PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005)
`
`OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 04/2009)
`
`Response to Office Action
`
`The table below presents the data as entered.
`
`Entered
`
`77116734
`
`LAW OFFICE 110
`
`Input Field
`
`SERIAL NUMBER
`
`LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED
`
`MARK SECTION (no change)
`
`ARGUMENT(S)
`
`This is in response to the Office Action dated June 14, 2007.
`
`Specimen
`
`The Trademark Attorney has refused registration of BUENO, Trademark Serial No. 77/116,734, stating that, because “the goods do
`not appear anywhere in the photograph of the mark” and “[c]onsumers will not recognize that the mark is used in relation to the goods set
`forth in the identification” the specimen is unacceptable. (cid:160) Applicant respectfully disagrees.
`
`Applicant submits that the specimen submitted with the application functions properly as a point-of-purchase display and that the two
`additional specimens submitted herewith also function as such displays.(cid:160) The original specimen is a drive-thru window sign that shows the
`mark BUENO prominently.(cid:160) The substitute specimens are restaurant table tents/displays that also show the mark prominently.(cid:160) The specimens
`inform the consumer that the branded BUENO goods are available for purchase at the restaurant where the specimens appear.(cid:160) In effect, the
`brand BUENO is associated with, or related to, the goods in the specimen itself and with the point-of-sale at which both the specimens and
`goods are located.(cid:160)
`
`The specimens invite and induce the consumer to request the goods at the restaurant point-of-sale.(cid:160) For example, the original specimen
`appears at a restaurant drive-through window where the consumer, upon seeing the sign, can request the BUENO product, purchase it, and
`take delivery at the window.(cid:160) The customer knows that the goods received are the goods identified on the specimen under the mark.(cid:160) The
`substitute specimens function the same way.(cid:160) In effect, the association between the specimens/displays and the goods is inevitable.
`
`As stated in the TMEP 904.06, “[i]t is not necessary that the display be in close proximity to the goods.” (cid:160) Citing In re Marriott Corp.,
`459 F.2d 525, 527, 173 USPQ 799 (C.C.P.A. 1972); Lands' End Inc. v. Manbeck, 797 F. Supp. 511, 24 U.S.P.Q.2d 1314 (E.D. Va. 1992).(cid:160) The
`TMEP 904.06 notes that displays such as banners, window displays, menus, and the like comprise proper point-of-sale material.
`In Marriott, the court reversed the examiner for refusing to register the words "TEEN TWIST" as a trademark for a sandwich.(cid:160) In re
`Marriott Corp., 459 F.2d 525.(cid:160) The customer could make a sandwich selection from the menu depiction of the sandwich associated by the
`mark “TWEEN TWIST”. (cid:160) Id. at 527.(cid:160) The customer made the selection from this depiction of the sandwich, and the item was emphasized by
`the mark "TEEN TWIST" such that the mark was associated with the sandwich the customer received. (cid:160) Id.(cid:160) (cid:160)
`As stated by the court in Lands' End Inc. v. Manbeck, “a point of sale location provides a customer with the opportunity to look to the
`displayed mark as a means of identifying and distinguishing the source of goods.” (cid:160) Lands' End Inc. v. Manbeck, 797 F. Supp. at 514 (citing In
`re Shipley Co. Inc., 230 U.S.P.Q. 691 (TTAB 1986). (cid:160) The customers of Lands’ End purchased merchandise through a catalog that displayed
`pictures of the goods and the mark “KETCH”, and the catalog provided a telephone number for placing an order. (cid:160) Id.(cid:160) Thus, the
`display/catalog associated the product with the mark.(cid:160) Id.
`In the present matter, the customer identifies and distinguishes the goods as being from the source BUENO.(cid:160) Again, Applicant’s mark
`BUENO is shown in the displays at the point-of-sale, identify the goods available for purchase at the point-of-sale, the customer requests the
`goods at the point-of-sale, and the customer receives the goods identified on the displays at the restaurant point-of-sale.(cid:160) The association
`between the mark on the displays and the goods is less attenuated than the association between the Lands’ End catalog and the “KETCH”
`
`

`
`goods located miles away for order by telephone.(cid:160) Because the goods are restaurant menu items, the display specimens filed herein function not
`only in the manner of generally appropriate point-of-sale displays, but also in the manner of menus which have specifically been found to
`function as proper point-of-sale displays – this is of particular relevance given that in many restaurant establishments, such as that depicted in
`the original specimen herein, menu items are displayed on wall and window boards and signs.
