• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 24-38 of 104 results

2 Power of Attorney: POWER OF ATTORNEY IN AN INTER PARTES REVIEW FOR PETITIONER TRILLER, INC

Document IPR2022-00180, No. 2 Power of Attorney - POWER OF ATTORNEY IN AN INTER PARTES REVIEW FOR PETITIONER TRILLER, INC (P.T.A.B. Nov. 10, 2021)
Patent Owner Case No. Patent No. 9,992,322 Issue Date: June 5, 2018 Title: Method Of Enabling Digital Music Content To Be Downloaded To And Used On a Portable Wireless Computing Device
Petitioner Triller, Inc. hereby appoints the following practitioners as their counsel to transact all business in the United States Patent & Trademark Office associated with the above-captioned inter partes review:
60 East South Temple, Suite 1000
The individual signing below hasthe authority to execute this document on behalf of the party indicated.
By /Chad E. Nydegger/ Chad E. Nydegger, Reg. No. 61,020 Brian N. Platt, Reg. No. 62,249 David R. Todd, Reg. No. 41,348
cite Cite Document
Analyze

2006 Exhibit: Transcript of August 1, 2022 Deposition of Dr Michael Shamos

Document IPR2022-00180, No. 2006-41 Exhibit - Transcript of August 1, 2022 Deposition of Dr Michael Shamos (P.T.A.B. Aug. 12, 2022)
So we've got a device that is a cellular telephone and it has, let's say, a Wi-Fi interface in addition to a cellular interface, but it's in a physical locale where it's not getting any cell service, but nonetheless has access to a Wi-Fi router, then ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze

2005 Exhibit: Declaration of Dr Rajeev Surati

Document IPR2022-00180, No. 2005-40 Exhibit - Declaration of Dr Rajeev Surati (P.T.A.B. Aug. 12, 2022)
Messaging and broadcasting content were a core part of the offering of the site and I managed the implementation and hosting aspect of setting up and running the various SMTP, MTA, WAP, and SMS servers to enable communication with our user base.
My opinions and analysis set forth in this Declaration are based on my education, training, and experience as summarized above and detailed in my C.V., as well as my review of the ’132 and ’322 patents, the May 2007 PCT application to which they claim priority (EX1008), and the references identified by Petitioner in these IPR proceedings.
For example, Abrams describes interactions between the user devices and server apparatus 110 that include email messaging and upload/download of photographs and other media data, tasks a POSITA would have considered to be relatively bandwidth-intensive in the 2006 timeframe of the ’132 and ’322 patents.
For example, Figure 2 of Khedouri shows the dedicated digital media playback device, which a POSITA would have recognized as being distinct from both personal computers and cellular phones that were generally available at the time: Cases IPR2022-00179, IPR2022-00180 Attorney Docket Nos: 50048-0015IP1, 50048-0016IP1
British Telecom, Apple, IBM, Triplay (against Facebook), Ford, Code Corp(ITC), and RPost, Sony as an expert related to e-commerce, telecommunication systems, video streaming and multimedia recording, database backed websites, photography, real-time communication, ,two-way and instant messaging.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

2006 Exhibit: Transcript of August 1, 2022 Deposition of Dr Michael Shamos

Document IPR2022-00180, No. 2006 Exhibit - Transcript of August 1, 2022 Deposition of Dr Michael Shamos (P.T.A.B. Aug. 12, 2022)
So we've got a device that is a cellular telephone and it has, let's say, a Wi-Fi interface in addition to a cellular interface, but it's in a physical locale where it's not getting any cell service, but nonetheless has access to a Wi-Fi router, then ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze

2005 Exhibit: Declaration of Dr Rajeev Surati

Document IPR2022-00180, No. 2005 Exhibit - Declaration of Dr Rajeev Surati (P.T.A.B. Aug. 12, 2022)
Messaging and broadcasting content were a core part of the offering of the site and I managed the implementation and hosting aspect of setting up and running the various SMTP, MTA, WAP, and SMS servers to enable communication with our user base.
My opinions and analysis set forth in this Declaration are based on my education, training, and experience as summarized above and detailed in my C.V., as well as my review of the ’132 and ’322 patents, the May 2007 PCT application to which they claim priority (EX1008), and the references identified by Petitioner in these IPR proceedings.
For example, Abrams describes interactions between the user devices and server apparatus 110 that include email messaging and upload/download of photographs and other media data, tasks a POSITA would have considered to be relatively bandwidth-intensive in the 2006 timeframe of the ’132 and ’322 patents.
For example, Figure 2 of Khedouri shows the dedicated digital media playback device, which a POSITA would have recognized as being distinct from both personal computers and cellular phones that were generally available at the time: Cases IPR2022-00179, IPR2022-00180 Attorney Docket Nos: 50048-0015IP1, 50048-0016IP1
British Telecom, Apple, IBM, Triplay (against Facebook), Ford, Code Corp(ITC), and RPost, Sony as an expert related to e-commerce, telecommunication systems, video streaming and multimedia recording, database backed websites, photography, real-time communication, ,two-way and instant messaging.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

