UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`(cid:160) (cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) SERIAL NO:(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160) (cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) APPLICANT:(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`78/790275
`
`Annco, Inc.
`
`*78790275*
`
`RETURN ADDRESS:(cid:160)
`Commissioner for Trademarks
`P.O. Box 1451
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`
`Please provide in all correspondence:
`
`(cid:160)1
`
`.(cid:160) Filing date, serial number, mark and
`applicant's name.
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`2.(cid:160) Date of this Office Action.
`3.(cid:160) Examining Attorney's name and
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) Law Office number.
`4. Your telephone number and e-mail
`address.
`
`First Office Action
`
`(cid:160)R
`
`ESPONSE TIME LIMIT:(cid:160) TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A
`PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE MAILING OR E-
`
`MAILING DATE.(cid:160)(cid:160)
`MAILING/E-MAILING DATE INFORMATION:(cid:160) If the mailing or e-mailing date of this Office
`action does not appear above, this information can be obtained by visiting the USPTO website at
`http://tarr.uspto.gov/, inserting the application serial number, and viewing the prosecution history for the
`mailing date of the most recently issued Office communication.
`
`(cid:160)S
`
`erial Number(cid:160) 78/790275
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he assigned examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and determined the following.
`
`Section 2(d) Likelihood of Confusion
`
`The assigned examining attorney refuses registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C.
`§1052(d), because the applicant’s mark, when used on or in connection with the identified goods, so
`resembles the mark in U.S. Registration Nos. 1349382, 2010880, and 2787698 as to be likely to cause
`confusion, to cause mistake, or to deceive.(cid:160) TMEP §§1207.01 et seq.(cid:160) See the enclosed registrations (
`Attachments 1-1 to 3-3).
`The assigned examining attorney must analyze each case in two steps to determine whether there is a
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:
`(cid:160) WILLIAM M. BORCHARD
`(cid:160) COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.
`(cid:160) 1133 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS
`(cid:160) NEW YORK, NY 10036-6710
`(cid:160)
`
`LOFT
`
`001WMB
`
`(cid:160) (cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) MARK:(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160) (cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO :(cid:160)(cid:160) 24719-
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS:(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`

