3342325
`
`Date Registered
`2010jO8j31
`
`Type of Merit
`TRADEMARK
`
`Register
`PRINCIPAL
`
`Mark Drawing Code
`[2] DESIGN oNLY
`
`Owner
`Harvey Ball Smile Limited LIMITED LIABILITY ooMPANY JAPAN
`#832Minamimeguroen Bldg 4-6-16 Kamiosaki Shinagawa-ku Tokyo JAPAN
`141-0021
`
`Goodsiservices
`G & 8: Caps: Coats;
`O22 039.
`US
`IC 025.
`Class Status —— ACTIVE.
`Footwear; Gloves; Hats; Neckties; Pajamas; Pants; Soarves; Shirts;
`Shorts; Skirts; Socks and stockings; Sweaters; Swimsuits; T-shirts;
`Trousers: Underwear. First Use: 2009fO2f27. First Use In Commerce:
`2009HO2f27.
`
`Prior Registratioms)
`3242122
`
`Description of Mark
`The mark oonsists of a smiley faoe.
`
`Colors Claimed
`Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark.
`
`Filing Date
`2DD8/12/14
`
`Examining Attorney
`PLETCHER, TRACY
`
`
`
`____=_________M;;;;;;;;;===
`
`EE_3_E====_=_==_===
`
`
`
`Pfint:Dmfl19,2fl15
`
`TTE327TB
`
`DESIGN MARK
`
`Serial Number
`TTEBZTTB
`
`Status
`REGISTERED
`
`Registration Number
`4315571
`
`Date Registered
`2013jOTj3U
`
`Type of Merit
`TRADEMARK
`
`Register
`PRINCIPAL
`
`Mark Drawing Code
`[2] DESIGN ONLY
`
`Owner
`Harvey Ball Smile Limited LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY JAPAN
`#832Minamimeguroen Bldg 4-6-16 Kamiosak Shinagawa-ku Tokyo JAPAN
`141-0021
`
`Goodsiservices
`G & 8: Caps: Coats;
`O22 039.
`US
`IC 025.
`Class Status —— ACTIVE.
`Footwear; Gloves; Hats; Neokties; Pajamas; Pants; Soarves; Shirts;
`Shorts; Skirts; Socks and stockings; Sweaters; Swimsuits; T-shirts;
`Trousers: Underwear. First Use: 2009fO2f27. First Use In Commerce:
`2009HO2f27.
`
`Prior Registratioms)
`3242T22;3502982
`
`Description of Mark
`The mark oonsists of a smiley faoe.
`
`Colors Claimed
`Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark.
`
`Filing Date
`2008/12/14
`
`Examining Attorney
`RHIM, ANDREW
`
`
`
`___EEEEEEE;§__
`
`________;=E=====_;____
`
`
`
`To:
`
`Subject:
`
`Sent:
`
`Sent As:
`
`Attachments:
`
`The Smiley Company (SPRL) (sbaron@mandellmenkes.com)
`
`U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 79073546 - 9243
`
`10/21/2015 5:03:40 PM
`
`ECOM109@USPTO.GOV
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
`
`IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING YOUR
`U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION
`
`USPTO OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) HAS ISSUED
`ON 10/21/2015 FOR U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 79073546
`
`Please follow the instructions below:
`
`(cid:160)(
`
`1)(cid:160) TO READ THE LETTER:(cid:160) Click on this link or go to http://tsdr.uspto.gov, enter the U.S. application serial number, and click on
`“Documents.”
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he Office action may not be immediately viewable, to allow for necessary system updates of the application, but will be available within 24
`hours of this e-mail notification.
`
`(cid:160)(
`
`2)(cid:160) TIMELY RESPONSE IS REQUIRED:(cid:160) Please carefully review the Office action to determine (1) how to respond, and (2) the applicable
`response time period.(cid:160) Your response deadline will be calculated from 10/21/2015 (or sooner if specified in the Office action).(cid:160) For information
`regarding response time periods, see http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/process/status/responsetime.jsp.
`
`(cid:160)D
`
`o NOT hit “Reply” to this e-mail notification, or otherwise e-mail your response because the USPTO does NOT accept e-mails as
`responses to Office actions.(cid:160)
`Instead, the USPTO recommends that you respond online using the Trademark Electronic Application System
`(TEAS) response form located at http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.
`
`(cid:160)(
`
`3)(cid:160) QUESTIONS:(cid:160) For questions about the contents of the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.(cid:160) For
`technical assistance in accessing or viewing the Office action in the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system, please e-mail
`TSDR@uspto.gov.
`
`WARNING
`
`(cid:160)F
`
`ailure to file the required response by the applicable response deadline will result in the ABANDONMENT of your application.(cid:160) For
`more information regarding abandonment, see http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/basics/abandon.jsp.
`
`PRIVATE COMPANY SOLICITATIONS REGARDING YOUR APPLICATION:(cid:160) Private companies not associated with the USPTO are
`using information provided in trademark applications to mail or e-mail trademark-related solicitations.(cid:160) These companies often use names that
`closely resemble the USPTO and their solicitations may look like an official government document.(cid:160) Many solicitations require that you pay
`
`“fees.” (cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`Please carefully review all correspondence you receive regarding this application to make sure that you are responding to an official document
`from the USPTO rather than a private company solicitation.(cid:160) All official USPTO correspondence will be mailed only from the “United States
`Patent and Trademark Office” in Alexandria, VA; or sent by e-mail from the domain “@uspto.gov.” (cid:160) For more information on how to handle
`private company solicitations, see http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/solicitation_warnings.jsp.
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
![](/site_media/img/document_icon.png)
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
![](/site_media/img/error_icon.png)
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
![](/site_media/img/error_icon.png)
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
![](/site_media/img/error_icon.png)
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
![](/site_media/img/document_icon.png)
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
![](/site_media/img/document_icon.png)
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
![](/site_media/img/error_icon.png)
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site