• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
145 results

Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. formerly Monosol RX, LLC v. Neurelis, Inc.

Docket IPR2019-00450, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Jan. 29, 2019)
Jamie Wisz, Jon Tornquist, Zhenyu Yang, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent9763876
Orange Book Patent9763876
Patent Owner Neurelis, Inc.
Petitioner Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. formerly Monosol RX, LLC
cite Cite Docket

10 Refund Approval: Notice of Refund

Document IPR2019-00450, No. 10 Refund Approval - Notice of Refund (P.T.A.B. Nov. 18, 2019)
Petitioner’s request for a refund of certain post-institution fees paid on January 29, 2019 in the above proceeding is hereby granted.
The amount of $27,600 has been refunded to Petitioner’s deposit account.
The parties are reminded that unless otherwise permitted by 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(b)(2), all filings in this proceeding must be made electronically in the Patent Trial and Appeal Board End to End (PTAB E2E), accessible from the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
cite Cite Document

8 Institution Decision: Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review

Document IPR2019-00450, No. 8 Institution Decision - Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review (P.T.A.B. Aug. 1, 2019)

cite Cite Document

4 Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition: Notice of Accord Filing Date

Document IPR2019-00450, No. 4 Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition - Notice of Accord Filing Date (P.T.A.B. Feb. 6, 2019)
For more information, please consult the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756 (Aug. 14, 2012), which is available on the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
Patent Owner is advised of the requirement to submit mandatory notice information under 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(2) within 21 days of service of the petition.
The parties are advised that under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), recognition of counsel pro hac vice requires a showing of good cause.
Many non-profit organizations, both inside and outside the intellectual property field, offer alternative dispute resolution services.
If the parties actually engage in alternative dispute resolution, the Case IPR2019-00450 Patent No. 9,763,876 PTAB would be interested to learn what mechanism (e.g., arbitration, mediation, etc.) was used and the general result.
cite Cite Document

9 Refund Request: PETITIONERS REQUEST FOR REFUND OF POST INSTITUTIO...

Document IPR2019-00450, No. 9 Refund Request - PETITIONERS REQUEST FOR REFUND OF POST INSTITUTION FEES (P.T.A.B. Nov. 7, 2019)

cite Cite Document

2 Petition: Petition

Document IPR2019-00450, No. 2 Petition - Petition (P.T.A.B. Jan. 29, 2019)

cite Cite Document

7 Notice: Patent Owners Mandatory Notices

Document IPR2019-00450, No. 7 Notice - Patent Owners Mandatory Notices (P.T.A.B. May. 21, 2019)

cite Cite Document

6 Preliminary Response: Patent Owners Preliminary Response

Document IPR2019-00450, No. 6 Preliminary Response - Patent Owners Preliminary Response (P.T.A.B. May. 6, 2019)

cite Cite Document
1 2 3 4 5 ... 9 10 11 >>