`
`likelihood of confusion.(cid:160) First, the assigned examining attorney must look at the marks themselves for
`similarities in appearance, sound, connotation and commercial impression. (cid:160) In re E. I. DuPont de Nemours
`& Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973).(cid:160) Second, the assigned examining attorney must
`compare the goods and/or services to determine whether they are similar or related or whether the
`activities surrounding their marketing are such that confusion as to origin is likely.(cid:160) In re National Novice
`Hockey League, Inc., 222 USPQ 638 (TTAB 1984); In re August Storck KG, 218 USPQ 823 (TTAB
`1983); In re International Telephone and Telegraph Corp., 197 USPQ 910 (TTAB 1978); Guardian
`
`Products Co., v. Scott Paper Co., 200 USPQ 738 (TTAB 1978).(cid:160) TMEP §§1207.01 et seq.(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`A.(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`Similarity of the Marks:
`
`The assigned examining attorney must compare the marks for similarities in sound, appearance, meaning
`or connotation.(cid:160) In re E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177(cid:160)USPQ 563 (C.C.P.A. 1973). (cid:160)
`Similarity in any one of these elements is sufficient to find a likelihood of confusion. In re Mack, 197
`USPQ 755 (TTAB 1977).(cid:160) TMEP §§1207.01(b) et seq.(cid:160) Furthermore, while the assigned examining
`attorney must look at the marks in their entireties under Section 2(d), one feature of a mark may be
`recognized as more significant in creating a commercial impression.(cid:160) Greater weight is given to that
`dominant feature in determining whether there is a likelihood of confusion.(cid:160) In re National Data Corp.,
`224 USPQ 749 (Fed. Cir. 1985); Tektronix, Inc. v. Daktronics, Inc., 534 F.2d 915, 189 USPQ 693 (CCPA
`
`1976). In re J.M. Originals Inc., 6 USPQ2d 1393 (TTAB 1988).(cid:160) TMEP §1207.01(b)(viii).(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`Disclaimed matter is typically less significant or less dominant when comparing marks.(cid:160) Although a
`disclaimed portion of a mark certainly cannot be ignored, and the marks must be compared in their
`entireties, one feature of a mark may be more significant in creating a commercial impression.(cid:160) In re Dixie
`Restaurants Inc., 105 F.3d 1405, 41 USPQ2d 1531 (Fed. Cir. 1997); In re National Data Corporation,
`753 F.2d 1056, 224 USPQ 749 (Fed. Cir. 1985); and In re Appetito Provisions Co. Inc., 3 USPQ2d 1553
`(TTAB 1987).(cid:160) See also Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Packard Press Inc., 281 F.3d 1261, 62 USPQ 2d 1001
`(Fed. Cir. 2002); Tektronix, Inc. v. Daktronics, Inc., 534 F.2d 915, 189 USPQ 693 (C.C.P.A. 1976); In re
`El Torito Rests. Inc., 9 USPQ2d 2002 (TTAB 1988); In re Equitable Bancorporation, 229 USPQ 709
`(TTAB 1986).
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`i.(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`Registration No. 1349382 (LEATHER LOFT)
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he applicant’s proposed mark LOFT is highly similar to the referenced registrant’s mark LEATHER
`LOFT because they share the identical and dominant term LOFT.(cid:160) The addition of the descriptive term
`
`LEATHER to LOFT does not alter the overall commercial impression of the marks.(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`ii.(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`Registration No. 2010880 (SOFT LOFT)
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he applicant’s proposed mark LOFT is highly similar to the referenced registrant’s mark SOFT LOFT
`because they share the identical and dominant term LOFT.(cid:160) The addition of the descriptive term SOFT to
`
`LOFT does not alter the overall commercial impression of the marks.(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`iii.(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`Registration No. 2787698 (WOOL-LOFT)
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he applicant’s proposed mark LOFT is highly similar to the referenced registrant’s mark WOOL-LOFT
`because they share the identical and dominant term LOFT.(cid:160) The addition of the descriptive term WOOL to
`LOFT does not alter the overall commercial impression of the marks.
`
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`

