`
`T0:
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a Court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`DlSll’lClI Of Minnesota
`oI1 the following
`|Z Trademarks or
`D Patents.
`( D the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`DOCKET NO.
`14-2993 JNE/TNL
`PLAINTIFF
`
`DATE FILED
`7/24/2014
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`District of Minnesota
`
`Cosmetic Warriors Limited
`
`Daniel Rodriguez; Josefina Rodriguez; Los Rodriguez
`Services, |nc.; John Does 1-9; John Does 10-35
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`In the above
`INCLUDED BY
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`D Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`D Answer
`
`B Cross Bill
`
`D Other Pleading
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`1 3,987,808
`
`7/5/2011
`
`Cosmetic Warriors Limited
`
`2 85/186,432 Cosmetic Warriors Limited
`-—
`
`In the above
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`
`Complaint filed 7/24/2014
`Order and Judgment entered 12/18/2015
`Order Dismissing Case filed 6/29/2016
`
`CLERK
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`DATE
`
`RICHARD D. SLETTEN
`
`A. Linner
`
`7/6/2016
`
`Copy l—UpoI1 initiation of action, Inail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon terIni11atio11 of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patentts), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy
`
`
`
`CASE O:14—CV—O2993—JNE—KMM Document 92 Filed 06/29/16 Page 1 Of 1
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
`
`Cosmetic Warriors Limited,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Terri Rozema and A Doozee, LLC; Tatiana Sizova;
`Silvia Zub; Brenda Gadbois—Westphal; John Hanly
`and MJ Marketing, LLC; Annie Davis LLC; and
`Ganna Povolotska,
`
`Defendants.
`
`Civil No. 14-2993 (JNE/KMM)
`ORDER
`
`With the exception of Brenda Gadbois—Westphal, Cosmetic Warriors Limited voluntarily
`
`dismissed its claims against each defendant. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4l(a)(1)(A). In December
`
`2015, the Court granted Gadbois—Westphal’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.
`
`1
`
`Because all claims against all parties have been resolved, the Court directs that judgment be
`
`entered with respect to Gadbois—Westphal’s dismissal. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). The Clerk of
`
`Court shall terminate the motion at Docket No. 83. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`The Judgment and Amended Judgment [Docket Nos. 78 and 79] are VACATED.
`
`The Clerk of Court shall terminate the motion at Docket No. 83.
`
`Cosmetic Warrior’s claims against Brenda Gadbois—Westphal are DISMISSED
`WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
`
`LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
`
`Dated: June 29, 2016
`
`s/Joan N. Ericksen
`JOAN N. ERICKSEN
`
`United States District Judge
`
`In the December Order, the Court prematurely directed that judgment be entered. See
`1
`Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). The Court vacates the judgment and amended judgment that issued in
`December.
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site