`Therefore, Applicant submits that the specimens herein depict proper point-of-sale displays.
`Identification of Goods
`
`The Trademark Attorney has stated that the identification of goods is too broad.(cid:160) Applicant has amended the identification of goods to
`read:(cid:160)(cid:160) “Prepared food products, namely processed vegetables in the nature of cut chile peppers for sale and use in the restaurant setting, in
`International Class 29.”
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`For the reasons stated in response to the Trademark Attorney’s rejection over the mark, Applicant requests that the refusal be
`withdrawn.(cid:160) It is submitted that the present application is in condition for publication and registration, and such action is requested.(cid:160)
`
`GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (class deleted)
`
`INTERNATIONAL CLASS
`
`DESCRIPTION
`
`030
`
`Prepared food products, namely chopped chile, chile sauce, tamales, tacos, and enchiladas for sale and use in the restaurant setting
`
`FILING BASIS
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE
`
`Section 1(a)
`
`At least as early as 12/31/1986
`
`At least as early as 12/31/1986
`
`GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (class added) Original Class (030)
`
`INTERNATIONAL CLASS
`
`DESCRIPTION
`
`029
`
`Prepared food products, namely processed vegetables in the nature of cut chile peppers for sale and use in the restaurant setting
`
`FILING BASIS
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)STATEMENT TYPE
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)SPECIMEN
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)FILE NAME(S)
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)SPECIMEN DESCRIPTION
`
`SIGNATURE SECTION
`
`DECLARATION SIGNATURE
`
`SIGNATORY'S NAME
`
`SIGNATORY'S POSITION
`
`DATE SIGNED
`
`RESPONSE SIGNATURE
`
`SIGNATORY'S NAME
`
`Section 1(a)
`
`At least as early as 12/31/1986
`
`At least as early as 12/31/1986
`
`"The substitute specimen(s) was in use in commerce as of the filing date of the
`application."
`
`\\TICRS2\EXPORT13\771\167 \77116734\xml3\ROA0002.JP G
`
`\\TICRS2\EXPORT13\771\167 \77116734\xml3\ROA0003.JP G
`
`(1) Restaurant table tent/display showing mark and identifying goods available at the
`point-of-sale; (2) Restaurant table tent/display showing mark and identifying goods
`available at the point-of-sale
`
`/Vidal A. Oaxaca/
`
`Vidal A. Oaxaca
`
`Attorney
`
`07/16/2007
`
`/Vidal A. Oaxaca/
`
`Vidal A. Oaxaca
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`

`
`SIGNATORY'S POSITION
`
`DATE SIGNED
`
`AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
`
`FILING INFORMATION SECTION
`
`Attorney
`
`07/16/2007
`
`YES
`
`SUBMIT DATE
`
`TEAS STAMP
`
`PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005)
`
`OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 04/2009)
`
`Mon Jul 16 22:45:06 EDT 2007
`
`USPTO/ROA-XX.XXX.XXX.XX-2
`0070716224506487130-77116
`734-380ba678e7911e83979b3
`b4fce95c8651-N/A-N/A-2007
`0716223401091449
`
`Response to Office Action
`
`To the Commissioner for Trademarks:
`
`Application serial no. 77116734 has been amended as follows:
`
`ARGUMENT(S)
`In response to the substantive refusal(s), please note the following:
`
`This is in response to the Office Action dated June 14, 2007.
`
`Specimen
`
`The Trademark Attorney has refused registration of BUENO, Trademark Serial No. 77/116,734, stating that, because “the goods do not
`appear anywhere in the photograph of the mark” and “[c]onsumers will not recognize that the mark is used in relation to the goods set forth in
`the identification” the specimen is unacceptable. (cid:160) Applicant respectfully disagrees.
