• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
3 results

Inter Partes Review of U.S. Reissue Pat. RE042,913

Docket IPR2014-01439, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Sept. 3, 2014)
Erica Franklin, Glenn Perry, James Arpin, presiding
10/16/2015
10/16/2015 10-16-2015-Board Board Notice None: Expunged (PUBLIC), Board Notice None: Order - 37 C.F.R. 42.10(a) (PUBLIC)
10/02/2015
10/02/2015 10-02-2015-Patent_Owner Patent Owner Power of Attorney None: Power of Attorney (PUBLIC), Patent Owner Notice None: PO Supplemental Mandatory Notice (P...
09/25/2015
09/25/2015 09-25-2015-Patent_Owner Patent Owner Notice None: Second Joint Notice to Amend Schedule (PUBLIC), Patent Owner Notice None: PO Notice of Se...
cite Cite Docket

32 Notice: Petitioners Request for Oral Argument IPR2014 01439

Document IPR2014-01439, No. 32 Notice - Petitioners Request for Oral Argument IPR2014 01439 (P.T.A.B. Nov. 2, 2015)
U.S. Patent No. RE42,913 Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 42.70(a), Petitioner requests oral argument on the issues set forth below at a place and time set by the Board.
Oral argument is presently scheduled for December 11, 2015 (originally set for December 7, 2015 (Paper No. 10 - Scheduling Order), but modified by the e-mail notice of October 9, 2015 from the Interference Trial Section).
Issues to be Presented by Petitioner at Oral Argument:
Proper constructions of the relevant claims of the ’913 patent; Arguments and evidence that claims 48-53 are anticipated by Ando; Arguments and evidence that Patent Owner’s Contingent Motion to Amend should be denied because: a. Substitute claims 54-59 lack adequate written description support for newly added limitations, and impermissibly add new subject matter; b.
Substitute claims 54-59 are rendered obvious over Stephany in view of Wilkenson, Sauer or Hickok; c. Substitute claims 54-59 are rendered obvious over Stephany in view of Wilkenson, Sauer or Hickok, and further in view of Froome, Stroke or Taylor;
cite Cite Document

2 Power of Attorney: Power of Attorney

Document IPR2014-01439, No. 2 Power of Attorney - Power of Attorney (P.T.A.B. Sep. 3, 2014)
Patent No. RB42,913 Issued: November 15, 2011 _ Title: OPTICAL DETECTION Attorney Docket No; 351912-
Box 1450 Alexandria, VA 22313~ 1450 Petitioner Toshiba Corporation hereby appoints the Practitioner(s) associated with Customer Number 263 79 as its attorney(s) to prosecute and to transact ail business in the Patent Trial & Appeal Board of the United States Patent and Trademark Office connected with the above-identified petition for Inter Fortes Review.
Patent No. RE42,913 Petition For Inter Paries Review Please direct all communications regarding this Petition to Customer Number 26379, copying if appropriate the following email address: OD—Toshiba—DLA-IPRdelaQiger.oom.
No. 53,808 The undersigned is authorized to Sign this Power Of Attorney on behaif of the Petitioner Toshiba Corporation.
% a “P; ‘ For Petitioner Toshiba Corporatioé By Name: Hideo Kama ai
cite Cite Document