• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Displaying 99-113 of 192 results

No. 19-1 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand and, COUNTERCLAIM (Part 1) against Yahoo! Inc. byOpenTV, ...

Document Yahoo! Inc. v. Kudelski SA et al, 5:16-cv-00349, No. 19-1 (N.D.Cal. Apr. 11, 2016)
Yahoo’s interactive video ads “automatically and directly electronically access[] said online information associated with said link in response to a user initiated command.” ’736 Patent at 10:49-51.
Yahoo has directly infringed, and is directly infringing, at least Claim 1 of the ’754 Patent, in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271 et seq., by making, using, offering for sale, selling, and/or importing in or into the United States without authority the fantasy gaming functionality employed by Yahoo’s fantasy sports gaming services available through yahoo.com and Yahoo branded mobile applications available at least on Android or iOS devices and Yahoo’s Connected TV platform.
Furthermore, to receive the benefit of the fantasy gaming functionality employed by Yahoo’s fantasy sports gaming services, users may be required to perform one or more actions, to the extent user actions DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS; Civil Case No.: 5:16-cv-00349 are considered to meet steps of the patented method, Yahoo maintains full control over the manner and/or timing of the infringing steps.
As the patent explains, this occurs for multiple reasons (see id. at 3:9-50) including significant differences in “the resource and bandwidth capabilities of the subnetworks that receive the network broadcast.” Id. at 3:36-38.
Upon information and belief, one or more of Yahoo’s interactive video advertising functionalities, alone or in combination with Yahoo mobile applications, meet all the elements of exemplary Claim 13.
cite Cite Document

No. 19-3 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand and, COUNTERCLAIM (Part 1) against Yahoo! Inc. byOpenTV, ...

Document Yahoo! Inc. v. Kudelski SA et al, 5:16-cv-00349, No. 19-3 (N.D.Cal. Apr. 11, 2016)
Upon information and belief, one or more of Yahoo’s interactive video advertising functionalities, alone or in combination with Yahoo mobile applications, meets all the elements of exemplary Claim 1 of the ’642 Patent.
The video streaming service, Yahoo TV, “relates” to television viewing, while Internet searching or otherwise perusing text content on a GPS enabled mobile device does not.
The Yahoo targeted advertising functionality employed by Yahoo’s streaming video delivery services available through yahoo.com and Yahoo’s branded mobile applications at least on Android or iOS devices and Yahoo’s Connected TV platform, are specially made and adapted to infringe the ’229 Patent, are not staple articles of commerce, and have no substantial non-infringing uses.
Yahoo contributorily infringes one or more claims of the ’229 Patent by offering for sale or selling the targeted advertising functionality in Yahoo’s streaming video delivery services available through yahoo.com and Yahoo’s branded mobile applications at least on Android or iOS devices and Yahoo’s Connected TV platform.
In the interest of efficiency this Court should stay adjudication of the infringement and validity disputes between OpenTV and Yahoo with respect to the claims of the ’081 Patent pending resolution of the appeal to be filed in the Apple case.
cite Cite Document

No. 19-2 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand and, COUNTERCLAIM (Part 1) against Yahoo! Inc. byOpenTV, ...

Document Yahoo! Inc. v. Kudelski SA et al, 5:16-cv-00349, No. 19-2 (N.D.Cal. Apr. 11, 2016)
Yahoo has indirectly infringed, and is indirectly infringing, at least Claims 13 and 36 of the ’327 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271 et seq., by making, using, offering for sale, selling, and/or importing in or into the United States without authority the interactive video advertising functionality employed by Yahoo’s streaming video delivery services available through yahoo.com and Yahoo’s branded mobile applications available at least on Android or iOS devices and Yahoo’s Connected TV platform, including, for example, Yahoo TV available online at https://www.yahoo.com/tv/.
For example, Yahoo provides its developers considerable information about its infringing adaptive streaming and resource management functionality employed by its Yahoo Connected TV platform on its website https://developer.yahoo.com, including instructing its developers how to create and operate directives for content presentation, that include prerequisite directives indicating that the acquisition of a subset of identified resources is a prerequisite for initiating the presentation.
Yahoo contributorily infringes one or more claims of the ’139 Patent by offering for sale or selling its streaming media service available through yahoo.com and Yahoo’s branded mobile applications available at least on Android or iOS devices and Yahoo’s Connected TV platform that uses timing indicia in the presentation of online content.
Upon information and belief, one or more of Yahoo’s interactive video advertising functionalities, alone or in combination with Yahoo mobile applications, meets all the elements of DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS; Civil Case No.: 5:16-cv-00349 exemplary Claims 1 and 41 of the ’656 Patent.
Yahoo controls and directs the infringing characteristics of these ad products by requiring advertisers to comply with specifications and style sheets which indicate how enhancement images are selected and overlaid onto preexisting program content.
cite Cite Document

