• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
54 results

Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. 6,152,623

Docket IPR2015-00779, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Feb. 19, 2015)
Barbara Parvis, David McKone, Jo-Anne Kokoski, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
6152623
Petitioner Esselte Corporation
Patent Owner DYMO B.V.B.A.
Assignee DYMO
...
cite Cite Docket

31 Termination Settlement After Institution: Decision Termination Pursuant to Settlement

Document IPR2015-00779, No. 31 Termination Settlement After Institution - Decision Termination Pursuant to Settlement (P.T.A.B. Jan. 6, 2016)
In the joint motions, the parties also represent that the settlement agreement resolves all disputes in the related lawsuit.
In each of the proceedings, Petitioner has not filed a Reply to the Patent Owner Response.
Upon consideration of the facts before us, we determine that it is appropriate to terminate the proceedings with respect to both parties.
The parties also filed in each case a joint request that the settlement agreement be treated as business confidential information pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
For the foregoing reasons, it is: ORDERED that the parties’ joint request in each proceeding that the settlement agreement (IPR2015-00766, Ex. 1009; IPR2015-00771, Ex. 1015; IPR2015-00779, Ex. 1012; IPR2015-00781, Ex. 1022) be treated as business confidential information, to be kept separate from the patent file is granted; and FURTHER ORDERED that the joint motions to terminate in each of the IPR2015-00766, IPR2015-00771, IPR2015-00779, and IPR2015-00781 proceedings are granted and each of the proceedings is terminated with respect to both Petitioner and Patent Owner.
cite Cite Document

26 Order: Decision Patent Owners Request to Withdraw Motion to Seal

Document IPR2015-00779, No. 26 Order - Decision Patent Owners Request to Withdraw Motion to Seal (P.T.A.B. Nov. 16, 2015)
We exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be docketed in each case.
On June 16, 2015, Patent Owner filed a Motion to Seal a Stock Purchase Agreement (Exhibit 2002) and Disclosure Schedule (Exhibit 2003).
On October 7, 2015, the parties informed us via e-mail (Ex. 3002) that they agreed that Exhibit 2002 may be made publicly available and that previously redacted material in Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response may be made public, and agreed to redactions to Exhibit 2003.
On October 8, 2015, Exhibit 2003 was expunged and the parties were notified that Patent Owner should file a withdrawal of its Motion to Seal and the redacted Exhibit 2003.
We treat Patent Owner’s request as a withdrawal of its Motion to Seal.
cite Cite Document

24 Order: Decision Pro Hac Vice Motion

Document IPR2015-00779, No. 24 Order - Decision Pro Hac Vice Motion (P.T.A.B. Oct. 22, 2015)

cite Cite Document

21 Order: Decision Granting Patent Owners Motion to Withdraw Counsel

Document IPR2015-00779, No. 21 Order - Decision Granting Patent Owners Motion to Withdraw Counsel (P.T.A.B. Sep. 30, 2015)

cite Cite Document

19 Order: Initial Conference Summary

Document IPR2015-00779, No. 19 Order - Initial Conference Summary (P.T.A.B. Sep. 22, 2015)

cite Cite Document

13 Institution Decision: Decision Institution of Inter Partes Review

Document IPR2015-00779, No. 13 Institution Decision - Decision Institution of Inter Partes Review (P.T.A.B. Aug. 28, 2015)

cite Cite Document

14 Notice: Scheduling Order

Document IPR2015-00779, No. 14 Notice - Scheduling Order (P.T.A.B. Aug. 28, 2015)

cite Cite Document
1 2 3 4 5 >>