• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
749 results

IBG LLC v. Trading Technologies International, Inc.

Docket CBM2015-00182, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Sept. 11, 2015)
Jeremy Plenzler, Meredith Petravick, Philip Hoffmann, Sally Medley, presiding
Case TypeCovered Business Method Patent Review
Patent
6772132
Petitioner IBG LLC
Patent Owner Trading Technologies International, Inc.
Assignee HARRIS BRUMFIELD, AS TRUSTEE OF THE ASCENT TRUST
...
cite Cite Docket

CQG, INC. v. Trading Technologies International, Inc.

Docket CBM2015-00058, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Jan. 9, 2015)
Meredith Petravick, Philip Hoffmann, Sally Medley, presiding
Case TypeCovered Business Method Patent Review
Patent
6772132
Petitioner CQG, INC.
Patent Owner Trading Technologies International, Inc.
Petitioner CQGT
cite Cite Docket

TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation v. Trading Technologies International, Inc.

Docket CBM2014-00135, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (May 19, 2014)
Jameson Lee, Meredith Petravick, Philip Hoffmann, Sally Medley, presiding
Case TypeCovered Business Method Patent Review
Patent
6772132
Petitioner TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation
Patent Owner Trading Technologies International, Inc.
Assignee HARRIS BRUMFIELD, AS TRUSTEE OF THE ASCENT TRUST
...
cite Cite Docket

145 Other: CAFC Petition for Rehearing Denied April 30, 2019

Document CBM2015-00182, No. 145 Other - CAFC Petition for Rehearing Denied April 30, 2019 (P.T.A.B. Oct. 18, 2019)
Document: 144 Page: 1 Filed: 04/30/2019 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
Before PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, DYK, MOORE, O’MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges*.
Document: 144 Page: 2 Filed: 04/30/2019 IBG LLC v. TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INT'L
A response to the petition was invited by the court and filed by Cross-Appellant Trading Technologies Inter- national, Inc.
Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The petition for panel rehearing is denied.
cite Cite Document

145 Other Not for motions: CAFC Petition for Rehearing Denied April 30, 2019

Document CBM2015-00182, No. 145 Other Not for motions - CAFC Petition for Rehearing Denied April 30, 2019 (P.T.A.B. Oct. 18, 2019)
nited States Court of Appeals for the federal Circuit
Before PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, DYK, Moore, O’MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges".
Document: 144 Page: 2 Filed: 04/30/2019 IBG LLC v. TRADING TECHNOLOGIESINT'L
A response to the petition was invited by the court and filed by Cross-Appellant Trading Technologies Inter- national, Inc.
The petition was referred to the panel that ‘heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc wasreferred to the circuit judges who are in regu- lar active service.
cite Cite Document

144 Court Mandate: CAFC Decision and Mandate May 7, 2019

Document CBM2015-00182, No. 144 Court Mandate - CAFC Decision and Mandate May 7, 2019 (P.T.A.B. Oct. 18, 2019)
Decided: February 13, 2019 BYRON LEROY PICKARD, Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for appellants in 2017-1732, 2017-2052 and for appellees in 2017-2054, 2017-2565.
KATHERINE TWOMEY ALLEN, Appellate Staff, Civil Divi- sion, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for intervenor.
The district court determined that “[t]his issue did not arise in the open outcry systems, i.e. the pre- electronic trading analog of the ’304 and ’132 patents’ Document: 135 Page: 7 Filed: 02/13/2019
“the claimed subject matter is directed to a specific im- provement to the way computers operate,” as we held in CQG, 675 F. App’x at 1006, the patents are also for a “tech- nological invention” under any reasonable meaning of that term.
Based on our decision in CQG and the Board’s adoption thereof, the Board’s reasoning in determining that the ’132, ’304, ’41 1, and ’996 patents are eligible for CBM review was arbitrary and capricious.
cite Cite Document

143 Order: ORDERExpunging Confidential Information37 CFR 4256

Document CBM2015-00182, No. 143 Order - ORDERExpunging Confidential Information37 CFR 4256 (P.T.A.B. Oct. 15, 2019)
Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, MEREDITH C. PETRAVICK, and JEREMY M. PLENZLER, Administrative Patent Judges.
On February 13, 2019, the Federal Circuit vacated1 the Final Written Decision, and the mandate issued on May 7, 2019.
Our Final Written Decision did not rely upon the redacted information from these Papers or Exhibits 2169 and 2172.
1 The Motion to Expunge mistakenly states that the Federal Circuit affirmed the Final Written Decision.
Patent No. 6,772,132 For PETITIONER: Robert Sokohl Lori Gordon Richard Bemben
cite Cite Document

143 Order: ORDERExpunging Confidential Information37 CFR ¿¿ 4256

Document CBM2015-00182, No. 143 Order - ORDERExpunging Confidential Information37 CFR ¿¿ 4256 (P.T.A.B. Oct. 15, 2019)
Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, MEREDITH C. PETRAVICK, and JEREMY M. PLENZLER, Administrative Patent Judges.
On February 13, 2019, the Federal Circuit vacated1 the Final Written Decision, and the mandate issued on May 7, 2019.
Our Final Written Decision did not rely upon the redacted information from these Papers or Exhibits 2169 and 2172.
1 The Motion to Expunge mistakenly states that the Federal Circuit affirmed the Final Written Decision.
Patent No. 6,772,132 For PETITIONER: Robert Sokohl Lori Gordon Richard Bemben
cite Cite Document
1 2 3 4 5 ... >>