• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Displaying 54-68 of 310 results

34 Oral Hearing Request: Petitioners Request for Oral Hearing

Document CBM2016-00063, No. 34 Oral Hearing Request - Petitioners Request for Oral Hearing (P.T.A.B. Apr. 10, 2017)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

34 Oral Hearing Request: Petitioners Request for Oral Hearing

Document CBM2016-00064, No. 34 Oral Hearing Request - Petitioners Request for Oral Hearing (P.T.A.B. Apr. 10, 2017)
Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Petitioner, United Services Automobile
Association, submits this Request for Oral Argument on all of the instituted grounds of unpatentability of U.S. Patent No. 8,266,432, namely:  Claims 1-3, 5-28, and 30-55 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) in view of U.S.
Petitioner requests no more than one hour per side of oral argument time.
The Board has already scheduled Oral Hearing for May 15, 2017.
Respectfully submitted, /Thomas A. Rozylowicz/ Thomas A. Rozylowicz Reg. No. 50,620 4/10/2017 Date:
cite Cite Document
Analyze

9 Opposition: Petitioner Opposition to PO Motion for Cert of Correction

Document CBM2016-00063, No. 9 Opposition - Petitioner Opposition to PO Motion for Cert of Correction (P.T.A.B. Aug. 3, 2016)
I. PO’s Motion Fails To Meet The Statutory And Regulatory Burden of Proof 35 U.S.C. §255 governs an applicant’s “mistake of clerical or typographic nature, or of minor character.” To be eligible for redress under §255, “a typograph- ical error should be manifest from the contents of the file of the patent sought to be corrected.” In re Arnott, 19 U.S.P.Q.2d 1049, 1053 (Comm’r Pat. 1991).
A missing priority claim cannot be manifest or “clearly evident from the specification, draw- ings, and prosecution history.” Superior Fireplace v. Majestic Prods.
PO fails to account for the controlling au- thority that “[a] mistake is not considered to be of the ‘minor’ character required for the issuance of a Certificate of Correction if the requested change would materially
A claim in a CIP application only receives the benefit of its parent’s priority date if it finds written description support in the parent applica- tion.
If PO is allowed to cure a known defect ex post, Petitioner would suffer great prejudice by relying on infor- mation from the ‘432 Patent when filing the Petition.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

8 Motion: Motion to file a Certificate of Correction and Petition To Accept

Document CBM2016-00063, No. 8 Motion - Motion to file a Certificate of Correction and Petition To Accept (P.T.A.B. Jul. 27, 2016)
The Commissioner is hereby authorized to charge any fees which may be required to Deposit Account No. 50-5922, making reference to Attorney Docket No. LL2890045.
The failure to claim the benefit under this second chain was a mistake of a clerical nature, which occurred in good faith, and which was completely unintentional.
The Motion to file a Certificate of Correction is to claim the benefit of this second chain of applications.
The second part is to file a Petition for a delayed claiming of the benefits under 35 USC §120 pursuant to 37 CFR §1.78(e).
With the approval of the Certificate of Correction and the granting of a Petition to the PTO to accept an unintentionally delayed claim for the benefit of the prior filed nonprovisional applications, the instant CBM proceeding will be much simpler by adding one more chain of priority.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

8 Motion: Motion to file a Certificate of Correction and Petition To Accept

Document CBM2016-00064, No. 8 Motion - Motion to file a Certificate of Correction and Petition To Accept (P.T.A.B. Jul. 27, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

27 Notice of Deposition: Notice of Deposition of Dr Seth Nielson

Document CBM2016-00063, No. 27 Notice of Deposition - Notice of Deposition of Dr Seth Nielson (P.T.A.B. Mar. 21, 2017)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

24 Notice of Deposition: Notice of Deposition of Dr Alfred Weaver

Document CBM2016-00063, No. 24 Notice of Deposition - Notice of Deposition of Dr Alfred Weaver (P.T.A.B. Jan. 27, 2017)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

25 Notice: Notice of Designation of Additional Back Up Counsel

Document CBM2016-00063, No. 25 Notice - Notice of Designation of Additional Back Up Counsel (P.T.A.B. Jan. 27, 2017)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

24 Notice of Deposition: Notice of Deposition of Dr Alfred Weaver

Document CBM2016-00064, No. 24 Notice of Deposition - Notice of Deposition of Dr Alfred Weaver (P.T.A.B. Jan. 27, 2017)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

2 Petition: Petition for Covered Business Method Review of USP 8266432

Document CBM2016-00063, No. 2 Petition - Petition for Covered Business Method Review of USP 8266432 (P.T.A.B. May. 2, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

2 Petition: Petition for Covered Business Method Review of US Patent 8,266,432

Document CBM2016-00064, No. 2 Petition - Petition for Covered Business Method Review of US Patent 8,266,432 (P.T.A.B. May. 2, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

23 Objection: Petitioners Notice of Objections to Evidence

Document CBM2016-00063, No. 23 Objection - Petitioners Notice of Objections to Evidence (P.T.A.B. Dec. 12, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

23 Objection: Petitioners Notice of Objections to Evidence

Document CBM2016-00064, No. 23 Objection - Petitioners Notice of Objections to Evidence (P.T.A.B. Dec. 12, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

22 Response: PATENT OWNERS RESPONSE

Document CBM2016-00063, No. 22 Response - PATENT OWNERS RESPONSE (P.T.A.B. Dec. 5, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

22 Response: PATENT OWNERS RESPONSE

Document CBM2016-00064, No. 22 Response - PATENT OWNERS RESPONSE (P.T.A.B. Dec. 5, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... >>