• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All

Search the Patent Trial and Appeal Board

71 results

9 Institution Decision: Decision Institution of Inter Partes Review

Document IPR2013-00483, No. 9 Institution Decision - Decision Institution of Inter Partes Review (P.T.A.B. Feb. 4, 2014)
Additionally, in the event of a crash, a distress signal is automatically sent out to alert other personnel that aid may be required.
... it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the automatic distress signal feature of Oishi with the recording apparatus of Aoyanagi, as it would facilitate handling of an accident and treatment of injured persons, ...
... the automatic distress signal feature of Vollmer with the recording apparatus of Aoyanagi, as it would decrease emergency response times, provide emergency services with more complete information, and avoid problems that a person ...
Patent Owner makes two additional assertions as to why Petitioner fails to demonstrate that a person of ordinary skill in the art would have combined Aoyanagi with the automatic collision notification of Oishi or Vollmer.
In addition, Petitioner’s declarant, Mr. McNamara, states that a person of ordinary skill in the art would understand that the Aoyanagi system would monitor engine ignition timing pulse signals and convert them to revolutions per minute ...
As the timing pulses in Aoyanagi are converted into RPM and then watched either by a processor or a person, Aoyanagi discloses “monitoring” RPM. b.
cite Cite Document
+ More Snippets

10 Institution Decision: Decision Institution of Inter Partes Review 37 CFR 42108

Document IPR2013-00638, No. 10 Institution Decision - Decision Institution of Inter Partes Review 37 CFR 42108 (P.T.A.B. Mar. 25, 2014)
Additionally, in the event of a crash, a distress signal automatically is sent out to alert other personnel that aid may be required.
In this context, claim terms generally are given their ordinary and customary meanings, as understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art, at the time of the invention, having taken into consideration the language of the claims, the ...
―In some cases, the ordinary meaning of claim language as understood by a person of skill in the art may be readily apparent even to lay judges, and claim construction in such cases involves little more than the application of the widely ...
Petitioner contends that, although the specification does not discuss ―a load on the engine,‖ Petitioner’s construction is consistent with the specification, which describes several sensors that a person of ordinary skill in the art would ...
Petitioner also contends that its construction is consistent with how a person of ordinary skill in the art would understand ―a load on the engine.‖ Id. at 7 (citing 2 The phrase ―sensors for monitoring‖ appears in claim 26.
As Petitioner points out, the specification does discuss throttle position 67B, engine fuel consumption 67C, inclinometer 67F, and load sensor 67K, and contends that a person of ordinary skill in the art would understand these ...
However, Mr. McNamara also testifies that a person of ordinary skill in the art would understand that things such as throttle position could be used to indicate a load of the engine.
... it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the automatic distress signal feature of Oishi with the recording apparatus of Aoyanagi, as it would facilitate handling of an accident and treatment of injured persons, ...
cite Cite Document
+ More Snippets

10 Institution Decision: Decision Institution of Covered Business Method Review

Document CBM2012-00004, No. 10 Institution Decision - Decision Institution of Covered Business Method Review (P.T.A.B. Jan. 25, 2013)
In fact, claim 4 does not recite any technological element (e.g., a computer or electrical sensors), but rather recites only method steps that can be completed by a person.
Indeed, a person can generate an insured profile by writing down on a paper the value of the 7 Case CBM2012-00004 Patent 6,064,970 vehicle, insurance coverage limits, and deductibles, before a passenger monitors the vehicle ...
... ’970 10 Case CBM2012-00004 Patent 6,064,970 patent teaches that conventional insurance cost determination methods involve generating an insured profile for the vehicle operator by gathering relevant historical data from a personal ...
) Each driver has a personalized ERA that maintains 13 Case CBM2012-00004 Patent 6,064,970 information that identifies the driver and a record of the driver’s driving history and performance.
) According to the Florida Guide, all drivers in the state of Florida must carry a minimum amount of property damage liability coverage in addition to the required personal injury protection coverage.
... claim is unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) if the differences between the claimed subject matter and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person ...
... but not limited to, a cost to the insured and/or insurer/underwriter associated with the insurance Safety standard (claims 5, 10-11, 13-14, 16-18) Value/criteria associated with the promotion of safety/prevention of risk/loss/injury ...
Hence, a person of ordinary skill in the art would have appreciated that when a vehicle operator is applying for an insurance policy from an insurance company, an insured profile for the vehicle operator would be generated to determine a base ...
cite Cite Document
+ More Snippets

