• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Displaying 54-68 of 179 results

1052 Exhibit: Exhibit 1052 CAFC Order

Document IPR2019-01399, No. 1052 Exhibit - Exhibit 1052 CAFC Order (P.T.A.B. Dec. 23, 2020)
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
ANDRES HEALY, Susman Godfrey LLP, Seattle, WA, ar- gued for plaintiffs-appellants.
MICHAEL S. CONNOR, Alston & Bird LLP, Charlotte, NC, argued for defendant-appellee.
JAMES LIGOTTI, New York, NY; BRIAN DAVID HILL, Lerner, FORD Ex. 1052, page 1
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (DYK, CLEVENGER, and O’MALLEY, Cir- cuit Judges).
cite Cite Document

1049 Exhibit: Exhibit 1049 Joint Claim Construction Brief

Document IPR2019-01399, No. 1049 Exhibit - Exhibit 1049 Joint Claim Construction Brief (P.T.A.B. Sep. 10, 2020)
Even if the term would be understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art, Ford’s construction will provide substantial guidance to a jury to determine whether the accused Ford engines fall within the scope of the claims.
Plaintiffs acknowledge as much in their Preliminary Response filed in the ’839 Patent IPR, distinguishing a prior art reference on grounds that it “does not necessarily disclose using a higher ratio of fuel that is directly FORD Ex. 1049, page 52
anti-knock agent that is used to achieve a given level of engine efficiency increase” and “the amount of ethanol that is required can be limited to a relatively small fraction of the fuel used by the spark ignition gasoline engine.” Ex. 2 at 1:54-62 (emphasis added).
As explained in Cont’l Circuits, “descriptions of ‘the present invention,’ which also appear within the discussion of the preferred embodiment, are not limiting” where the references “are not uniform, or where other portions of the intrinsic evidence do not support applying the limitation to the entire patent.” 915 F.3d at 798 (emphasis added) (citation omitted).
Moreover, Ford does not dispute Plaintiffs’ position that the patent describes load in the context of “FTP and US06 drive cycles” that plot “the amount of operating time spent at various values of torque and engine speed.” Supra at 71-72 (citing Ex. 1 at 8:18-25).
cite Cite Document

1051 Exhibit: Exhibit 1051 Anderson

Document IPR2019-01399, No. 1051 Exhibit - Exhibit 1051 Anderson (P.T.A.B. Sep. 10, 2020)
Base designspecifications for the single-cylinder research engineare shown in Table 2.To obtain good air utilization, it was desirable toposition the fuel injector near the center of thechamber such that the spray would distribute itselfmore evenly in the cylinderical geometry.
The cooling by thefuel evaporation results in lower fuel-air mixturetemperature near TDC, thereby reducing the engine’sknocking tendency.The assumption that the fuel of the DISI engine isevaporated mainly by absorbing thermal energy fromthe air has been verified by other studies ofexperimentation [20] and 3-D numerical simulation[21].
However, the fact thatall part load data show a small DI fuel consumptionbenefit and the model indicates a similar level isstrong evidence that the difference exists.SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONSAn approach for the design and development of aresearch single-cylinder direct-injection, spark-ignitioncombustion system is presented.
Nitrogen oxide emissionsare shown to be less than the base PI engine as aresult of charge cooling and the higher residualcontent of the system offsetting the effects of theincreased compression ratio.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe authors recognize Mr. Paul Sleeman foroperating the test cell.
4, 360-64, 1931[20] Salters, D., Williams, P., Greig, A., and Brehob,D., “Fuel spray characterization within anoptically accessed gasoline direct injectionengine using a CCD imaging system,” SAEPaper 961149, 1996[21] Han, L, Reitz, R.D., Claybaker, P.J., Rutland,C.J., Yang, J. and Anderson, R.W.
cite Cite Document