No. 19-11 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand and, COUNTERCLAIM (Part 1) against Yahoo! Inc. byOpenTV, ...

Document Yahoo! Inc. v. Kudelski SA et al, 5:16-cv-00349, No. 19-11 (N.D.Cal. Apr. 11, 2016)
FIG. 13 is a flow diagram illustrating the steps that may be performed for the installation of labels, using automatic methods, in a manner which combines the processes of look- ing for an actual object and blank space simultaneously.
The enhanced video signal completely obscures the real barmer advertisements present at the sports arena and appears to the viewer as though the superimposed labels 534, 536, and 538 are inherent to the setting and are a natural part of the scene.
Accessing this interactive hot label may link the viewer to either the home page ofthe company depicted in the nation- ally recognized logo or to an address and phone number of a local tattoo shop.
Selling of advertising space may be accomplished by solicitation of companies, annual fees, random placement, automated selection (based on some sort of criteria or other choosing mechanism), or other ways.
In accordance with the above respective applications, affinity data provides information to a TV broadcaster as to whether or not an audience is actually engaged in the current TV video presentation, through use of a variety of sensors, as opposed to simply having the TV on and not watching the TV.
cite Cite Document

No. 19-7 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand and, COUNTERCLAIM (Part 1) against Yahoo! Inc. byOpenTV, ...

Document Yahoo! Inc. v. Kudelski SA et al, 5:16-cv-00349, No. 19-7 (N.D.Cal. Apr. 11, 2016)
In one embodiment, a device in an interactive television system is configured to receive one or more directives provided by a content author which describe or otherwise indicate an audio and/or video presentation.
For example, in a current interactive television environment, an application may be configured to only execute code or use data that is packaged within the carousel in the same directory as the first program module.
Click Me If the request is authorized and resolves to a valid charmel- _narne, then the HTML document will be unloaded and replaced with a TV media handler playing the default video and audio streams associated with the cnn.com service.
In order to maximize the availability of the transparency values for the author’s use, a system may be defined that allows an author to specify a region, including both its location and dimensions, which they want to contain overlay graphics.
Therefore, new properties which allow the specification of these alpha values is described in the sub- section below entitled “Alpha Properties.” An application author may specify that a particular palette (often referred to as a color lookup table or “clut” for short) may be useful in rendering objects in the body of an HTML page.
cite Cite Document

No. 19-13 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand and, COUNTERCLAIM (Part 1) against Yahoo! Inc. byOpenTV, ...

Document Yahoo! Inc. v. Kudelski SA et al, 5:16-cv-00349, No. 19-13 (N.D.Cal. Apr. 11, 2016)
[75] Inventors: Steven Szymanski, San Jose; Jean Rene Menand; Vincent Dureau, both of Palo Alto, all of Calif.; Suresh N. Chari, Elmsford, NY 5,536,260 12/1996 Hu .
The interactive content may enable the receiver to perform a variety of functions, including generating audio or graphics which are combined with the television program for display.
RAM 37 may include memory units which are static (e.g., SRAM), dynamic (e.g., DRAM), volatile or non-volatile (e.g., FLASH), as required to support the functions of the set-top box.
It is therefore desirable to implement a security device which controls, for purposes such as system and application safety, whether modules of one carousel are allowed to perform restricted operations.
For example, the carousel may comprise an electronic commerce application which allows interactive television users to make purchases via credit card transac- tions.
cite Cite Document

No. 19-5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand and, COUNTERCLAIM (Part 1) against Yahoo! Inc. byOpenTV, ...

