PTO Form 1478 (Rev 9/2006)
`
`OMB No. 0651-0009 (Exp 09/30/2008)
`
`Trademark/Service Mark Application, Principal Register
`
`Serial Number: 77118853
`Filing Date: 02/28/2007
`
`The table below presents the data as entered.
`
`Input Field
`
`Entered
`
`SERIAL NUMBER
`
`MARK INFORMATION
`
`*MARK
`
`SPECIAL FORM
`
`USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE
`
`LITERAL ELEMENT
`
`COLOR MARK
`
`DESCRIPTION OF THE MARK
`(and Color Location, if applicable)
`
`PIXEL COUNT ACCEPTABLE
`
`PIXEL COUNT
`
`APPLICANT INFORMATION
`
`*OWNER OF MARK
`
`*STREET
`
`*CITY
`
`*STATE
`(Required for U.S. applicants)
`
`*COUNTRY
`
`*ZIP/POSTAL CODE
`(Required for U.S. applicants only)
`
`LEGAL ENTITY INFORMATION
`
`*TYPE
`
`*STATE/COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION
`
`GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION
`
`77118853
`
`\\TICRS2\EXPORT12\771\188 \77118853\xml1\APP0002.JP
`G
`
`YES
`
`NO
`
`MYOZYME
`
`NO
`
`The mark consists of the word MYOZYME and the depiction
`of a person.
`
`YES
`
`940 x 265
`
`Genzyme Corporation
`
`500 Kendall Square
`
`Cambridge
`
`Massachusetts
`
`United States
`
`01701
`
`CORPORATION
`
`Massachusetts
`
`INTERNATIONAL CLASS
`
`005
`
`DESCRIPTION
`
`FILING BASIS
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)SPECIMEN
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)FILE NAME(S)
`
`Pharmaceuticlas for use in the treatment of lysosomal storeage
`diseases
`
`SECTION 1(a)
`
`At least as early as 06/30/2006
`
`At least as early as 06/30/2006
`
`\\TICRS2\EXPORT12\771\188 \77118853\xml1\APP0003.JP
`G
`
`

`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)SPECIMEN DESCRIPTION
`
`ATTORNEY INFORMATION
`
`NAME
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NUMBER
`
`FIRM NAME
`
`STREET
`
`CITY
`
`STATE
`
`COUNTRY
`
`ZIP/POSTAL CODE
`
`PHONE
`
`FAX
`
`EMAIL ADDRESS
`
`package insert included with product
`
`Lawrence R. Robins
`
`08727.0038-00000
`
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner L.L.P.
`
`901 New York Avenue, N.W.
`
`Washington
`
`District of Columbia
`
`United States
`
`20001
`
`202-408-4000
`
`202-408-4400
`
`docketing@finnegan.com
`
`AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL
`
`Yes
`
`CORRESPONDENCE INFORMATION
`
`NAME
`
`FIRM NAME
`
`STREET
`
`CITY
`
`STATE
`
`COUNTRY
`
`ZIP/POSTAL CODE
`
`PHONE
`
`FAX
`
`EMAIL ADDRESS
`
`AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL
`
`FEE INFORMATION
`
`NUMBER OF CLASSES
`
`FEE PER CLASS
`
`TOTAL FEE DUE
`
`SIGNATURE INFORMATION
`
`SIGNATURE
`
`SIGNATORY'S NAME
`
`SIGNATORY'S POSITION
`
`DATE SIGNED
`
`FILING INFORMATION SECTION
`
`Lawrence R. Robins
`
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner L.L.P.
`
`901 New York Avenue, N.W.
`
`Washington
`
`District of Columbia
`
`United States
`
`20001
`
`202-408-4000
`
`202-408-4400
`
`docketing@finnegan.com
`
`Yes
`
`1
`
`325
`
`325
`
`/Lawrence R. Robins/
`
`Lawrence R. Robins
`
`Attorney for Applicant
`
`02/28/2007
`
`SUBMIT DATE
`
`Wed Feb 28 17:37:05 EST 2007
`
`

`
`TEAS STAMP
`
`USPTO/BAS-XX.XXX.X.X-2007
`0228173705121135-77118853
`-36091ce41d75af78e9d1b20f
`ccf17a12d-CC-778-20070228
`173205945077
`
`

