• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
47 results

Prolime Agricultural, LLC v. Sul4r-Plus, LLC

Docket IPR2024-00236, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Nov. 28, 2023)
Donna Praiss, Elizabeth Roesel, Julia Heaney, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent9873638
Patent Owner Sul4r-Plus, LLC
Petitioner Prolime Agricultural, LLC
Assignee CHARAH, LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHARAH, INC.)
...
cite Cite Docket

23 Notice refund approved: Notice refund approved

Document IPR2024-00236, No. 23 Notice refund approved - Notice refund approved (P.T.A.B. Jun. 20, 2024)
Petitioner’s request for a refund of certain post-institution fees paid on November 28, 2023 in the above proceeding is hereby granted.
The amount of $24,750.00 has been refunded to Petitioner’s deposit account.
The parties are reminded that unless otherwise permitted by 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(b)(2), all filings in this proceeding must be made electronically in the Patent Trial and Appeal Board PTACTS System, accessible from the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
cite Cite Document

21 Termination Decision Pre DI settlement: Termination Decision Pre DI settlement

Document IPR2024-00236, No. 21 Termination Decision Pre DI settlement - Termination Decision Pre DI settlement (P.T.A.B. Jun. 12, 2024)
On June 10, 2024, with the Board’s authorization, Prolime Agricultural, LLC and Caudill Seed and Warehouse Co., Inc. (“Petitioner”) filed an Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Petition for Inter Partes Review due to settlement in the above-identified proceeding challenging U.S. Patent 9,873,638 B2 (“the ’638 Patent”)).
In support of the Motion, Petitioner filed a copy of a written Settlement and License Agreement.
Petitioner and Patent Owner (collectively referred to as “the Parties”) also filed a Joint Request That Settlement Agreement Be Treated as Business Confidential Information and Be Kept Separate pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
In the Motion, Petitioner represents that “[t]he parties have entered into a confidential settlement agreement (‘Settlement Agreement’) that will resolve the parties’ instant dispute regarding the challenged ’638 Patent, as well as a lawsuit in the Eastern District of Michigan captioned as Sulf4r- Plus, LLC v. Prolime Agriculture, LLC (Civil Action No. 2:22-cv-12798) involving the ’638 Patent.” Mot.
Petitioner states that “a true and correct copy [of this Settlement Agreement] shall be filed with this Office as business confidential information pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b)” as “Ex.
cite Cite Document

11 Order on Motion: ORDER Granting Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admissi...

Document IPR2024-00236, No. 11 Order on Motion - ORDER Granting Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Steven Susser 37 CFR § 4210 (P.T.A.B. Mar. 13, 2024)

cite Cite Document

8 Notice Notice filing date accorded: Notice Notice filing date accorded

Document IPR2024-00236, No. 8 Notice Notice filing date accorded - Notice Notice filing date accorded (P.T.A.B. Dec. 22, 2023)

cite Cite Document

19 Motion Motion to dismiss due to settlement pre DI: Unopposed Motion to Dismiss...

Document IPR2024-00236, No. 19 Motion Motion to dismiss due to settlement pre DI - Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Petition for Inter Partes Review (P.T.A.B. Jun. 10, 2024)

cite Cite Document

9 Motion PHV: Revised Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission

Document IPR2024-00236, No. 9 Motion PHV - Revised Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission (P.T.A.B. Feb. 23, 2024)

cite Cite Document

5 Motion PHV: Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission

Document IPR2024-00236, No. 5 Motion PHV - Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission (P.T.A.B. Dec. 1, 2023)

cite Cite Document
1 2 3 4 >>