• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Displaying 129-143 of 178 results

1020 Exhibit: When can I get a coronavirus vaccine

Document IPR2020-01028, No. 1020 Exhibit - When can I get a coronavirus vaccine (P.T.A.B. Dec. 4, 2020)
When can I get a coronavirus vaccine? - CNN https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/30/health/covid-vaccine-questions-when/i... 1 of 8 12/4/2020, 11:38 AM KEYME EX. 1020, PAGE 1 When can I get a coronavirus vaccine? - CNN https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/30/health/covid-vaccine-questions-when/i... 2 of 8 12/4/2020, 11:38 AM KEYME EX.
cite Cite Document

2010 Exhibit: Hillman Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions

Document IPR2020-01028, No. 2010-21 Exhibit - Hillman Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions (P.T.A.B. Oct. 23, 2020)
Hillman’s infringement charts, which identify specifically where each element of each asserted claim of the Patents-in-Suit is found within each Accused Instrumentality, are attached as Exhibits A-C and are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.
As noted in Exhibits A-C, to the extent KeyMe argues that any claim limitation is not literally present, Hillman contends that the corresponding features of KeyMe’s kiosks are not substantially different and thus infringe by equivalence.
Hillman reserves the right to supplement this production and disclosure pursuant to the Rules of Practice for Patent Cases before the Eastern District of Texas (including, but not limited to, P.R.
These documents and things are largely files in SolidWorks format, and are available for review at KeyMe’s convenience on a dedicated computer system located at the offices of Finnegan L.L.P., 11955 Freedom Drive, Suite 800, Reston, VA 20190.
Hillman reserves the right to supplement this production and disclosure pursuant to the Rules of Practice for Patent Cases before the Eastern District of Texas (including, but not limited to, P.R.
cite Cite Document

2004 Exhibit: Letter from E Huang dated Oct 2, 2020

Document IPR2020-01028, No. 2004-17 Exhibit - Letter from E Huang dated Oct 2, 2020 (P.T.A.B. Oct. 23, 2020)
Dear Ryan, I write to follow up on our discussions regarding narrowing of prior art positions in advance of trial and your letter of September 11, 2020.
As we noted previously, we planned to narrow our prior art positions for trial.
May 3, 2011) (ordering reduction from after expert reports to 20 claims and 60 prior art references-not positions); Universal Electronics Inc. v. Roku Inc., No. 18- cv-1580, 2019 WL 1878351, at *2-3 (C.D.
That being said, KeyMe intends to present the following prior art positions at trial: quinn emanuel urquhart & sullivan, llp
446 patent: 2 asserted claims depending on 2 unasserted claims  Freeman 163 + Barber + Almblad  Freeman 163 + Barber + Almblad + Ross  Freeman 163 + Ross  Freeman 163 + Minute Key system  Minute Key System (obviousness) 179 patent: 6 asserted claims  Almblad  Almblad + Campbell  Haggstrom 969 + Haggstrom 999 + Bass 878  Haggstrom 969 + Haggstrom 999 + Crasnianski + Patriquin  Haggstrom 969 + Haggstrom 999 + Wills 474 patent: 4 asserted claims, with 3 depending from 1 unasserted claim  Mutch 990 + Marsh 468 + Minute Key system  Mutch 990 + Marsh 468  Mutch 990 + Hyko system  Mutch 990  Marsh 468 We believe this narrows the issues for trial and is commensurate with the spirit of the reduction in asserted claims for trial.
cite Cite Document

2008 Exhibit: Docket Report

Document IPR2020-01028, No. 2008-19 Exhibit - Docket Report (P.T.A.B. Oct. 23, 2020)
(nkl, ) (Entered: 06/03/2019) In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment.
(Findlay, Eric) (Entered: 06/05/2019) 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Ryan P. O'Quinn on behalf of The Hillman Group, Inc.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540- 7299823.
(O'Quinn, Ryan) (Entered: 06/06/2019) 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Christopher P. Isaac on behalf of The Hillman Group, Inc.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540- 7299828.
(Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Stephen) (Entered: 10/08/2019) NOTICE of Hearing: Scheduling Conference RESET for 10/16/2019 01:30 PM in Ctrm 106 (Marshall) before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap.
CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed Page 16 of 28 01/17/2020 01/21/2020 01/22/2020 01/22/2020 01/23/2020 01/23/2020 01/23/2020 01/27/2020 01/27/2020 01/28/2020 01/29/2020 NOTICE by The Hillman Group, Inc. of Compliance with Disclosure of Preliminary Claim Constructions Pursuant to Local Patent Rule 4-2 (Findlay, Eric) (Entered: 01/17/2020) 103 NOTICE by KeyMe, Inc., KeyMe, LLC of Compliance with Disclosure of Preliminary Claim Constructions (Smith, Stephen) (Entered: 01/17/2020) 104 Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap: Motion Hearing held on 1/21/2020 re 32 Opposed SEALED MOTION TO DISQUALIFY COOLEY LLP filed by The Hillman Group, Inc.. (Court Reporter Shelly Holmes, CSR-TCRR.)
cite Cite Document

2001 Exhibit: Third Amended Docket Control Order

Document IPR2020-01028, No. 2001-14 Exhibit - Third Amended Docket Control Order (P.T.A.B. Oct. 23, 2020)
128) December 7, 2020 November 9, 2020 November 2, 2020 *Jury Selection – 9:00 a.m. in Marshall, Texas before Judge Rodney Gilstrap *Pretrial Conference – 9:00 a.m. in Marshall, Texas before Judge Rodney Gilstrap *Notify Deputy Clerk in Charge regarding the date and time by which juror questionnaires shall be presented to accompany by jury summons if the Parties desire to avail themselves the benefit of using juror questionnaires1 1 The Parties are referred to the Court’s Standing Order Regarding Use of Juror Questionnaires in Advance of Voir Dire.
The parties shall advise the Court of any agreements reached no later than 1:00 p.m. three (3) business days before the pretrial conference.
*File Joint Pretrial Order, Joint Proposed Jury Instructions, Joint Proposed Verdict Form, Responses to Motions in Limine, Updated Exhibit Lists, Updated Witness Lists, and Updated Deposition Designations *File Notice of Request for Daily Transcript or Real Time Reporting.
Deadline to Complete Expert Discovery Serve Disclosures for Rebuttal Expert Witnesses Deadline to Complete Fact Discovery and File Motions to Compel Discovery Serve Disclosures for Expert Witnesses by the Party with the Burden of Proof August 24, 2020 August 10, 2020 July 20, 2020 July 20, 2020 2 The parties are directed to Local Rule CV-7(d), which provides in part that “[a] party’s failure to oppose a motion in the manner prescribed herein creates a presumption that the party does not controvert the facts set out by movant and has no evidence to offer in opposition to the motion.” If the deadline under Local Rule CV 7(e) exceeds the deadline for Response to Dispositive Motions, the deadline for Response to Dispositive Motions controls.
3-7 (Opinion of Counsel Defenses) *Claim Construction Hearing – 1:30 p.m. in Marshall, Texas before Judge Rodney Gilstrap *Comply with P.R.
cite Cite Document

2002 Exhibit: Letter from R OQuinn dated Aug 4, 2020

Document IPR2020-01028, No. 2002-15 Exhibit - Letter from R OQuinn dated Aug 4, 2020 (P.T.A.B. Oct. 23, 2020)
The Hillman Group, Inc. v. KeyMe, LLC, Case No. 2:19-cv-00209-JRG, E.D.
Counsel: In the interests of narrowing the issues for trial in the above matter, Hillman hereby supplements its disclosure of Asserted Claims as follows: U.S. Patent No. 8,979,446 Claims 70 and 71 U.S. Patent No. 9,914,179 Claims 9-12, 15, and 18 U.S. Patent No. 10,400,474 Claims 7-9 and 20 Hillman plans for its experts to submit rebuttal expert reports on August 10, 2020 directed only to the claims listed above.
Sean S. Pak Jeff Nardinelli Zachary Flood David A. Nelson Eric Hui-chieh Huang August 4, 2020 Page 2 of 2 Hillman reserves all rights to amend the above disclosure in response to further disclosures or document production by KeyMe or other third parties.
Hillman’s disclosure above is in no way a representation that KeyMe does not infringe other previously asserted claims, or that any previously asserted claim is invalid or unenforceable.
Tex.
cite Cite Document

