• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Displaying 84-98 of 175 results

2005 Exhibit: World Cup Case Study

Document IPR2018-00376, No. 2005-17 Exhibit - World Cup Case Study (P.T.A.B. Apr. 9, 2018)
Linktel Corp., responsible for operating the largest independent network of hotspots in Brazil, partnered with Nomadix to deliver a solution that would meet this exceptional demand for public Internet access.
• This gateway solution was integrated into all 12 of the major airports servicing the World Cup, as well as subway stations near the Maracana Stadium, the site of the much-anticipated finale game in Rio de Janeiro.
Linkel was able to successfully deliver a winning business model, with MasterCard gaining widespread visibility to people from all over the world, all of whom enjoyed an elevated and free Internet experience.
Uninterrupted Performance The AG 5800 features built-in flash memory and the proven Nomadix Service Engine (NSE) Core Software, keeping Internet traffic flowing even with increased user access.
As member and participant of the Wi-Fi Alliance and WBA communities, Linktel has a network that complies with parameters of performance, safety and quality established and recognized on a worldwide basis, keeping pace with the latest global technological trends.
cite Cite Document

6 Preliminary Response: Patent Owners Preliminary Response to Petition for Inter Partes Review

Document IPR2016-00077, No. 6 Preliminary Response - Patent Owners Preliminary Response to Petition for Inter Partes Review (P.T.A.B. Feb. 10, 2016)
Shipped from its headquarters in Los Angeles, Nomadix’s gateway products are used worldwide to manage over 5 million connections per day, everywhere from landmark hotels like The Jefferson in Washington, D.C., to Central Station in Sydney, Australia, to the 2014 FIFA World Cup in Brazil.
One of the critical features that Nomadix’s customers rely on is the Nomadix gateway’s ability to redirect users’ web browsers to a portal page, like the one shown to the right, where users may need to supply authentication credentials or agree to payment terms before gaining full Internet access.
Never moving beyond this conclusory assertion, Petitioner fails to explain why it is impossible for the program described in Slemmer to return the HTTP redirect message without also satisfying the specific connection-handshake limitations of claims 1, 11, and 24.
Petitioner posits that one of ordinary skill in the art would combine the references because “[t]he technique selected for packet diversion was merely a design choice driven by the capabilities of the underlying operating system.” (Pet.
Despite being held out as an expert in computer networks, Mr. Olson is unable to articulate any basis for his contention that a “proxy handshake” is inherent in what he calls “packet Case IPR2016-00077 Patent 8,266,266 transparent interception and diversion,” which Slemmer supposedly discloses.1 (Ex. 1011 ¶ 34.)
cite Cite Document

5 Notice: Patent Owners Mandatory Notices Pursuant to 37 CFR Section 428

Document IPR2016-00077, No. 5 Notice - Patent Owners Mandatory Notices Pursuant to 37 CFR Section 428 (P.T.A.B. Nov. 17, 2015)
Filed: November 16, 2015 Doug G. Muehlhauser (Reg. No. 42,018) William H. Shreve (Reg. No. 35,678) KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP 2040 Main Street, Fourteenth Floor Irvine, CA 92614 Tel.
Related Matters Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(2) Patent Owner has asserted U.S. Patent No. 8,266,266 (“the ’266 patent”) in Nomadix, Inc. v. Hospitality Core Services, LLC, d/b/a Blueprint RF, Case No. 14- cv-08256, in the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
Patent Owner has asserted the related ’894 patent in the following litigations:  Nomadix, Inc. v. Hospitality Core Services, LLC, d/b/a Blueprint RF, Case No. 14-cv-08256, in the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Case IPR2016-00077 Hospitality Core Services, LLC v. Nomadix, Inc.
Respectfully submitted, KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
/Douglas G. Muehlhauser/ Douglas G. Muehlhauser (Reg. No. 42,018) William H. Shreve (Reg. No. 35,678) Attorneys for Patent Owner
cite Cite Document