`
`Applicant submits that the specimen submitted with the application functions properly as a point-of-purchase display and that the two
`additional specimens submitted herewith also function as such displays.(cid:160) The original specimen is a drive-thru window sign that shows the mark
`BUENO prominently.(cid:160) The substitute specimens are restaurant table tents/displays that also show the mark prominently.(cid:160) The specimens inform
`the consumer that the branded BUENO goods are available for purchase at the restaurant where the specimens appear.(cid:160) In effect, the brand
`BUENO is associated with, or related to, the goods in the specimen itself and with the point-of-sale at which both the specimens and goods are
`located.(cid:160)
`
`The specimens invite and induce the consumer to request the goods at the restaurant point-of-sale.(cid:160) For example, the original specimen
`appears at a restaurant drive-through window where the consumer, upon seeing the sign, can request the BUENO product, purchase it, and take
`delivery at the window.(cid:160) The customer knows that the goods received are the goods identified on the specimen under the mark.(cid:160) The substitute
`specimens function the same way.(cid:160) In effect, the association between the specimens/displays and the goods is inevitable.
`
`As stated in the TMEP 904.06, “[i]t is not necessary that the display be in close proximity to the goods.” (cid:160) Citing In re Marriott Corp.,
`459 F.2d 525, 527, 173 USPQ 799 (C.C.P.A. 1972); Lands' End Inc. v. Manbeck, 797 F. Supp. 511, 24 U.S.P.Q.2d 1314 (E.D. Va. 1992).(cid:160) The
`TMEP 904.06 notes that displays such as banners, window displays, menus, and the like comprise proper point-of-sale material.
`In Marriott, the court reversed the examiner for refusing to register the words "TEEN TWIST" as a trademark for a sandwich.(cid:160) In re
`Marriott Corp., 459 F.2d 525.(cid:160) The customer could make a sandwich selection from the menu depiction of the sandwich associated by the
`mark “TWEEN TWIST”. (cid:160) Id. at 527.(cid:160) The customer made the selection from this depiction of the sandwich, and the item was emphasized
`
`

`
`by the mark "TEEN TWIST" such that the mark was associated with the sandwich the customer received. (cid:160) Id.(cid:160) (cid:160)
`As stated by the court in Lands' End Inc. v. Manbeck, “a point of sale location provides a customer with the opportunity to look to the
`displayed mark as a means of identifying and distinguishing the source of goods.” (cid:160) Lands' End Inc. v. Manbeck, 797 F. Supp. at 514 (citing In re
`Shipley Co. Inc., 230 U.S.P.Q. 691 (TTAB 1986). (cid:160) The customers of Lands’ End purchased merchandise through a catalog that displayed
`pictures of the goods and the mark “KETCH”, and the catalog provided a telephone number for placing an order. (cid:160) Id.(cid:160) Thus, the display/catalog
`associated the product with the mark.(cid:160) Id.
`In the present matter, the customer identifies and distinguishes the goods as being from the source BUENO.(cid:160) Again, Applicant’s
`mark BUENO is shown in the displays at the point-of-sale, identify the goods available for purchase at the point-of-sale, the customer
`requests the goods at the point-of-sale, and the customer receives the goods identified on the displays at the restaurant point-of-sale.(cid:160) The
`association between the mark on the displays and the goods is less attenuated than the association between the Lands’ End catalog and
`the “KETCH” goods located miles away for order by telephone. (cid:160) Because the goods are restaurant menu items, the display specimens filed
`herein function not only in the manner of generally appropriate point-of-sale displays, but also in the manner of menus which have specifically
`been found to function as proper point-of-sale displays – this is of particular relevance given that in many restaurant establishments, such as that
`depicted in the original specimen herein, menu items are displayed on wall and window boards and signs.
`Therefore, Applicant submits that the specimens herein depict proper point-of-sale displays.
`Identification of Goods
`
`The Trademark Attorney has stated that the identification of goods is too broad.(cid:160) Applicant has amended the identification of goods to
`read:(cid:160)(cid:160) “Prepared food products, namely processed vegetables in the nature of cut chile peppers for sale and use in the restaurant setting, in
`International Class 29.”