10 Institution Decision: Decision Institution of Covered Business Method Review

Document CBM2012-00002, No. 10 Institution Decision - Decision Institution of Covered Business Method Review (P.T.A.B. Jan. 25, 2013)
In fact, claim 4 does not recite any technological element (e.g., a computer or electrical sensors), but rather only recites method steps that can be completed by a person.
Indeed, a person can generate an insured profile by writing down on a paper the value of the 7 Case CBM2012-00002 Patent 6,064,970 vehicle, insurance coverage limits, and deductibles, before a passenger monitors the vehicle ...
... In particular, the background section of the ’970 patent discloses that conventional insurance cost determination methods involve generating an insured profile for the vehicle operator by gathering relevant historical data from a personal ...
) According to the Florida Guide, all drivers in the state of Florida must carry a minimum amount of property damage liability coverage in addition to the required personal injury protection coverage.
... claim is unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) if the differences between the claimed subject matter and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person ...
... but not limited to, a cost to the insured and/or insurer/underwriter associated with the insurance Safety standard (claims 5, 10-11, 13-14, 16-18) Value/criteria associated with the promotion of safety/prevention of risk/loss/injury ...
Hence, a person of ordinary skill in the art would have appreciated that when a vehicle operator is applying for an insurance policy from an insurance company, an insured profile for the vehicle operator would be generated to determine a base ...
See KSR, 550 U.S. at 421, (“A person of ordinary skill is also a person of ordinary creativity, not an automaton.”).
cite Cite Document
+ More Snippets

22 Institution Decision Grant: Institution Decision Grant

Document IPR2022-01226, No. 22 Institution Decision Grant - Institution Decision Grant (P.T.A.B. Jan. 11, 2023)
Under that standard, claim terms “are generally given their ordinary and customary meaning” as understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention.
“Initial dose,” “Secondary Dose,” and “Tertiary Dose” Petitioner next contends that a person of ordinary skill in the art would understand each of these claim terms as expressly defined in the ’601 patent’s Specification. Pet. 22.
Granted, the outcome for the patient in either case might well be 14 IPR2022-01226 Patent 10,888,601 B2 unfortunate, but there are no positive or negative limitations in the challenged claims that require a person of ordinary skill in ...
A Person of Ordinary Skill in the Art B. Petitioner contends that a person of ordinary skill in the art would have: (1) knowledge regarding the diagnosis and treatment of angiogenic eye disorders, including the administration of therapies to ...
Petitioner asserts that such a person would typically have an advanced degree, such as an M.D. or Ph.D. (or equivalent, or less education but considerable professional experience in the medical, biotechnological, or pharmaceutical ...
Patent Owner does not expressly contest this definition of a person of ordinary skill in the art in its Preliminary Response.
With respect to the limitation reciting “an effective sequential dosing regimen,” we find that a person of ordinary skill in the art would understand that a sequence of primary, secondary, and tertiary doses would constitute a sequence of ...
We find that the “effect … on the … 22 IPR2022-01226 Patent 10,888,601 B2 integrity of the patent system,” of exercising our discretion to deny institution of inter partes review of the challenged claims would be, in fact, directly injurious ...
cite Cite Document
+ More Snippets

10 Institution Decision Grant: Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review 35 USC § 314

Document IPR2023-00481, No. 10 Institution Decision Grant - Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review 35 USC § 314 (P.T.A.B. Sep. 22, 2023)
“Over time, MS may result in the accumulation of various neurological disabilities” and “[c]linical disability in MS is presumed to be a result of repeated inflammatory injury with subsequent loss of myelin and axons, leading to tissue ...
A claim is unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person ...
Petitioner proposes that the person of ordinary skill in the art (“POSA”) would have a “high” level of skill.
cite Cite Document

10 Institution Decision Grant: Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review 35 USC § 314

Document IPR2023-00480, No. 10 Institution Decision Grant - Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review 35 USC § 314 (P.T.A.B. Sep. 22, 2023)
“Over time, MS may result in the accumulation of various neurological disabilities” and “[c]linical disability in MS is presumed to be a result of repeated inflammatory injury with subsequent loss of myelin and axons, leading to tissue ...
A claim is unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person ...
Petitioner proposes that the person of ordinary skill in the art (“POSA”) would have a “high” level of skill.
cite Cite Document

9 Institution Decision Grant: Institution Decision Grant

Document IPR2022-00016, No. 9 Institution Decision Grant - Institution Decision Grant (P.T.A.B. Apr. 8, 2022)

cite Cite Document
1 2 3 4 5 6 >>