`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`B.(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`Relation to the Goods:
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he assigned examining attorney must compare the goods and/or services to determine if they are related
`or if the activities surrounding their marketing are such that confusion as to origin is likely.(cid:160) In re National
`Novice Hockey League, Inc., 222 USPQ 638 (TTAB 1984); In re August Storck KG, 218 USPQ 823
`(TTAB 1983); In re International Telephone and Telegraph Corp., 197 USPQ 910 (TTAB 1978);
`
`Guardian Products Co., v. Scott Paper Co., 200 USPQ 738 (TTAB 1978).(cid:160) TMEP §§1207.01 et seq.(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`The goods and/or services of the parties need not be identical or directly competitive to find a likelihood
`of confusion.(cid:160) They need only be related in some manner, or the conditions surrounding their marketing be
`such, that they could be encountered by the same purchasers under circumstances that could give rise to
`the mistaken belief that the goods and/or services come from a common source.(cid:160) On-line Careline Inc. v.
`America Online Inc., 229 F.3d 1080, 56 USPQ2d 1471 (Fed. Cir. 2000); In re Martin's Famous Pastry
`Shoppe, Inc., 748 F.2d 1565, 223 USPQ 1289 (Fed. Cir. 1984); In re Corning Glass Works, 229 USPQ 65
`(TTAB 1985); In re Rexel Inc., 223 USPQ 830 (TTAB 1984); Guardian Products Co., Inc. v. Scott Paper
`Co., 200 USPQ 738 (TTAB 1978); In re Int’l Tel. & Tel. Corp ., 197 USPQ 910 (TTAB 1978); TMEP
`§1207.01(a)(i).
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`i.(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`Registration No. 1349382 (LEATHER LOFT)
`
`he applicant’s goods (“Clothing, Headgear, Footwear”) are highly related to the registrant’s goods
`
`(“Leather Jackets”) because both include clothing items. (cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`Please note that the decisions in the clothing field have held many different types of apparel to be related
`under Section 2(d).(cid:160) Cambridge Rubber Co. v. Cluett, Peabody & Co., Inc., 286 F.2d 623, 128 USPQ 549
`(C.C.P.A. 1961) (“WINTER CARNIVAL” for women’s boots v. men’s and boys’ underwear);
`Jockey
`Int’l, Inc. v. Mallory & Church Corp. , 25 USPQ2d 1233 (TTAB 1992) (“ELANCE” for underwear v.
`“ELAAN” for neckties); In re Melville Corp. 18 USPQ2d 1386 (TTAB 1991) (“ESSENTIALS” for
`women’s pants, blouses, shorts and jackets v. women’s shoes); In re Pix of America, Inc., 225 USPQ 691
`(TTAB 1985) (“NEWPORTS” for women’s shoes v. “NEWPORT” for outer shirts);
`In re Mercedes
`Slacks, Ltd., 213 USPQ 397 (TTAB 1982) (“OMEGA” for hosiery v. trousers); In re Cook United, Inc.,
`185 USPQ 444 (TTAB 1975) (“GRANADA” for men’s suits, coats, and trousers v. ladies’ pantyhose
`and hosiery); Esquire Sportswear Mfg. Co. v. Genesco Inc., 141 USPQ 400 (TTAB 1964) (“SLEEX” for
`brassieres and girdles v. slacks for men and young men).(cid:160) As such, an amendment to the identification of
`goods specifying certain clothing items and excluding leather jackets will not be sufficient in overcoming
`
`the assigned examining attorney’s finding that the goods are highly related. (cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`ii.(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`Registration No. 2010880 (SOFT LOFT)
`
`The applicant’s goods (“Clothing, Headgear, Footwear”) are highly related to the registrant’s goods
`(“Gloves”) because both include clothing items.
`
`(cid:160)A
`
`s stated above, the decisions in the clothing field have held many different types of apparel to be related
`under Section 2(d), and as such, an amendment to the identification of goods specifying certain clothing
`items and excluding gloves will not be sufficient in overcoming the assigned examining attorney’s
`finding that the goods are highly related.(cid:160)
`
`(cid:160)
`

`
`Registration No. 2787698 (WOOL-LOFT)
`
`(cid:160)i
`
`ii.(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`The applicant’s goods (“Clothing, Headgear, Footwear”) are highly related to the registrant’s goods
`(“Clothing made in whole or in substantial part from wool fabric used as insulation, namely parkas,
`jackets, vests, overcoats, snowmobile suits, coveralls, overalls, shop coats, pants, shirts, socks, hats,
`gloves, mitts and boots”) because both include clothing items.
`
`(cid:160)A
`
`s stated above, the decisions in the clothing field have held many different types of apparel to be related
`under Section 2(d), and as such, an amendment to the identification of goods specifying certain clothing
`items and excluding parkas, jackets, vests, overcoats, snowmobile suits, coveralls, overalls, shop coats,
`pants, shirts, socks, hats, gloves, mitts and boots will not be sufficient in overcoming the assigned
`
`examining attorney’s finding that the goods are highly related. (cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`Although the assigned examining attorney has refused registration, the applicant may respond to the
`refusal to register by submitting evidence and arguments in support of registration.
`
`(cid:160)A
`
`dditionally, the applicant should note that the grace period for filing the renewal application for Reg. No.
`1349382 (LEATHER LOFT) has passed and it appears that the registration may be subject to cancellation
`under §8 or expiration under §9.
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he applicant should also note the following potential §2(d) refusals.(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`Notice – Potential Section 2(d) Refusals
`
`Information regarding pending Application Serial Nos. 76226655 & 78556670 are enclosed (See
`Attachments 4-1 to 5-2).(cid:160) The filing dates of the referenced applications precede the applicant’s filing
`date.(cid:160) There may be a likelihood of confusion under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d)
`between the applicant’s mark and the referenced marks. (cid:160) If one or more of the referenced applications
`registers, registration may be refused in this case under Section 2(d).(cid:160) 37 C.F.R. §2.83; TMEP §§1208 et
`seq.(cid:160) Therefore, upon entry of a response to this First Office Action, action on this case may be suspended
`pending final disposition of the earlier-filed applications.
`
`(cid:160)I
`
`f the applicant believes there is no potential conflict between this application and the earlier-filed
`applications, then the applicant may present arguments relevant to the issue in a response to this First
`Office Action.(cid:160) The election not to submit arguments at this time in no way limits the applicant’s right to
`address this issue at a later point.
`
`(cid:160)I
`
`f the applicant chooses to respond to the refusal(s) to register, then the applicant must also respond to the
`following requirement(s).
`
`Identification of Goods
`
`(cid:160)A
`
`pplicant must clarify the wording used to describe the goods and/or services to indicate the common
`commercial or generic name for each product or service.(cid:160) In the present case, applicant used the headings
`of the international classes as the identification of the goods and/or services.(cid:160) These headings are meant to
`indicate only the general subject matter and scope of each of the classes of goods and/or services.(cid:160) While
`such broad designations may be sufficient under the trademark laws and practice of many countries, the
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office considers them too broad to identify the goods or services in a United
`
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`