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`For the reasons stated in response to the Trademark Attorney’s rejection over the mark, Applicant requests that the refusal be withdrawn. (cid:160)
`It is submitted that the present application is in condition for publication and registration, and such action is requested.(cid:160)
`
`CLASSIFICATION AND LISTING OF GOODS/SERVICES
`Applicant hereby deletes the following class of goods/services from the application.
`Class 030 for Prepared food products, namely chopped chile, chile sauce, tamales, tacos, and enchiladas for sale and use in the restaurant setting
`
`Applicant hereby adds the following class of goods/services to the application:
`New: Class 029 (Original Class: 030 ) for Prepared food products, namely processed vegetables in the nature of cut chile peppers for sale and use
`in the restaurant setting
`Filing Basis: Section 1(a), Use in Commerce: The mark was first used at least as early as 12/31/1986 and first used in commerce at least as
`early as 12/31/1986, and is now in use in such commerce.
`Applicant hereby submits a specimen for Class 029. The specimen(s) submitted consists of (1) Restaurant table tent/display showing mark and
`identifying goods available at the point-of-sale; (2) Restaurant table tent/display showing mark and identifying goods available at the point-of-
`sale.
`For an application based on 1(a), Use in Commerce, "The substitute specimen(s) was in use in commerce as of the filing date of the application."
`Specimen File1
`Specimen File2
`
`SIGNATURE(S)
`Declaration Signature
`If the applicant is seeking registration under Section 1(b) and/or Section 44 of the Trademark Act, the applicant had a bona fide intention to use
`or use through the applicant's related company or licensee the mark in commerce on or in connection with the identified goods and/or services as
`of the filing date of the application. 37 C.F.R. Secs. 2.34(a)(2)(i); 2.34 (a)(3)(i); and 2.34(a)(4)(ii). If the applicant is seeking registration under
`Section 1(a) of the Trademark Act, the mark was in use in commerce on or in connection with the goods or services listed in the application as of
`the application filing date. 37 C.F.R. Secs. 2.34(a)(1)(i). The undersigned, being hereby warned that willful false statements and the like so made
`are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. §1001, and that such willful false statements may jeopardize the validity of the
`application or any resulting registration, declares that he/she is properly authorized to execute this application on behalf of the applicant; he/she
`believes the applicant to be the owner of the trademark/service mark sought to be registered, or, if the application is being filed under 15 U.S.C.
`§1051(b), he/she believes applicant to be entitled to use such mark in commerce; to the best of his/her knowledge and belief no other person,
`firm, corporation, or association has the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form thereof or in such near resemblance
`
`

`
`thereto as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services of such other person, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to
`deceive; that if the original application was submitted unsigned, that all statements in the original application and this submission made of the
`declaration signer's knowledge are true; and all statements in the original application and this submission made on information and belief are
`believed to be true.
`
`Signature: /Vidal A. Oaxaca/(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)Date: 07/16/2007
`Signatory's Name: Vidal A. Oaxaca
`Signatory's Position: Attorney
`
`Response Signature
`Signature: /Vidal A. Oaxaca/(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)Date: 07/16/2007
`Signatory's Name: Vidal A. Oaxaca
`Signatory's Position: Attorney
`
`The signatory has confirmed that he/she is an attorney who is a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state, which
`includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and other federal territories and possessions; and he/she is currently the applicant's attorney or an
`associate thereof; and to the best of his/her knowledge, if prior to his/her appointment another U.S. attorney or a Canadian attorney/agent not
`currently associated with his/her company/firm previously represented the applicant in this matter: (1) the applicant has filed or is concurrently
`filing a signed revocation of or substitute power of attorney with the USPTO; (2) the USPTO has granted the request of the prior representative to
`withdraw; (3) the applicant has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her in this matter; or (4) the applicant's appointed U.S. attorney or
`Canadian attorney/agent has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her as an associate attorney in this matter.
`
`Serial Number: 77116734
`Internet Transmission Date: Mon Jul 16 22:45:06 EDT 2007
`TEAS Stamp: USPTO/ROA-XX.XXX.XXX.XX-2007071622450648
`7130-77116734-380ba678e7911e83979b3b4fce
`95c8651-N/A-N/A-20070716223401091449
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

PTO Denying Access

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket