• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Displaying 129-142 of 142 results

1003 Exhibit: Exhibit 1003

Document IPR2013-00304, No. 1003 Exhibit - Exhibit 1003 (P.T.A.B. May. 23, 2013)
Overview of Fault Management Activities Today’s high speed, heterogeneous networks represent a complex and data intensive environment that requires different solutions from the traditional methods performed by human operators.
This action serves as a temporary stop gap while the fault diagnosis process proceeds, in order to ensure the customer does not experience a loss or decrease in service.
Faults are identified by analyzing the filtered and correlated alarms and by requesting tests and status updates from the element managers, which provide additional information for diagnosis.
Many of these functions involve analysis, correlation, pattern recognition, clustering or categorization, problem solving, planning, and interpreting data from a knowledge base that contains descriptions of network elements and topology.
This type of NN operates by using gradient methods to find a local minimum of a quadratic energy function that represents an optimization problem, and whose coefficients depend on the network’s interconnection strengths.
cite Cite Document

1009 Exhibit: Exhibit 1009

Document IPR2013-00304, No. 1009 Exhibit - Exhibit 1009 (P.T.A.B. May. 23, 2013)
Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.107(a) Patent Owner, Clouding IP, LLC, submits the following preliminary response to the petition, setting forth reasons why no inter partes review should be instituted under 35 U.S.C. § 314.
1 The “reasonable likelihood” standard was intended by Congress to be a substantially higher barrier to patent validity challenged that the former “substantial new question of patentability” test used for inter partes reexaminations.
A bare allegation of this nature falls woefully short of any articulated reasons why the claimed invention would be obvious to the person of ordinary skill in the art.
The failure of Petitioner to provide any articulated reasons for the conclusion of obviousness is therefore fatal to its cause and the Board should refuse to institute inter partes review on this basis.
Petitioner’s sole and only basis for finding the subject feature of claim 6 in the prior art is Professor Mowry’s testimony that, it would be clear to a person of ordinary skill in the art that in order for the programmer or user to understand how and when these additional rules should be added, a state of the computer system should be saved when the AI engine fails to determine a likely solution, so that the programmer or user can later determine the context when the failure took place.
cite Cite Document

1006 Exhibit: Exhibit 1006

Document IPR2013-00304, No. 1006 Exhibit - Exhibit 1006 (P.T.A.B. May. 23, 2013)
Patel-Schneider, P. F., Brachman, R. J. and Levesque, H. J. ARGON: Knowledge Representation meets Information Retrieval, Proceedings of the First Conference on Applica tions of Artificial Intelligence, IEEE, Dec. 1984, pp.
Yen, J. Neches, R. and DeBellis, M., Specification by Reformulation: A Paradigm for Building Integrated User Support Environments, Proceedings of the National Confer ence on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI, Aug. 1988, pp.
While this method has been effective in 25 some cases, it has the natural drawback that it often requires a substantial amount of time and effort, by both computer software engineers and experts in the particular field of application, to produce a useful product.
In a preferred embodiment, the processor 110 may com prise an IBM-compatible PC configured to be able to 50 execute the MicroSoft Windows 3.0 and DOS 3.1 software, and having a hard disk drive, a mouse, and a VGA display.
For example, the text string "DANIEL" would match the tri grams "xxD", "xDA", "DAN", "ANI", "NIB", "IEL", "ELx", and "Lxx", where "x" is the special initial/final character.
cite Cite Document

1005 Exhibit: Exhibit 1005

Document IPR2013-00304, No. 1005 Exhibit - Exhibit 1005 (P.T.A.B. May. 23, 2013)
Therefore, it is a primary objective of the present inven- tion to provide a management system that understands abstract relationships between components (i.e.. processes, hosts.
If process A on hostAis reporting a performance problem, it is very hard for a conventional management system to isolate the cause of the fault and provide a solution.
The solutions may include system parameter tuning, application modifications, configuration changes, load balancing, and suggestions of possible hard— ware upgrades if needed.
In addition to obtaining information regarding abstract relationships, the diagnostic system can query the measure- ment agents 24 about individual objects.
In addition, the fault and performance analysis of the present invention can be used for any system composed of hardware and software components, and even abstract com- ponents like actions, tasks, and deliverables.
cite Cite Document

1001 Exhibit: Exhibit 1001

Document IPR2013-00304, No. 1001 Exhibit - Exhibit 1001 (P.T.A.B. May. 23, 2013)
Some utilities, such as SYSTEM AGENT by Microsoft Corp. (Redmond, Wash.), merely schedule a fixed set of tools to execute at predetermined intervals.
Therefore, computer prob- lems include such things as a fragmented file on storage device 314, an incorrect video driver, and a poorly config- ured memory manager.
FIG. 1 illustrates a scheduler 110, a number of sensors 112a-112d, a knowledge database 114, also called a "case base," and an artificial intelligence ("Al") engine 116.
At predetermined time intervals, the scheduler 110 activates various sensors 112 to determine the state of the computer system 300 and store relevant data in the knowledge database 114.
The program storage device of claim 15, wherein the sensing step comprises the substep of: periodically activating the at least one sensor to gather information about the computer system.
cite Cite Document

1002 Exhibit: Exhibit 1002

Document IPR2013-00304, No. 1002 Exhibit - Exhibit 1002 (P.T.A.B. May. 23, 2013)
SeriaI Number: 08/820,513 Art Unit: 2185 Page 11 steps (i.e., detecting a problem, activating an AI engine, determining a solution, etc...) ; therefore, these cl-aims are al_so rejected under the same rationale applied against cl-aims 1-6.
", tgS$ lh\\ I ' '''l 'l' it Total Number of Pages in This Subhitqsjo$ir ENCLOSURES (check all that apply) tr V f""Transmittal Form (in duplicate) tr Check Enctosed lssue Fee Transmittal Letter to Chief Draftsperson Formal Drawing(s): [ ] Sheet(s) of Figure(s) [ ] Appeal Communicatlon to Board of Appeals and Interferences nn t r tr Appeal Communication to Group (Appeal Notice, Brief, Reply Brief) Certified Copy of Priorig Document(s) After Allowance Communication to Group nt rnt r tr nt r tr gnt r tr nt r Refurn Receipt Postcard Response to Notice to File Missing Parts Assignment & PTO-1595 Declaration Small Entity Statement Information Disclosure Statement & PTO-1449 E Copies of IDS Cited References Request for Corrected Filing Receipt Request for Correction of Recorded Assignment tr tr
I hereby certity that this conespondence, including th€ enclosures identified above, is being deposited with the United States Postal Service as first cfass mail in an envelope addrossed to: The Assistant Commissioner for Patents, Washingiton, O.C.
(Unchanged) The method of claim 7, wherein the detecting step comprises the substeps of: periodically activating selected ones of the plurality of sensors to gather information about the computer system; and analyzingthe infcrmation to determine whether a problem exists.
The portions of Graf cited by the Examiner in his rejection of claim 5, the abstract and col. 56, disclose a system for filtering alert messages that are shown to a computer user.
cite Cite Document

1007 Exhibit: Petition Exhibit 1007

Document IPR2013-00095, No. 1007 Exhibit - Petition Exhibit 1007 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 21, 2012)

cite Cite Document

1006 Exhibit: Petition Exhibit 1006

Document IPR2013-00095, No. 1006 Exhibit - Petition Exhibit 1006 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 21, 2012)

cite Cite Document

1002 Exhibit: Petition Exhibit 1002

Document IPR2013-00095, No. 1002 Exhibit - Petition Exhibit 1002 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 21, 2012)

cite Cite Document

1003 Exhibit: Petition Exhibit 1003

Document IPR2013-00095, No. 1003 Exhibit - Petition Exhibit 1003 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 21, 2012)

cite Cite Document

1001 Exhibit: Petition Exhibit 1001

Document IPR2013-00095, No. 1001 Exhibit - Petition Exhibit 1001 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 21, 2012)

cite Cite Document

1004 Exhibit: Petition Exhibit 1004

Document IPR2013-00095, No. 1004 Exhibit - Petition Exhibit 1004 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 21, 2012)

cite Cite Document

1005 Exhibit: Petition Exhibit 1005

Document IPR2013-00095, No. 1005 Exhibit - Petition Exhibit 1005 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 21, 2012)

cite Cite Document

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATICALLY MAINTAINING A COMPUTER SYS...

Docket 08/820,573, U.S. Patent Application (March 19, 1997)

cite Cite Docket
<< 1 2 3 4 5 ... 8 9 10