4 Power of Attorney: Power of Attorney

Document IPR2016-00077, No. 4 Power of Attorney - Power of Attorney (P.T.A.B. Nov. 16, 2015)
Box 1450 Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 Dear Sir: The undersigned is an empowered representative of the Assignee and hereby appoints the registrants of Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, Customer No. 20,995, as attorneys and agents to represent the Assignee before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in connection with any and all patent applications assigned to the Assignee according to the USPTO assignment records or assignment documents supplied with an accompanying Statement Under 37 CFR § 3.73(b).
A Statement Under 37 CFR § 3.73(b), signed by a registrant of Knobbe, Martens, Olson _&>Bear, LLP, is attached setting forth a fiill chain oftitle for the subject application owned by the Assignee named below.
Please recognize or change the correspondence address for the application identified in the attached Statement to Customer No. 20,995.
Box 1450 Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 Dear Sir: This document is being filed with a copy of a Power of Attorney signed by the Assignee.
Nomadix, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, is the Assignee of the entire right, title, and interest of the above—referenced application by virtue of: The Assignment from the inventor(s) to the Assignee recorded in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on January 22, 2001, at Reel 011469, and Frame 0538.
cite Cite Document

1011 Exhibit: Exhibit 1011

Document IPR2018-00376, No. 1011-11 Exhibit - Exhibit 1011 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 22, 2017)
Abstract Many modern IP security systems (also called "firewalls" in the trade) make use of proxy technology to achieve access control.
At the start of the FTP session, a TCP packet with a source address of C and a destination address of S travels to the proxy system, expecting to cross it just like a normal IP gateway.
Based on some criteria (a configuration file, for Chatel Informational [Page 23] RFC 1919 Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies March 1996 example), it decides NOT to forward or drop the packet (which are the only two choices an RFC-standard TCP/IP implementation would have).
Once this is done, the actual FTP proxy application is invoked since an incoming connection to TCP port 21 has occurred.
b) Decide (based on some internal configuration data) that it https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1919.txt 2/16/2015 Hospitality Core Services, LLC - Ex 1023 - Page 002
cite Cite Document

1009 Exhibit: Exhibit 1009

Document IPR2018-00376, No. 1009-9 Exhibit - Exhibit 1009 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 22, 2017)
Secondly, the prior art techniques require the proxy cache to perform the function of forming an absolute URL from the informa tion in the HOST field and in the packet(s) containing the GET request.
AS shown in FIG. 2, the programmable network element 200 includes a dispatcher process 202 with which plural different gateway programs (204, 205 and 206) register and request access to IP packets that fit specific descriptions.
Similarly, in all packets received by the proxy redirec tor from the client directed to the origin server within a persistent TCP connection, the Seq parameter must reflect cumulative changes.
Thus, for example, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the block diagrams and flowcharts described hereinabove represent conceptual views of illustrative cir cuitry and processes embodying the principles of the inven tion.
The computer readable memory of claim 40 wherein Said computer program instructions further comprise instructions defining the Step of modifying a value in a Sent byte Sequence number field to reflect the increased number of bytes in the modified request message resulting from prefixing the complete address with the destination address of the origin Server in a TCP header in packets received from the client following receipt of the request message.
cite Cite Document

1012 Exhibit: Exhibit 1012

Document IPR2018-00376, No. 1012-12 Exhibit - Exhibit 1012 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 22, 2017)
Hospitality Core Services, LLC - Ex 1002 - Page 001 EXHIBIT 1012 Guest-Tek v. Nomadix, IPR2018-00376 Hospitality Core Services, LLC - Ex 1002 - Page 002 Hospitality Cor
cite Cite Document

1003 Exhibit: Exhibit 1003

Document IPR2018-00376, No. 1003-3 Exhibit - Exhibit 1003 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 22, 2017)

cite Cite Document

1005 Exhibit: Exhibit 1005

Document IPR2018-00376, No. 1005-5 Exhibit - Exhibit 1005 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 22, 2017)

cite Cite Document

1010 Exhibit: Exhibit 1010

Document IPR2018-00376, No. 1010-10 Exhibit - Exhibit 1010 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 22, 2017)

cite Cite Document

1004 Exhibit: Exhibit 1004

Document IPR2018-00376, No. 1004-4 Exhibit - Exhibit 1004 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 22, 2017)

cite Cite Document

1002 Exhibit: Exhibit 1002

Document IPR2018-00376, No. 1002-2 Exhibit - Exhibit 1002 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 22, 2017)

cite Cite Document

1008 Exhibit: Exhibit 1008

Document IPR2018-00376, No. 1008-8 Exhibit - Exhibit 1008 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 22, 2017)

cite Cite Document

1006 Exhibit: Exhibit 1006

Document IPR2018-00376, No. 1006-6 Exhibit - Exhibit 1006 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 22, 2017)

cite Cite Document

1007 Exhibit: Exhibit 1007

Document IPR2018-00376, No. 1007-7 Exhibit - Exhibit 1007 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 22, 2017)

cite Cite Document
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 >>