... injured persons in dangerous scenarios wear a Sensor Module and a Receiver Module, and each Receiver Module transmits measurements to the PDA carried by a medic. The medic uses their PDA to remotely monitor multiple injured ...
Further, even if D’Angelo were prior art, there are many reasons why a POSITA would not have been motivated to use the medic’s PDA to power and “read out” measured data from one injured person’s Receiver Module after its battery ...
... three wirelessly connected components: (1) a “Sensor Module” worn by on each injured person’s forehead; (2) a “Receiver Module” worn on each injured person’s body; and (3) one PDA used by a medic to remotely monitor the injured ...
Further, Apple’s proposed modification assumes that the medic would use the PDA to power the Receiver Module attached to an injured person, upon reaching that person in the field.
A POSITA would have understood that if the medic went to the injured person, he or she would not have used Mendelson’s PDA to power the Receiver Module because there would no longer be a need to remotely monitor that person.
... person right in front of them using typical medical equipment such as a finger-clip pulse oximeter or stethoscope, and applied the emergency medical care deemed necessary. Id. And if the person’s injuries warranted monitoring after ...
A POSITA would have understood that the medic was not using the PDA as intended (i.e., monitoring “multiple” injured people at the same time) whenever the medic had to use the PDA to read out one injured person’s Receiver Module, ...
... Relatedly, if the medic was using the PDA-turned-wristwatch to power and read out data from one injured person’s Receiver Module as Apple proposes, the medic would not be using the PDA-turned-wristwatch to monitor “multiple” injured ...