`
`States application.(cid:160) In re Societe Generale des Eaux Minerales de Vittel S.A., 1 USPQ2d 1296, 1298
`(TTAB 1986), rev'd on other grounds, 824 F.2d 957, 3 USPQ2d 1450 (Fed. Cir. 1987); TMEP §§1401.08,
`1402.01 and 1402.01(a).
`
`(cid:160)A
`
`pplicant may adopt the following identification of goods, if accurate.(cid:160) TMEP §1402.01.(cid:160) Please refrain
`from the use of parenthetical symbols and colons in the amended identification.
`
`Clothing, namely, {indicate specific item – e.g., dresses, skirts, suits, jackets, swimsuits,
`vests, scarves, gloves}; headwear; and footwear, in International Class 025.
`
`For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and/or services in trademark applications, please see
`the online searchable Manual of Acceptable Identifications of Goods and Services at
`http://tess2.uspto.gov/netahtml/tidm.html.
`
`(cid:160)P
`
`lease note that, while an application may be amended to clarify or limit the identification, additions to the
`identification are not permitted.(cid:160) 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.(cid:160) Therefore, the applicant may not
`amend to include any goods that are not within the scope of the goods recited in the present identification.
`
`(cid:160)I
`
`f the applicant has any questions or needs assistance in responding to this First Office Action, please
`telephone the assigned examining attorney.
`
`/Deirdre G. Robertson/
`Trademark Examining Attorney
`Law Office 111
`Phone No. (571) 272-8806
`Fax No. (571) 272-9111(571) 273-9111
`
`HOW TO RESPOND TO THIS OFFICE ACTION:
`ONLINE RESPONSE:(cid:160) You may respond using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application
`System (TEAS) Response to Office action form available on our website at
`http://www.uspto.gov/teas/index.html.(cid:160) If the Office action issued via e-mail, you must wait 72
`hours after receipt of the Office action to respond via TEAS.(cid:160) NOTE:(cid:160) Do not respond by e-mail.(cid:160)
`THE USPTO WILL NOT ACCEPT AN E-MAILED RESPONSE.
`REGULAR MAIL RESPONSE:(cid:160) To respond by regular mail, your response should be sent to the
`mailing return address above, and include the serial number, law office number, and examining
`attorney’s name. (cid:160) NOTE:(cid:160) The filing date of the response will be the date of receipt in the Office,
`not the postmarked date.(cid:160) To ensure your response is timely, use a certificate of mailing.(cid:160) 37 C.F.R.
`§2.197.
`
`(cid:160)S
`
`TATUS OF APPLICATION: To check the status of your application, visit the Office’s Trademark
`Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.uspto.gov.
`
`(cid:160)V
`
`IEW APPLICATION DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Documents in the electronic file for pending
`applications can be viewed and downloaded online at http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/tow.
`
`(cid:160)G
`
`ENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: For general information about trademarks, please visit
`the Office’s website at http://www.uspto.gov/main/trademarks.htm
`
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160)
`

`
`
`FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THEFOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE
`
`ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY SPECIFIED ABOVE.ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY SPECIFIED ABOVE.
`
`(cid:160)F
`
`OR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE
`ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY SPECIFIED ABOVE.
`
`(cid:160)
`

`
`Pfint:Jul1D,2flDB
`
`?fi22Gfi55
`
`DESIGN MARK
`
`Serial Number
`16226655
`
`Shus
`OPPOSITION PENDING
`
`Word Marl:
`LOFT DESIGN BY...
`
`Standard Character Mark
`NO
`
`Type of Marl:
`TRADEMARK
`
`Register
`PRINCIPAL
`
`Mark Drawing Code
`[3] DESIGN PLUS WORDS, LETTERS ANDJOR NUMBERS
`
`Ehnner
`FRECHE ET FILS ASSOCIES PERSONAL BUSINESS WITH LIMITED LIABILITY
`FRANCE 3, COur Berard T5004 PARIS FRANCE
`
`Goodsfservices
`G & S:
`O01 O04 O06 O50 O51 052.
`US
`IC 003.
`Class Status -- ACTIVE.
`SKIN SOAPS, TOILET SOAPS; PERFUME, TOILET WATERS, COLOGNE; ESSENTIAL
`OILS FOR PERSONAL USE; HAIR LOTIONS; HAIR SHAMPOOS; BODY OILS AND SKIN
`LOTIONS FOR COSMETIC USE; SKIN OREAMS; MILKS, LOTIONS, GELS AND
`POWDERS FOR THE FACE, THE BODY AND THE HANDS; SUN PRODUCTS, NAMELY,
`SUN SCREEN CREAMS, SUN TANNING AND AFTER—SUN CREAMS, MILKS, GELS AND
`OILS; COSMETIC PREPARATIONS FOR TANNING THE SKIN, NAMELY, SUN TAN
`GELS, OILS AND LOTIONS; COSMETIC PREPARATIONS FOR THE EATH, NAMELI,
`BATH BEADS, BATH CRYSTALS, BATH FOAM; GELS AND SALTS FOR BATH AND
`SHOWER EXCEPT FOR MEDICAL USE; DEODORANTS FOR PERSONAL USE; PRE AND
`AFTER SHAVE LOTIONS.
`
`Guudsfserviues
`G & S:
`O01 D02 D03 D22 D41.
`US
`IC DIS.
`CISSS Status —— ACTIVE.
`GOODS MADE OF LEATHER AND IMITATIONS OF LEATHER NOT INCLUDED IN OTHER
`
`CLASSES, NAMELY, BRIEF CASES, BILLFOLDS, PURSES NOT OE PRECIOUS METAL,
`WALLETS, KEY CASES, LUGGAGE, CARD CASES, SUITCASES, SCHOOL BAGS,
`VANITY CASES SOLD EMPTY, TOTE BAGS, ALL-PURPOSE SPORTS BAGS, BEACH
`BAGS, TRAVELING CASES, HANDBAGS, TRUNKS FOR TRAVELING, TRAVELING BAGS,
`UMERELLAS, PARASOLS AND WALKING STICKS, WHIPS, HARNESS AND SADDLERY.
`
`Goodsisarvicas
`CISSS Status —— ACTIVE.
`
`IC 025.
`
`US
`
`O22 039.
`
`G & S: CLOTHING FOR
`
`-1-
`
`