`
`PTO Form 1478 (Rev 9/2006)
`
`OMB No. 0651-0009 (Exp 09/30/2008)
`
`Trademark/Service Mark Application, Principal Register
`
`Serial Number: 77118853
`Filing Date: 02/28/2007
`
`To the Commissioner for Trademarks:
`
`MARK:(cid:160)MYOZYME(cid:160)(stylized and/or with design, see mark)
`
`The literal element of the mark consists of MYOZYME. The applicant is not claiming color as a feature of the mark. The mark consists of the
`word MYOZYME and the depiction of a person.
`The applicant, Genzyme Corporation, a corporation of Massachusetts, having an address of 500 Kendall Square, Cambridge, Massachusetts,
`United States, 01701, requests registration of the trademark/service mark identified above in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on
`the Principal Register established by the Act of July 5, 1946 (15 U.S.C. Section 1051 et seq.), as amended.
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) International Class 005: (cid:160)Pharmaceuticlas for use in the treatment of lysosomal storeage diseases
`
`Use in Commerce: The applicant is using the mark in commerce, or the applicant's related company or licensee is using the mark in commerce, or
`the applicant's predecessor in interest used the mark in commerce, on or in connection with the identified goods and/or services. 15 U.S.C.
`Section 1051(a), as amended.
`
`In International Class 005, the mark was first used at least as early as 06/30/2006, and first used in commerce at least as early as 06/30/2006, and
`is now in use in such commerce. The applicant is submitting or will submit one specimen for each class showing the mark as used in commerce
`on or in connection with any item in the class of listed goods and/or services, consisting of a(n) package insert included with product.
`Specimen File1
`
`The applicant hereby appoints Lawrence R. Robins of Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner L.L.P., 901 New York Avenue, N.W.,
`Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20001 to submit this application on behalf of the applicant. The attorney docket/reference
`number is 08727.0038-00000.
`
`Correspondence Information: Lawrence R. Robins
`901 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, District of Columbia 20001
`202-408-4000(phone)
`202-408-4400(fax)
`docketing@finnegan.com (authorized)
`
`A fee payment in the amount of $325 will be submitted with the application, representing payment for 1 class(es).
`
`Declaration
`
`The undersigned, being hereby warned that willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under
`18 U.S.C. Section 1001, and that such willful false statements, and the like, may jeopardize the validity of the application or any resulting
`registration, declares that he/she is properly authorized to execute this application on behalf of the applicant; he/she believes the applicant to be
`the owner of the trademark/service mark sought to be registered, or, if the application is being filed under 15 U.S.C. Section 1051(b), he/she
`believes applicant to be entitled to use such mark in commerce; to the best of his/her knowledge and belief no other person, firm, corporation, or
`association has the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form thereof or in such near resemblance thereto as to be likely,
`when used on or in connection with the goods/services of such other person, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive; and that all
`statements made of his/her own knowledge are true; and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.
`
`Signature: /Lawrence R. Robins/(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)Date Signed: 02/28/2007
`Signatory's Name: Lawrence R. Robins
`Signatory's Position: Attorney for Applicant
`
`

`
`RAM Sale Number: 778
`RAM Accounting Date: 03/01/2007
`
`Serial Number: 77118853
`Internet Transmission Date: Wed Feb 28 17:37:05 EST 2007
`TEAS Stamp: USPTO/BAS-XX.XXX.X.X-2007022817370512113
`5-77118853-36091ce41d75af78e9d1b20fccf17
`a12d-CC-778-20070228173205945077
`
`

`
`

`
`FOR lNTR/WENOUS
`INFUSION ONLY
`
`RISK OF HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTIONS
`LIFBTHREATENING ANAPHYLACTIC REACTIONS, INCLUDING ANAPHYLACTIC SHOCK, HAVE
`BEEN OBSERVED IN PATIENTS DURING MYOZYME INFUSION.
`BECAUSE OF THE POTENTIAI. FOR SEVERE INFUSION REACTIONS, APPROPRIATE MEDICAL
`SUPPORT MEASURES SHOULD BE READILY AVAILABLE WHEN MYOZYME IS ADMINISTERED.
`
`DES RIPTRON
`
`MYOZYMFW (alglucosidase alia) consists of the
`human enzyme acid or-glucosidase (GAA),
`encoded by the most predominant of nine observed
`haplotypes of this gene. MYOZYME is produced by
`recombinant DNA technology in a Chinese hamster
`ovary cell line. Alglucosidase alfa degrades glycogen
`by catalyzing the hydrolysis of r1~1,4— and ot~1,6~
`glycosidic linkages of lysosomal glycogen.
`Alglucosidase alfa is a glycoprotein with a calculated
`mass of 99,377 daltons for the polypeptide chain,
`and a total mass of approximately 109,000 daltons,
`including carbohydrates. Alglucosidase alfa has a
`specific activity of 3 to 5 U/mg (one unit is defined
`as that amount of activity that results in the hydrolysis
`of 1 pmole of synthetic substrate per minute under
`the specified assay conditions). MYOZYME is intended
`for intravenous infusion. It is supplied as a sterile,
`nonpyrogenic, white to off—white, lyophilized cake
`or powder for reconstitution with 10.3 mL Sterile
`Water for injection, USP. Each 50 mg vial contains
`525 mg aiglucosidase alfa, 210 mg mannitol,
`0.5 mg polysorbate 80, 9.9 mg sodium phosphate
`dibasic heptahydrate, 31.2 mg sodium phosphate
`monobasic monohydrate. Following reconstitution as
`directed, each vial contains 10.5 mL reconstituted
`solution and a total extractable volume of 10 mt at
`5.0 mg/mL alglucosidase alfa. MYOZYME does not
`contain preservatives; each vial is for single use only.
`
`CLlNiC/J‘tl. PH./\RtVi:'5\CO§ QC-Y
`Mechanism of Action
`
`Pompe disease (glycogen storage disease type II,
`GSD ll, glycogcnosis type II, acid maltase deficiency)
`is an inherited disorder of glycogen metabolism
`caused by the absence or marked deficiency of the
`lysosomal enzyme GAA.
`in the infantileonset form, Pompe disease results in
`intralysosomal accumulation of glycogen in various
`tissues, particularly cardiac and skeletal muscles,
`and hepatic tissues, leading to the development of
`cardiomyopathy, progressive muscle weakness, and
`impairment of respiratory function.
`in the juvenile- and adult-onset forms, intralysosomal
`accumulation of glycogen is limited primarily to
`skeletal muscle, resulting in progressive muscle
`weakness. Death in all forms is usually related to
`respiratory failure.
`MYOZYME provides an exogenous source of
`GAA. Binding to mannose~6-phosphate receptors
`on the cell surface has been shown to occur via
`carbohydrate groups on the GAA molecule, after
`which it is internalized and transported into
`lysosomes, where it undergoes proteolytic cleavage
`
`that results in increased enzymatic activity. it then
`exerts enzymatic activity in cleaving glycogen.
`Pharmacokinetics
`
`The pharmacokinetics of alglucosidase alfa were
`evaluated in 13 patients of age ranging from
`1 month to 7 months with infantile-onset Pompe
`disease who received 20 mg/kg (as an approximate
`4Ahour infusion) or 40 mg/kg (as an approximate
`65-hour infusion) of MYOZYME every 2 weeks.
`The measurement of alglucosidase alfa plasma
`concentration was based on an activity assay using
`an artificial substrate. Systemic exposure was
`approximately dose proportional between the
`20 and 40 mg/kg doses (see Table 1).
`
`§ After Single Intravenous lnfuion of MYOZYME
`Pharmacokinetic
`Parameter
`
`62.L31
`8111141
`
`E Cmax (mcg/mL)
`AUCr lrncg«hr/mt
`CL (mL/hr/kg)
`Vss (m L/kg)
`
`The pharmacokinetics of alglucosidase alfa were
`also evaluated in a separate trial in 14 patients of
`age ranging from 6 months to 3.5 years with Pompe
`disease who received 20 mg/kg of MYOZYME as an
`approximate 4-hour infusion every 2 weeks. The
`pharmacokinetic parameters were similar to those
`observed for the 20 mg/kg dose group in the trial of
`patients of age ranging from 1 month to 7 months.
`Nineteen of 21 patients who received treatment with
`MYOZYME and had pharmacokinetics and antibody
`titer data available at Week 12 developed antibodies
`to alglucosidase alfa. Five patients with antibody
`titers 2 12,800 at Week 12 had an average increase
`in clearance of 50% (range 5% to 90%) from Week
`1 to Week 12. The other 14 patients with antibody