2003 Exhibit: As Filed Statutory Disclaimer

Document IPR2020-01028, No. 2003-16 Exhibit - As Filed Statutory Disclaimer (P.T.A.B. Oct. 23, 2020)
0MB 0651-0031 U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMEt~T OF COMMERCE Under tt1e Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. no persons are required to respond to a col!ection of information unless it displays a valid 0MB control number.
~ The Director is hereby authorized to charge any fees which may be required or credit any overpayment to Deposit Account No. 06-0916 WARNING: Information on this form may become public.
The information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by tile public wiiich is to me (and by tt1e US PTO to process) an application.
Any comments on Hie amount of time you require to complete tt1is form and/or suggestions for reduc;ng this burden, should be sent to the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Patent and Trademark Ollice, U.S. Department of Commerce, P.O.
Information: Fee Worksheet (5B06) fee-info.pdf no ec5f5e1a3108939166125a0c7f6c097ff89ee 30673 Warnings: Information: Total Files Size (in bytes) 488141 This Acknowledgement Receipt evidences receipt on the noted date by the USPTO of the indicated documents, characterized by the applicant, and including page counts, where applicable.
cite Cite Document

2012 Exhibit: Returned Summons

Document IPR2020-01028, No. 2012-23 Exhibit - Returned Summons (P.T.A.B. Oct. 23, 2020)
The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney, whose name and address are: If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.
’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place) on (date) ; or ’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name) , a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there, , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or on (date) ’ I served the summons on (name of individual) designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization) on (date) ’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ’ Other (specify): My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.
Defendant: Keyme, Inc. For: Findlay Craft, PC 102 N. College Avenue Ste.
900 Tyler, TX Received by Austin Process LLC on the 4th day of June, 2019 at 2:10 pm to be served on Keyme, Inc. by serving Corporation Service Company d/b/a CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Service Company, 211 E. 7th Street, Suite 620, Austin, Travis County, TX 78701.
I, Mike Techow, being duly sworn, depose and say that on the 4th day of June, 2019 at 3:00 pm, I: delivered to REGISTERED AGENT by delivering a true copy of the Summons, Complaint, Exhibits A-S, Corporate Disclosure, and AO120 Form with the date of service endorsed thereon by me, to: Adam Ways, by serving Corporation Service Company d/b/a CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Service Company as Authorized agent at the address of: 211 E. 7th Street, Suite 620, Austin, Travis County, TX 78701 on behalf of Keyme, Inc., and informed said person of the contents therein, in compliance with state statutes.
cite Cite Document

2013 Exhibit: US Patent Application Publication 20080145163 to Freeman et al

Document IPR2020-01028, No. 2013-24 Exhibit - US Patent Application Publication 20080145163 to Freeman et al (P.T.A.B. Oct. 23, 2020)
Conventional key cut ting machines are usually located in locksmith shops and hardware stores, or similar avenues of commerce not typi cally known to be open late into the evening.
First, it allows the master key to remain in a fixed position, thus preventing any intentional and unintentional movement by the human user which might cause misalignment either before the process starts or in mid-duplication.
Spring 64 provides a large compressive force to stiffen the position of alignment head 56 yet allows for some flexibility or play to accommo date variations in tooth height on master key A. [0069] Operation of aligmnent module 50 is as follows.
When switch 60 is engaged, and iflength sensor 132 determines master key A to be of an acceptable length, central positioning base 250 moves aligmnent module 50 down in the - Y direction as shown in FIG. 4E.
It is very important to provide a way to remove the debris caused by the cutting and cleaning processes, since there are a significant number of moving parts that can be compromised if metal shavings permeate the device.
cite Cite Document

2014 Exhibit: Consolidation Order

Document IPR2020-01028, No. 2014-25 Exhibit - Consolidation Order (P.T.A.B. Oct. 23, 2020)
The parties dispute the standard that the Court should apply to determine whether Hillman should be granted leave to amend.
After consideration, the Court is persuaded that -209 and -70 cases involve sufficiently common questions of law and fact to justify consolidation.
In addition to the commonalities between the ’830 and ’474 Patents, both the -209 and -70 cases involve the same parties (Hillman and KeyMe) and the same Accused Products (KeyMe’s self-service key duplication kiosks).
1 KeyMe also argues that a failure to consolidate the cases would constitute impermissible “claim splitting,” citing Eubanks v.
The Parties are ORDERED to meet and confer and then submit a proposed Amended Docket Control Order for the consolidated case within fourteen (14) days reflecting a jury selection date of Monday, April 5, 2021 and a pretrial conference date of Monday, March 22, 2021.
cite Cite Document