3002 Exhibit: Ex 3002

Document IPR2022-00180, No. 3002-39 Exhibit - Ex 3002 (P.T.A.B. Jul. 11, 2022)
Monday, July 11, 2022 11:14:00 AM image001.png From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments: Counsel: We grant Petitioner’s unopposed request to waive the 15 page limit for its motion (and allow the 16 pages as filed) based on the circumstances Petitioner provides below.
To the Patent Trial and Appeal Board: I am lead counsel for Petitioner in IPR2022-00180.
In an email dated June 24, 2022, the Board authorized Petitioner to file a motion to submit supplemental information within five business days (i.e., by July 1, 2022).
On July 1, 2022, Petitioner filed a motion to submit supplemental information.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify the sender immediately, and do not use, copy, or disclose to anyone any of the contents hereof.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

3002 Exhibit: Ex 3002

Document IPR2022-00180, No. 3002 Exhibit - Ex 3002 (P.T.A.B. Jul. 11, 2022)
Monday, July 11, 2022 11:14:00 AM image001.png From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments: Counsel: We grant Petitioner’s unopposed request to waive the 15 page limit for its motion (and allow the 16 pages as filed) based on the circumstances Petitioner provides below.
To the Patent Trial and Appeal Board: I am lead counsel for Petitioner in IPR2022-00180.
In an email dated June 24, 2022, the Board authorized Petitioner to file a motion to submit supplemental information within five business days (i.e., by July 1, 2022).
On July 1, 2022, Petitioner filed a motion to submit supplemental information.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify the sender immediately, and do not use, copy, or disclose to anyone any of the contents hereof.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

1031 Exhibit: Supplemental Declaration of Michael Shamos, PHD

Document IPR2022-00180, No. 1031-38 Exhibit - Supplemental Declaration of Michael Shamos, PHD (P.T.A.B. Jul. 1, 2022)
... interpretations for the phrase” “track meta-data that is formed as a separate meta- data layer.” However, my understanding is that Petitioner merely tried to discern the ways in which Patent Owner might be interpreting that term, and none ...
None of the passages of the PCT application cited in the Institution Decision (or cited in the POPR) discloses a software application that uses a multithreaded architecture (or a multitasking architecture) to “balance the computational ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze

3001 Exhibit: PCT Application

Document IPR2022-00180, No. 3001-37 Exhibit - PCT Application (P.T.A.B. May. 16, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

3001 Exhibit: PCT Application

Document IPR2022-00180, No. 3001 Exhibit - PCT Application (P.T.A.B. May. 16, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

2004 Exhibit: US Patent Pub No 20070214141 to Sittig

Document IPR2022-00180, No. 2004-36 Exhibit - US Patent Pub No 20070214141 to Sittig (P.T.A.B. Feb. 17, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

2003 Exhibit: US Patent No 7,260,381 to Lipsit

Document IPR2022-00180, No. 2003-35 Exhibit - US Patent No 7,260,381 to Lipsit (P.T.A.B. Feb. 17, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

2001 Exhibit: US Patent Pub No 20040268005 to Dickie

Document IPR2022-00180, No. 2001-33 Exhibit - US Patent Pub No 20040268005 to Dickie (P.T.A.B. Feb. 17, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

2002 Exhibit: US Patent Pub No 20070130592 to Haeusel

Document IPR2022-00180, No. 2002-34 Exhibit - US Patent Pub No 20070130592 to Haeusel (P.T.A.B. Feb. 17, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

1030 Exhibit: Triller Exhibit 1030 Order on Motions ND Cal 20 07572, Dkt 78

Document IPR2022-00180, No. 1030-32 Exhibit - Triller Exhibit 1030 Order on Motions ND Cal 20 07572, Dkt 78 (P.T.A.B. Feb. 3, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >>