• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Displaying 114-116 of 116 results

2018 Exhibit: Complaint for Patent Infringement, Dkt No 1, Case No 621 cv 00943 ADA, September 10, 2021 WD Tex

Document IPR2022-01037, No. 2018 Exhibit - Complaint for Patent Infringement, Dkt No 1, Case No 621 cv 00943 ADA, September 10, 2021 WD Tex (P.T.A.B. Sep. 6, 2022)
Plaintiff Arigna Technology Limited (“Plaintiff” or “Arigna”) is an Irish company conducting business at The Hyde Building, Carrickmines, Suite 23, Dublin 18, Ireland.
semiconductor products relevant to this action.2 Additionally, Samsung’s website lists numerous job openings in its Austin offices, including for hardware and electrical engineering roles.
This suit is commenced against Defendants pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 299 in a single action because (a) a right to relief is asserted against Defendants jointly, severally, or in the alternative with respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences relating to the making, using, importing into the United States, offering for sale, and/or selling of the same accused products or processes and (b) questions of fact common Arigna Exhibit 2018 Apple Inc., et al v. Arigna Technology Limited
On information andbelief, a feedback loop 0 This description of infringementis illustrative and not intended to be an exhaustiveor limiting explanation of every manner in which Samsung’s products infringe the ’164 Patent.
Morespecifically, Apple designs, manufactures, assembles, imports, offers for sale, and/or sells mobile devices that incorporate the Qualcomm SDR865 transceiver and Skyworks SKY58245-19 front-end module, and/or other components, which infringe at least independent claim | of the ’164 Patent.
cite Cite Document

2004 Exhibit: Exhibits to Defendants Opening Claim Construction Brief, Dkt Nos 71 1 to 71 4, Case No 621 cv 00943 ADA, Filed April 21, 2022 WD Tex

Document IPR2022-01037, No. 2004 Exhibit - Exhibits to Defendants Opening Claim Construction Brief, Dkt Nos 71 1 to 71 4, Case No 621 cv 00943 ADA, Filed April 21, 2022 WD Tex (P.T.A.B. Sep. 6, 2022...
Arigna Exhibit 2004 Apple Inc., et al v. Arigna Technology Limited IPR2022-01037 Page 1 of 74 Arigna Exhibit 2004 Apple Inc., et al v. Arigna Technology Limited IPR2022-01037 Page 2 of 74 Arigna Exhibit 2004 Apple Inc., et al v.
cite Cite Document

2012 Exhibit: Order of Dismissal With Prejudice as to Samsung defendants, Dkt No 111, Case No 621 cv 943 ADA, signed August 15, 2022 WD Tex

Document IPR2022-01037, No. 2012 Exhibit - Order of Dismissal With Prejudice as to Samsung defendants, Dkt No 111, Case No 621 cv 943 ADA, signed August 15, 2022 WD Tex (P.T.A.B. Sep. 6, 2022)
On this day, Plaintiff Arigna Technology Limited (‘Plaintiff’) and Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (together, “Samsung”) announced to the Court that they have resolved Plaintiffs claims for relief against Samsungasserted in this case and Samsung’s claims, defenses and/or counterclaims for relief against Plaintiff asserted in this case.
Plaintiff and Samsung have therefore requested that the Court dismiss Plaintiffs claims for relief against Samsung with prejudice and Samsung’s claims, defenses and/or counterclaims for relief against Plaintiff without prejudice, and with all attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses taxed against the party incurring same.
The Court, having considered this request, is of the opinion that their request for dismissal should be granted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDEREDthat Plaintiff's claims for relief against Samsung are dismissed with prejudice and Samsung’s claims, defenses and/or counterclaims for relief against Plaintiff are dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDEREDthatall attorneys’ fees, costs of court and expensesshall be borne by each party incurring the same.
cite Cite Document
<< 1 2 3 4 5 ... 7 8 9