Document Yahoo! Inc. v. Kudelski SA et al, 5:16-cv-00349, No. 19-5 (N.D.Cal. Apr. 11, 2016)
According to an embodiment of the invention, an introductory splash screen may containing a product name and logo, an anima- tion or movie, audio or other content.
According to an embodiment of the invention, a ticker may hold a maximum number (such as 22, for example) of names, with each new addition pushing the oldest off of the list.
Opt-in is a method of compliance with generally recognized consumer privacy policies, whereby a user indicate acceptance of correspondence from the server program, for example by checking a box or otherwise providing a positive acknowledgment.
By way of example only, when there are six human players on either side, an announcement from a referee may indicate that a game is set to begin within a predetermined time period.
According to an embodiment of the invention, in order to allow a side which is losing badly in a match to maintain a chance to win, a bonus question may be presented to teams.
cite Cite Document

No. 92-2 MOTION to Stay Defendant Apple Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion to Stay Pending Completion ...

Document OpenTV, Inc. et al v. Apple Inc., 5:15-cv-02008, No. 92-2 (N.D.Cal. May. 3, 2016)
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Statistics 3/31/2016 4743 Total AIA Petitions* Cumulative from 09/16/2012 4288 90% 9% 1% Narrative: This pie chart shows the total number of cumulative AIA petitions filed to date broken out by trial type (i.e., IPR, CBM, and PGR).
Narrative: This bar graph depicts the number of AIA petitions filed each fiscal year, with each bar showing the filings for that fiscal year by trial type (i.e., IPR, CBM, and PGR).
Petitions Denied Terminated Before Institution Decision: 2 Settled 0 Dismissed 0 Request for Adverse Judgement Terminated After Institution Decision: 0 Settled 0 Dismissed 0 Request for Adverse Judgement Trials Completed (Reached Final Written Decision) 0 Trials All Instituted Claims Unpatentable (0% of Total Petitions, 0% of Trials Instituted, 0% of Final Written Decisions) 0 Trials Some Instituted Claims Unpatentable (0% of Total Petitions, 0% of Trials Instituted, 0% of Final Written Decisions) 0 Trials No Instituted Claims Unpatentable (0% of Total Petitions, 0% of Trials Instituted, 0% of Final Written Decisions) *Data current as of: 3/31/2016 IPR Petitions Terminated to Date* 2100 Claims Found Patentable by PTAB in Final Written Decision 5744 Claims Remaining Patentable (Not Subject to Final Written Decision) 1841 Claims Cancelled or Disclaimed by Patent Owner Narrative: This visual contains four cylinders.
The first cylinder shows the total number of claims available to be challenged in the IPR petitions filed.
The first cylinder shows the total number of claims available to be challenged in the CBM petitions filed.
cite Cite Document

No. 92-1

Document OpenTV, Inc. et al v. Apple Inc., 5:15-cv-02008, No. 92-1 (N.D.Cal. May. 3, 2016)

cite Cite Document

No. 92-3

Document OpenTV, Inc. et al v. Apple Inc., 5:15-cv-02008, No. 92-3 (N.D.Cal. May. 3, 2016)

cite Cite Document

No. 87-4

Document OpenTV, Inc. et al v. Apple Inc., 5:15-cv-02008, No. 87-4 (N.D.Cal. Apr. 20, 2016)

cite Cite Document

No. 87-1

Document OpenTV, Inc. et al v. Apple Inc., 5:15-cv-02008, No. 87-1 (N.D.Cal. Apr. 19, 2016)

cite Cite Document

No. 87-2

Document OpenTV, Inc. et al v. Apple Inc., 5:15-cv-02008, No. 87-2 (N.D.Cal. Apr. 19, 2016)

cite Cite Document

No. 87-3

Document OpenTV, Inc. et al v. Apple Inc., 5:15-cv-02008, No. 87-3 (N.D.Cal. Apr. 19, 2016)

cite Cite Document

No. 85-9

Document OpenTV, Inc. et al v. Apple Inc., 5:15-cv-02008, No. 85-9 (N.D.Cal. Apr. 13, 2016)

cite Cite Document
<< 1 2 3 4 5 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 >>