`titers < 12,800 at Week 12 had similar average
`clearance values at Week 1 and Week 12.
`
`CtiNICAL STUDIES
`
`The safety and efficacy of MYOZYME were assessed
`in 2 separate clinical trials in 39 Pompe disease
`patients, who ranged in age from 1 month to
`3.5 years at the time of first infusion.
`Study 1 was an international, multicenter, open~
`label, clinical trial of 18 infantile-onset Pompe
`disease patients. This study was conducted between
`2003 and 2005. Patients were randomized equally
`to either 20 mg/kg or 40 mykg MYOZYME every
`
`two weeks, with length of treatment ranging from
`S2 to 106 weeks. Enrollment was restricted to patients
`ages 7 months or less at first infusion with clinical
`signs of Pompe disease, with cardiac hypertrophy,
`and who did not require ventilatory support at
`study entry.
`Efficacy was assessed by comparing the proportions
`of MYOZYMEvtreatcd patients who died or needed
`invasive ventilator support with the mortality
`experience of an historical cohort of untreated
`infantile-onset Pompe patients with similar age and
`disease severity, In the historical cohort, 61 untreated
`patients with infantileonset Pompe disease
`diagnosed by age 6 months, born between 1982
`and 2002, were identified by a retrospective review
`of medical charts. By the age of 18 months, only
`one of the 61 historical control patients was alive
`(98% mortality), indicating the poor outcome of
`patients who are left untreated.
`Within the first 12 months of treatment, 3 of
`18 MYOZYME-treated patients required invasive
`ventilatory support (17%, with 95% confidence
`interval 4% to 41%); there were no deaths.
`With continued treatment beyond 12 months,
`4 additional patients required invasive ventilatory
`support, after receiving between 13 and 18 months
`of MYOZYME treatment; 2 of these 4 patients died
`after receiving 14 and 25 months of treatment, and
`after receiving 1 1 days and 7.5 months of invasive
`ventilatory support, respectively. No other deaths
`have been reported through a median fol|ow~up of
`20 months, and all 16 surviving patients continue to
`be followed. Survival without invasive ventilatory
`support was substantially greater in the MYOZYME-
`treatcd patients in this study than would be expected
`compared to the poor survival of the historical
`control patients. No differences in outcome were
`observed between patients who received 20 mg/kg
`versus 40 mg/kg.
`Other outcome measures in this study included
`unblinded assessments of motor function by the
`Alberta infant Motor Scale (AIMS). The AIMS is a
`measure of infant motor performance that assesses
`motor maturation of the infant through age 18
`months and is validated for comparison to normal.
`healthy infants. AlMS—assessed gains in motor
`function occurred in 13 patients. In the majority of
`patients, motor function was substantially delayed
`compared to normal infants of comparable age. The
`continued effect of MYOZYME treatment over time
`on motor function is unknown. Two of 9 patients
`who had demonstrated gains in motor function after
`12 months of MYOZYME treatment and continued
`to be followed regressed despite ongoing treatment.
`Changes from baseline to Month 12 in left ventricular
`mass index (LVMI), an evaluation of bioactivity, were
`measured by echocardiography. For the 15 patients
`with both baseline and Month 12 echocardiograms,
`all had decreases from baseline in LVMI (mean
`decrease 118 g/ml, range 45 to 193 g/m2).
`The magnitude of the decrease in LVMI did not
`correlate with the clinical outcome measure of
`ventilatonfree survival.
`
`Study 2 is an ongoing, international, multicenter,
`non—rand0mized, open«label clinical trial that
`enrolled 21 patients who were ages 3 months to
`3.5 years at first treatment. All patients received
`20 mg/kg MYOZYME every other week for up to
`104 weeks. Five of 21 patients were receiving invasive
`ventilatory support at the time of first infusion.
`The primary outcome measure was the proportion
`of patients alive at the conclusion of treatment.
`At the 52-week interim analysis, 16 of 21 patients
`were alive. Sixteen patients were free of invasive
`ventilatory support at the time of first infusion:
`of these, 4 died, 2 required invasive ventilaiory
`support, and 10 were free of invasive ventilatory

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

Connectivity issues with tsdrapi.uspto.gov. Try again now (HTTP Error 429: ).

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket