• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
167 results

Progenity, Inc. v. Natera, Inc.

Docket IPR2021-00282, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Jan. 11, 2021)
Grace Karaffa Obermann, Ryan Flax, Zhenyu Yang, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent10266893
Patent Owner Natera, Inc.
Petitioner Progenity, Inc.
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

12 Notice refund approved: Notice refund approved

Document IPR2021-00282, No. 12 Notice refund approved - Notice refund approved (P.T.A.B. Mar. 22, 2022)
Petitioner’s request for a refund of certain post-institution fees paid on January 11, 2021 in the above proceeding is hereby granted.
The amount of $22,500.00 has been refunded to Petitioner’s deposit account.
The parties are reminded that unless otherwise permitted by 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(b)(2), all filings in this proceeding must be made electronically in the Patent Trial and Appeal Board End to End (PTAB E2E), accessible from the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

10 Institution Decision: Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review

Document IPR2021-00282, No. 10 Institution Decision - Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review (P.T.A.B. Jul. 12, 2021)
None of the passages in Shimkets Petitioner cites, except the one on page 21, mentions a “cell-free” sample.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

7 Order: Order Conduct of the Proceedings 35 USC 425, 4223, 4224c, 42108c

Document IPR2021-00282, No. 7 Order - Order Conduct of the Proceedings 35 USC 425, 4223, 4224c, 42108c (P.T.A.B. May. 12, 2021)
In an email to the Board on May 10, 2021, Petitioner stated: Natera filed its Preliminary Response (POPR) in IPR2021-00282 on April 27, 2021.
Moreover, Natera’s POPR advances new arguments regarding the Lo reference and its voluminous corresponding prosecution history (including an interference proceeding and a Federal Circuit decision) that are at odds with the corresponding record.
Consistent with the PTAB’s trial practice guide and to maximize efficiency for the Board and for the parties, Petitioner (Progenity) seeks Board authorization to submit the petitioner pre-institution reply materials from IPR2021-00266, as previously filed, together with a new 3-page brief directed specifically to the POPR filed in this case.
Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response focuses its arguments on factual allegations based on testimony presented in the Declaration of John Quackenbush, Ph.D. (Ex. 2001, “Quackenbush Declaration”), which itself makes assertions of facts.
Thus, we authorize Petitioner to file a 10-page Reply, limited to addressing Patent Owner’s arguments and evidence relating to the testimony
cite Cite Document
Analyze

3 Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition: Notice of Accord Filing Date

Document IPR2021-00282, No. 3 Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition - Notice of Accord Filing Date (P.T.A.B. Jan. 27, 2021)
For more information, please consult the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756 (Aug. 14, 2012), which is available on the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
Patent Owner is advised of the requirement to submit mandatory notice information under 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(2) within 21 days of service of the petition.
The parties are advised that under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), recognition of counsel pro hac vice requires a showing of good cause.
Stephen M. Hash BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. 98 San Jacinto Blvd, Suite 1500 Austin, TX 78701 Case IPR2021-00282 Patent 10,266,893 B2
If the parties actually engage in alternative dispute resolution, the PTAB would be interested to learn what mechanism (e.g., arbitration, Case IPR2021-00282 Patent 10,266,893 B2 mediation, etc.) was used and the general result.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

11 Refund Request: Petitioners Request for Refund

Document IPR2021-00282, No. 11 Refund Request - Petitioners Request for Refund (P.T.A.B. Mar. 10, 2022)
On July 12, 2021, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) denied institution of IPR2021-00282 (Paper No. 10).
Accordingly, Progenity, Inc. (“Progenity”) hereby requests a refund of $22,500 for the Post-Institution Fees under 37 C.F.R. §42.15.
Upon approval of this request, Progenity respectfully requests that the Board credit the Post-Institution Fees to our Deposit Account No. 23-2415.
Dated: March 10, 2022 Respectfully submitted, / Michael T. Rosato / Michael T. Rosato, Lead Counsel Reg. No. 52,182
cite Cite Document
Analyze

9 Reply: Patent Owners Sur Reply iso Preliminary Response

Document IPR2021-00282, No. 9 Reply - Patent Owners Sur Reply iso Preliminary Response (P.T.A.B. May. 26, 2021)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

8 Reply: Petitioners Pre Institution Reply

Document IPR2021-00282, No. 8 Reply - Petitioners Pre Institution Reply (P.T.A.B. May. 19, 2021)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 3 4 5 ... 10 11 12 >>