Document
Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Google LLC, 6:21-cv-00569, No. 219 (W.D.Tex. Jun. 20, 2023)
Do you have strong feelings either way about your ability to follow my instructions in a civil case like this where one party is seeking money damages from another?
(24) The lawyers and law firms involved in these cases are: Firms: o Jones Day o Potter Minton PC o Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P. Lawyers: o Fiona A. Bell o Jordan T. Bergsten o Samuel G. Bernstein o John R. Boule, III o Justin R. Donoho o Lauren Douville o Ryan D. Dykal o Philip Alexander Eckert o Kyle Edward Friesen o Edwin O. Garcia o Jackson J. Gilkey o Michael W. Gray o Shaun William Hassett o Michael C. Hendershot o Sharon A. Israel o Michael E. Jones o Tharan Gregory Lanier o Samuel J. Laroque o Andrew M. Long o Robert McClendon o Evan M. McLean o Gary M. Miller o Gurneet Singh o Tracy Ann Stitt o Jennifer L. Swize Do any of you or your immediate families know any of the attorneys or law firms I have just named?
(25) The potential witnesses in this case are: Kevin Almeroth Majd Bakar George Bonanto Nandi Byer Mark Chandler Jamie Cohen Chris Cooke Kyle Cuthbert Michael Dodd Andre Golueke Amberish Kenghe Farinaz Khorsand-Raven Rajiv Lulla Michael Maigret Christopher Martinez Ketan Mayer-Patel Herb Mitschele Shanna Preve Micahel Rinzler Corey Robins Scott Roepnack Micah Rupersburg David Strober Matt Van Der Staay Meher Vurimi Jack Weixel Are you familiar with any of these potential witnesses?
(27) Have you, a family member, or a close friend ever worked for any of the parties, Touchstream/Shodogg and Google, or law firms, Shook Hardy & Bacon, Jones Day, and Potter Minton, in this case?
(55) Do you know of any other matter which you believe should be called to the Court’s attention as having some bearing upon your qualifications or ability to sit as a juror, or which you think may prevent you from rendering a fair and impartial verdict?
Cite Document
Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Google LLC, 6:21-cv-00569, No. 219 (W.D.Tex. Jun. 20, 2023)
+ More Snippets
Document
Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Google LLC, 6:21-cv-00569, No. 212 (W.D.Tex. May. 3, 2023)
Applicant is presently a member in good standing of the bars of the courts listed above, except as provided below (list any court named in the preceding paragraph before which Applicant is no longer admitted to practice):
Applicant has never been subject to grievance proceedings or involuntary removal proceedings while a member of the bar of any state or federal court, except as provided:
Applicant has read and is familiar with the Local Rules of the Western District of Texas and will comply with the standards of practice set out therein.
Wherefore, Applicant prays that this Court enter an order permitting the admission of Robert McClendon to the Western District of Texas pro hac vice for this case only.
Respectfully submitted, Robert McClendon [printed name of Applicant]
Cite Document
Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Google LLC, 6:21-cv-00569, No. 212 (W.D.Tex. May. 3, 2023)
+ More Snippets
Document
Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Google LLC, 6:21-cv-00569, No. 78 (W.D.Tex. Aug. 19, 2022)
Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice
Comes now Jackson J. Gilkey applicant herein, and movesthis Court to grant admission to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas pro hac vice to represent
Applicant is an attorney and a memberofthe law firm (or practices under the nameof) SHOOK, HARDY & BACON LLP with offices at: Maiingadaress: 2555GRANDBLVD.
Applicant has read and is familiar with the Local Rules of the Western District of Texas and will comply with the standards ofpractice set out therein.
BE IT REMEMBEREDonthis day, there was presented to the Court the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vicefiled by Jackson J. Gilkey , counsel for
, and the Court, having reviewed the motion, enters the following order: IT IS ORDEREDthat the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED,and Jackson J. Gilkey in the abovecase.
Cite Document
Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Google LLC, 6:21-cv-00569, No. 78 (W.D.Tex. Aug. 19, 2022)
+ More Snippets
Document
IPR2022-00794, No. 3 Notice Notice filing date accorded - Notice NOTICE OF FILING DATE ACCORDED TO PETITION AND TIME FOR FILING PATENT OWNER PRELIMINARY RESPONSE (P.T...
Patent Owner is advised of the requirement to submit mandatory notice information under 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(2) within 21 days of service of the petition.
The parties are advised that under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), recognition of counsel pro hac vice requires a showing of good cause.
Keith Bae SHOOK, HARDY & BACON LLP Intellectual Property Department 2555 Grand Blvd.
Many non-profit organizations, both inside and outside the intellectual property field, offer alternative dispute resolution services.
If the parties actually engage in alternative dispute resolution, the PTAB would be interested to learn what mechanism (e.g., arbitration, Case IPR2022-00794 Patent No. 8,904,289 mediation, etc.) was used and the general result.
Cite Document
IPR2022-00794, No. 3 Notice Notice filing date accorded - Notice NOTICE OF FILING DATE ACCORDED TO PETITION AND TIME FOR FILING PATENT OWNER PRELIMINARY RESPONSE (P.T.A.B. Apr. 26, 2022)
+ More Snippets
Document
Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Google LLC, 6:21-cv-00569, No. 207 (W.D.Tex. Apr. 20, 2023)
Cite Document
Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Google LLC, 6:21-cv-00569, No. 207 (W.D.Tex. Apr. 20, 2023)
+ More Snippets
Document
Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Google LLC, 6:21-cv-00569, No. 198 (W.D.Tex. Jan. 31, 2023)
Cite Document
Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Google LLC, 6:21-cv-00569, No. 198 (W.D.Tex. Jan. 31, 2023)
+ More Snippets
Document
Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Google LLC, 6:21-cv-00569, No. 196 (W.D.Tex. Jan. 30, 2023)
Cite Document
Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Google LLC, 6:21-cv-00569, No. 196 (W.D.Tex. Jan. 30, 2023)
+ More Snippets
Document
Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Google LLC, 6:21-cv-00569, No. 190 (W.D.Tex. Jan. 26, 2023)
Cite Document
Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Google LLC, 6:21-cv-00569, No. 190 (W.D.Tex. Jan. 26, 2023)
+ More Snippets
Document
Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Google LLC, 6:21-cv-00569, No. 192 (W.D.Tex. Jan. 26, 2023)
Cite Document
Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Google LLC, 6:21-cv-00569, No. 192 (W.D.Tex. Jan. 26, 2023)
+ More Snippets
Document
Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Google LLC, 6:21-cv-00569, No. 195 (W.D.Tex. Jan. 26, 2023)
Cite Document
Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Google LLC, 6:21-cv-00569, No. 195 (W.D.Tex. Jan. 26, 2023)
+ More Snippets
Document
Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Google LLC, 6:21-cv-00569, No. 194 (W.D.Tex. Jan. 26, 2023)
Cite Document
Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Google LLC, 6:21-cv-00569, No. 194 (W.D.Tex. Jan. 26, 2023)
+ More Snippets
Document
Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Google LLC, 6:21-cv-00569, No. 193 (W.D.Tex. Jan. 26, 2023)
Cite Document
Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Google LLC, 6:21-cv-00569, No. 193 (W.D.Tex. Jan. 26, 2023)
+ More Snippets
Document
IPR2022-00794, No. 26 Motion Oral Hearing Request - Motion Oral Hearing Request (P.T.A.B. May. 16, 2023)
Cite Document
IPR2022-00794, No. 26 Motion Oral Hearing Request - Motion Oral Hearing Request (P.T.A.B. May. 16, 2023)
+ More Snippets
Document
IPR2022-00794, No. 36 Notice notice of appeal - Petitioners Notice of Appeal (P.T.A.B. Nov. 28, 2023)
Cite Document
IPR2022-00794, No. 36 Notice notice of appeal - Petitioners Notice of Appeal (P.T.A.B. Nov. 28, 2023)
+ More Snippets
Document
Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Google LLC, 6:21-cv-00569, No. 30 (W.D.Tex. Jan. 20, 2022)
Cite Document
Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Google LLC, 6:21-cv-00569, No. 30 (W.D.Tex. Jan. 20, 2022)
+ More Snippets