2007 Exhibit: Claim Construction Memorandum and Order

Document IPR2020-01028, No. 2007-18 Exhibit - Claim Construction Memorandum and Order (P.T.A.B. Oct. 23, 2020)
In addressing the role of the specification, the Phillips court quoted with approval its earlier Page 5 of 44 observations from Renishaw PLC v. Marposs Societa’ per Azioni, 158 F.3d 1243, 1250 (Fed. Cir. 1998): Ultimately, the interpretation to be given a term can only be determined and confirmed with a full understanding of what the inventors actually invented and intended to envelop with the claim.
Further, Plaintiff argues that “[t]he specification discloses optical sensors, optical and electronic scanning devices, and mechanical devices; all of which belong to the known class of structures connoted by the ‘key analysis system’ (i.e., structures that can make the simple cross-sectional determination in the context of the above-noted claim limitations, operations, and objectives).” (Id.) Finally, Plaintiff cites prosecution history in which the patentee amended the claims to replace “for” with “configured to” with the aim of “making it more clear that the elements are not intended as means-plus-function limitations.” (Id., at 18 (citation omitted).)
Defendant also argues that “[t]he changes made by the patentee to its claims (using ‘configured to’ instead of ‘for’) during prosecution that accompanied its statement still followed the traditional format of means plus function limitations and failed to impart structure.” (Id., at 22.)
The patentee’s above-cited prosecution statement contains no explanation regarding the structural meaning of “key analysis system.” Nonetheless, Defendant does not show that this intent of the patentee, which is part of the intrinsic record, should be given no weight.
Defendant cites subsequent disclosure regarding providing “queues and/or responses” to a customer: The instructions, selections, and/or questions, as well as corresponding responses, may be communicated visually, audibly, and/or tactilely, as desired.
cite Cite Document

2011 Exhibit: KeyMe Invalidity Contentions

Document IPR2020-01028, No. 2011-22 Exhibit - KeyMe Invalidity Contentions (P.T.A.B. Oct. 23, 2020)

cite Cite Document

2009 Exhibit: Complaint for Patent Infringement

Document IPR2020-01028, No. 2009-20 Exhibit - Complaint for Patent Infringement (P.T.A.B. Oct. 23, 2020)
Plaintiff Hillman is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Delaware that maintains its principal place of business at 10590 Hamilton Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45231.
Hillman also maintains three manufacturing and distribution facilities located within the Eastern District of Texas, totaling more than 368,000 square feet of commercial real estate.
On information and belief, KeyMe has marketed, sold, offered for sale, and/or provided the Infringing Products to various retailers throughout the United States and this judicial district, including but not limited to 7-Eleven, Bed Bath & Beyond, Rite Aid, Albertson’s, Kmart, Safeway, Sears, Mall of America, Giant Eagle, Ralphs, Kroger, Vons, and Tom Thumb, and is continuing to do so.
Within this front panel, on information and belief the Infringing Products contain physical features that constitute a guard to protect the head of a key protruding from the key- receiving entry from accidental contact.
This is further supported by KeyMe’s mobile phone app, which requires the customer to capture photographs of both sides of the customer’s existing key before submission to the KeyMe system.
cite Cite Document

2012 Exhibit: Returned Summons

Document IPR2020-01028, No. 2012 Exhibit - Returned Summons (P.T.A.B. Oct. 23, 2020)
The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney, whose name and address are: If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.
’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place) on (date) ; or ’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name) , a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there, , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or on (date) ’ I served the summons on (name of individual) designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization) on (date) ’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ’ Other (specify): My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.
Defendant: Keyme, Inc. For: Findlay Craft, PC 102 N. College Avenue Ste.
900 Tyler, TX Received by Austin Process LLC on the 4th day of June, 2019 at 2:10 pm to be served on Keyme, Inc. by serving Corporation Service Company d/b/a CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Service Company, 211 E. 7th Street, Suite 620, Austin, Travis County, TX 78701.
I, Mike Techow, being duly sworn, depose and say that on the 4th day of June, 2019 at 3:00 pm, I: delivered to REGISTERED AGENT by delivering a true copy of the Summons, Complaint, Exhibits A-S, Corporate Disclosure, and AO120 Form with the date of service endorsed thereon by me, to: Adam Ways, by serving Corporation Service Company d/b/a CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Service Company as Authorized agent at the address of: 211 E. 7th Street, Suite 620, Austin, Travis County, TX 78701 on behalf of Keyme, Inc., and informed said person of the contents therein, in compliance with state statutes.
cite Cite Document

2004 Exhibit: Letter from E Huang dated Oct 2, 2020

Document IPR2020-01028, No. 2004 Exhibit - Letter from E Huang dated Oct 2, 2020 (P.T.A.B. Oct. 23, 2020)

cite Cite Document
<< 1 2 3 4 5 ... 9 10 11 12 13 >>