`
`Print: Jul 10', 2005
`
`?fi22Gfi55
`
`MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN, NAMELY, OUTERWEAR AND UNDERWEAR, NAMELY,
`BATHING SUITS, BATHROBES, SWIM WEAR, BERMUDA SHORTS, SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS,
`SWEAT-SHIRTS, POLO SHIRTS, PULLOVERS, SWEATERS, BLOUSES, BODICES,
`SHORTS, TRACK SUITS, PANTS, TROUSERS,
`JEANS, OVERALLS,
`JACKETS,
`DRESSES, BLOUSES, SKIRTS, NECK—TIES, BLAZERS, TAILOR—MADE PERIOD
`COSTUMES, NAMELY, SUITS, DRESS SUITS, LOUNGE WEAR, SLEEP WEAR,
`WAISTCOATS, RAIN WEAR, OVERCOATS, COATS, FUR COATS AND FUR JACKETS,
`VESTS, PARKAS, ANORAKS, CAPES, WIND—RESISTANT JACKETS, MUFFS, TIES,
`BELTS, SCARVES, STOLES, GIRDLES, FOULARDS, GLOVES, SHOES, BOOTS,
`SLIPPERS, SOCKS, STOCKINGS, HEADWEAR.
`
`Foreign Country Name
`FRANCE
`
`Foreign Registration Number
`1522037
`
`Foreign Registration Date
`l989fO3f3l
`
`Foreign Expiration Date
`2oo9xo3x2e
`
`Prior Registratioms]
`2363555
`
`Diselairner Statement
`NO CLAIM IS MADE TO THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO USE "DESIGN BY" APART FROM
`THE MARK AS SHOWN.
`
`Filing Date
`200lHO3Hl6
`
`Examining Attorney
`POWELL, LINDA
`
`Attorney of Record
`WILLIAM H HOLT
`
`

`
`

`
`Print: Jul 14, 2005
`
`?3Il-996-I-ti
`
`TYPED DRAWING
`
`Serial Number
`13499640
`
`Status
`SECTION 3 & 15-ACCEPTED AND ACKNOWLEDGED
`
`Word Marl:
`LEATHER LOFT
`
`Standard Character Mark
`No
`
`Registration NI.II"I'IhBf
`1349382
`
`Date Registered
`IQSBKOTXIG
`
`Type of Mark
`TRADEMARK
`
`Register
`PRINCIPAL
`
`Mark Drawing Code
`[1] TYPED DRAWING
`
`DBVHBT
`LEATHER LOFT STORES,
`EXETER NEW I-LAI"IPSHIRE
`
`INC. CORPORATION NEW HAMPSHIRE WATSON BROOK ROAD
`
`Goodslservices
`G 5. s: BRIEFCASES AND
`003.
`US
`IC 018.
`Class Status —— ACTIVE.
`HANDBAGS. First Use:
`l984fO5HO9. First Use In Commerce:
`l984HO5fU9.
`
`Goodsfservices
`G 5. S: LEATHER JACKETS [
`039.
`US
`IC 025.
`Class Status -- ACTIVE.
`COATS, VESTS, BOOTS, BELTS, GLOVES AND PANTS ]. First Use:
`l984fO5fO9. First Use In Commerce: 1984/OEIOQ.
`
`,
`
`Disclaimer Statement
`NO CLAIM IS MADE TO THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO USE "LEATHER" APART FROM
`THE MARK As SHOWN.
`
`Filing Date
`1984/O9/1?
`
`Examining Attorney
`UNKNOWN
`
`

`
`Print: Jul 14, 2005
`
`?3l-996-I-{I
`
`Attumey of Record
`THOMAS V. SMURZYNSKI
`
`