1050 Exhibit: Exhibit 1050 Hannemann Deposition Transcript

Document IPR2019-01399, No. 1050 Exhibit - Exhibit 1050 Hannemann Deposition Transcript (P.T.A.B. Sep. 10, 2020)
·6· · · · · · · ·This begins the videotaped deposition of Mr. ·7· ·Neil E. Hannemann, taken in the matter of Ford Motor ·8· ·Company versus Ethanol Boosting Systems, LLC and ·9· ·Massachusetts Institute of Technology, filed in the 10· ·patent trial and Appeal Boards, Case No. IPR2019-01399.
·1· ·from Hamilton Brook Smith Reynolds on behalf of the ·2· ·patent owners Massachusetts Institute technology and -- ·3· · · · · · · ·THE COURT REPORTER:· Keith, your audio is ·4· ·not good.· It's very difficult to understand.
·6· · · Q.· Thank you, Mr. Hannemann.· Just so it's clear on ·7· ·the record, would a spark ignition internal combustion ·8· ·engine four-stroke have a cylinder head, pistons, ·9· ·connecting rods, crank shaft and valves?
·4· · · Q.· Mr. Hannemann, in a spark ignition combustion ·5· ·engine and limits of four-stroke engines, would you ·6· ·agree that the fuel management system would include the ·7· ·fuel injector pipes and pumps and ECU that we've been ·8· ·talking about?
19· · · A.· I wouldn't say it even has to be a rich mixture, 20· ·but, you know, whenever you put fuel into the combustion 21· ·chamber, it stratifies at that particular point in time 22· ·and then depending on the engine design, it stays that 23· ·way or it then mixes.
cite Cite Document

2006 Exhibit: Ex 2006, Transcript of Deposition of Nigel Clark, May 15, 2020

Document IPR2019-01399, No. 2006 Exhibit - Ex 2006, Transcript of Deposition of Nigel Clark, May 15, 2020 (P.T.A.B. Jun. 14, 2020)

cite Cite Document

2005 Exhibit: Ex 2005, Transcript of Deposition of Nigel Clark, May 14, 2020

Document IPR2019-01399, No. 2005 Exhibit - Ex 2005, Transcript of Deposition of Nigel Clark, May 14, 2020 (P.T.A.B. Jun. 14, 2020)

cite Cite Document

2002 Exhibit: Ex 2002, DECLARATION OF NEIL E HANNEMANN

Document IPR2019-01399, No. 2002 Exhibit - Ex 2002, DECLARATION OF NEIL E HANNEMANN (P.T.A.B. Jun. 14, 2020)

cite Cite Document

2007 Exhibit: Ex 2007 Heywood textbook

Document IPR2019-01399, No. 2007 Exhibit - Ex 2007 Heywood textbook (P.T.A.B. Jun. 14, 2020)

cite Cite Document

3001 Exhibit: Exhibit 3001

Document IPR2020-00010, No. 3001-37 Exhibit - Exhibit 3001 (P.T.A.B. Mar. 26, 2020)

cite Cite Document

3002 Exhibit: Exhibit 3002

Document IPR2020-00010, No. 3002-38 Exhibit - Exhibit 3002 (P.T.A.B. Mar. 26, 2020)

cite Cite Document

2002 Exhibit: Ex 2002, Markman Order

Document IPR2020-00010, No. 2002-36 Exhibit - Ex 2002, Markman Order (P.T.A.B. Feb. 3, 2020)

cite Cite Document

2001 Exhibit: Ex 2001, Markman Hearing Transcript

Document IPR2020-00010, No. 2001-35 Exhibit - Ex 2001, Markman Hearing Transcript (P.T.A.B. Feb. 3, 2020)

cite Cite Document

1116 Exhibit: Exhibit 1116 File History of US Patent No 8,146,568

Document IPR2020-00010, No. 1116-10 Exhibit - Exhibit 1116 File History of US Patent No 8,146,568 (P.T.A.B. Oct. 16, 2019)

cite Cite Document

1141 Exhibit: Exhibit 1141 US Patent No 7,694,666

Document IPR2020-00010, No. 1141-25 Exhibit - Exhibit 1141 US Patent No 7,694,666 (P.T.A.B. Oct. 16, 2019)

cite Cite Document

1102 Exhibit: Exhibit 1102 File History of US Patent No 9,810,166

Document IPR2020-00010, No. 1102-2 Exhibit - Exhibit 1102 File History of US Patent No 9,810,166 (P.T.A.B. Oct. 16, 2019)

cite Cite Document
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 11 12 13 >>