Document
IPR2022-01291, No. 15 Institution Decision Grant - Institution Decision Grant (P.T.A.B. Feb. 1, 2023)
Cite Document
IPR2022-01291, No. 15 Institution Decision Grant - Institution Decision Grant (P.T.A.B. Feb. 1, 2023)
+ More Snippets
Document
IPR2022-01292, No. 15 Institution Decision Deny - Institution Decision Deny (P.T.A.B. Feb. 1, 2023)
Cite Document
IPR2022-01292, No. 15 Institution Decision Deny - Institution Decision Deny (P.T.A.B. Feb. 1, 2023)
+ More Snippets
Document
IPR2022-01466, No. 15 Institution Decision Deny - Institution Decision Deny (P.T.A.B. Feb. 23, 2023)
Petitioner concurrently filed another petition in another proceeding requesting inter partes review of the Challenged Claims on different grounds.
For the reasons provided below, and based on the circumstances present here, we find a second petition challenging the same claims of the same patent is not warranted and exercise discretion under 35 U.S.C. § 314(a) to deny institution of an inter partes review in this proceeding.
Patent 10,687,745 B1 With regard to motivation to combine Venkatraman, we note that Petitioner argues in the Petition as follows: A [person of ordinary skill in the art] would have been motivated to wirelessly connect the wristband-type physiological monitoring device of Ackermans (as previously modified based on Savant) to a secondary processing device, such as a smartphone, having a user interface with a touch screen display, as taught by Venkatraman, in order to increase the functionality of the system without significantly increasing the power consumption of Ackermans’ sensor.
In the ’1465 Petition, Petitioner argues with regard to motivation to combine Venkatraman as follows: A [person of ordinary skill in the art] would have been motivated to transmit information from Iwamiya’s[9] wrist-worn wearable device, which has limited display space and processing power, to a secondary device like a smart phone, as taught by Venkatraman in order to increase the functionality of the system without significantly increasing the power consumption of Iwamiya’s sensor.
Rather than materially differ, as Petitioner asserts, at least with regard to Venkatraman, the purported motivation to combine appears to be substantially the same in both petitions.
Cite Document
IPR2022-01466, No. 15 Institution Decision Deny - Institution Decision Deny (P.T.A.B. Feb. 23, 2023)
+ More Snippets
Document
IPR2022-01465, No. 15 Institution Decision Grant - Institution Decision Grant (P.T.A.B. Feb. 6, 2023)
Cite Document
IPR2022-01465, No. 15 Institution Decision Grant - Institution Decision Grant (P.T.A.B. Feb. 6, 2023)
+ More Snippets
Document
IPR2022-01465, No. 16 Order Other - Order Scheduling Order (P.T.A.B. Feb. 6, 2023)
Cite Document
IPR2022-01465, No. 16 Order Other - Order Scheduling Order (P.T.A.B. Feb. 6, 2023)
+ More Snippets
Document
IPR2022-01291, No. 9 Order Other - ORDR Conduct of the Proceeding (P.T.A.B. Sep. 28, 2022)
Cite Document
IPR2022-01291, No. 9 Order Other - ORDR Conduct of the Proceeding (P.T.A.B. Sep. 28, 2022)
+ More Snippets
Document
IPR2022-01291, No. 9 Order Other - ORDR Conduct of the Proceeding (P.T.A.B. Sep. 28, 2022)
Cite Document
IPR2022-01291, No. 9 Order Other - ORDR Conduct of the Proceeding (P.T.A.B. Sep. 28, 2022)
+ More Snippets
Document
IPR2022-01292, No. 9 Order Other - ORDR Conduct of the Proceeding (P.T.A.B. Sep. 28, 2022)
Cite Document
IPR2022-01292, No. 9 Order Other - ORDR Conduct of the Proceeding (P.T.A.B. Sep. 28, 2022)
+ More Snippets
Document
IPR2022-01291, No. 8 Order on Motion - ORDER Granting Patent Owners Unopposed Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Jeremiah S Helm, PhD 37 CFR sec 4210 (P.T.A.B. Sep. 23, 2022)
Cite Document
IPR2022-01291, No. 8 Order on Motion - ORDER Granting Patent Owners Unopposed Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Jeremiah S Helm, PhD 37 CFR sec 4210 (P.T.A.B. Sep. 23, 2022)
+ More Snippets
Document
IPR2022-01292, No. 8 Order on Motion - ORDER Granting Patent Owners Unopposed Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Jeremiah S Helm, PhD 37 CFR sec 4210 (P.T.A.B. Sep. 23, 2022)
Cite Document
IPR2022-01292, No. 8 Order on Motion - ORDER Granting Patent Owners Unopposed Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Jeremiah S Helm, PhD 37 CFR sec 4210 (P.T.A.B. Sep. 23, 2022)
+ More Snippets
Document
IPR2022-01292, No. 8 Order on Motion - ORDER Granting Patent Owners Unopposed Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Jeremiah S Helm, PhD 37 CFR sec 4210 (P.T.A.B. Sep. 23, 2022)
Cite Document
IPR2022-01292, No. 8 Order on Motion - ORDER Granting Patent Owners Unopposed Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Jeremiah S Helm, PhD 37 CFR sec 4210 (P.T.A.B. Sep. 23, 2022)
+ More Snippets
Document
IPR2022-01466, No. 9 Order Other - ORDR Conduct of the Proceeding (P.T.A.B. Sep. 28, 2022)
Cite Document
IPR2022-01466, No. 9 Order Other - ORDR Conduct of the Proceeding (P.T.A.B. Sep. 28, 2022)
+ More Snippets
Document
IPR2022-01465, No. 9 Order Other - ORDR Conduct of the Proceeding (P.T.A.B. Sep. 28, 2022)
Cite Document
IPR2022-01465, No. 9 Order Other - ORDR Conduct of the Proceeding (P.T.A.B. Sep. 28, 2022)
+ More Snippets
Document
IPR2022-01466, No. 8 Order on Motion - ORDER Granting Patent Owners Unopposed Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Jeremiah S Helm, PhD 37 CFR sec 4210 (P.T.A.B. Sep. 23, 2022)
Cite Document
IPR2022-01466, No. 8 Order on Motion - ORDER Granting Patent Owners Unopposed Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Jeremiah S Helm, PhD 37 CFR sec 4210 (P.T.A.B. Sep. 23, 2022)
+ More Snippets
Document
IPR2022-01465, No. 8 Order on Motion - ORDER Granting Patent Owners Unopposed Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Jeremiah S Helm, PhD 37 CFR sec 4210 (P.T.A.B. Sep. 23, 2022)
Cite Document
IPR2022-01465, No. 8 Order on Motion - ORDER Granting Patent Owners Unopposed Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Jeremiah S Helm, PhD 37 CFR sec 4210 (P.T.A.B. Sep. 23, 2022)
+ More Snippets