`
`Print: Jul 14, 2005
`
`?-I-605639
`
`TYPED DRAWING
`
`Serial Number
`14605639
`
`Status
`SECTION 3 & 15—AccEFTED AND AORNOWLEDGED
`
`Word Marl:
`SOFT LOFT
`
`Standard Character Mark
`NO
`
`Registration NI.II"I'IhBf
`2010880
`
`Date Registered
`l996fl0f22
`
`Type of Mark
`TRADEMARK
`
`Register
`PRINCIPAL
`
`Mark Drawing Code
`[1] TYPED DRAWING
`
`U'WI1Bf
`Fownes Brothers & CO., Inc. CORPORATION NEW YORK 411 Fifth Avenue New
`York NEW YORK 10016
`
`Goodslse-wines
`G & S: glOvee. First
`022 039.
`US
`IC 025.
`Class Statue —— ACTIVE.
`Use:
`l995H07H2l. First Use In Commerce:
`l995H07f2l.
`
`Disclaimer Statement
`NO CLAIM IS MADE TO THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO USE "SOFT" APART FROM THE
`MARK'AS SHOWN.
`
`Filing Date
`l994!l0H05
`
`Examlnlng Attomay
`SUSSMAN, RONALD R.
`
`Attnmey of Record
`JAY H. BEGLER
`
`

`
`Print: Jul 14, 2005
`
`?fi3-I-EH97
`
`DESIGN MARK
`
`Serial Number
`T634809?
`
`Status
`REGISTERED
`
`Word Marl:
`WOOL-LOFT
`
`Standard Character Mark
`No
`
`Registration NI.II"I'IhBf
`2787698
`
`Date Registered
`2003fllf25
`
`Type of Mark
`TRADEMARK
`
`Register
`SUPPLEMENTAL
`
`Mark Drawing Code
`[1] TYPED DRAWING
`
`U'WI1Bf
`Winnipeg Pants & Sportswear Mfg. Ltd. CORPORATION CANADA 85 Adelaide
`Street Winnipeg, Manitoba CANADA R3A OV9
`
`Goodslse-wines
`G & 3: Clothing made
`O22 039.
`US
`IC 025.
`Class Status —— ACTIVE.
`in whole or in substantial part from wool fabric used as insulation,
`namely parkas, jackets, vests, overcoats, snowmobile suits, coveralls,
`overalls, shop coats, pants, shirts, socks, hats, gloves, mitts and
`boots. First Use: 2003fO4f2l. First Use In Commerce: 2003fO4f2l.
`
`GDDHSISEIVICES
`Class Status —— ACTIVE.
`
`IC 024.
`
`US
`
`O42 050.
`
`G & S: Wool fabric
`
`used as insulation in the manufacture of clothing. First Use:
`ZOOBHO4/21. First Use In Commerce: 2003fO4f2l.
`
`Filing Date
`2001H12f11
`
`Amended Register Date
`ZOOBXOSXOI
`
`

`
`Print: Jul 14, 2005
`
`?fi3-I-EH97
`
`Examining Attnmey
`KING, CHRISIE B.
`
`Attorney of Record
`James T. Nikolai, Esq.
`
`

`
`

`
`Print: Jul 14, 2005
`
`TBSSGGTIII
`
`Issue: iiiliiilfflflfiiil
`
`DESIGN MARK
`
`Serial Number
`18556670
`
`Status
`oppoSITIoN PENDING
`
`Word Marl:
`BRIDE SMAIDS' LoET
`
`Standard Character Mark
`Yes
`
`Type of Marl:
`TRADEMARK
`
`Register
`PRINCIPAL
`
`Mark Drawing Code
`[4]
`STANDARD CMARACTER MARK
`
`Owner
`Kleinfeld Bridal Corp. CORPORATION DELAWARE 8202 Fifth Avenue Brooklyn
`NEW YORK ll2D92987
`
`Goodaiservices
`G & 8: Women's and
`O22 039.
`US
`IC 025.
`Class Status -- ACTIVE.
`girl's dresses; Shoes for special occasions; Women's‘ and girls‘
`wedding and special occasion dresses, NAMELY, bridesmaid's dresses,
`flower girl dresses and ohristening dresses; gloves, veils,
`undergarments, ties and men's shirts.
`
`Disclaimer State-nient
`No CLAIM IS MADE To THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT To USE ERIDESMAIDS' APART FROM
`THE MARK AS SHOWN.
`
`Filing Date
`2005HU1H31
`
`Examining Attorney
`GRIFFIN,
`JAMES
`
`Attorney Of RBl!‘.'0I"d
`Eric D. Offner