Search court records - Searching within IPR2021-00346, page 10

All Courts
Federal Courts
Bankruptcies
PTAB
ITC

Filters

Display dockets
Display documents
- Decisions and Orders
- Exhibits
- Briefs and Motions
- Pleadings
- x Reset Selection

Like full text docket searches?

Get docket alerts, perform legal research, get updates of major decisions and orders, use our advanced analytics, and more. Request a Demo or create your account.

Click for

AnalyticsSearch

Motions and Pleadings

No motions found.

Displaying 129-143 of 154 results

sorted by

1017 Exhibit: HR Rep No 112 98, at 39 40 2011

Document IPR2021-00346, No. 1017-14 Exhibit - HR Rep No 112 98, at 39 40 2011 (P.T.A.B. Jan. 14, 2021)

Domestic and foreign protection of federally owned inventions (a) Each Federal agency is authorized to— (1) * * * (2) grant nonexclusive, exclusive, or partially exclusive licenses under federally owned inventions, royalty-free or for ...

Cite Document

Analyze

1002 Exhibit: Declaration of Daniel van der Weide, PhD VDW Decl

Document IPR2021-00346, No. 1002-25 Exhibit - Declaration of Daniel van der Weide, PhD VDW Decl (P.T.A.B. Jan. 14, 2021)

1 The ‘108 patent specification uses the term “carrier signal.” A POSITA would refer to the waveform simply as a “carrier waveform” or “carrier.” Nonetheless, for the purposes of this declaration, I will refer to various concepts with the ...

Nonetheless, in my opinion, construing the “control signal” term in this IPR proceeding is not necessary because, as noted below, the combined teachings of Downey and Sedra disclose a “control signal” under either Petitioner’s ...

Nonetheless, in my opinion, the combined teachings of Downey and Sedra disclose the bias signal of the ‘108 patent under both Petitioner’s proposed construction and under Patent Owner’s proposed construction because both ...

Nonetheless, in my opinion, the combined teachings of Downey and Hahnel disclose the pulse shaper of the ’108 89 patent under both Petitioner’s proposed construction and under Patent Owner’s Case No. IPR2021-00346 U.S. Patent ...

Cite Document

Analyze

+ More Snippets

1011 Exhibit: Intels proposed claim constructions

Document IPR2021-00346, No. 1011-9 Exhibit - Intels proposed claim constructions (P.T.A.B. Jan. 14, 2021)

Cite Document

Analyze

Search within this case

1015 Exhibit: Preliminary Infringement Contentions

Document IPR2021-00346, No. 1015-13 Exhibit - Preliminary Infringement Contentions (P.T.A.B. Jan. 14, 2021)

This preliminary understanding is obtained at least through ParkerVision’s independent investigation of Intel’s transceivers, examination of teardowns and circuit extractions, and review of relevant literature and manuals.

The accused instrumentalities also include Intel products that are considered sold in the United States according to the Federal Circuit’s decision in Carnegie Mellon Univ.

Pursuant to the Court’s Scheduling Order, these claim charts provide Intel with the requisite notice by identifying instrumentalities that incorporate or reflect ÿ ÿ

Further, ParkerVision asserts infringement under the doctrine of equivalents, to the extent that the difference between any component of any product and any claim element is insubstantial.

Subject to ongoing discovery and investigation, and based on available information to date, at least the patents-in-suit evidence conception and/ or reduction to practice for the claimed inventions.

Cite Document

Analyze